This is an accurate description of people on /jp/ Don't even try to deny it.

File: 73 KB, 512x600, BIRRY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat May 16 01:21:03 2009 No.2596017 [Reply] [Original]

This is an accurate description of people on /jp/

Don't even try to deny it.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:23:03 2009 No.2596024 Majority of the people in /jp/ are thin faggots.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:24:03 2009 No.2596027 We are all Coreans.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:24:03 2009 No.2596028 herp derp

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:24:03 2009 No.2596029 Not really. Also, who draws these?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:24:03 2009 No.2596030 You say 'homosexual camicadze terrorists' as if it were something bad...

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:25:03 2009 No.2596035 Except we don't like ANYTHING made by gooks ("gook" refers to corean pigdogs, never nips) and we HATE cartoons of all kinds.

>>	Kana !DPuvm5lnIA Sat May 16 01:26:03 2009 No.2596043 Try posting this to /a/ for accuracy

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:27:03 2009 No.2596044 >>2596035 Keep telling yourself that, but you know it isn't true.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:27:03 2009 No.2596045 File: 170 KB, 650x650, twelve specifically.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Fine. I won't try to deny it. Instead, I shall post this image of an attractive preteen girl.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:28:03 2009 No.2596050 >>2596035 >we HATE cartoons of all kinds. Speak for yourself. We just hate /a/ for it's userbase.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:28:03 2009 No.2596054 >>2596035 >HATE cartoons Really? I have nothing against the old shows i watched as a kid like thundercats.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:30:03 2009 No.2596065 >>2596050 /a/ and /jp/ share most of their user base.

Anonymous Sat May 16 01:30:32 2009 No.2596066 [DELETED]

>>2596044

The gook part or the cartoon part?

Because the cartoon part is accurate. We're basically hiding in bomb shelters in preparation for the Umineko anime adaption.

The gook part, I'm only pretty sure of. I know nips refers explicitly to japanese, and chinks to chinese, so I figured gook to be corean.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:31:03 2009 No.2596075 >>2596065 /jp/ hates it's orgin/itself. It's true.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:35:03 2009 No.2596097 >>2596054 Give me sight beyond sight!

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:35:03 2009 No.2596098 >>2596075 That is a pretty obvious lie.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:36:03 2009 No.2596105 >>2596065 I guess that explains why /jp/ is so much slower than /a/.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:38:03 2009 No.2596117 >>2596105 /jp/ is a redundant board, as 90% of the content on here is also on /a/

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:39:03 2009 No.2596121 >homosexual ACTUALLY, MOM, I'M BISEXUAL. >>2596035 Speak for yourself, I browse /co/ more than any other board.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:40:03 2009 No.2596125 >>2596117 I've never seen /a/ have a decent Umineko thread or get so heated into Type-Moon stuff as /jp/ does.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:43:03 2009 No.2596142 >>2596125 >a decent Umineko thread True. >get so heated into Type-Moon stuff False. /a/'s pretty good as it is, they exist as a buffer for the Summer.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:48:03 2009 No.2596160 Exactly like I said. /a/ and /jp/ share most of their user base, and a good 90% of the content on /jp/ is also in /a/. I don't know why you would try to deny that. Are you ashamed of what you like?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:50:03 2009 No.2596173 >>2596160 meh I havent been to /a/ since geass 2 ended. For like a week every single god damn thread was about that show, finally lost my patience and have not gone back.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:53:03 2009 No.2596183 >>2596160 Yeah, this /a/ vs /jp/ thing is pretty much just another pathetic example of 2 groups of the exact same people that hate each other just because they're in 2 different groups.

Anonymous Sat May 16 01:53:03 2009 No.2596186

>>2596160
I'm wondering where you get this idea when most people on /jp/ say they don't go to /a/. The increased board overlap when the KS demo came out showed that there is a large disparity between the boards. If most of /a/ already posted on /jp/ there wouldn't have been such noticable decline in quality.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:55:03 2009 No.2596194 >>2596160 >and a good 90% of the content on /jp/ is also in /a/ This is the BAD 90%. Also, I can't stand the speed at which /a/ moves. Good discussion is better without the need for high-paced posting.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:57:03 2009 No.2596198 Personally, I HATE /jp/ for being /touhou/

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:57:03 2009 No.2596202 >>2596183 Next you are going to say that there is no real difference between people who crack their egg from the large side and those who crack it from the small side.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:58:03 2009 No.2596205 >>2596198 Better this than /bleach/

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 01:58:03 2009 No.2596207 So who let all the /a/ faggots in? Seriously there must be something wrong with you if you still browse /a/ after code gayass code gayss code gayass code gayass code gayss code gayass.

