top3 cancer of /jp/ 1 touhou 2 NEET 3 japan

File: 203 KB, 600x337, tmp_6836-14120337811063424724.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Feb 16 07:30:09 2015 No.13059829 [Reply] [Original]

top3 cancer of /jp/
1 touhou
2 NEET
3 japan

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 07:32:15 2015 No.13059832 File: 40 KB, 500x375, op-alphabet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13059829 Top3 faggots : 1 OP 2 OP 3 OP

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 07:52:15 2015 No.13059890 >>13059829 Then what is /jp/?

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 07:57:49 2015 No.13059902 >>13059890 Kancolle.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 08:00:30 2015 No.13059907 File: 87 KB, 100x100, 668641.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13059902

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 08:29:23 2015 No.13059991 1 Kancolle 2 JAV 3 idolmaster

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 09:20:53 2015 No.13060109 >>13059829 1 Perfume 2 Babymetal 3 Anime

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 09:24:19 2015 No.13060121 >>13059829 1. Monster Girl thread 2. Fumo autists 3. 0 discussion image dumps/x a CUTE! threads

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 09:28:49 2015 No.13060132 >>13059829 Generals, except the idol general since they have nowhere else to go.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 09:29:28 2015 No.13060135 1. 2hufags still unable to cope with the series being dead 2. threads clearly started by /a/ crossboarders who think we care about their 2D obsessions 3. Babymetal threads and the creepers greentexting how they'd fuck the members

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 10:01:04 2015 No.13060228 >>13060132 /s/ and /mu/ would be perfect for them tbh

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 10:03:54 2015 No.13060238 >>13059829 1 Idol general #1 2 Idol general #2 3 Idol general #3

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 10:04:07 2015 No.13060239 1. Kancole 2. Monster Girl thread 3. This thread

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 10:35:32 2015 No.13060324 1.2hus 2.Generals 3.Idols Not saying they should disappear, just keep them to a minimum. Some generals are fine.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 10:40:25 2015 No.13060343 I just wish they would stop bumping the damn generals every three seconds, learn to sage dammit.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 10:41:21 2015 No.13060348 >>13059829 this should be a banner

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 10:45:43 2015 No.13060363 >>13060343 Learn how to hide threads, you crippled monkey

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 10:51:35 2015 No.13060384 1. Kancole threads 2. Idol threads 3. Onahole threads

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 10:54:10 2015 No.13060393 >>13059829 1 Meta threads 1 OP 1 Crossboarders

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 10:58:17 2015 No.13060406 1- op's mom 2- kancole 3- idol threads

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 11:01:35 2015 No.13060417 1. >>13060430 2. >>13060431 3. >>13060432

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 11:03:37 2015 No.13060428 File: 359 KB, 1052x1248, perfect jp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] About 99% of /jp/'s content is disliked by someone somewhere. So the only compromise is a blank board where you can't make threads.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 11:04:57 2015 No.13060435 >>13060417 Post number >>13060500 says what we spam /sp/ with, le epic winrar XDDDDDDD

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 11:05:07 2015 No.13060435,1 >>13059832 I don't get this image

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 11:10:28 2015 No.13060462 >>13060435 Wow, what a wonderful idea! Really looking forward to it! It will help our board with sense of community!!

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 11:14:10 2015 No.13060462,1 >>13060435,1 a faggot is a term used for a bunch of sticks and it's replaced the letters O and P in the alphabet of the image

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 11:28:03 2015 No.13060529 Threads like this.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 11:34:48 2015 No.13060529,1 what is even /jp/ related at this point

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 12:56:39 2015 No.13060841 1. Monstergirl shit 2. Touhou 3. Generals

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 12:58:50 2015 No.13060847 >>13060363 Hiding all the crap that's killing /jp/ under a carpet won't help.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 13:11:58 2015 No.13060888 >>13060847 >'s killing Bad tense sweetie.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 13:12:55 2015 No.13060892 >>13060888 You forgot a comma there, buddy. Glad I could help out.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 13:53:15 2015 No.13060892,1 >>13060529,1 the same shitty touhou threads over and over

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:11:15 2015 No.13061068 1. Idolshit 2. Erogeshit 3. Metashit

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:21:05 2015 No.13061101 File: 104 KB, 252x224, 1424107336980.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] please don't bully

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:29:56 2015 No.13061137 1. Idols 2. /v/ getting too comfortable 3. Not enough Anons taking it easy.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:37:46 2015 No.13061175 1. 2hu 2. is 3. dead

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:45:04 2015 No.13061216 >>13060132 How about /mu/?

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:45:07 2015 No.13061175,1 >>13061137 honestly I think /v/ would make this board better at this point

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:47:04 2015 No.13061224 >>13061216 No, please keep them out of our board. We have to deal with Kpopshit, that's bad enough. Weebshit is also running rampant already, there's no need to pour oil into that particular flame.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:49:00 2015 No.13061236 >>13061224 fuck off GJ

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:49:07 2015 No.13061238 File: 268 KB, 1035x1027, 1390270459981.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Kancolle, because touhou posters didn't arrive in /jp/ and say everyone else is the problem.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:49:45 2015 No.13061247 >>13061236 no u

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:50:11 2015 No.13061254 >>13061224 Yeah sorry I don't visit that board so I have no idea about its current state. I really wish we would get a containment board all that eceleb shit from /tv/, /v/ and idol shit from /jp/.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:51:55 2015 No.13061265 >>13061238 That's because they were the problem when they first arrived in /a/ Not to defend Kancolle, but still

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:52:21 2015 No.13061271 >>13061101 I swear I've seen this cat before. Idk he just looks like someone but I can't quite place who...

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 14:55:54 2015 No.13061284 >>13061238 how new can you be

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 15:36:47 2015 No.13061445 >>13061238 This is a joke, right?

Anonymous Mon Feb 16 17:27:52 2015 No.13061859

top 3 cancer of /jp/

1. eternal generals on topics of which there isn't anything worth discussing (monster girl, kancolle, idol, onahole, jav, etc etc)
2. people that post in eternal generals
3. people that create new generals even though there is nothing to discuss but they feel a need to always have a thread up

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 17:29:54 2015 No.13061873 >>13060428 If 4chan is hell, that is purgatory.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 17:40:33 2015 No.13061923 >>13061859 /kcg/ here, I'd be more than happy if we were forced off to /vg/.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 17:45:37 2015 No.13061956 After extensive chemotherapy, /jp/ today is cancer-free. Probably because the patient is dead.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 18:20:28 2015 No.13062106 also echoing the sentiment that all of the eternal generals are fucking horrible and the jay was never meant for them

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 19:31:44 2015 No.13062453 ｐｅｏｐｌｅ　ｔｈａｔ　ｃｏｍｐｌａｉｎ　ａｂｏｕｔ　ｓｈｉｔ　ｌｉｋｅ　ｔｈｉｓ

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 19:39:52 2015 No.13062478 >>13059829 1. Kancolle 2. Idols/AKB 3. Babyshitters

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 20:05:23 2015 No.13062576 >>13062478 >Babyshitters wh-what?

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 20:21:25 2015 No.13062640 I really dislike the idol stuff and I wish they would at least merge into a single thread. Generals are also kind of annoying.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 20:28:55 2015 No.13062678 File: 159 KB, 500x500, 1423895360255.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13059829 cancer pls go

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 20:30:52 2015 No.13062689 Lot of complaining going on so, What do you want to see on /jp/?

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 20:35:16 2015 No.13062712 >>13062689 /r/ trade, /kcg/ and /mgg/ for /vn/, /@/, and /llsfig/

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 20:38:39 2015 No.13062724 >>13062689 I don't know, like open your /jp/ folder and look back into 2008?

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 20:39:36 2015 No.13062730 1. "Touhou is dead" people 2. JAV 3. OP

Anonymous Mon Feb 16 20:46:26 2015 No.13062750

1. rabid shitposters endlessly forcing unfunny shit memes (finally kicked into their own shit boards)
2. random fucking deletions by retarded janitors arbitrarily running topics and users off the board (now less retarded)
3. autistic morons trying to force some vision of /jp/ onto the board (mostly gave up)

honestly the levels of cancer now are lower than they've been in a while

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 20:52:48 2015 No.13062777 >>13062750 This, after moot left the janny got very lenient for a few days and we had some nice threasd

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 20:57:11 2015 No.13062796 >>13059829 1 EOPs 2 people who whine about EOPs 3 snark, irony

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 21:01:05 2015 No.13062814 >>13062777 I feel the same. Also, now that I checked the mgg, it is kinda scary the ammount of activity and crossboarders in that thread.

Anonymous Mon Feb 16 21:30:44 2015 No.13062989
File: 227 KB, 560x376, chris_poole_moot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

1. The moot-like legacy moderation policy that ruined every board that was ever good, consisting of permitting mods and janitors to allow:

-Threads like this

-Crossboarder posts

-Epic memes

-Posts with reaction images

-Endless sihtpost arguments between two idiots samefagging

-Meta discussion

This thread is more one day old, and still is here. How fucking hard is it to understand that if you don't moderate discussion in a theme-based board, soon the discussion is damped down by bored retards who don't give a fuck about the board, the theme or the discussion and just want to post epic 4chan memes xDD and effortless shitposts?

"But they are 4chan users too!" -moot, administrative genius

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 21:32:19 2015 No.13062998 >>13059829 Translate it weeabs

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 21:43:28 2015 No.13062998,1 god fucking dammit I miss early 2010 so much fuck this entire thread

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 22:09:47 2015 No.13063228 >>13062989 post the one where he's balding

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 22:12:55 2015 No.13063228,1 >>13062998,1 yeah, i really liked when this board got raided by shitters from /b/, /v/ and /sp/ so much

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 22:13:42 2015 No.13063252 The cancer is janny not doing his job(which he does for free) and deleting all these garbage threads,

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 22:18:12 2015 No.13063278 lmaoing at 2hu niggers calling anybody else the problem

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 22:57:20 2015 No.13063423 >>13062989 /jp/ allowed all of the above for years without issue. The real problem is retarded users.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 23:04:24 2015 No.13063423,1 >>13063228,1 Better than the board literally being /vg/.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 23:47:26 2015 No.13063423,2 an entirely new population of crossies and newshits sits around and tries to act out what they think is /jp/ out of some retarded respect for a fucking imageboard this is the entirety of 4chan warosu shitposting is the only good part about /jp/

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 16 23:54:38 2015 No.13063423,3 >>13063423,2 i don't really fucking care at this point, ok

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 00:06:59 2015 No.13063423,4 >>13063423,3 i just want chinks to die...

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 00:08:25 2015 No.13063423,5 >>13063423,4 What if you had a gun with one bullet and you were in a room with a chink and gook

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 00:12:37 2015 No.13063423,6 >>13063423,5 the dog eatign chink

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 01:22:28 2015 No.13063423,7 >>13063423,5 I would shoot the gook every time

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 04:42:21 2015 No.13064563 Reminder 2huniggers used to mass report everything that wasn't 2hu with scripts and that resulted in us getting a janitor who would delete everything except 4 pages of 2hu threads.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 05:25:26 2015 No.13064726 >>13062814 Ive noticed they dont sage and go through several threads a day. For comparison, the Patchouli thread has been up something like 45 days.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 05:33:40 2015 No.13064742 >>13064726 That's because 2hu is dead

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 05:36:59 2015 No.13064748 If this is cancer, I don't want to be the cure. Though there is a lot of 2hu. Not "a problem", just an observation.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 05:37:37 2015 No.13064752 >>13064726 If Patchouli threads got 4500 posts a day we'd go through them a lot faster, but they don't.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 06:13:20 2015 No.13064847 File: 435 KB, 1280x1175, janny.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 06:40:35 2015 No.13064890 >>13062750 >rabid shitposters endlessly forcing unfunny shit memes somebody spoke too soon

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 11:38:18 2015 No.13064890,1 >>13064890 steamed as fuck janman

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 11:48:17 2015 No.13064890,2 >>13062750 This guy has to be the jan there is no way someone can be this delusional

Anonymous Tue Feb 17 11:48:55 2015 No.13065628

>Don't tell anybody, but I'm in love with Shinmyoumaru!
>Remelia wants to take over Gensokyo, how horrifying!
>So what are your thoughts on Sakuya being a mass murderer who makes meat pies out of human flesh?
>Nue is too lewd! What was ZUN thinking?!
>I want to lay on Patchouli's soft tummy!
>Hello darkness my old friend I've come to talk with you again
>What do you suppose Nazrin is waiting for?
>I want to make breakfast for Yukari!
>Sekibanki is love. That small cape. That short miniskirt. These impossible long legs. These little boots. That little ribbon. The red hair. She's cute. I want to cuddle her hard.
>Dork thread Only dorks allowed in here
>Ran thread. Post your Rans. Here's a little Ran.
>Be gentle. It's Momiji's first time.

cancer

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 12:00:10 2015 No.13065652 #BringBackVisibleSage

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 13:45:12 2015 No.13066062 How about retards who claim to want anonymity and at the same time jerk each other off over who's a crossboarding newfag and who's a real 2005 OG and friends with the mods and janitors.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 13:58:52 2015 No.13066062,1 >>13065652 lol forgot about this 4chan has no visible sage how the fuck are people still using it

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 14:03:24 2015 No.13066107 File: 17 KB, 480x360, hqdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13061224 stay mad faggot

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 14:20:10 2015 No.13066183 >>13066062 Where's the connection?

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 17 14:24:58 2015 No.13066198 >>13066062 Their attitude and their vocabulary make them easy to spot as crossies, you don't need to have visible IDs to do that.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 05:23:09 2015 No.13069321 File: 175 KB, 295x366, niggy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13062750 I read number 3 but it feels more like a number 2 is coming.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 05:32:25 2015 No.13069346

The amount of pedoposts and upskirt shots/sexualized images in the babymetal thread. Seriously, I got banned for reporting the same pics that were reposted right after mods deleted them. The fuck? Mods need to get rid of all that kind of shit on /jp/. Not ban the fuckin people for reporting it. How backwards is that?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 05:35:27 2015 No.13069354 >>13069346 I got warnings all the time when I actualy report all the cancer on /v/. Fuck mods for allowing the shitposters to run wild everywhere.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 05:56:51 2015 No.13069415

>>13069354
It's just crazy to me because they literally just had deleted a string of pictures I reported and a couple of the deleted images were posted right after almost as a 'fuck you' to the mods and I got banned for reporting them the second time lmao

Obviously the mods have inconsistent interpretations of the rules. I'd like more of a consensus because if I'm gonna get banned for reporting upskirt shots of kids and bikini pics of even younger girls then this isn't the place for me.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 06:23:47 2015 No.13069509 File: 57 KB, 520x537, 1411013461497.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13059829 Nice post miyazaki, but please, go back to bed.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 06:33:20 2015 No.13069550 >>13069415 >lmao >shots of kids This isn't the place for you.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 06:43:06 2015 No.13069575 >>13069346 What do you expect from directionless pedophiles, normalfriend?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 06:47:44 2015 No.13069589 >>13069550 >leave out the upskirt part Apparently it is the place for me if sometimes they do get deleted and the users banned for that shit. Child models and sexualized images of children are literally a permabannable offense.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 07:29:42 2015 No.13069665

>>13069589
You can get permabanned for calling a mod a fag when he does something retarded but it doesn't mean it's the standard.

>if I'm gonna get banned for reporting upskirt shots of kids and bikini pics of even younger girls then this isn't the place for me
Bye.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 12:19:52 2015 No.13070567 >>13069589 Don't forgot those pictures of fictional children too, absolutely disgusting.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 12:27:51 2015 No.13070590 >>13069575 Except the Babyshitter thread is populated by redditors and /mu/ scum, which are both a breed of normalfags.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 12:32:00 2015 No.13070609 >>13070590 I used to go to that thread, and they hate reddit a bit too much, so I'm not sure where you got that idea from.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 12:35:26 2015 No.13070622 >>13070590 >/mu/ scum I don't see why /mu/ posters would go there, /kpop/ is basically it's own board too.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 12:51:45 2015 No.13070681 File: 203 KB, 296x282, 1421242592350.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13059829 great thread, congrats OP

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 15:04:41 2015 No.13071242 >>13069665 Oh look, I found him. Blue colored boards are supposed to be SFW. Bye.

>>	ノひしンそれ !1rIMhqf2DE Wed Feb 18 16:11:07 2015 No.13071477 File: 356 KB, 1279x697, 1415161864898.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] 1. Teenbros 2. Megamolg seagulls 3. Meta switch from easy taking to Aushwitz mode

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 16:23:23 2015 No.13071516
File: 810 KB, 1000x954, 25698651_p0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>13071242
I don't think you realize what's SFW and what isn't, SFW doesn't literally mean Safe for work or else all kinds of posts would be deleted, probably 90% of the board.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 16:34:08 2015 No.13071557 >>13071516 I know that. It basically means nudity mainly but the point is there are lines you don't cross and there is something wrong when some mods delete that shit and other mods ban you for reporting it.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 16:44:39 2015 No.13071591

>>13071557
It doesn't even mean nudity, it refers to specifically female nipples and genitalia. The most likely case is that one mod personally didn't like people talking about it and so deleted it. You can't really compare what goes on in the babymetal threads to junior idols picture wise because the later are a lot more sexualized. Pantyshots are just pantyshots.

I mean I get you're grossed out by in and find it "Creepy" or whatever but just hide the posts and move on, quit being so offended by everything you disagree with, learn to ignore things unless they're obviously illegal like full blown CP.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 17:17:58 2015 No.13071708

>>13071591
No, the mod deleted the pictures. Not words. Well, also sometimes just text posts get deleted too. There is no excuse for panty shots of children. It is sexualization which is bannable. I'm gonna continue reporting what is against the rules.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 17:20:10 2015 No.13071718 >>13071591 Using the hide feature does nothing when you don't wanna see it in the first place. That's the point of reporting. >offended I'm sure you all would love panty shots of your kids/nieces etc floating around the internet.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 17:24:25 2015 No.13071735 >>13070590 and somehow that poster managed to be more of a normalfag than they are.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 17:41:45 2015 No.13071811 File: 56 KB, 1276x720, Illya.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13071708 >>13071718 Where did all these Normies come from? Is this the after effect of the Monster girl general? Kill yourselves.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 17:53:38 2015 No.13071861 >>13071811 Nah man, I'm normal, why would I kill myself. I would tell you to kill yourself but you might actually do it since you take pride in being a depressed social outcast loser and I have compassion(since I'm normal).

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:05:02 2015 No.13071914 >>13071708 >what is against the rules. Which one? >>13071718 Yeah, that's show business.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:05:44 2015 No.13071917

>>13059829
Rule Violation, local rule #1:
All images and discussion should pertain to light and visual novels, figures and other otaku paraphernalia, Touhou Project, Vocaloid, doujin works and music, and diverse niche Japanese interests (kigurumi, idols, mahjong, tea).

