[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 387 KB, 626x1792, 1241742188307.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2716905 No.2716905 [Reply] [Original]

Why won't JAM Project do a vocal remix of Touhou themes? I'm tired of the moe moe vocals in Touhou remixes and I want burning passion in my Touhou vocal remixes.

SKILL is now playing in your head...manually

>> No.2716928

Man, a PAD joke. Very creative.

>> No.2716936

What's jam project? Some j-rock group or something? That's as bad as moe moe vocals dipshit.

>> No.2716945

MOTTO MOTTO

>> No.2716947

JAM Project is the mecha equivalent of IOSYS.

>> No.2716958
File: 82 KB, 640x480, 1239251679824.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2716958

>>2716936

You better watch yourself on the streets...

>> No.2716967

>>2716947
This.

>> No.2716973
File: 17 KB, 237x306, 1214408549172.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2716973

>>2716947
>>2716967

B-but Jam Project actually produces themes for animes and has concerts whereas IOSYS just has shitty weeaboo fans loving them...

>> No.2716983

Well, they did sing Okkusenman once.
So why not?

>> No.2716991

>>2716973
IOSYS has concerts...they're superfly too

>> No.2716993

>>2716905

fucking sauce?!

>> No.2717000

>>2716973
>>B-but Jam Project actually produces themes for animes and has concerts whereas IOSYS just has shitty weeaboo fans loving them...

And? The only thing different between them so far is that JAM has produced songs for really crappy anime. Other than that, they're pretty much the same.

>> No.2717002

JAM project is shit tier. Enjoy your noise

>> No.2717006

>>2717000

Now I know you're trolling.

>> No.2717056

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ea_fAmpeZWI

He may not be JAM Project, but Jimang is just as awesome.

>> No.2717062

What's with all this Jam project hate here on /jp/?

>> No.2717071

www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRx3WDZ8DFM

>> No.2717083

>>2717062
Probably the same guy.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action