Anonymous Sat May 16 01:58:03 2009 No.2596208

/a/ is too full of newfag underage b&s with low powerlevels who start threads about the latest Naruto chapter, or how they watched Death Note and want more anime recommendations, or other shit. Really the board is shit, and the few good threads usually get drowned out by the massive waves of shit posts and wikispam. Which is why /a/ is shit.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:00:14 2009 No.2596223 >>2596205 Not really. /jp/ seems to tal about nothing else than Touhou.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:01:03 2009 No.2596231 >>2596205 Are they still in the Soul Society?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:05:03 2009 No.2596242 >>2596208 Yeah, and /jp/ is TOUHOU, TOUHOU, TOUHOU, TOUHOU, TOUHOU, TOUHOU, TOUHOU, TOUHOU. Seriously, people. You don't seem to be talking about nothing else around here. Geass flood was at least temporary.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:06:03 2009 No.2596251 File: 69 KB, 425x567, a touhou character.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2596205

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:07:03 2009 No.2596254 >>2596231 Ichigo and FRIIDO are fighting majin buu on the kai planet

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:08:03 2009 No.2596261 >>2596242 Touhou has more than 100 characters more than 100doujin albums per year more than 10000 fanart/official art per month own convention (reitaisai)

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:08:03 2009 No.2596262 >>2596254 would be better if it was ichigo and frodo

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:11:03 2009 No.2596278 >>2596261 By that logic you should just love Inuyasha or Naruto as well.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:11:03 2009 No.2596280 >>2596242 /jp/ is the Touhou board, so it's supposed to be just Touhou. Sometimes VNs and other games. /a/, on the other hand, doesn't have much excuse.

Anonymous Sat May 16 02:16:03 2009 No.2596301

>>2596261
Touhou has 16 games in little more than a decade, plus a number of doujinshi.

And it's ONE guy behind all of that (a merit, BTW).

In contrast, every trimester there are more than 20 new shows, plus the ones ongoing.

I consider Touhou fans worse than Trekkies and Ringers, or your regular weeaboo. They have more depth behind their fandom. (and I'm not trolling, just voicing my opinion).

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:17:03 2009 No.2596303 >>2596278 None of them has more than 100doujin albums per year. Do they have their own convention? Lastly they are not little girls.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:19:03 2009 No.2596312 >>2596280 Then go and ask Moot to rename the board to /touhou/. Or escind (again) /jp/ in two boards: Japan/General (VNs, doramas, even Toku) and Touhou Project. I'm not against Touhou, just the way it overwhelms this board since its inception.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:20:03 2009 No.2596323 File: 131 KB, 800x681, littlegirl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2596303 Inuyasha and Naruto both have little girls in them. /a/ just moves to fast and it's too populated. Slower moving boards are better, even if it's the same material.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:22:03 2009 No.2596327 I don't care what he renames it so long as posting ks is not allowed.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:23:03 2009 No.2596331 What gets to me the most is that the so-called Touhou fans in here can't play the game worth shit.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:24:03 2009 No.2596334 Japan hates weaboos. Why would they use them against America?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:24:03 2009 No.2596335 >>2596331 Word.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:25:03 2009 No.2596341 Funny why there is so many people complaining about overdose of touhou. /jp/ has always been like that since it was made. You guys new or something?

Anonymous Sat May 16 02:25:03 2009 No.2596344

>>2596261
>Touhou has more than 100 characters more than 100doujin albums per year more than 10000 fanart/official art per month own convention (reitaisai)

Reminder: All that doujin work is essentially fanfiction. Fanfiction is terrible, regardless of where it's made and only retards and shipperfaggots eat that stuff up. /thread.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:26:03 2009 No.2596347 >>2596341 No. Just here to complaint about you. Call it fandom hating.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:26:03 2009 No.2596351 I'm just here for the loli. I heard /a/ hates loli now, so I'm not stepping foot in there again.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:27:03 2009 No.2596353 >>2596017 Reported Troll bait

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:27:03 2009 No.2596355 >>2596344 AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:28:59 2009 No.2596360 File: 42 KB, 400x500, giantblackshemalecock.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>50 posts omitted

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:30:03 2009 No.2596367 >>2596017 no one on /jp/ watches Naruto or Bleach. Take it to /a/ for proper accuracy.

Anonymous Sat May 16 02:32:03 2009 No.2596373

I still go on /a/, but the majority of /a/ is horrible, especially on weekends and during the day.

I do believe there is heavy overlap though, maybe not as big as some people are claiming in this thread, but it's got to be a sizable chunk of /jp/ goes to /a/ (but that does not mean a sizable chunk of /a/ goes to /jp/)

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:34:03 2009 No.2596380 >>2596344 Written fanfiction is shit. Doujinshi is fanfiction also, but (99%of the time) fap material, ergo, WIN.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:38:03 2009 No.2596391 >>2596380 Except Touhou porn is all /d/ garbage. Unless you like /d/, I guess. You would think there would be more /l/.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:39:03 2009 No.2596393 >>2596380 >fap material, ergo, WIN. You make me sick.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:41:03 2009 No.2596401 >>2596393 What are you, a homo? A moralfag?

Anonymous Sat May 16 02:42:03 2009 No.2596406

>>2596380
Real men should exercise enough restraint as to forgo fapping. If you're so lacking in self-control as to let your base instincts guide your actions, are you any better than the sluts which you claim to hate?

Nay. Thus, as men, we should be able to suppress our instincts and pay these kinds of worthless diversions no heed. They provide no sort of lasting benefit to us and only serve to lower ourselves to the level of our enemies.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:44:03 2009 No.2596415 >>2596391 >/l/ I thnk you're refering to /u/ - Yuri. /y/ is taken for yaoi and there is not /l/ board. Unless that 'l' is a capital 'i' and you mean the Oekaki board, which is shit.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:45:03 2009 No.2596420 >>2596415 /l/ was loli, newfag

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:46:03 2009 No.2596421 >>2596406 Girls aren't sluts unless they have sex. Masturbation is a-okay.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:46:03 2009 No.2596422 >>2596360 Hot.

>>	「ロリあき」 Sat May 16 02:48:03 2009 No.2596429 >>2596406 WHile I do follow the "self-restraint" idea, I believe in "all things in moderation" much more strongly. Restrain yourself, but no need to cease completely. Also, "fap material" can be read without actually fapping to it.

Anonymous Sat May 16 02:49:03 2009 No.2596433

>>2596406
>Real men should exercise enough restraint as to forgo fapping. If you're so lacking in self-control as to let your base instincts guide your actions, are you any better than the sluts which you claim to hate?

>Nay. Thus, as men, we should be able to suppress our instincts and pay these kinds of worthless diversions no heed. They provide no sort of lasting benefit to us and only serve to lower ourselves to the level of our enemies.

WHAT??!?!?!?!? ARE YOU A MORMON OR SOMETHING?

From which fucking cave did you crawl out? That, or it's a nice piece of copypaste.

No, seriously. Get the fuck out of the Internet forever.

>the sluts which you claim to hate
When did I ever say that?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:50:03 2009 No.2596435 >>2596415 Did you forget about old /l/? The game is FULL of frilly lolis, having more /l/ material would not require much of a stretch of the imagination at all.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 02:52:03 2009 No.2596446 >>2596420 >/l/ was loli, newfag I knew that. WAS. Past tense. Now it's banned, except for /b/, and I'm not going there. And stop saging, man.

Anonymous Sat May 16 02:58:03 2009 No.2596473

>>2596429
>WHile I do follow the "self-restraint" idea, I believe in "all things in moderation" much more strongly. Restrain yourself, but no need to cease completely.