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:06:38 2015 No.13071919

>>13071861
wow so much COMPASSION those POOR KIDS having pictures taken of them literally stealing their innocence straight through their pink stripy underwear
non-consensual (not that you care about that) upskirts aren't very nice but reporting them does not make you compassionate

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:08:57 2015 No.13071924 >>13071919 >literally stealing their innocence straight through their pink stripy underwear What an image.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:12:16 2015 No.13071941 Lol pedos irate with their mind-numbingly retarded rationalizations to try quelling their guilt

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:15:53 2015 No.13071951 >>13071941 /jp/ is the directionless pedophile board, you must have gotten lost somewhere on the way.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:16:11 2015 No.13071952

>>13071914
If there was a nipslip of a little girl would that fall under "yeah, that's showbusiness" and be allowed here?

No. Because age is a factor.

>>13071919
No, I'm compassionate because I'm a "normie". That post really got to you huh.

WEEABOO POWA!!!!! XD

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:17:32 2015 No.13071956 >>13071951 No. That's /b/ This is a board for discussions on Japanese related things.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:18:19 2015 No.13071958

>>13071952
>If there was a nipslip of a little girl would that fall under "yeah, that's showbusiness" and be allowed here?
It wouldn't be allowed because that would literally be illegal.

>WEEABOO POWA!!!!! XD
It's still shitposting even if you're being ironic.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:19:54 2015 No.13071965 >>13071956 Good job showing how new you are.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:20:04 2015 No.13071967 >>13071956 >No. That's /b/ "Directionless pedophiles" is a title moot himself bestowed on us in 2009. Please learn your history.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:27:34 2015 No.13071992 >>13071958 https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130419042140AAmeAGj Do some research. This is part of global rule 1.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:29:22 2015 No.13072002 >>13071967 Uhh, you can't be banned for being a pedo. You can be banned for posting that content. Which is why he gave you that name, not because he encourages it. and he's gone now

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:31:25 2015 No.13072010

>>13071992
None of the pictures you were posting violated US law. If you truly believe that what they are posting is child pornography, then you should be using tips.fbi.gov, not the report button.

>>13072002
>Which is why he gave you that name
I'm pretty fucking sure you were not around for that to pass judgment on it.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:32:14 2015 No.13072012 >>13072002 Let's not forget this place is MUUCH different and waaaay less lax than it was even a couple years ago. Especially back then.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:32:49 2015 No.13072014 >>13072010 >pictures you were posting pictures you were reporting*

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:35:19 2015 No.13072021

>>13072010
None of the pictures I was posting? You mean reporting? Hello, read the damn link. The pics aren't illegal but they are bannable. It's not like you only get banned for posting illegal content here.

And you really think moot encouraged that kind of shit?

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:38:18 2015 No.13072033

>>13072021
>The pics aren't illegal but they are bannable. It's not like you only get banned for posting illegal content here.
So again - which rule are these posts violating?

Just because you can be banned for it doesn't mean it's actually against the rules - you can be banned for anything. Not too long back /jp/ had a field day when a mod threadbanned everyone in a sticky because he got mad that /jp/ didn't like his thread.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:40:00 2015 No.13072042 >>13072021 >And you really think moot encouraged that kind of shit? moot has always had a soft spot for /jp/, even though we are and always have been a terrible board full of directionless pedophiles who don't even like him.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:40:06 2015 No.13072043 >>13072033 Read the goddamn link

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:41:03 2015 No.13072048 >>13072043 >Read the goddamn link Did the posts you were reporting violate US law?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:44:27 2015 No.13072062 >>13072048 >this dense

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:46:53 2015 No.13072068

>>13072062
Since you don't want to answer the question, I'll answer for you: no, they did not violate US law. Since Rule 1 says, "you will not upload, post, discuss, request, or link to anything that violates local or United States law," we can safely conclude that the pictures did not violate Rule 1, regardless of what some random Yahoo Answers jackoff claims some random mod did two years ago.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:52:09 2015 No.13072094 >>13072068 For the 3968483785 time, it does NOT have to be illegal to result in a ban. And your literal interpretations of the rules is too bad, since it has resulted in bans before.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:55:29 2015 No.13072107 >>13072068 Oh look. Another one. http://www.reddit.com/r/BannedFrom4chan/comments/2mnphw/supposedly_violated_global_rule_1_what_do/

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:55:58 2015 No.13072110

>>13072094
>For the 3968483785 time, it does NOT have to be illegal to result in a ban.
Fact 1: The posts are not illegal, thus they don't violate rule one.
Fact 2: The mods have banned you for submitting false reports, thus they agree that the posts don't violate rule one.

If the mods and the rules both agree that the posts are fine, then the problem is you, and waving around some decision from two years ago like it's a binding precedent (protip: it's not) doesn't change the fact that the mods are doing their jobs properly.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 18:57:47 2015 No.13072115

>>13072107
Just because mods in /r9k/ ban arbitrarily ban people for posts that don't break the rules doesn't mean we should have the same kind of arbitrary jackass moderation here in /jp/.

You are always free to leave for a board that better fits your moral standards, such as Reddit.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:00:08 2015 No.13072126 >>13072107 Really? You're linking reddit here?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:01:14 2015 No.13072127 >>13072126 The thing he linked to doesn't have anything to do with what he was talking about anyway - the OP of the Reddit thread didn't post any pictures of any kind.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:02:40 2015 No.13072129 >>13072115 The point is 2 different mods from different boards in different years used the same exact verbiage to (perma)ban someone under global rule 1. It is a part of the rule. I've seen snapshots of the ban window too.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:04:17 2015 No.13072134 >>13072127 >doesn't have anything to do with what he was talking about Man you guys try so hard. He got banned for exactly the same reason and wording the yahoo answers guy did. Denial is a strong thing.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:04:41 2015 No.13072136 >>13072129 >It is a part of the rule. It literally is not a part of the rules and a mod literally banned you for being wrong about this.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:06:45 2015 No.13072145

>>13072134
>However, it turns out I'm permanently b& for posting "sexualized pictures of children". My PC has a static IP which doesn't match the one in the ban notice
He received a ban intended for someone else. This has absolutely fuck-nothing to do with posting "sexualized images of children." Based on the reading of the OP, it's possible that he could have only ever uploaded pictures of toasters to 4chan, and still received the ban. They have absolutely fucking nothing to do with each other and at this point you're just shitposting outright (and probably ban evading, too).

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:07:30 2015 No.13072147 File: 64 KB, 774x600, 1867168748654563.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This thread is now touhou

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:07:58 2015 No.13072150

>>13072136
The thing is, I've presented two pieces of evidence while you have done nothing to disprove it. I got banned because I'm sure some mods here are of.....your....ilk.

But you ignore that a lot of those pictures were also deleted and got the users banned so by your logic it isn't allowed. But no, only when it supports your position.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:09:03 2015 No.13072154 >>13072107 >reddit You can go back there normie-kun.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:09:08 2015 No.13072155 File: 635 KB, 1024x768, 1281085334993.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:10:10 2015 No.13072159 File: 11 KB, 200x200, 1282093232790.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Everyone needs to chill out Take some drugs

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:10:21 2015 No.13072160 >>13072145 Are you that absolutely retarded? It doesn't matter who the ban was intended for. That doesn't have anything to do with the fact whoever the fuck was perma'd for.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:10:46 2015 No.13072162

>>13072150
>The thing is, I've presented two pieces of evidence while you have done nothing to disprove it.
I showed you rule one. I showed you how the posts did not violate rule one. Therefore, it is a fact that the posts in question did not violate rule one. This is an indisputable fact, regardless of what irregular, rules-controverting actions other mods may have taken in other boards.

>I got banned because I'm sure some mods here are of.....your....ilk.
Thank god /jp/ mods run /jp/ and not whatever jackoffs from /r9k/ or Reddit you think you should be running it.

>But no, only when it supports your position.
"The 4chan staff reserves the right to remove content for any reason without notice." It doesn't mean that what they deleted is against the rules or that the users were banned.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:11:30 2015 No.13072165 >>13072154 Google "global rule 1 4chan banned" and you will see my two results dumbass.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:12:02 2015 No.13072166 >>13072165 Please go back to wherever you came from and stop shitting up /jp/ with your imported culture.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:12:17 2015 No.13072167 File: 97 KB, 460x544, 1286295933890.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Just come to bed anon

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:13:20 2015 No.13072173 File: 321 KB, 1024x730, 1283736050596.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:14:35 2015 No.13072175 >>13072162 Yea, it's absolutely coincidence that 2 different mods from 2 different boards from 2 different years permabanned someone for the exact same reason with the exact same wording under rule 1. kek

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:14:39 2015 No.13072176 File: 329 KB, 720x480, 1283977909899.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:15:58 2015 No.13072178

>>13072175
>2 different mods from 2 different boards
Thank god /jp/ mods run /jp/ and not whatever jackoffs from /r9k/ or Reddit you think you should be running it.

>permabanned someone for the exact same reason with the exact same wording under rule 1.
It is a fact that the posts in question did not violate rule one. This is an indisputable fact, regardless of what irregular, rules-controverting actions other mods may have taken in other boards, or what ban templates they may be using.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:18:45 2015 No.13072189 File: 195 KB, 750x700, 1278548217722.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:19:47 2015 No.13072193 >>13061859 Onaho thread OP here, where else would you recommend that we discuss the Japanese male masturbators so ubiquitous in doujinshi? That's what I thought.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:20:01 2015 No.13072196 File: 35 KB, 395x293, This is bait.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Hey jeepe, pls don't be mean to anoncuck, he's just an innocent m8 who wants to fix the world, starting in the wrong place...

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:21:25 2015 No.13072203 >>13072193 What he probably means is that you shouldn't have an eternally recurring general thread for it.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:22:29 2015 No.13072209 File: 929 KB, 1300x1200, 1279112899329.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:23:40 2015 No.13072213 >>13072209 Keep up the good work.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:24:35 2015 No.13072223 File: 40 KB, 300x300, 1284410794300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13072213 I would love to but I actually have to sleep at some point.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:28:18 2015 No.13072238

>>13072203
I take it he does not grasp the concept of a containment thread, then. Without a general you will get endless redundant threads asking the same three questions about the same onaholes over and over again, which is why I had to generalize it.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:28:37 2015 No.13072240 File: 122 KB, 850x618, 1284588512952.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:29:31 2015 No.13072244 >>13072238 >I take it he does not grasp the concept of a containment thread, then. We got along just fine without such all-purpose containment threads for a long time.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:29:39 2015 No.13072245 File: 380 KB, 500x1786, 1278092304378.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:31:13 2015 No.13072251 File: 614 KB, 1440x900, 1278542612643.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I miss the GTA Touhou threads.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:32:18 2015 No.13072254 File: 1.61 MB, 2000x1500, 1278542970446.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:32:50 2015 No.13072256 File: 435 KB, 800x1132, 0561b27dc3f4aa2bc5b9d121aa5c386f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13072189 I want to pet the sparrow.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:33:06 2015 No.13072257

Hey look. Even more evidence. From 2012.

"You have been permanently banned from all boards for breaking Global Rule 1:

Posting child models or sexualized images of children.

Your ban was filed on December 14th, 2012. This ban will not expire.

According to our server, your IP is: The name you were posting with was Anonymous.

Please check back in 3 days when you may appeal your ban.

You have also been permanently banned from all boards for breaking Global Rule 1:

Posting child models or sexualized images of children.

Your ban was filed on December 14th, 2012. This ban will not expire.

The name you were posting with was Anonymous.

Please check back in 3 days when you may appeal your ban.

Is the Janitor even trying? Does the Mod even read? Is there a way to send a message to the admins or MOOT?

This is the new way that janitors and mods are using to deal with the users. Be careful /jp/ you could be next."

>>/jp/thread/10214222

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:33:37 2015 No.13072259 File: 970 KB, 740x1470, 1278551879946.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13072256 You better mean pet and not "pet" anon

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:35:48 2015 No.13072264 >>13072257 >>/jp/thread/10214222#p10214382_9 >>/jp/thread/10214222#p10214382_10 >>/jp/thread/S10200785#p10214654 As we can see from your very own link, rule one bans are apparently not indicative of anything.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:36:03 2015 No.13072267 File: 669 KB, 758x608, 1278598479490.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:38:01 2015 No.13072273 File: 89 KB, 467x370, 1280705617374.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This thread must be purified

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:39:53 2015 No.13072279 File: 182 KB, 453x672, 1281030429375.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >2009 Fuck me that didn't feel like that long ago

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:40:57 2015 No.13072283 File: 174 KB, 500x339, 1281174561821.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:42:03 2015 No.13072287 >>13072264 Lol at jumping through hurdles to cherry pick the smallest thing while ignoring the main point. It is established now that it is a permabannable offense. No denying it anymore.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:43:43 2015 No.13072293 File: 32 KB, 880x496, 1421705097422.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] And I'm off Never forget, loli Lu Bu's got a bigger dick than you.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:43:56 2015 No.13072295 >>13072287 >permabannable 1 day*

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:44:47 2015 No.13072301

>>13072287
Same thread:

>>/jp/thread/10209394#p10210368_1
>>/jp/thread/10209394#p10210415_1

>ignoring the main point.
The only main point here is that:

1. The posts do not violate rule one.
2. You were banned for false reporting people for rule one violations.
3. You're currently trying to give the mods shit for actually enforcing the rules, as opposed to arbitrarily shitting on them.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:50:01 2015 No.13072322

>>13072301
I'm trying to figure out how those posts prove anything. Stop ignoring the ban reasons already. You are so far in denial you have programmed yourself to automatically delete the reason all these people were banned from your memory because you don't want to believe it.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:50:25 2015 No.13072326 >>13072259 >You better mean pet and not "pet" anon I mean pet, as in fondly touch her head. Coincidentally, I'm night blind.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:54:00 2015 No.13072337

>>13072322
>I'm trying to figure out how those posts prove anything.
Posting images of children wearing less clothing than you would like is not against the rules.

>Stop ignoring the ban reasons already.
Such ban templates overreach the rules.

Fact: The posts do not violate rule one.
Fact: You were banned for false reporting people for rule one violations.
Fact: You're currently trying to give the mods shit for actually enforcing the rules, as opposed to arbitrarily shitting on them.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 19:58:01 2015 No.13072354

>>13072337
So you yourself say that some ban reasons are bullshit but the ones you agree with are not huh? It's not an overreach if multiple mods ban for that exact reason. Mods clearly have more reasons that they can ban for that isn't stated in the global rules. The global rules are a summarized version to make it easy to read so people don't ignore it.

Once again, you keep citing that I got banned for over reporting but another mod banned the user for the same reports so you can't use that excuse. Different mods, different discretion.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 20:02:26 2015 No.13072371

>>13072354
>So you yourself say that some ban reasons are bullshit but the ones you agree with are not huh?
If people got banned for things that were against the rules, that's legit. If people got banned for things that were not against the rules, that's not legit (unless the catch-all "we can ban you for anything" clause has been invoked.)

>Mods clearly have more reasons that they can ban for that isn't stated in the global rules.
Mods can be you for any reason they want, but that doesn't make those reasons part of the rules.

>another mod banned the user for the same reports so you can't use that excuse. Different mods, different discretion.
Are you sure the user was banned? At least one staff member here likes to preemptively head off anything that could become a shitstorm.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 20:11:15 2015 No.13072408

Came back and mentioned he got a day ban.

It is so obviously a part of rule 1. There are multiple pieces of evidence stating that specific reasoning. You're in denial at this point.

You don't give a shit about mods following rules though. You only wanna see that type of shit. Otherwise you'd advocate for all racism to be bannable and making this board completely SFW as the global rules state it has to be. You wouldn't want that though, right? You don't actually care about mods enforcing the rules to a T, right? Only the ones you like.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 20:16:01 2015 No.13072427

>>13072408
>It is so obviously a part of rule 1.
Can your read back rule one to me?

>You don't give a shit about mods following rules though.
I actually don't care. You seem like you care, though, so I'm just throwing it back into your teeth.

>You don't actually care about mods enforcing the rules to a T, right? Only the ones you like.
What I really want is for whiny shits who try to lawyer the mods to be taken out and shot. That's you.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 20:41:10 2015 No.13072515

>>13072427
Lel way to delegitimize your entire argument for the past few hours. None of what you said holds any weight anymore. You outed yourself as taking that position only because you enjoy that content regardless of the rules. I knew it all along though but it's better when they admit it themselves.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 20:50:51 2015 No.13072546

>>13072515
>You outed yourself as taking that position only because you enjoy that content regardless of the rules.
I really don't give a shit about the girls. The closest I ever came to really caring about Babymetal was downloading Megitsune when it came out.

>You outed yourself as taking that position only because you enjoy that content regardless of the rules.
It's literally not against the rules. We've been over this many times. You're trying to accuse the mods of "not following the rules" when what's actually happening is that the mods ARE following the rules, and you're mad about it because your delicate sensibilities have been offended.

>I knew it all along though but it's better when they admit it themselves.
You don't know shit about anything, least of all /jp/. All you are is the last in an extremely long list of retarded shits trying to game the mods running back years on end.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 20:54:59 2015 No.13072556 >>13072546 You're right. When they deleted upskirt shots of a 10 year old and banned the user, they were following the rules. Glad you agree with me.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 20:59:10 2015 No.13072572

>>13072556
>When they deleted upskirt shots of a 10 year old
They can delete anything they want via the bonus rule, so yes - they were working within their responsibilities. Now that we've established that, now we can also agree that you were justly banned for reporting shit for rule one that didn't violate rule one.

>and banned the user
Did they?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:03:40 2015 No.13072591 >>13072572 >>13061969 Not that it matters since you'll continue moving the goalposts.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:06:54 2015 No.13072610 >>13072591 I've asked him for the ban reason. Even if he weren't banned, it wouldn't change the fact that your ban was justified and that you're a whiny little for shit for crying when mods enforce the rules.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:08:16 2015 No.13072622 >>13072610 Even if he were banned*

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:14:06 2015 No.13072645 >>13062989 >people who can't greentext

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:20:18 2015 No.13072671

>>13072610
Pretending like you care aboit the rules again. It doesn't change the fact that his ban was justified either then. There is more than one mod here. One of them agrees with you, one of them agrees with me. Btw, he was banned for requesting pics from another poster by saying "post lewd Ayami".

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:25:09 2015 No.13072688

>>13072671
>Pretending like you care about the rules again.
The rules are simply tools for getting rid of shitty posters. Since you're a whiny little shit who doesn't know the first thing about /jp/, you look like a prime candidate to me.

If you're going to try and lawyer rules you should at least be right about what you're trying to lawyer. When you're wrong it's just fucking sad.

>Btw, he was banned for requesting pics from another poster by saying "post lewd Ayami".
Probably a rule three. Almost certainly not a rule one.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:27:13 2015 No.13072698

>>13072622
Lol I just realized I've been arguing with one of those babyshitters this entire time. When you posted in that thread the poster count stayed the same.

Lel no wonder. Pretending to act like some outside observer who cares about the integrity of the rules.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:28:55 2015 No.13072704 >>13072688 Hmmmmm and what rule was it that got the upskirt pics deleted?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:31:41 2015 No.13072719 When will you grow up from Touhou? It's like the most entry level thing ever.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:32:22 2015 No.13072721

>>13072698
>Pretending to act like some outside observer who cares about the integrity of the rules.
I've told you before - I don't really care about rules, but I do care about getting rid of shitty posters. I preferred 4chan when I had far less rules than it does now. I've been arguing with rules-lawyering shitters since the days of kuroko spammer and probably long before. Don't like it? Get the fuck out of /jp/.

>When you posted in that thread the poster count stayed the same.
You're either lying or wrong.

>>13072704
Probably three.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:36:31 2015 No.13072741 >>13059829 1. I can see it's a bit overrated OP but it's at least /jp/ related. 2. NEET is one of the things problem in Japan. What did you expect? 3. Then what is /jp/ meant for then?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:38:23 2015 No.13072751 >>13072721 >probably 3 Lel if you say so bud, but guess what? By saying that, then you yourself are saying those are against the rules regardless of which one it is breaking. Ya goof'd

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:38:25 2015 No.13072752 >>13072645 Who are you quoting?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:38:46 2015 No.13072757 >>13072741 >NEET is one of the things problem in Japan. >Then what is /jp/ meant for then? Otaku Culture, not Japan General.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:40:14 2015 No.13072761

>>13072751
>By saying that, then you yourself are saying those are against the rules regardless of which one it is breaking.
Rules three and six rely on staff judgment on whether something is trolling (posted intentionally to piss people off) or excessively low-quality (which is an arbitrary judgment). They're not blanket bans on an entire class of post.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:48:28 2015 No.13072793 >>13072761 So then you're saying those posts ARE bannable which has been my argument from the start. You agree with me more and more with every post. Can't wait for the next one.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 21:53:48 2015 No.13072820

>>13072793
>So then you're saying those posts ARE bannable
An upskirt by itself is not bannable. If he was spamming them or using them troll, then the POSTS would be - but if you're just reporting every post that shows more skin than you like you're abusing the report system and need to be banned off it.

Also, if you were handing out rule one (third option) reports, then it's pretty fucking obvious that you would be banned.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 22:00:52 2015 No.13072851 So... Can we have NEET threads yet?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 22:03:44 2015 No.13072864 >>13072820 I reported everything under rule violations, not illegal content. The user wasn't doing it to troll. People here say that's just how /jp/ is, so why would you jump to that conslusion?

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 22:05:12 2015 No.13072874

>>13072864
Then, tell me - what rule did they violate?

>why would you jump to that conslusion?
Because they were deleted despite not obviously violating any rules.

It's also possible that the janitor used his own rule six discretion on the posts because he personally didn't like them.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 22:12:21 2015 No.13072910

>>13072874
I've shown you multiple times the infractions mods ban people for. I'm done with this because you continue to ignore it. There is no point in continuing this if you blind yourself to the entire basis of my argument for which I presented proof and for which some mods find reasonable to ban for.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 22:19:23 2015 No.13072941

>>13072910
>I've shown you multiple times the infractions mods ban people for.
It's still not in the rules, and thus, not a rules violation.

>which some mods find reasonable to ban for.
They are not enforcing the rules as written, but their personal preference. Which they're technically permitted to do even if it overreaches or violates the rules.

On the other hand, YOU are not given free reign to treat everything you don't like as rules-breaking, and thus when you report it all, you are violating the rules. And when you cry about getting banned for it you're just being a fucking queen.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 22:25:43 2015 No.13072969 >>13072941 >still ignoring multiple people getting banned specifically for child models/sexualized images. I never considered reporting til I found that out, and sometimes they do get banned. This cycle is extremely tiring. Goodbye sperglord32.

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 22:30:38 2015 No.13072991

>>13072969
>I never considered reporting til I found that out, and sometimes they do get banned.
It's still not in the rules, and thus, not a rules violation.

>still ignoring multiple people getting banned specifically for child models/sexualized images.
They are not enforcing the rules as written, but their personal preference. Which they're technically permitted to do even if it overreaches or violates the rules.

On the other hand, YOU are not given free reign to treat everything you don't like as rules-breaking, and thus when you report it all, you are violating the rules. And when you cry about getting banned for it you're just being a fucking queen.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 22:43:20 2015 No.13073028 >>13072991 And where do you assume that all those different mods got the idea that that specific thing was bannable under rule 1? Huh?

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 22:55:43 2015 No.13073064

>>13073028
>And where do you assume that all those different mods got the idea that that specific thing was bannable under rule 1?
Probably because various mods agreed in the mod forum that they could ban people for it if they felt like it even if they weren't actually violating rule one.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 22:58:37 2015 No.13073073 >>13069415 >then this isn't the place for me Bingo!

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 18 23:02:28 2015 No.13073082 >>13073064 Sure sounds like a rule to me then

Anonymous Wed Feb 18 23:43:12 2015 No.13073221

From /gif/:

Anonymous## Mod07/01/14(Tue)09:23:31No.6356233▶

Do NOT post threads / images about "teens", "young girls", "jailbait", "questionable age", or anything that could be construed as advocating pornography involving minors.

This includes questionable content from Omegle, Chatroulette, Gifyo, etc. This rule also applies to /b/. Don't take it there, don't even recommend that people post that shit there. We don't want it anywhere on this site.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 02:34:21 2015 No.13073806 >>13059832 I don't get it, why is OP a bundle of sticks?

Anonymous Thu Feb 19 02:45:52 2015 No.13073865

>>13073221
that post is for porn involving pre-18 actors on a porn board, very different from non-suggestive pictures of pre-18 people wearing short shorts or a swimsuit.

do you think every image on the internet of minors not dressed to your conservative ideals is cp now?

do you feel like a creep when you accidentally see 13 year olds in the summer wearing short shorts or at the beach wearing swimsuits?

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 03:33:39 2015 No.13074040 The Babymetal thread is the most glorious pile of cancer, autism and pure concentrated shit you can get, it's like a big shitposter parade.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 03:44:33 2015 No.13074094 >>13059829 translate it, weebs

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 11:01:09 2015 No.13075221 1 touhou 2 idolmaster/other 3d idols 3 monstergirl And the first 2 are the main reason why /jp/ has become so stale. You have like 40 threads of nothing but the same 2hu/imas characters/memes.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 11:29:21 2015 No.13075311 hey I'm more fucked up than you irl so in /jp/ that makes me your god :)

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 12:00:44 2015 No.13075417 >>13075311 That's not how it works. I'm sure /b/ or /v/ would enjoy hearing about your issues though.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 12:47:38 2015 No.13075593 File: 14 KB, 209x242, 14861484564563.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 12:48:42 2015 No.13075599 File: 880 KB, 1550x1450, 1279645846181.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 12:51:17 2015 No.13075614 File: 1.44 MB, 1408x1028, 1279192048504.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 12:52:21 2015 No.13075620 File: 632 KB, 875x700, 1279200860505.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 12:53:25 2015 No.13075629 File: 1.00 MB, 1200x960, 1280956448016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 13:25:53 2015 No.13075743 File: 1.31 MB, 1920x1200, 1281023331045.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 13:31:51 2015 No.13075760 File: 202 KB, 1271x1000, 1281827469493.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 13:33:28 2015 No.13075766 Oh boy, pointless 2hu imagedumps. Clearly the quality improvement this thread needed.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 13:36:15 2015 No.13075784 File: 437 KB, 800x650, 1302913420784.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13075766 Yes.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 13:43:52 2015 No.13075814 File: 770 KB, 1280x1035, 1304709343406.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 14:17:45 2015 No.13075964 File: 483 KB, 1920x1080, 1302704320975.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 14:19:10 2015 No.13075973 >>13075766 >trying to make this thread "quality" /jp/ 2015 in da house xD

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 14:21:34 2015 No.13075986 2huniggers spamming threads out of desperation only goes to prove they're the sole problem in here. This board was originally created for you, but I'm afraid you've long worn out your welcome.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 14:24:29 2015 No.13076005 File: 353 KB, 992x851, 1307197139996.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13075986 There's only me nigger.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 14:31:15 2015 No.13076027 >>13075766 Still an improvement.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 14:32:40 2015 No.13076032 Did you actually bump this thread to post images? It was a few pages back during the "discussion".

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 14:38:09 2015 No.13076051 This thread is what happens when you don't take it easy. Remember to take it easy.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 15:23:21 2015 No.13076197 niggers

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 15:27:48 2015 No.13076212 File: 215 KB, 770x922, 1308242339559.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13076032 Every image has been saged, but the people complaining want to bump the thread.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 16:02:57 2015 No.13076322 >>13076051 It's impossible to take it easy when this board is such a pile of shit.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 16:05:52 2015 No.13076330 >>13076051 Le take it easy and ignore shitposting meme xD

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 19:36:39 2015 No.13077141 touhou is retarded just grow up

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 19:37:16 2015 No.13077147 >>13076212 >not saging every post

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 19:39:30 2015 No.13077163 >>13077147 The days of people arguing over whether a sage was something negative or just not wanting to bump threads were fun.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 20:17:35 2015 No.13077329 >>13073865 No it's not. Hence the "OR". It has to do with anything suggestive.

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 20:25:52 2015 No.13077371 >>13077329 >cross borders in charge of reading

>>	Anonymous Thu Feb 19 20:38:00 2015 No.13077434 >>13077371 >reading >borders

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 02:03:16 2015 No.13078826 >>13077371 Borders is closed.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 02:35:59 2015 No.13078962 i like this thread

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 03:22:02 2015 No.13079111 >>13078962 I like you ;)

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 03:40:50 2015 No.13079166 Dont mind me just saging to reach bumplimit earlier.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 03:55:56 2015 No.13079209 hm

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 04:13:05 2015 No.13079238 dflkj

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 09:17:54 2015 No.13079853 File: 15 KB, 250x250, 1423002196032.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] rude sage

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 19:35:58 2015 No.13081809 >>13079853 That sure is rude my man

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 19:43:51 2015 No.13081831 >>13077147 >>13077371 >>13077434 Who are you quoting?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 19:44:39 2015 No.13081835 >>13077329 >this cancer I'll make sure you get permabanned reporting cute loli pics

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 19:51:49 2015 No.13081854 Touhou is shit and entry level as fuck. Just grow up. Neet discussions are 100 % off topic Lately /jp/ is full of convience store, Japanese food etc. threads... Just stop. Just because it says Japan, it isn't related.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 19:52:54 2015 No.13081859 >>13081854 /jp/ should just be one untranslated VN thread

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 19:55:02 2015 No.13081864 File: 764 KB, 1920x1200, 1278360071696.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 20:08:11 2015 No.13081912 >>13076330 Get out.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 20:28:23 2015 No.13081979 >>13081835 >cute Funny interpretation of your sickness m8. You won't do shit.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 20:37:38 2015 No.13082003 File: 206 KB, 600x455, nishimaririn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 20 20:51:21 2015 No.13082041 File: 21 KB, 300x205, okinawa0819.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13082003

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 21 15:43:21 2015 No.13085597 lol this thread

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 21 15:55:20 2015 No.13085641 File: 711 KB, 1920x1200, shikieikiyabbadabbadu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>13081864 I made this for you.

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 21 15:56:00 2015 No.13085645 >>13081979 >m8 >>>/v/

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 21 17:15:42 2015 No.13085864 >>13085645 ^^^^#2 cancer #3 is japey detective bullshit calling samefag at everything

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 21 17:18:06 2015 No.13085868 >>13059829 suck my cock dude

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 22 16:46:45 2015 No.13090114 File: 99 KB, 733x550, steam cleaning.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] There's only one true cancer and you know it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 22 16:57:25 2015 No.13090151 >>13090114 kek

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 22 21:25:05 2015 No.13091540 >>13082003 give me download link

Anonymous Tue Feb 24 11:31:12 2015 No.13098000

top3 cancer of /jp/
1 Kancolle
2 Kancolle
3 Kancolle

Seriously, that shit infested both /jp/ and Danbooru. Just saying you don't like Kancolle will get you massively downvoted and insulted by admins in one, and massively insulted in the other.

Fuck Kancolle, and fuck all kancollefags.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 24 12:29:53 2015 No.13098103 >>13098000 Force us to /vg/ then.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 24 13:14:18 2015 No.13098196 what a great thread guys

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 24 13:15:49 2015 No.13098202 >>13098000 How can you be this butthurt, it's no different than how 2hu was before.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 24 13:29:41 2015 No.13098247 >>13098202 >>13098196 Thanks for not saging! Let's bully those nerds out of /jp/ lmao

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 24 13:37:04 2015 No.13098276 >>13098247 Yeah, think about all those quality threads that are going to be lost like "x 2hu a CUTE" or maybe even "Where can buy daki" "Why is Japan so wacky xD"

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 24 13:51:16 2015 No.13098335 >>13098247 i saged, retard

Reply to thread

Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture