/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Anonymous No.]

Someone just comment on a video of mine saying なんぞ。

What does this mean?

[VanDarkholme !Fm1nltMd1. No.]

sage for uploading Lucky Shit on YT

[Anonymous No.]

cummed inside

[Anonymous No.]

>>3960492
Its actually Touhou sir

[Anonymous No.]

"what"

[Anonymous No.]

http://dic.nicovideo.jp/a/%E3%81%AA%E3%82%93%E3%81%9E%E3%81%93%E3%82%8C

[Anonymous No.]

>>3960503
I think your getting closer. The whole page is moonrunes though.

[VanDarkholme !Fm1nltMd1. No.]

>>3960496
That's even worse...
There are two main usages, i.e. “reiji [illustration]” and “hiteiteki-hyoka [negative evaluation]” in the modern Japanese language particles “nazo” and “nanzo” as in “nado”. The former, the “nazo” or “nanzo” is preceded by more than one subject, mainly expressed by a noun, and followed by an affirmative predicate to illustrate that there is something else similar to the preceding subject or noun, and the latter, they are preceded by only one subject, and followed by a negative predicate, to illustrate the speaker’s evaluations. Development from the objective expression of relations among the subjects in the real world to the subjective expressions of the speaker is also introduced.
However, comparing the two time periods (Meiji-era and the Present (1980-2000)), there are many examples of both in “nazo”and “nanzo” in the Meiji-era, but almost none in the Present. The paper concludes the reasons for the disappearance (from us-age) of “nazo” and “nanzo” was not only a result of being purged by similar meanings and functions of “nado” in the written language, but also a similar word “nanka” in the spoken language.
http://www.jpf.go.jp/e/japanese/survey/globe/15/report.html