This board (completely and justifiably, in my opinion) calls any woman who has had sex a slut, because her indulgence in carnal frolicking is a clear indicator of her lack of self restraint. Thus, as the superior sex, should seek to eliminate the same defect from ourselves and demonstrate our control over our erotic impulses?

>Also, "fap material" can be read without actually fapping to it.

This is true, but how often does "fap material" have any merits other than its intended purpose?

>>2596433
>WHAT??!?!?!?!? ARE YOU A MORMON OR SOMETHING?

I'm not. I've never attended any sort of religious gathering in my life, actually.

>From which fucking cave did you crawl out?That, or it's a nice piece of copypaste.

So what's wrong with my statement, from a rational standpoint?

>When did I ever say that?
Do you not hate sluts then?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:00:03 2009 No.2596481 >>2596473 Masturbating is a perfectly safe outlet for controlling one's sexual urges.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:00:03 2009 No.2596484 >>2596473 Choosing masturbation over prostitutes or a one night stand from club already put us over most sluts.

Anonymous Sat May 16 03:01:03 2009 No.2596488

>>2596421
>Girls aren't sluts unless they have sex. Masturbation is a-okay.

This is the same sort of reasoning employed by Christian "virgins" who've engaged in anal and oral sex for years. The title of slut is earned not earned through actions, but through your thoughts - being obsessed with sex, whatever your actions might be, is the defining characteristic of a slut.

Anonymous Sat May 16 03:05:03 2009 No.2596505

>>2596446
You know, "Former-/l/ material" and "ex-/l/ material" just don't roll off the tongue quite so well; the fact taht /l doesn't exist anymore has absolutely nothing to do with the genre of material that was posted there.

But hey, if you wanna know what your own foot tastes like that badly...

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:07:03 2009 No.2596511 >>2596488 You are thinking about perversion. Being a slut is to be dirtied by action.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:09:59 2009 No.2596519 File: 1.27 MB, 1196x1600, 1215809472317.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2596488 So now thought is equivocal to or worse than action? Man, I wouldn't want to live in a country run by YOU

Anonymous Sat May 16 03:12:03 2009 No.2596526

>>2596473
I conclude that you're a sophisticated troll, engaged in a Spock-like verbose language to purposely annoy any other posters.

>as the superior sex

I present this as evidence of you trolling. The smug attitude towards masculinity implies a inmature understanding of the nature of sexes and human relations and capabilities. Such statements are in accordance of the established mindset of many of the boards around here, /b/ in particular, with its "no women on the internet" "TITS OR GTFO" attitude.

Your posts look completely inane and out of place in 4chan, or even the entierty of the Internet, considering its long history as a vehicle for lust and forbiddenness.

>Do you not hate sluts then?

No, I do not. Most people around here consider any girl who has had a monogamic relationship with somebody on the show, manga or videogame a ''slut''. Such behavior is not inherently wrong in my system of morals. Nor does constant fapping.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:13:03 2009 No.2596530 >>2596488 So you're saying that every man in the world is a slut?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:14:03 2009 No.2596531 >>2596481 >>2596484 >>2596511 >>2596519 Alright, if being a slut is measured by action then, what's wrong with the action of having sex as opposed to masturbating?

「ロリあき」 Sat May 16 03:15:03 2009 No.2596535

>>2596473
>but how often does "fap material" have any merits other than its intended purpose?

That's just the thing-- you have to read it to find out.

>being obsessed with sex, whatever your actions might be, is the defining characteristic of a slut.

I would certainly agree, but fapping isn't really that simple. Personally, I usually will wake up early in the morning if the "morning wood" is uncomfortable; if I fap, I can get back to sleep comfortably, or ride the motivation a little more and and get up early.

It's really got very little to do with me thinking about sex.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:17:03 2009 No.2596541 >>2596488 You might want to know the definition of "thoughtcrime". Contrary to your outdated conservative values, anything that happens within the realm of the mind is fair game.

Anonymous Sat May 16 03:18:03 2009 No.2596549

>>2596531
Sex is unhealthy act which spreads diseases and pregnancy is a serious issue that needs an equal amount of consideration and planning. Masturbation, on the other hand, is just a bodily function that is no different morally from using the toilet.

Anonymous Sat May 16 03:24:03 2009 No.2596570

>>2596526
>I conclude that you're a sophisticated troll, engaged in a Spock-like verbose language to purposely annoy any other posters.

Someone who challenges the unequivocal acceptance of baseless paradigms without the intention of causing frustration isn't a troll.

> I present this as evidence of you trolling. The smug attitude towards masculinity implies a inmature understanding of the nature of sexes and human relations and capabilities.

Are you aware of the male:female ratio found in technically difficuly professions like science or engineering? How about the number of women who're heads of state, compared to men? How about the potential of world-class female athletes, measured against those of male athletes?

Granted, there are many reasons for this situation, but given the comparatively greater egalitarianism of recent years (at least in American), there's still an overwhelming disparity, no?

>Such statements are in accordance of the established mindset of many of the boards around here, /b/ in particular, with its "no women on the internet" "TITS OR GTFO" attitude.

You're making a mistake in believing that whatever sort of imagined concurrence I have with those internet sinkholes is proof that my ideas originated from those places. They didn't.

Your posts look completely inane and out of place in 4chan, or even the entierty of the Internet, considering its long history as a vehicle for lust and forbiddenness.

Only on those aforementioned sinkholes is that description true. I'd like to think a few of the boards are above them, albeit not by much.

>>2596530
Not everyone, but most. However, if any group of people have the ability to transcend this failing, it's us.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:26:03 2009 No.2596576 >>2596406 >>2596473 You're a retard.

>>	Arcueid Brunestud !ARCIkc4cG6 Sat May 16 03:27:03 2009 No.2596585 >>2596570 >difficuly You know you done fucked up.

Anonymous Sat May 16 03:31:03 2009 No.2596605

>>2596549
>Sex is unhealthy act

Unhealthy?

>which spreads diseases and pregnancy is a serious issue that needs an equal amount of consideration and planning.

Both of these problems are easily avoided by anyone of reasonable intelligence. Are you suggesting that if you engaged in sex, you would be incapable of remaining disease or child free, despite the fact that so many normals manage to do it?

>Masturbation, on the other hand, is just a bodily function that is no different morally from using the toilet.

You could justify sex the same way.

>>2596541
Before you start throwing terms like "thoughtcrime" around, you should read what I wrote again and ask if it's true. Have you ever met a slut who wasn't obesessed with sex?

Also, for the record, what happens in the mind is hardly "fair game" given the more serious penalty given to premeditated crimes rather than those committed spontaneously.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:33:03 2009 No.2596613 File: 1.27 MB, 1196x1600, 1215809472317.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2596605 >>Have you ever met a human being on this planet who wasn't obsessed with sex? fixed

Anonymous Sat May 16 03:34:03 2009 No.2596619

>>2596570
>without the intention of causing frustration isn't a troll.

Your remarks regarding human sexuality (masturbation in particular) in such a website make you controversial enough to consider you a troll.

>Are you aware of the male:female ratio found in technically difficuly professions like science or engineering? How about the number of women who're heads of state, compared to men? How about the potential of world-class female athletes, measured against those of male athletes?

>Granted, there are many reasons for this situation, but given the comparatively greater egalitarianism of recent years (at least in American), there's still an overwhelming disparity, no?

Egalitarianism of the sexes (and races) is still very young, historically speaking. Perhaps in a century or two, the ratios will be more balanced. And let's not forget that this is just widespread in the Western Hemisphere.

>proof that my ideas originated from those places. They didn't.

Basic logic. Correlation does not imply causation. I keep to think, however, that your ideas are outdated, extremely conservative and imbecilic at best.

Anonymous Sat May 16 03:35:03 2009 No.2596624

>>2596605
I'm not saying that one act of sex with make you disease-ridden and with child, merely that for every sex act there is a 1% chance of either happening, and that 1% happens a lot more than you think it would. That's with proper precautions taken, like condoms.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:41:03 2009 No.2596641 >>2596613 There are people who've cast off that desire or not indulged in it, you know.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:42:03 2009 No.2596645 >>2596613 Google "Asexuality"

Anonymous Sat May 16 03:44:03 2009 No.2596651

>>2596605

>Also, for the record, what happens in the mind is hardly "fair game" given the more serious penalty given to premeditated crimes rather than those committed spontaneously.

Does this means that you believe that people should be punished for what they THINK?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:45:03 2009 No.2596654 Do i read this from left to right or right to left

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:47:03 2009 No.2596663 >>2596605 Premeditated crimes isn't punishing thought, it's being lighter on those who were suffering from anger and were caught up in the moment.

Anonymous Sat May 16 03:49:03 2009 No.2596676

>>2596651
>Does this means that you believe that people should be punished for what they THINK?

I merely said that even Western society seems to have an opinion that you can justifiably be punished for what you think. Isn't that why, in addition to the example I gave you earlier on premeditation, we have psychiatrists and asylums (which can hold you indefinitely)?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:51:03 2009 No.2596683 >>2596641 >>There are people who've cast off that desire or not indulged in it, you know. I didn't deny that I asked if you had met one. You haven't, you don't live in Tibet

Anonymous Sat May 16 03:52:03 2009 No.2596688

>>2596663
>Premeditated crimes isn't punishing thought, it's being lighter on those who were suffering from anger and were caught up in the moment.

Whatever the intention might be, the result is that MURDEROUS FURY is a less serious offense than the act of considering and planning a murder.

Anonymous Sat May 16 03:54:03 2009 No.2596700

>>2596683
If you're implying that everyone everywhere else is no better than the carictures seen on Fox or MTV, you probably should put down your remote. I'll agree that they're in the minority (but then again, isn't everyone, when compared to normals?), but there are likely more than you think.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:54:03 2009 No.2596702 >>2596688 It's the same reason innocent by reason of insanity is an excuse.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:55:03 2009 No.2596703 Someone who gets laid more than me = slut, amirite?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:55:03 2009 No.2596707 >>2596641 >>2596645 Asexuals are emo fags.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:57:03 2009 No.2596718 >>2596683 You apparently still haven't googled asexuality.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:58:03 2009 No.2596723 "Slut" is a stupid word. Only Abrahamic God-worshippers and aspies think sexuality is bad.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 03:58:03 2009 No.2596724 >>2596707 Wow, that's certainly an educated opinion.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 04:00:03 2009 No.2596728 >>2596723 aspies? really?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 04:00:03 2009 No.2596730 File: 54 KB, 351x600, The_Fox_and_the_Grapes_-_Project_Gutenberg_etext_19994.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2596645 Pic related.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 04:01:03 2009 No.2596732 Moar propaganda!

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 04:02:03 2009 No.2596737 >>2596728 I'm not saying they're ALL like that. But shouldn't anyone with a healthy mind realize that sex is a mitzvah?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 04:02:03 2009 No.2596738 >>2596724 It is. Asexuals always sound like condescending assholes. "I'm so postmodern I shit mascara and piss black hairdye."

Anonymous Sat May 16 04:03:03 2009 No.2596744

>>2596676
>I merely said that even Western society seems to have an opinion that you can justifiably be punished for what you think.
>Isn't that why, in addition to the example I gave you earlier on premeditation, we have psychiatrists and asylums (which can hold you indefinitely)?

Yes, but, when the normal and human act of thinking doesn't affect your behavior and relationships with other people, it's OK. The question here is the effect of a certain idea in a person's psyche.

If a person is able to behave ''normally'' (and even that is hard to define), there should be of no concern to others, like yourself, whan an individual has on his/her mind.

Nevertheless, I still think you're a troll who doesn't seriously believe what youu posted in >>2596570 >>2596473 >>2596406 & >>2596393

Otherwise, what are you doing here of all places? Evangelizing your views of morality on the heathen population of this board?

By the way, English is not even my first language. But I think I have been able to pull off the formalities.

Anonymous Sat May 16 04:13:03 2009 No.2596781

>>2596744
>Yes, but, when the normal and human act of thinking doesn't affect your behavior and relationships with other people, it's OK.

Again, whatever you or I might think, society doesn't seem to agree with that notion. Or do you think otherwise?

If a person is able to behave ''normally'' (and even that is hard to define), there should be of no concern to others, like yourself, whan an individual has on his/her mind.

I'm not certain what you mean, could you explain?

>>2596744
>Nevertheless, I still think you're a troll who doesn't seriously believe what youu posted in >>2596570 >>2596473 >>2596406 & >>2596393. Otherwise, what are you doing here of all places? Evangelizing your views of morality on the heathen population of this board?

I try to avoid sledgehammering my opinions into others, but I was interested in exploring certain opinions held by others, no more, no less. If I really were trying to troll (and I'm not), I would be failing hard, given that the point of trolling is to provoke lengthy responses with little effort.

On /jp/, the easiest way to do that is simply to start a ronery thread pretending to be a woman, a trick which seems to work no matter how many times its repeated, unfortunately.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 04:13:03 2009 No.2596786 >>2596738 >Sweeping generalizations. Quite.

Anonymous Sat May 16 04:15:03 2009 No.2596795

>>2596707
>>2596738

Those are likely scene faggots and could hardly be taken as good representatives of people who aren't interested in sex. The sorts of people you've described are for Asexuality what Narutards are for anime or anyone with slightly weeaboo interests.

Anonymous Sat May 16 04:21:03 2009 No.2596830

>>2596781
>Again, whatever you or I might think, society doesn't seem to agree with that notion. Or do you think otherwise?

Not, but, as I said, is none of their concern.

>I try to avoid sledgehammering my opinions into others, but I was interested in exploring certain opinions held by others, no more, no less. If I really were trying to troll (and I'm not), I would be failing hard, given that the point of trolling is to provoke lengthy responses with little effort.

That's in direct contradiction of your early posts. And you are a sucessful troll, considering that I've been doing exactly that: provoking in me lengthy responses with little effort. Also, considering what time is it, most people are asleep. As for me, I'm Chile: same as the Eastern US Seaboard Time (about 4 AM).

And your language and ideas seem more as an attempt on ''exploiting'' rather than ''exploring''

>On /jp/, the easiest way to do that is simply to start a ronery thread pretending to be a woman, a trick which seems to work no matter how many times its repeated, unfortunately.

I do not know how /jp/ operates. I just came here if a miracle had happened: a front page free of Touhou.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 04:24:03 2009 No.2596839 >>2596795 Sadly, those are the vocal ones. Asexuality isn't, or shouldn't be, a choice, just something you are or not. If you deliberately "become" asexual you're tryiong too fucking hard and are basically one of those emo faggots.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 04:27:03 2009 No.2596851 >>2596839 For what I've read of Asexuality, it seems as a disorder with genetic origins, rather than a choice. Homosexuality, however, looks like a bit of both nature and nurture.

Anonymous Sat May 16 04:27:03 2009 No.2596852

As I believe that most monotheistic moral codes are indeed superior to current societal ones, minus the worshipping, I'll hav to stand by the point that sex indeed has a negative influence on society and should only be used for the purpose of procreation.

Anonymous Sat May 16 04:29:11 2009 No.2596865 [DELETED]

As I believe that most monotheistic moral codes are indeed superior to current societal ones, minus the worshipping, I'll have to stand by the point that sex indeed has a negative influence on society and should only be used for the purpose of procreation.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 04:30:03 2009 No.2596874 >>2596852 Are you the same troll of >>2596570 >>2596473 >>2596406 >>2596393 ? Or somebody else with the idea that ''sex is bad''? Or just a regular troll?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 04:43:03 2009 No.2596949 >>2596852 As I believe that most monotheistic moral codes are indeed superior to current societal ones, minus the worshipping >monotheistic moral codes are indeed superior >minus the worshipping What difference does it make?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 04:43:03 2009 No.2596950 File: 167 KB, 1250x1425, 1236931913334.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Ahh... Isn't it fun to see people pissed off because someone else is pissed

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 07:05:03 2009 No.2597370 > troll thread > 112 posts and 5 image replies omitted. /jp/... I am disappoint.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 16 07:13:03 2009 No.2597380 >>2597370 4hours after I reported it, look like this thread still alive. So is it just two faggots that is arguing back and forth about asexuality and sluts? Sure feel like weekend around here.

Reply to thread

Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture