Is ordering loli/shota now illegal? Will I get jail time for it?

File: 693 KB, 1346x1345, 1256267687092.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:00:24 2010 No.4504188 [Reply] [Original]

Is ordering loli/shota now illegal?
Will I get jail time for it?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:01:24 2010 No.4504191 Enjoy getting raped by a man named Bubba.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:02:24 2010 No.4504209 What about freedom of speech?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:02:24 2010 No.4504210 It's not illegal. Order away.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:03:24 2010 No.4504214 >>4504209 I have some bad news for you.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:03:24 2010 No.4504218 Isn't me purchasing loli/shota material fueling the economy? I don't see the problem.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:03:24 2010 No.4504221 >>4504209 Freedom to own drawn child pronography? I am sure the judge and the jury might be interested to hear your reasons.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:03:24 2010 No.4504222 >>4504214 yes?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:04:24 2010 No.4504228 >>4504209 >he still believes in freedom of speech I wish I hadn't deleted my lauguing_girls.jpg folder.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:06:24 2010 No.4504253 Images depicting minors under the age of 18 = jail time But what if the character was, let's say Rinko. Rinko is 16, so making/buying doujinshi of Rinko is bad? So that means doujins of teenagers are also illegal? That would totally kill comiket.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:07:24 2010 No.4504256 >>4504253 >he actually believes fictional characters can have "ages"

>>	Satorin Komeiji !!2iqYZrZ3IOK Sun Feb 28 00:07:28 2010 No.4504257 File: 952 KB, 1447x1447, 17a8504fa5e970825d2f8af06ca802cc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>4504209 >>Freedom of Speech Nice one. Too bad it doesn't cover obsence materials.

>>	miles !!yEv/ZBcowB8 Sun Feb 28 00:08:24 2010 No.4504268 >>4504257 I humbly request your Satori folder please.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:09:24 2010 No.4504273 >>4504268 I don't think he wants you to get piss all over it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:09:24 2010 No.4504276 File: 369 KB, 490x613, 3984237.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] So something like this drawing is illegal to order?

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:10:24 2010 No.4504282

>>4504209
The U.S. at least, has always had freedom of speech, unless it is considered obscene. Which, I can understand with loli(though I disagree with it), but obscene shit has been stamped on political shit, religious shit, and information on birth control.
So pretty much, you have freedom of speech unless the inherently reactionary government doesn't like it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:13:24 2010 No.4504289 >>4504276 Are those mikos under the age of 18?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:13:24 2010 No.4504290 Are little boys diddling eachother obscene?

>>	White Ren !YLuFFdRcFQ Sun Feb 28 00:13:24 2010 No.4504297 >>4504257 Actually, it does. Obscenity laws are routinely overturned by courts.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:13:24 2010 No.4504298 >>4504290 Yes. It's very hot though.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:16:24 2010 No.4504315 >>4504289 yes

>>	Philosophy Major !opRZ63cuZo Sun Feb 28 00:16:24 2010 No.4504320 I think you should be more concerned about how it would affect you as an individual more than a probable punishment.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:17:24 2010 No.4504326 >>4504315 Really? Where does ZUN state their ages? I want to see this.

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:17:24 2010 No.4504329

>>4504188

Illegal in Australia, Canada and the UK. Supposedly if you're in canada, they aren't enforcing it too heavily, however.

In the US of A, it's a state issue. Most states won't care, but if you're unlucky and live in say, Iowa, they can bust you for bringing "obscene" materials across state lines. Loli in and of itself is completely legal, however.

Solution: Ask someone in a sane state to receive it. Go drive and pick it up.

Solution 2: Ask someone in a sane state to receive it. Have it shipped to you through UPS(NOT usps).

Solution 3: See if you get lucky and no one bothers to check your shit.

Solution 4: Move to a new state

>>	Satorin Komeiji !!2iqYZrZ3IOK Sun Feb 28 00:18:28 2010 No.4504335 File: 309 KB, 1020x1400, 303dedb6637b6245c3da224edf92d48d5bb0f026.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>4504297 But do you honestly believe that would apply to loli? Its too bad the only case so far he plead guilty in.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:20:24 2010 No.4504343 File: 51 KB, 327x365, 1265415428504.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>4504320 It's not like I'm going to go and take a child and do what I read. I find 3D people disgusting.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:21:24 2010 No.4504358 File: 149 KB, 650x750, 6584257.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>4504329 Is California a sane state?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:21:24 2010 No.4504359 >Nice one. >Too bad it doesn't cover obscene materials. "you're completely free to say whatever you want except for what the government deems as naughty" That is not "freedom of speech". That is America's definition of freedom of speech.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:22:24 2010 No.4504360 >>4504320 >Philosophy Major Yes, I would like one double grande latte! Extra sugar please!

