/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Anonymous No.]

>/jp/

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

>>4294771
Op acts as if this is /a/. He's probably from /a/.

[Anonymous No.]

>Really long winded way of saying that a sage post does not bump a thread.
>Image cuts off the text
/jp/ is the only board that correctly uses sage.
I do not wish to bump this metathread.
Therefore I am using sage.

[Anonymous No.]

>>4294788
/a/ still says "sage for x", right?

[THIS SHALL BE OUR FINEST HOUR No.]

>/TEC/

THIS SHALL BE OUR FINEST HOUR

[Anonymous No.]

nothing at all

[Anonymous No.]

>>4294797
Vasari's average everyday hour > TEC's finest hour > Advent's finest hour

[Anonymous No.]

>>4294788
>>4294794
>>4294796
>>4294797
>>4294798
You seem to be under the impression that sage affects a thread negatively. This is untrue.

The value of a non-stickied thread is 0. For all intents and purposes, the thread is in equilibrium.

A normal post has a value of +1. At the instant a normal post is submitted, the value of the thread becomes 0+1, and the thread is bumped, breaking equilibrium. However, the thread immediately returns to its previous state of equilibrium, 0.

A sage post has a value of 0. When a sage post is submitted, the value of the thread becomes 0+0, and the thread is not bumped, but remains in equilibrium.

Tl;dr SAGE DOES NOTHING (and you are most likely an idiot)

[Anonymous No.]

>>4294846
One of those wasn't even a sage post.

[White Ren !YLuFFdRcFQ No.]

>>4294842
Well, they will rule again, after all, so that's understandable.

[Anonymous No.]

Hey, guess what? I can call you a faggot without bringing attention to your worthless thread. Because that's exactly why you made this thread. For attention.

[Anonymous No.]

I don't get it.
What does this have to do with /jp/?