[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 23 KB, 411x427, Rumia.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1562920 No.1562920 [Reply] [Original]

Man-eating loli in the white house, watch out Obama.

>> No.1562926

Great

>> No.1562924

>>1562920
Why do you think he chose Biden?

>> No.1562945

Is that Biden's Granddaughter?

>> No.1562959
File: 153 KB, 800x1030, 1225870643136.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1562959

Just imagine how awesome it would be to kill Rumia.

>> No.1562962

>>1562924
Obama chose Biden because of his danmaku skills?

I bet when they're together it's like the Devil Team. Biden's pretty quick and has a wide angled attack, but when you hit shift Obama takes over with his more focused attack.

Also, Biden's kind of scatter-brained and human, while Obama is a otherworldly creature with highly refined tastes and an insane sibling secretly locked in the white house basement.

>> No.1562991

>>1562962

Shouldn't Obama have the wide spread attack due to his wide appeal? Biden should have the focused attack due to his foreign policy experience.

>> No.1562995

>>1562920
More like Erections 2008, AM I RIGHT?

>> No.1563000

>>1562995
Well, I know I'd fuck the cute lolis if given the chance. Or that kid of Palin's, Piper.

>> No.1563006

>>1563000
Fuck that shit, I'm going for the toddler with down syndrome.

SO MOE~ Uguu~

>> No.1563008
File: 11 KB, 242x251, 1225871843823.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1563008

>> No.1563011
File: 51 KB, 640x480, 1225871962700.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1563011

>> No.1563014
File: 62 KB, 770x366, 1225872074419.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1563014

Yamame?

>> No.1563019

>>1563000
Piper is only seven years old, but I'd still comfort her for her mother's loss, if you know what I mean.

>> No.1563024

>>1563011
what a terribly annoying man D< every time he came on the screen with his lollipop i wanted to die >O

>> No.1563031

Biden's flawless plan to overtake the presidency.

>> No.1563049
File: 7 KB, 200x200, 1225873497765.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1563049

>>1563019

>> No.1563054

>>1563019
>Piper is only seven years old
Old enough for vaginal, with some practice.

>> No.1563067

Proposition 8 is passing here in California.

One step forward for niggers

Twenty steps backwards for true equality.

>> No.1563073

>>1563067
At least in Washington they are passing the law to have doctor-assisted suicide legalized. It's just in time, too, considering a nigger just got elected.

>> No.1563077
File: 18 KB, 500x600, 1225874405540.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1563077

>>1563073
Oh 4chan, don't ever change.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1Hzwf7xD_Q&feature=related

>> No.1563078

>>1562995
Damn it, I laughed.

I would like to hear a Jap try to say elections.

>> No.1563081

>>1563067
53% to 47%, with only 50% of precincts reporting. Don't be a defeatist.

>> No.1563089

>>1563081
You're behind, it's 60.1 percent of the precincts, and it's now 53.1 in favor.

It's going to pass, be realistic.

>> No.1563091

Homosexuals are gay, stop supporting them.

>> No.1563092

>>1563067

Equality my ass. You let a man marry a man, and what next? You let marry a dog? A 2D loli?

If proposition 8 fails, it will be twenty steps backwards for humanity.

>> No.1563094

>>1563091
yeah, it's real fucking funny on 4chan, sure. But when it passes into a state's constitution, it's serious fucking business.

>> No.1563097

>>1563094
I mean it, although I phrase it in amusing wording, I really don't approve of homosexual relations.

>> No.1563098

>>1563092
There's a difference between discrimination against humans and discrimination against non-humans. Apparently you're too retarded to see the difference. Why make discrimination a part of the state constitution? Because you're a fag, that's why.

>> No.1563099

>>1563091
Yes, we know gays are also called homosexuals, but thanks for pointing that out.

>> No.1563104

>>1563092
1) Man x Man
2) Man x Dog
3) Man x 2D loli
4) Man x 3D loli

I support this progressiveness.

>> No.1563107

>>1563092
There's a huge difference between people and not-people.
Hell, polygamy isn't that bad with me as long as it's consenting and sane.

There should be no singling-out of any group in law like this. It didn't work for the Chinese Exclusion act, Japanese internment, Black's 3/5ths vote, all of that jazz.

>> No.1563108

>>1563098

i find it amusing that i'm the fag when you're the one supporting gay marriage. fag.

>> No.1563113

>>1563108
I'm standing against blatant, pointed discrimination. I don't really like gays.

>> No.1563115

>>1563108
Frankly, even I'm not COMPLETELY comfortable with the idea of gays getting married.

But I'm intelligent enough to know that discrimination was, is, and will continue to be a terrible mistake. My personal beliefs should not be passed into law to deny others not like myself their rights and liberties. You sir, are just an idiot.

>> No.1563117

Ideally, I'd want to be the only person with rights and everybody else being my slave.
Since that's not possible, I'll just vote against any extension of rights for anyone.

>> No.1563120

>>1563115
>>1563113

this isn't a matter of discrimination. this isn't about equality. the survival of the human race is dependent on reproduction. a man cannot give birth to a child; a union between two men is nothing short of a crime against nature.
how can gays want something that isn't intended for them? it's like trying to give a polar bear apples.

>> No.1563129

>>1563120
Marriage -> Reproduction
This is a broken and flawed logical progression.

You've changed the subject to reproduction. This isn't about reproduction, this is about having the right to have a marriage/civil union, and all the benefits, financial or otherwise that follow.

You are also singling out man-man gay relationships, which highlights the fact that you are a complete bigot and idiot. Lesbians are gay couples too.

A civil union or marriage does not imply or mandate that a child results from the marriage. It's just a fact that there are thousands and thousands of STRAIGHT marriages out there that have not and will not result in a child being conceived.

tl;dr your arguments defeat themselves.

>> No.1563131

>>1563120
Then people who are impotent shouldn't be allowed to marry, neither should people who are too old, and all marriages if they find that they can't have kids should be annulled.

You're a fucking discriminatory retard spewing brainwashed shit, or a really clever troll.

>> No.1563132

>>1563108
Everyone on 4chan is a fag, fag. No exceptions.

>> No.1563137

>>1563131

>or a really clever troll.

apparently i wasn't that clever, since you figured me out.

>> No.1563138
File: 56 KB, 610x451, 1225875990514.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1563138

>> No.1563144

if fags can get married people should be allowed to marry their sisters

>> No.1563146

>>1563137
It was obvious from the get-go. This place is much too liberal and deviant for someone with such beliefs to last here more than a couple minutes.

>> No.1563151

>>1563146
Not really.
You'd be surprised how conservative /jp/ can be on some matters.
For example, drugs.
Not that I disagree.
I might even say that tentacle loli rape aside, I'm leaning towards traditional christian values.

>> No.1563155

>>1563151
>I might even say that tentacle loli rape aside, I'm leaning towards traditional christian values.
That statement is so broken.

>> No.1563157

the greeks were gay as shit and they didn't have gay marriage. you can't go around redefining 3000 year old terms just to suit your agenda.

>> No.1563159

>>1563155
I see nothing wrong with it, dear chap.

>> No.1563160

>>1563157
We're not redefining an age-old term. We wanted to redefine when a term would apply to someone under the law. Operative there: under the law. The whole fucking problem with this to begin with is that the fuckers decided that legal marriage would use the word "marriage" - a religious term - to describe a completely legal binding. The legal binding is what Prop 8 is trying to block, it has absolutely zero regard whatsoever on the religious meaning of the word. Fags would still not be allowed to marry in any church that wouldn't recognize it in the first place.

>> No.1563161

>>1563120
What.

Both children born out of marriage and marriages without children are very common. Beyond that, it's not like banning or allowing gays to marry is going to affect reproduction either way; it's not like they're going to turn heterosexual because they can't get married.

Anyway, we should be posting more little girls instead of talking about some question on a CA ballot.

>> No.1563163

>>1563161
So goes California, thus goes the nation. What happens in California certainly doesn't stay in California.

>> No.1563167

>>1563159
Tentacle loli rape is a christian value.

>> No.1563169

Aside from that, it's been proven that marriage, or civil association ( the name hardly matters, except for people who believe in religion) is an essential part of private property.
Indeed, without civil association, there is no way for parents to secure goods for their offspring and spouse, them not being recognised legally.
If your marriage had no legal status, your wife wouldn't lawfully be entitled to anything if something were to happen to you.
Neither would your children, since your family would be seen as such only by you and your surroundings.
So a system where marriage/civil contract/association doesn't exist would have no intergenerational exchanges.
This would negate the basics of private property, since the goods you secured for yourself aren't available to your family.
What fags are trying to do is secure this right to a legal recognition, asserting their right to private property.
It in itself is an entirely viable reason.
the only problem is, I'm a human, I don't like gays, fuck them and their rights.

>> No.1563183
File: 147 KB, 632x979, 1225877378805.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1563183

You're all complaining about men marrying men, but have you forgotten that the term 'homosexual' refers to women who want to marry women too?

>> No.1563186

Hating gays is for religious and for the old. also, there is quite a generation gap on this issue.

just wait for all the old people to die out in california, then all these same sex marriage stuff will be accepted

>> No.1563199

>>1563183
No it doesn't.

Besides, girls only get with girls to get mens' attention.

>> No.1563209

>>1563163
Almost ironic given that I live in Las Vegas.

I wasn't saying it doesn't affect us, just that talking about the little girls seems much more /jp/ related.

>> No.1563222

>>1563209
Constitutional Amendment to make Consensual Pedophilia and non-rape Child Pornography legal. Yea or Nay?

>> No.1563252

>>1563222
Do you really need to ask?

>> No.1563259

>>1563222
Hell Yea.

>> No.1563261

Well. I for one welcome your new Tony Blair ELITE ver. Here's hoping this one doesn't get all defective midway into his run and start claiming that he can hear the voice of god.

Seriously WTF? You lead a secular country, you can't say that you hear the voice of motherfucking god! You CERTAINLY can't say that it was his idea to invade Iraq. That's not going to go down at all.
Despite this he was STILL more competant at his job than the one we've got now, who is essentially a communist, and has been ever since he joined the Labour party.

God our elections can't come soon enough. Even though the Conservative choice has no ideas whatsoever, at least he'll be politically predisposed against going into my home and telling me what I can and can't fap to.

>> No.1563263

>>1563261
Gordon Brown is a godsend to Britain in those times, he really is thanks to his experience in the BoE.

>> No.1563268

>>1563222
Yea, obviously. The thing would never even make it to a vote though, let alone pass.

>> No.1563287

>>1563263

You mean that same Bank of England that got us into this economic recession in the first place? That BoE? Or are you talking about the BoE spell from Ar Tonelico, because if he can hurl his words as physical entities Yellow Submarine style at his political opponents, NOW IS THE TIME TO DO THAT.

>> No.1563288
File: 146 KB, 836x760, 1225881898727.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1563288

i'm sure obama can handle a mere girl

>> No.1563306

>>1563287
I'm talking about the one that's working to keep your economy from dying.
Brown is probably the most knowledgeable elected politician on the matter of economics and finance.
Look at Sarkozy, spewing shit around like he knows anything about the economy.

>> No.1563361

>>1563306
>I'm talking about the one that's working to keep your economy from dying.

Yeah, I guess. Sorry, the BBC talks about our economy like your news stories talk about terrorism. They've started to run out of psuedonyms for recession and using words like Financial Abyss and Moneyapocalypse.
That said, the BBC have been looking for something to really stick it to the government lately, what with all the shit they've been getting from them.

This said, never forget that Gordon Brown is, and always has been a socialist with a better head for money than he has for socialism. He NEVER should have left the Treasury, he just doesn't have the media savvy to make himself seem competant as a World Leader, which was why Tony tried to keep him out of the top spot for so long.

Well, that, and the obvious reason.

>> No.1563767

FUCK YEAR I JUST WOKE UP AND OBAMA FUCKIN WON

>> No.1564269

>>1562920
HOLY FUCK I SAW THIS TOO

>> No.1564282
File: 39 KB, 448x597, 1225900376657.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1564282

old but relevant

>> No.1564306

This thread rules

>> No.1564348

>Man-eating loli in the white house, watch out Obama.

>watch out
>man-eating
>Obama

Why would he be worried?

>> No.1564364
File: 58 KB, 400x414, 1225902343282.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1564364

>>1564348
Are you implying that this isn't a man?

>> No.1564393
File: 14 KB, 416x300, 1225902860380.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1564393

>>1564364
Actually, I was implying that he's not a human, but your logic is amusing too.

>> No.1564467
File: 95 KB, 550x400, 1225904382084.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1564467

>> No.1564484

Obama is a uneducated nigger who will destroy the economy.

>> No.1564507

>>1564484
>>uneducated
>>Harvard law school
>>University of Chicago law professor

derp

>> No.1564766
File: 37 KB, 512x326, 1225910332497.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1564766

I wish to see Putin rape Obama's family until they like it. Which btw shouldn't take more than 30 seconds.

>> No.1564789

>>1564766
90% of obamas family is over 80 so yeah...

>> No.1564794

>>1564507
You forgot to mention that he was the top of the class at Harvard Law.

>> No.1564872

>>1564484
lol

>> No.1565208

>>1564789
well I wasn't thinking of his Kenyan grandma but his little girls and bitch wife

>> No.1565229

Ah, That's right.

Obama isn't human, he's the anti-christ.
I bet he'd get along well with Youkai like Rumia.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action