>>	Philosophy Major !opRZ63cuZo Sun Feb 28 00:22:24 2010 No.4504361 >>4504343 It is still outlined in the shape of an immature human, however.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:22:24 2010 No.4504362 >>4504320 quite right philosophy major

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:22:24 2010 No.4504363 >>4504188 >Supposedly if you're in canada, they aren't enforcing it too heavily, however. I'm going to need a citation on this because I have heard many times that Canada is the worst for importing stuff. Customs rip and tear shit open.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:23:24 2010 No.4504372 >>4504361 You'd think a philosophy major would be able to tell the difference between thought and action.

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:25:24 2010 No.4504379

>>4504358
California resident for 20 years.
This state is a bit schizophrenic. On a great deal of issues, California is the open, reasonable society you could find. On others, particularly financial issues, they're batshit insane.
On the issue though, I'd say you're probably fine in California. I think the police are too busy dealing with the fucking Mexican gangs and the negroes to bother you.

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:25:24 2010 No.4504384

>>4504358

I have no idea. Look up your state laws yourself or see if anyone here is a member of your tiny gay republic.

I can't see why they wouldn't allow loli though, with all the faggots and trannies and other disturbing deviants you have running around.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:25:58 2010 No.4504388 File: 398 KB, 1800x1350, 7538953.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This is illegal?

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:27:24 2010 No.4504396

>>4504372
Philosophy majors think their brain is in a vat being controlled by an evil scientist.

It's quite an amazing and pathetic thing that the modern academic community actually offers philosophy as a major or even recognizes it at all.
Sure it's enlightening to hear ideas and give it a little thought, but only as a passing interest.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:27:24 2010 No.4504398 >>4504388 More and yes.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:27:24 2010 No.4504399 I can see why CP is a federal offense, but why are drawings?

>>	Philosophy Major !opRZ63cuZo Sun Feb 28 00:27:24 2010 No.4504403 >>4504372 I can also tell you their correlation.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:28:02 2010 No.4504409 File: 479 KB, 800x1000, 5913180.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>4504398

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:29:24 2010 No.4504410 >>4504399 Loli isn't a federal offense. It's simply classified as "Obscene" like any porn, and thus not protected by free speech. This means states may decide if they wish to ban it or not.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:30:24 2010 No.4504417 >>4504403 Regardless of the thought, it is a large step between it and action. Law should only punish based on action. Victimless crimes should not exist. Thought crimes especially.

>>	(☞ﾟヮﾟ)☞ BOOF ☜(ﾟヮﾟ☜) !AWEsomEEEE!!g4pQz5RFuPl Sun Feb 28 00:31:24 2010 No.4504430 >>4504409 good until i scrolled down and saw the dick

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:32:24 2010 No.4504432 >>4504320 Philosophy =/= Psychology

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:33:24 2010 No.4504441 So in short, UPS your shit and hope nobody find out.

Philosophy Major !opRZ63cuZo Sun Feb 28 00:33:24 2010 No.4504447

>>4504417
I agree, I never said the law should punish you for obtaining this material even if it is obscene. However, it may lead you down the road to break a bigger law. It is your own hesitation that blocks you from ripping apart an innocent child, be careful when meddling with it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:34:24 2010 No.4504452 Why are you faggots honoring our newest triptroll? Why all the posts of the Satori tripfag disappeared? The world may never know.

>>	Anonymous ‮.tahw ‪‪‪‬ ‪‬ ‭‬ !Jones4ZrPA Sun Feb 28 00:35:24 2010 No.4504458 >>4504452 Athens is hardly new.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:37:24 2010 No.4504470 >>4504447 >However, it may lead you down the road to break a bigger law. The "gateway effect" is a legal and logical black hole. You should be ashamed of yourself for even considering it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:38:02 2010 No.4504477 File: 156 KB, 627x677, 8165025.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:39:24 2010 No.4504479 >>4504477 More shota please.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:39:24 2010 No.4504481 Remember, we're all homosexuals anyway so we don't have to be ashamed of liking loli.

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:40:24 2010 No.4504486

>>4504379

Checking here. The law you want is section 311.
>Every person who knowingly sends or causes to be sent,
or brings or causes to be brought, into this state for sale or
distribution, or in this state possesses, prepares, publishes,
produces, or prints, with intent to distribute or to exhibit to
others, or who offers to distribute, distributes, or exhibits to
others, any obscene matter is for a first offense, guilty of a
misdemeanor.

tl;dr. You're good to order loli but may not distribute.

