[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 96 KB, 1020x724, 2008-11-14-124577..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2967692 No.2967692[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Have you grabbed your iPod, and fired up your favorite IOSYS album with your imouto today /jp/?

>> No.2967692,1 [INTERNAL] 

Janitor-kun is so great, defending my honor like this.

>> No.2967692,2 [INTERNAL] 

>>2967692
Have you?!

>> No.2967692,3 [INTERNAL] 

>>2967692,1
Is this really the work of Arcueid? He wasn't the only one spamming the iPod+IOSYS stuff in the dream thread, and that was the only time I really noticed him go off the deep end in his behavior.

>> No.2967692,4 [INTERNAL] 

>>2967692,3
How do you know he wasn't the only one? It certainly seems his style, and he's proven himself capable of using tripcode explorer (the !ARC of his trip).

Although, one of the guys I was grinding with last night seemed as though he would probably enjoy propagating this sort of silly /b/ forced meme, but he might have just been trolling me.

>> No.2967692,5 [INTERNAL] 

>>2967692,4
This guy, for one. http://archive.easymodo.net/cgi-board.pl/jp/thread/2946547#p2948071

There's also a few cases when Arc and an anonymous person posted at the same time, though it is kind of odd when the timestamps are exactly the same.

Who in the world is Anonymous of Colombia !/MTU7LNU7s, anyway? He clearly isn't the AoC writer-guy I remember.

>> No.2967692,6 [INTERNAL] 

>>2967692,5
He's the original AoC.

>> No.2967692,7 [INTERNAL] 

>>2967692,5
Arcueid trying to give himself legitimacy.

>timestamps are exactly the same.
You forget, these are easymodo timestamps. They're not accurate.
Besides, even if /jp/ did keep timestamps to the second, there are always proxies.

>> No.2967692,8 [INTERNAL] 

>>2967692,7
Seconds in the archive are accurate for image posts, but not for regular posts.

>> No.2967692,9 [INTERNAL] 

This thread makes no sense:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HilCb4zLSDM

>> No.2967692,10 [INTERNAL] 

>>2967692,9
That was no good at all.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action