Cough...cough... Satorin Komeiji !!2iqYZrZ3IOK Sun Feb 28 00:40:33 2010 No.4504488 [DELETED]

File: 294 KB, 486x641, 7a430fa31a4545ef499288bf065de911e9b12471.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

As I was saying...

Until we get a case in the US that goes all the way to the supreme court, the status of Loli in the US is both unknown federally and may vary state to state.

>>	Philosophy Major !opRZ63cuZo Sun Feb 28 00:41:24 2010 No.4504495 >>4504470 Perhaps in terms of some things, but when sexual desires are taken into account, the argument becomes more relevant. Notice how the argument for criminalizing possession of child porn is based off it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:42:24 2010 No.4504499 >>4504488 >Until we get a case in the US that goes all the way to the supreme court I'm almost positive we've already had one and SCoTUS ruled that it did not constitute child pornography.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:43:24 2010 No.4504503 File: 385 KB, 885x750, 1235549190874.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>4504495 >Notice how the argument for criminalizing possession of child porn is based off it. Notice how that's completely baseless.

>>	Philosophy Major !opRZ63cuZo Sun Feb 28 00:44:24 2010 No.4504504 >>4504503 Explain to me, then, the true reason it is criminalized.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:45:24 2010 No.4504506 File: 410 KB, 1136x1179, 1267157424990.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] such a complicated subject.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:45:24 2010 No.4504509 >>4504504 Paranoia, F.U.D. campaigns, Public opinion based on misinformation. Take your pick.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:46:24 2010 No.4504510 >>4504504 You're welcome to troll him, but stop spreading disinformation about my beloved country. Loli is not criminalized, at least on a federal level.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:46:24 2010 No.4504513 >>4504504 Because anyone who disagrees with the idea is labeled a filthy pedophile, which means that no one will ever oppose such measures.

>>	Philosophy Major !opRZ63cuZo Sun Feb 28 00:47:24 2010 No.4504518 >>4504510 The subject is about real child porn, not its artistic representation.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:48:24 2010 No.4504522 >>4504518 >The subject is about real child porn, not its artistic representation. >OP post >Is ordering loli/shota now illegal? Get out.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:48:24 2010 No.4504523 File: 401 KB, 1131x1600, 1267336076320.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:48:24 2010 No.4504525 >>4504518 Oh, I see. Carry on.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:48:24 2010 No.4504527 >>4504458 Oh so this is athens new moniker? Absolutely hilarious.

Cough...cough...? Satorin Komeiji !!2iqYZrZ3IOK Sun Feb 28 00:48:24 2010 No.4504531
File: 294 KB, 486x641, 7a430fa31a4545ef499288bf065de911e9b12471.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

As I was saying...again

Until we get a case in the US that goes all the way to the supreme court, the status of Loli in the US is both unknown federally and may vary state to state.

>>4504499
I believe that new and changed laws have gone into effect since then.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:48:34 2010 No.4504529 File: 312 KB, 600x900, 1267336086534.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:49:24 2010 No.4504534 >>4504504 That is AN argument for criminalizing it, but it is illegal is because it exploits real, living, breathing children.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:49:24 2010 No.4504537 File: 162 KB, 648x815, 1267336147455.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:49:34 2010 No.4504532 File: 118 KB, 600x800, 1267336117702.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:50:24 2010 No.4504542 File: 71 KB, 800x600, 1267336177525.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:50:24 2010 No.4504546 File: 79 KB, 519x727, 1267336207432.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:51:24 2010 No.4504549 File: 263 KB, 712x1217, 1267336237280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:51:24 2010 No.4504552 File: 434 KB, 571x800, 1267336268254.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:52:24 2010 No.4504556 File: 472 KB, 1143x800, 1267336303348.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:52:45 2010 No.4504560 File: 549 KB, 1050x1100, 1267336338844.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:53:24 2010 No.4504564 File: 555 KB, 1102x1414, 1267336375570.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Philosophy Major !opRZ63cuZo Sun Feb 28 00:53:24 2010 No.4504568 >>4504534 True enough, there are many arguments for anything. >>4504522 Topic of conversation.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:54:24 2010 No.4504569 File: 868 KB, 2125x1653, 1267336409676.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:54:24 2010 No.4504571

>>4504531

Scotus will never get rid of loli's gray area, bro. It'll always be "obscene" material, just like all porn. Scotus invented the definition of obscene as an exemption from free speech, if you don't remember. They'd need to overturn their own ruling.

That said, they have constantly destroyed any case where loli would end up the same as CP.

Loli will always remain "obscene", just like any other porn, and as such, it will always remain a state issue.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:54:24 2010 No.4504574 File: 576 KB, 1000x707, 1267336445272.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:55:24 2010 No.4504578 File: 382 KB, 1132x900, 1267336482219.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:55:24 2010 No.4504580 File: 122 KB, 800x600, 1267336513514.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:56:24 2010 No.4504586 File: 816 KB, 1000x1000, 1267336544443.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:56:24 2010 No.4504588 File: 154 KB, 600x600, 1267336585851.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:57:24 2010 No.4504592 File: 156 KB, 1000x707, 1267336616902.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:57:24 2010 No.4504595

>>4504188
We already had this thread, many many times now.
The conclusion's almost always the same:
1. It depends on where you live and how you squint at it.
2. No, not likely, unless you live somewhere where they spy on your internet usage.
2.5. In any event, not being into actual 3d pedoporn (which is illegal everywhere that's civilized) helps you a great deal.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:58:24 2010 No.4504597 File: 490 KB, 1200x800, 1267336682444.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:58:35 2010 No.4504602 File: 519 KB, 800x600, 1267336694373.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:59:07 2010 No.4504606 File: 56 KB, 358x1000, 1267336726074.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:59:24 2010 No.4504605 File: 31 KB, 483x359, 126261288996.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] FUCK YOU GUYS THE POLICE ARE AT MY DOOR NOW

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:59:24 2010 No.4504608

>>4504531
>Until we get a case in the US that goes all the way to the supreme court
Ashcroft vs Free Speech Coalition. Not involving actual loli, but rather the broader category of virtual CP. They basically said it must be obscene to be illegal - thus loli is legal unless a court renders it obscene (and given that obscenity violates the vagueness protocol, this means loli is legal except in unknown circumstances).

>>4504504
Because the production of it requires a crime to be commited (violation of a minor, obviously). They don't ban it due to gateway effect but due to the concept of the market - if people don't buy it/download it, less will produce it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 00:59:24 2010 No.4504611 P.S. >>4504588 Reported, http://www.4chan.org/rules go use some other site, there are many to choose from.

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:00:24 2010 No.4504620

>>4504571
>It'll always be "obscene" material
No, it'll be obscene if the jury says so. Just don't get tried in hick states and you'll probably get off if it's not something way over the top.

>Loli will always remain "obscene", just like any other porn
Not all porn is obscene. It's case-by-case.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:00:37 2010 No.4504613 File: 516 KB, 1050x1100, 1267336787987.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:01:24 2010 No.4504621 File: 572 KB, 800x800, 1267336808141.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:01:24 2010 No.4504624 File: 433 KB, 1100x900, 1267336878326.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:01:24 2010 No.4504626 Thread needs some shota.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:02:24 2010 No.4504630 File: 123 KB, 500x709, 1267336912038.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:02:24 2010 No.4504631 >>4504620 >all porn is obscene Yes it is, by the miller test. All porn is obscene. That is why one should instead defer to state obscenity laws to decide loli's legality.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:02:24 2010 No.4504633 File: 721 KB, 800x600, 1267336943676.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:03:24 2010 No.4504635

>>4504620
The everyman (read:normalfag) will no doubt call it obscene. This isn't an issue of whether or not it is. The problem is that "obscene" stuff isn't protected in the first place. That is a capital bullshit. Freedom of speech is all or none. It's not freedom if it's somewhere in the middle.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:03:24 2010 No.4504637 File: 165 KB, 502x710, 1267336979388.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:03:24 2010 No.4504638 >>4504631 lol no If you want me to believe this, give me a court case that shows this.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:03:24 2010 No.4504640 File: 183 KB, 800x1200, 8260607.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:03:24 2010 No.4504641 File: 134 KB, 715x1000, 1267337008841.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:04:24 2010 No.4504647 File: 738 KB, 1000x1332, 1267337039362.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:05:24 2010 No.4504652 File: 495 KB, 1106x1600, 1267337078918.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:05:24 2010 No.4504657 File: 195 KB, 600x840, 1267337110806.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Satorin Komeiji !!2iqYZrZ3IOK Sun Feb 28 01:06:24 2010 No.4504660
File: 97 KB, 500x500, c105037cc20e0f238d052e54d3aa515a2457e570.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

So, the mods have time to delete my posts, but can't get rid of this spam which is against the rules, not to mention the content of said images.

I am not impressed.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:06:24 2010 No.4504661 File: 151 KB, 700x990, 1267337140217.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:06:24 2010 No.4504667 File: 691 KB, 1015x1080, 1267337171747.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:07:24 2010 No.4504670 File: 427 KB, 1280x960, 1267337206048.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:07:24 2010 No.4504672 File: 246 KB, 800x800, 1264234896163.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:07:24 2010 No.4504673 File: 563 KB, 750x1000, 1267337239713.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:08:24 2010 No.4504675

>>4504638

What do you want me to prove? It's the supreme court's ruling itself. They created the miller test.

If you run any porn by the miller test, it's "obscene", and thus it's status is forfeit as free speech on federal level.

This means that it falls on state obscenity laws to define the legality of what porn is legal and what isn't.

For reference:
* Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest,
* Whether the work depicts/describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions[2] specifically defined by applicable state law,
* Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. (This is also known as the (S)LAPS test- [Serious] Literary, Artistic, Political, Scientific.)

That encompasses pretty much all pornography right there.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:08:24 2010 No.4504676 File: 588 KB, 750x1000, 1267337277905.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:08:24 2010 No.4504677 These threads are just two bots arguing and a lolispammer with foxyproxy? Somebody shitcan the thread or lock it. People can use the "NEET/General" archive or whatever and review the other 12999 endless useless circular threads JUST LIKE THIS ONE.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:08:24 2010 No.4504682 File: 367 KB, 868x800, 1267337308671.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:09:24 2010 No.4504686 >>4504670 Tasers are scary.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:09:24 2010 No.4504687 File: 395 KB, 868x800, 1267337342087.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:10:24 2010 No.4504689 File: 645 KB, 768x1024, 1267337375834.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:10:24 2010 No.4504692 >>4504660 They also deleted the shota. Shit sucks.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:10:24 2010 No.4504693 File: 401 KB, 1272x1038, 1267337408277.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:11:24 2010 No.4504694 File: 270 KB, 1414x1000, 1267337443146.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:11:24 2010 No.4504699 File: 1.07 MB, 844x1057, 1267337474119.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:11:24 2010 No.4504700 If God wanted loli to be illegal he wouldn't have made it so hot.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:12:24 2010 No.4504702 File: 340 KB, 1277x1600, 1267337515709.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:12:24 2010 No.4504704 >>4504700 Oh you.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:12:24 2010 No.4504707 File: 610 KB, 714x1000, 1267337547318.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:13:24 2010 No.4504710 File: 457 KB, 1582x2405, 89d5bc08f0ab04de2cc9a2c5028749cb4a92ffd7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:13:24 2010 No.4504715 >>4504660 See, the problem is that you're a tripfag and as such your posts are worthless. The mods love loli, this is awesome and it is also very old news. Official.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:14:24 2010 No.4504719 File: 222 KB, 600x800, 1267337648737.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:14:24 2010 No.4504721

Take a moment to look at what loli pics are in essence: Young girls, almost toddlers, in obscene situations. Why would any judge, local law enforcement officers and sane people in general, allow people who own this pornography to go free?

Worse of all, why take the chance of him/her finally becoming a child molester/rapist?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:15:24 2010 No.4504727 File: 249 KB, 800x1100, d861d16d66ce812365f3269205892a514789d8db.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:15:24 2010 No.4504728 File: 357 KB, 700x1075, 1267337730431.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:16:24 2010 No.4504731 File: 668 KB, 850x1170, 1267337741462.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:16:24 2010 No.4504732 File: 202 KB, 741x1224, 5d992bba727e0421a88ee69ca332d40e6275c12b.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:16:24 2010 No.4504733 >>4504721 Why take the chance of every video gamer turning into a crazed school shooter? Why take the chance of every driver becoming a speeder? Why take the chance of every alcoholic becoming a heroin addict?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:18:24 2010 No.4504740 File: 157 KB, 600x800, 1267337879067.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:18:24 2010 No.4504741 >>4504733 Sexuality is a different matter than those issues. Using something as masturbation fodder is expressing a sexual interest in it. It's not the same for video games, or dirving, or drinking.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:18:24 2010 No.4504747 >>4504733 Why take the chance of stepping outside of your house every day and possibly getti- >/jp/ Oh wait, nevermind.

>>	White Ren !YLuFFdRcFQ Sun Feb 28 01:19:24 2010 No.4504749 >>4504733 Why take the chance of every citizen revolting against an unjust government and upsetting the corrupt fatcats in charge? Better to enslave them all now.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:19:24 2010 No.4504750 >>4504660 >>4504715 Same faggot.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:19:24 2010 No.4504751 >>4504741 So then if I say I just looked at the pictures out of curiosity and did not fap to them, I would be ok right?

>>	Suika !IbukilEbpY Sun Feb 28 01:19:24 2010 No.4504752 File: 61 KB, 448x473, no fun.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>4504733 We should make fun illegal. Fun can lead towards laziness, and cause people to stop working completely and becoming unable to pay taxes.

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:20:24 2010 No.4504754

>>4504741
>Using something as masturbation fodder is expressing a sexual interest in it.
OH REALLY.

No, it would only be a different issue if I was claiming violent video games led to deriving sexual pleasure from killing.

Rather, I say it leads to pleasure. Just not sexual. If they have fun going on killing rampages in this virtual worlds, they are no doubt a ticking time bomb who will do the same in the real world.

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:20:24 2010 No.4504756

>>4504741
Well, you're the one saying they're different. I suggest you provide proof and quick before you're (probably justly) ignored.

Violent video games and violent movies obviously expresses an interest in violent action.
Driving obviously expresses an interest in going fast (otherwise you'd walk or take public transportation)
Drinking alcohol obviously expresses an interest in mind altering substances

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:20:24 2010 No.4504761 File: 434 KB, 800x1050, 1267338001479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:21:24 2010 No.4504763 File: 249 KB, 951x1130, 1267338047780.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:22:24 2010 No.4504765 File: 238 KB, 800x1131, 1267338080718.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:22:24 2010 No.4504767 >>4504751 I refer you to: >>4504486 and: >>4504329 For California's state laws. Please review your state laws, but it is highly likely loli is completely legal in your area.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:23:24 2010 No.4504774 File: 161 KB, 600x756, 1267338182190.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:25:24 2010 No.4504786 File: 608 KB, 1000x1556, 1267338313182.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:25:24 2010 No.4504790 File: 411 KB, 1112x1600, 1267338332973.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:26:24 2010 No.4504794 File: 192 KB, 800x600, 1267338363040.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:26:24 2010 No.4504797 File: 469 KB, 700x600, 1267338392389.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:27:24 2010 No.4504800 File: 261 KB, 900x1100, 1267338421780.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:28:24 2010 No.4504804 File: 574 KB, 900x1200, 1267338452817.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	White Ren !YLuFFdRcFQ Sun Feb 28 01:28:24 2010 No.4504805 >>4504774 I hope my body can handle it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:28:24 2010 No.4504806 File: 15 KB, 179x142, Giveafuckometer.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] why you bother? if you are not fucking retard, you can get all the lolis on the internets. is there even a point in ordering hentai manga?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:28:24 2010 No.4504809 File: 141 KB, 900x740, 1267338489989.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:28:24 2010 No.4504811 /jp/ is supreme

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:29:24 2010 No.4504819 File: 347 KB, 1200x1000, 1267338519338.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:30:24 2010 No.4504824 File: 197 KB, 500x450, 1267338584395.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:30:24 2010 No.4504828 File: 282 KB, 750x1125, 1267338616529.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:31:24 2010 No.4504831 File: 995 KB, 1213x910, 1267338649592.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:31:24 2010 No.4504834 File: 129 KB, 600x810, 1267338685299.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:32:24 2010 No.4504839 File: 62 KB, 800x600, 1267338716799.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:32:24 2010 No.4504845 File: 74 KB, 648x800, 1267338746952.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:33:24 2010 No.4504850 File: 313 KB, 1050x1050, 1267338806759.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:34:24 2010 No.4504853 File: 1.20 MB, 2128x2400, 1267338813720.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:34:24 2010 No.4504860 File: 384 KB, 1111x777, 1267338853819.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:35:24 2010 No.4504865 File: 336 KB, 660x880, 1267338886294.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:35:24 2010 No.4504866 >Shota removed >Loli still here Meido is fapping right now, please watch warmly.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:35:24 2010 No.4504867 File: 163 KB, 625x1000, 1267338918498.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:36:24 2010 No.4504872 File: 382 KB, 791x1100, 1267338949789.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:36:24 2010 No.4504874 File: 494 KB, 1075x1350, 1267338979218.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:36:24 2010 No.4504875 >>4504794 This thread should be deleted for going on this long, but before that, can I get a source for this please?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:37:24 2010 No.4504877 File: 321 KB, 563x767, 1267339011984.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:37:24 2010 No.4504882 File: 512 KB, 1000x750, 1267339043877.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:38:24 2010 No.4504885 File: 729 KB, 1200x1600, 1267339079105.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:39:24 2010 No.4504889 File: 382 KB, 1200x1600, 1267339117696.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:39:24 2010 No.4504894 Oh boy a religion thread!

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:39:24 2010 No.4504895 File: 523 KB, 1000x1200, 1267339146641.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:40:24 2010 No.4504899 File: 888 KB, 517x550, 1267339178747.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:40:24 2010 No.4504906 File: 192 KB, 584x960, 1267339210424.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:41:24 2010 No.4504909 File: 173 KB, 744x850, 1267339243979.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:41:24 2010 No.4504914 File: 999 KB, 1684x1224, 1267339273025.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:42:24 2010 No.4504915 >>4504894 loli bible.jpg

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:42:24 2010 No.4504917 File: 675 KB, 823x802, 1267339311984.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:42:24 2010 No.4504922 >>4504909 I'd her taco, if you know what I mean...

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:42:24 2010 No.4504923 File: 276 KB, 800x800, 1267339347979.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:43:24 2010 No.4504927 File: 94 KB, 575x800, 1267339410888.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:44:24 2010 No.4504931 File: 626 KB, 1150x1600, 1267339413648.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:44:42 2010 No.4504934 File: 355 KB, 965x1400, 1267339443917.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:45:24 2010 No.4504937 File: 114 KB, 834x1106, 1267339511770.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:45:24 2010 No.4504941 File: 402 KB, 1709x1200, 1267339519372.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:46:24 2010 No.4504946 File: 353 KB, 607x860, 1267339550284.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:47:24 2010 No.4504951 File: 59 KB, 578x800, 1267339619762.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:47:24 2010 No.4504958 File: 368 KB, 841x1200, 1267339624148.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:47:24 2010 No.4504960 >>4504937 Is that fucking dora the explorer?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:48:24 2010 No.4504964 File: 209 KB, 800x800, 1267339658926.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:48:24 2010 No.4504966 File: 52 KB, 485x800, 1267339690974.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:49:24 2010 No.4504974 File: 637 KB, 1019x800, 1267339719451.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:49:24 2010 No.4504979 File: 166 KB, 1067x800, 1267339750044.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:50:24 2010 No.4504991 File: 349 KB, 690x731, 1267339811645.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:51:24 2010 No.4504996 File: 680 KB, 800x600, 1267339844740.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:51:24 2010 No.4504997 yup. that poor bastard in the US got nabbed for having like 6 volumes of loli shit mailed to him. i don't really get it but whatever...

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:51:24 2010 No.4504999 I'm going to be moving to Nevada soon. Can someone point me to any sections of Nevada law relevant to this topic?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:51:24 2010 No.4505000 File: 427 KB, 707x1000, 1267339879788.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:52:24 2010 No.4505004 File: 431 KB, 700x987, 1267339911689.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:52:24 2010 No.4505010 File: 172 KB, 870x932, 1267339946711.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:53:24 2010 No.4505013 >>4504991 Guess I'll have to add loli glowy vagoo to my list of fetishes.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:53:24 2010 No.4505014 File: 235 KB, 1200x800, 1267339976894.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:53:24 2010 No.4505017 File: 361 KB, 826x1200, 1267340006608.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:54:24 2010 No.4505019 File: 210 KB, 800x800, 1267340038504.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:54:24 2010 No.4505024 >>4504999 http://leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-201.html Look that over real carefully, I think you may be boned, but I'd need to take a closer look and I've got a hardon right now

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:55:24 2010 No.4505031 File: 2.20 MB, 1888x2396, 1267340100448.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:56:24 2010 No.4505038 File: 291 KB, 905x1200, 1267340152422.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:56:24 2010 No.4505041 File: 487 KB, 800x800, 1267340186355.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:57:24 2010 No.4505048 File: 68 KB, 503x832, 1267340220088.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:57:24 2010 No.4505051 File: 441 KB, 690x731, 1267340250742.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:58:24 2010 No.4505053 File: 53 KB, 521x800, 1267340280655.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:58:24 2010 No.4505056 >>4505024 Thank you good sir

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:58:24 2010 No.4505059 File: 148 KB, 490x725, 1267340309228.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 01:59:24 2010 No.4505061 File: 215 KB, 976x1400, 1267340340545.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:00:24 2010 No.4505067 File: 478 KB, 1000x1100, 1267340372085.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:00:24 2010 No.4505069 File: 541 KB, 1000x1100, 1267340403680.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:01:24 2010 No.4505072 File: 308 KB, 800x766, 1267340432886.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:01:24 2010 No.4505074 >>4504765 what is this from?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:01:24 2010 No.4505080 File: 655 KB, 1408x2000, 1267340461574.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:09:24 2010 No.4505118

>NRS 201.241 Action to declare item or material obscene and obtain injunction.
> 1. The district attorney or city attorney of any county or city [...] may file a complaint in the district court seeking to have the item or material declared obscene and to enjoin the possessor and the owner from selling, renting, exhibiting, reproducing, manufacturing or distributing it and from possessing it for any purpose other than personal use.
I'm not sure how accurate my Legal Jargon is, but does this mean Nevada allows ownership of obscene material for personal use?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:10:24 2010 No.4505123 >>4505118 pretty much every state does. The last few legal cases were about transporting them across state lines, not possessing them.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:13:24 2010 No.4505138 File: 64 KB, 400x400, 1219839104113.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>4505123 Well then, there's no problem here until they open up a customs agency for internet traffic and start randomly searching that. Excellent.

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:16:24 2010 No.4505154

>>4505118

Having finished my business, the line you're looking for in this case is:

>NRS 201.249 Production, sale, distribution, exhibition and possession of obscene items or materials; penalty. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 201.237 and except under the circumstances described in NRS 200.720 or 200.725, a person is guilty of a misdemeanor who knowingly:
>Publishes, sells, rents, transports in intrastate commerce, or commercially distributes or exhibits any obscene item or material, or offers to do any such things.
>transports in intrastate commerce

No loli for vegas bro

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:21:24 2010 No.4505176 >>4505154 There should be a city that's to loli what vegas is to prostitution.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:23:24 2010 No.4505188 >>4505138 >Well then, there's no problem here until they open up a customs agency for internet traffic and start randomly searching that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:31:24 2010 No.4505234

>>4505176

There probably is a state that has lax enough obscenity laws. There's all kinds of obscenity laws across the US.

For example, I live in New York. Our obscenity laws ban "promotion" of obscene materials as defined by the community.

How is promotion determined? If one has six or more copies of material or likewise similar pieces, then they have the intent to promote.

So basically, Loli is fine in new york as long as you don't buy more than five doujins at a time.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:35:24 2010 No.4505255 >>4505234 That's.. weird. Wouldn't the seller naturally have more than 5 copies?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:35:24 2010 No.4505261 Other threads are going 404 and this one is still up? Great

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:37:24 2010 No.4505268

>>4505255

The seller in this case is out of NY state jurisdiction. Selling and promotion of obscene materials as defined by community law is prohibited. Transfer is now.

However, one has to intent to promote if they have more than five copies or pieces of similar nature.

Get it?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:37:24 2010 No.4505269 >>4504958 sauce

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 02:50:24 2010 No.4505317

>>4505234

After a quick looking, it appears that Vermont has no laws pertaining to distribution of obscene material outside of "Do not allow minors to buy or distribute".

So I guess now you know where to go if you need to open up your loli shop.

Amusingly, apparently if you do let kids sell your porn and the police need to take it for evidence and you only have one copy left, you're required to make a copy for them.

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 04:05:24 2010 No.4505677

I think it is just the human need of having someone to oppress at work here. If you can't have blacks, jews or homosexuals to bother, why not pick on pedophiles?

It isn't like any of these by default will commit crimes, and anyone with half a brain knows this. Too bad people with half a brain are about as rare as pedophiles.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 05:40:24 2010 No.4506016 >>4504188 Is it illegal if she's 495 years old?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 09:54:24 2010 No.4506752 >>4506016 It doesn't matter if she is 500. If she looks like a 10 year old then yes, she is illegal.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 09:55:24 2010 No.4506759 fappan

>>	Hong Meiling 門門 !!XzNn/qDPbir Sun Feb 28 10:01:24 2010 No.4506780 Back in the good old medieval times to was alright to shag 11 year olds.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 10:03:24 2010 No.4506788 >>4506780 Not for 30-year olds.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 10:10:24 2010 No.4506811 >>4506752 Just like in Australia!

Anonymous Sun Feb 28 10:14:24 2010 No.4506823

The Protect Act is an abomination.
I don't understand how that thing got passed, but basically based on the wording almost anything can be potentially child porn.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003

All it has to do is give the impression or 'lead the viewer to believe' that the work contains child porn and it becomes criminal.

Whoever gets nailed by the Protect Act like Hadley did really ought to fight it next time. I think his lawyer was a pussy.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 28 13:59:24 2010 No.4508094 I'm glad I left this thread open when I went to bed, a single image and a few posts turns into a loli dump. I love you, /jp/.

Reply to thread

Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture