Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 909 KB, 600x600, 1396654652805.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019321 No.12019321 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe]

Do that webm thing!

>> No.12019332

It only works in that thread.

>> No.12019333
File: 579 KB, 1980x1080, ranshake.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019333

>>12019332

>> No.12019336

sound when?

>> No.12019337

>>12019336
Not soon.

>> No.12019339

>>12019333
Is there any way to automatically loop these?

>> No.12019341

>>12019339
They are auto

>> No.12019342

>>12019339
They loop if you expand them on the page instead of opening in another tab.

>> No.12019343

>>12019333
Thanks, dev.

>> No.12019344

>>12019339
they loop for me in chrome with 4chan X installed

>> No.12019346

>>12019342
I don't like expand
They should make it loop in another tab too

>> No.12019347

>>12019339
enable the option to hover in the image in settings

>> No.12019348

>>12019346
Blame your browser.

>> No.12019349

>>12019342
Alright. I open things in tabs out of habit, but I guess that'll be how it is.

>> No.12019356

>>>/g/41178861
/g/ thread for reference

>> No.12019358

nice

>> No.12019359

>>12019348
They don't loop in another tab in Firefox. What are you using?

>> No.12019363

Still want moogs and strwaberry.

Guess i'll have to learn how to install gentoo now.

>> No.12019366
File: 281 KB, 566x800, alice.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019366

kinda mad now

>> No.12019370

>>12019359
I mean, it's probably not 4chan's fault if videos don't loop in new tabs.

>> No.12019374
File: 491 KB, 954x565, heh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019374

>>12019333
neat that it already works with 4chan X (that's a simple hover pictured, and starts playing without ugly controls)

>>12019336
probably never gets added, it's a source of problem for moot

without sound it's just a gif upgrade, so it's same as before -- people won't start uploading full shows in parts and stuff like that

>> No.12019378

>>12019370
I'm still curious what browser that guy's using that makes them loop.

>> No.12019380

Post a fave from /g/

>> No.12019382

my dik loves dis

>> No.12019383

>>12019378
not him, but with 4chan X and firefox 28.0 I see them when I mouse hover and they loop

>> No.12019386
File: 2.88 MB, 1920x1080, you will never a qt nip waifu.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019386

>>12019380
oops forgot my file

>> No.12019389

>>12019386
what the heck, I tried posting that same file but I got an error message

>> No.12019394

>>12019389
I don't know what to tell you bro.

>> No.12019395
File: 2.44 MB, 1280x720, 1396656319916.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019395

>>12019394
I forgot my file again!
I'm used to tabbing to choose file and since i disabled my extension it now tabs to submit.

>> No.12019399

>>12019383
..it also loads faster than gif, controls are hidden (intentionally) and the looping is completly seamless

I hope gif gets blocked

>> No.12019403 [DELETED] 
File: 271 KB, 460x436, yuyu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019403

can't wait for the cp

>> No.12019405

Blocked by noscript, never to be unblocked.

>> No.12019411

>>12019405
did you block gifs as well?

it's technically the same thing

are you hating the higher quality or something?

>> No.12019416

>>12019405
Why though?

>> No.12019420

What other boards does webm work on?

>> No.12019421

How do I post these? Can I post them on select threads or boards only?

>> No.12019425

>>12019420
because he has free will

>> No.12019427
File: 1.61 MB, 480x360, bitches_n_hoes.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019427

>>12019383
That works fine for me. I thought he said he had them looping in a new tab.

>> No.12019428 [DELETED] 
File: 2.90 MB, 1440x1080, test1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019428

>> No.12019429

>>12019420
only /g/ and /jp/ have webm enabled

>> No.12019431

>>12019429
what would happen to /gif/ and /wsg/? won't they become obsolete?

>> No.12019433

>>12019431
possibly
honestly webm is such an improvement over gif i don't think it matters

>> No.12019434
File: 2.93 MB, 640x360, oretst.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019434

>>12019431
maybe renamed

>> No.12019436

>>12019431
webm without sound is essentially the same thing, just in higher quality with lower filesizes

they'll just start posting webms on it as well

maybe boards will get renamed to a more generic name implying animations though

>> No.12019437

>>12019411
He must like the wiggling twitching dog flash advert on sites, on some kind of exclusive basis.

>> No.12019443

How can I make it expand the videos and play when I hover over them? I'm using 4chanX with Oniichan CSS.

>> No.12019448

>>12019436
I pretty much assume this.
Although /wbm/ and /wsw/ or something like that would probably be fine as well.

>> No.12019449

>>12019443
Who cares? I don't give a shit about your X chan stylesheet whatever. I mean I'm sorry, but I just plain don't care.

>> No.12019453

>>12019443
Update your crappy userscript.

>> No.12019455

>>12019443
It's fucking Oneechan dipshit.

And update your 4chanX

>> No.12019457

>>12019449
he asked for help, not your opinion or the state of your fucks

>> No.12019458

>>12019455
>using 4chanX

Why?

>> No.12019459 [SPOILER]  [DELETED] 
File: 2.81 MB, 1280x720, CHECK_EM.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019459

>> No.12019460

>>12019458
because kikes like woxxy brainwashed him to. I bet he uses foolz too.

>> No.12019464

>>12019458
Archive support, better filtering and the inline extension just sucks

>> No.12019465
File: 2.93 MB, 1280x720, kitkat_cap.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019465

>> No.12019466

Iceweasel is stuck like 10 versions behind of Firefox. I dont know how to switch.

>> No.12019467

>>12019460
>>12019458
I don't use 4chanX faggots don't start implying implications and jumping to conclusions but this faggot >>12019443 does.

>> No.12019468
File: 980 KB, 512x288, Momiji is a wolf.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019468

ok

>> No.12019470
File: 2.73 MB, 1280x720, alisu.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019470

>> No.12019473

ADD LEVELS RISING

>> No.12019474

>>12019467
Did you even read the post you're replying to?

>> No.12019476

>>12019470
Wow!

>> No.12019477

>>12019470

so worksafe i got promoted

we live in a glorious age

>> No.12019480 [DELETED] 

>>12019457
Yes well I just don't care. Is that okay with you? Buddy?

You both can go lie down on a rail together like in that "Insertion" movie or whatever it was called.

>> No.12019482

So plastic

>> No.12019488

>>12019466
personally just been building my own firefox on debian

>> No.12019489
File: 78 KB, 350x304, Shikieikiyuk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019489

>>12019470

>> No.12019490

4chan should be the new youtube

>> No.12019491

>>12019474
Yes.

>> No.12019492 [DELETED] 

>>12019480
I'll go lie down with your mom kid and do that "Insertion" thing, alright.

>> No.12019496

>>12019491
Yeah sorry, I'm fucking stupid.

>> No.12019498

>>12019474
Seems like you didn't bother to read the reply chain.

>> No.12019499 [DELETED] 
File: 19 KB, 400x500, high_five-2495.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019499

>>12019492
HOLY SHIT this nerd got owned

>> No.12019500
File: 385 KB, 512x288, output.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019500

>> No.12019501

Remember how .apng was the great .gif killer?

Good times.

>> No.12019504
File: 100 KB, 1280x720, mope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019504

>>12019470
>Google gave me nothing.

>> No.12019505

>>12019501
I dunno, this format is actually kind of picking up, though. Look at gfycat and the like.

>> No.12019507
File: 660 KB, 512x288, reimu_08.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019507

>>12019501
apng was never a thing. Only Firefox supported it.

>> No.12019509

>>12019501
it all starts by actually getting used

if everyone and their dog start uploading webms like it doesn't matter on image boards, others will copy

>> No.12019514

>>12019509
Are there any imageboards that support webm right now?

>> No.12019515

>>12019514
Yes.

4chan.org is one.

>> No.12019516
File: 14 KB, 220x220, 29119795_220x220.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019516

>>12019515

>> No.12019518

Oh hey, another encouragement to contentless image dumps! Moot sure does hate the current drop in quality across the chan and can't think of any solutions to improve the situation!

>> No.12019519

>>12019514
http://containerchan.org/tb/demo/
https://livechan.net/

>> No.12019520

>>12019518
>complaining about images on an imageboard

tip-top kek m80

inb4 who r u quoting

>> No.12019521

My computer can't even decode these, every single one of them lags hard.

>> No.12019525
File: 67 KB, 264x224, 1396659332927.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019525

>>12019509
webm is still too much a pain in the ass to make.

.gif has so much integrated support in everything at this point its not going to die any time soon.

Untill I can drag and drop individual frames into images editors with webm and not have to do any special fucking encoding, its not going to replace most simpler images.

Yeah sure its great to make things from youtube videos and shit, like all the porn clips you see in /gif/ or whatever.

But seriously for shit thats like 2-4 frames and per-pixel clarity. Why bother?

>> No.12019526

>>12019521
The server is suffering right now.

>> No.12019527

>>12019518
>>>/vip/
You're too good for our filthy imageboard

>> No.12019527,1 [INTERNAL] 

If gifs die because of this hipster piece of shit format, I'll have to take my shotgun off my closet and take a walk over sillicon valley.

>> No.12019529

>>12019521
I have 20 of them playing at once right now and cpu barely getting used (they also load pretty much instantly, faster than gif which tends to stutter)

>> No.12019530

>>12019525
So basically, use .gif for .gif's intended use, and use .webm for .webm's intended use?

>> No.12019533
File: 26 KB, 80x140, 1396659646377.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019533

>>12019530
Yeah basically, that's the right mindset people need.

>> No.12019534

Webm is getting shilled pretty hard. Does moot have anything to do with its inception? Is he going to add it to the list of accolades furnishing his twitter description?

>> No.12019535

>>12019534
>shill
>>>/pol/

>> No.12019538
File: 955 KB, 1280x720, test3.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019538

>> No.12019541
File: 1.06 MB, 720x1280, nep_05.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019541

>>12019525
No need to worry about the 3MB size limit.
No need to worry about the 256 gif color limiation.

>> No.12019542

>>12019535
Please become familiar with proper word definitions before browsing a board with little memetic linguistic mannerisms.

>> No.12019543

>moot kills sound images
>supports fucking webm
what the hell man

>> No.12019545

>>12019529
That is certainly not the case for me.

>> No.12019546

>>12019542
Please become familiar with staying in your containment board while we stay in ours.

>> No.12019547

>>12019543
sound images were a security issue, weren't they?

>> No.12019548

>>12019541
>No need to worry about the 3MB size limit

Brevity is the soul of wit.

>256 gif color limiation.

What the hell kind of software are you using to make gifs?

>> No.12019551

>>12019547
It required a 3rd party userscript, so it was all kind of shitty and circlejerky.

>> No.12019552
File: 1.18 MB, 720x1280, nep_03.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019552

>> No.12019553

GIFs the quality of some of these videos would be like 20 MB.

/jp/ really is full of luddites.

>> No.12019555

>>12019548
Can't have more than 256 colors per frame.

>> No.12019557

>>12019518
What point are you trying to make?

>> No.12019558

>>12019547
I mean I guess you could have hidden an exe in them if you wanted but you'd have to be a special kind of retard to go to the trouble of extracting an executable from a 4chan post.
I bet a bigger issue would be people hiding zips in them stuffed with CP.
Still, people loved sound images so fucking much, they should have come up with a legit workaround, even if it's just the ability to post oggs.

>> No.12019559

>>12019525
If you're not a content creator making your own animated images, which hardly anyone seems to be, GIF is so much more of a pain in the ass. You need to constantly balance dimensions, length, FPS and color pallet to get decent file-size and quality. People love putting videos into GIF format, so it's easier to convert a video to a video than a video to a format that works very differently.

>>12019548
"In practice, this technique for displaying full colour GIFs is rarely used due to its complexity and the existence of other file formats which can more easily display more than 256 colours."
GIFs are hardly ever more than 256 colors per frame.
About the filesize limit, yeah he was imprecise, but you get it.

>> No.12019560

>>12019525
All you have to do is take an .mp4 and:
ffmeg -i <source> -ss <start_time> -t <duration> -c:v libvpx -crf 32 -b:v 300k -an <output_name>.webm

Wow, so difficult.

>> No.12019561

>>12019541
nepu is 2cute

Time for me to start making nep anime webms

>> No.12019562

>>12019541
>>12019552

maybe one day I should play neptunia

>> No.12019568

>>12019559
Gifcam. Shut up.

>> No.12019569

>>12019529
Same. These are shockingly smooth. They take a second to buffer though.

>> No.12019570

>>12019548
Stop funposting.

If you can't clearly see with your goddamn eyes why webm is visually better than a gif then you're a freaking idiot.

Or are you one of the oldfag against new technologies or something?

>> No.12019571

>>12019560
Most people aren't on Loonix and need some garbage shareware GUI app to hold their hands through the process. This would be extremely intimidating to them.
Probably for the best though, otherwise you end up with tumblr syndrome, full of poorly looped 2 fps gifs made by dummies.

>> No.12019573 [DELETED] 

Holy FUCK the janishit just got owned so fuckin' hard, how is he expected to ban the hell out of everyone now? Is he going to have to open every single one of these to look for the goddess milk or references to Driving/cars/transportation. LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>> No.12019574

>>12019568
Have fun optimizing all those parameters and still having it look awful, retard
Either way you still had to download an external program

>> No.12019577

>>12019546
Why did moot give you a fun new toy that other boards want to play with if it's a containment board?

>> No.12019578

>>12019571
No, all you need is one of the Windows builds and the ability to operate a batch script, which any retard can do.

>> No.12019580

>>12019570
Why are you being so defensive about your new toy? Your shitposting paranoia means you have a bright future ahead of you in 4chan staff, though.

>> No.12019584 [DELETED] 

>>12019573
How is it different from gifs?

>> No.12019585

>>12019574
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. People will use webm if they see a need for it. If you have to push it this hard, it means the product isn't good enough on its own.

>> No.12019586

>>12019578
You would be surprised.

>> No.12019586,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>12019584
Longer and I already own the janitor with .gifs that he never notices.

>> No.12019589

>>12019586
The only people who can't navigate the internet these days are old people. Your average tumblr retard is probably tech-savvy enough to do it.

>> No.12019590 [DELETED] 

>>12019584
Since webm is so well compressed, it's a lot easier to hide shitposting references in it without disguising a 500kb jpeg image as a 2mb gif.

>> No.12019594

>>12019585
Yes, they will use it if they see a need for it. What's your point besides some weak fallacy?

>> No.12019595

>>12019580
>Your new toy
Sure, I'll admit it. Maybe it's just the refreshing feeling.

Still, you can't deny that webm has overall far better qualities than a gif. I mean, seriously, just take a look at all the files posted in here. Not to mention that you're actually able to play/replay/pause, which is also nice.

>> No.12019596 [DELETED] 

>>12019590
Pretty sure file size wasn't the thing stopping anyone from shitposting.

>> No.12019597

iOS doesn't support VP8.

>> No.12019599

>>12019507
opera supported it once

>> No.12019600 [DELETED] 

>>12019596
Uhh...

>> No.12019602

>>12019571
You don't need Linux. Just download a Windows build of ffmpeg. It's right there on their website.

>> No.12019604

>>12019594
Why are you distorting my words in search of fallacies you learned in high-school philosophy when I only replied to your thinly veiled personal attacks? Are you really that desperate to look intellectually superior?

>> No.12019607

>>12019571
Get a windows build of ffmpeg from https://ffmpeg.org/download.html

then:
>general conversion
>ffmpeg -i [input video] -ss [start time] -t [length] -c:v libvpx -an [output video].webm

>gif conversion
>ffmpeg -i your_weeaboo_gif.gif -c:v libvpx -an [output video].webm

start time and length may be either in seconds or in hh:mm:ss[.xxx] form

You can get the time using your video player. In MPC-HC, Ctrl+G gives the current timestamp.

>> No.12019608
File: 2.86 MB, 1300x731, inb4 someone asks for sauce.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019608

So is anyone making OC are are we just repostan from /g/?

>> No.12019610

>>12019604
I guess you're not going to make a point, then, eh? Cool, dude

>> No.12019611

>>12019608
I would, but the only thing I can think of is too lewd

>> No.12019612

>>12019595
/jp/ isn't an image-hosting board. This is much better suited for /gif/. Discussing its merits has nothing to do with what this board is about.

>> No.12019613

>>12019610
His point was that GIF isn't a shitty as you think it is and your response was to accuse him of funposting and then start funposting yourself.

>> No.12019614
File: 481 KB, 1000x1000, 1333323973151.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019614

>>12019612
>/jp/ isn't an image-hosting board

Dude what

>> No.12019616
File: 2.82 MB, 1920x1080, oh my fucking god.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019616

>>12019608
Reposting from /g/ is good enough for me

>>12019611
you should do that

>> No.12019617

>>12019610
Your point is that everyone is a retard for not knowing how to work webm. My point is that gif is a lot simpler, intuitive to use and you're coming up with late night infomercial-tier ``problems'' as to why gif creation is so much more complicated than webm creation.

>> No.12019618

>>12019613
I don't remember accusing anyone of funposting

>> No.12019620

so are gifs pretty much worthless now?

>> No.12019622

>>12019614
Image-hosting is pretty much what these threads are about and imagedumps is a /jp/ problem moot himself has acknowledged.

>> No.12019625

>>12019620
yes

except for fags browsing from phones or computer from 2000s

>> No.12019626

Thank you based mootles

>> No.12019627

>>12019620
Depends.
Do you only use gifs to jerk off to 6 second clips from /gif/? Then yes. Otherwise >>12019525

>> No.12019628

>>12019620
When webm because babby mode in a month or two for normies to make then yes.

>> No.12019631

>>12019622
There aren't really that many animated things that people dump in most imagedump threads, they're just single pictures.

Probably the most use anyone in /jp/ will get out of this is posting MMD videos.

>> No.12019634
File: 5 KB, 251x167, 1332313505313.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019634

>>12019622
Are you autistic? That's what I just fugging said.

>> No.12019635

>>12019608
Right when I thought that /jp/ couldn't get any lewder.

Having webm here might be a dangerous thing after all.

>> No.12019638

>>12019631
Why would you post mmd videos when you can go to nicodouga and have a better overall experience?

Unless you're deaf and don't know japanese, of course.

>> No.12019641

>>12019589
Bash is way easier than batch.

>> No.12019642

>>12019638
I don't mean entire MMD videos, I mean short clips for animations that you want to show off (in the 3DCG thread or something).

>> No.12019643

>>12019507
I don't remember any 2hu anime which had this scene or art style.

>> No.12019644

>>12019634
No, you quoted me and posted a memeface.

>> No.12019646

>>12019617
No, just retarded for your "Shut up. Gifcam."
GIF is currently more simple and intuitive because you're used to it and it's universal. It won't die out any time soon, but eventually we will look back at it like floppy disks. That's it, I'm not saying we should get rid of gif and learn to use webm, gif has a comfortable place on the internet.

>> No.12019648

>>12019638
it's nice when you want to show your own vids and don't care to upload them on another site, have them process it, and shit

>> No.12019651

>>12019644
What the hell are you even talking about, holy god damn piss you must actually be retarded.

>> No.12019652

>>12019641
You double-click the batch file and you get to the command line prompt. Wow, so hard.

Even if that's true, Linux is harder than Windows so it's not like it counts for much.

>> No.12019653

How old is webm? Also how long until moot beats youtube?

>> No.12019655

>>12019653
Right after canvas becomes popular.

>> No.12019656

>>12019646
It doesn't take "getting used to" to run gifcam.

>> No.12019658
File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, kissu.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019658

>> No.12019658,1 [INTERNAL] 

This thread feels like an ad.

>> No.12019659

>>12019656
When the internet gets used to webm there will be a program that makes webms just as easy.

>> No.12019660
File: 798 KB, 640x720, kojiharu.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019660

>>12019608
giving this a shot

>> No.12019663
File: 2.56 MB, 1440x2000, 東方緊縛録 弐.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019663

A new era of 2hu image dumps.

>> No.12019664 [SPOILER] 
File: 2.06 MB, 1920x1080, and some people will tell this show doesn't have any fucking yuri.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019664

>>12019658
spoiler that shit before you kill someone

>> No.12019667 [DELETED] 

What fuck, post your waboo crap elsewhere.

>> No.12019668

>>12019663
This is the kind of shit that a GIF actually would be better for.

>> No.12019669

>>12019658
>>12019660
>>12019664
>>12019616
The future is now isn't it?

>> No.12019670

>>12019663
far too lewd

>> No.12019671 [DELETED] 

>>12019669
WOW YOU CAN POST VIDEO ON 4CHAN

SUCH FUTURE

>> No.12019672

>>12019668
Are you actually retarded?

>> No.12019673

>>12019668
how so? the images would look like shit then

>> No.12019674
File: 1.76 MB, 1920x1080, da_joos.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019674

>>12019663
Call me a retard but how do you get the images back out? Is it encoded at 1 fps or something?

>> No.12019675

>>12019668
Can't put 129MB of illustrations in a gif with such quality, Anon.

>> No.12019677 [DELETED] 

>>12019671
Don't be an idiot.

>> No.12019678

>>12019673
I'm pretty sure I'm getting some artifacting, unless that's something Chrome is introducing.

>> No.12019679

>>12019656
Gifcam can just as easily encode the frames it lets you edit into a webm video. Behind the scenes, it doesn't use the GIF format until saving the image (not to teach you what you already know) but considering the amount of software out there, programs surely exist with gifcam-like functionality. If such software doesn't exist, it will..

"Getting used to" in the context of learning what the software generates the file, yes.

>> No.12019682 [DELETED] 

>>12019677
You got the wrong person, you probably intended to reply to >>12019669. I forgive you, though.

>> No.12019683

>>12019678
not saying it's the best thing there is

but compared to gif it's miles better

multiple completly different images in a gif does results even worse than an animation

>> No.12019684

>>12019674
You don't. The image quality is already degraded. WebM is not a good format for sharing images.

>> No.12019686

Why are there people seriously defending GIF?

It's been around forever, it's had a good run. Now there is something better,

>> No.12019691 [DELETED] 

>>12019682
Stop bullying.

>> No.12019693 [DELETED] 

>>12019691
You got the wrong person, you probably intended to reply to >>12019677. I forgive you, though.

>> No.12019694 [DELETED] 

>>12019693
Telling someone to not be an idiot isn't bullying, it's helpful advice.

>> No.12019697 [DELETED] 

>>12019694
The bullying ends here guy stop please.

>> No.12019698

>>12019686
I've wanted gif gone for almost 2 decades

there's been multiple different formats over the years that were all better.. but because only a handful of browsers had support.. no one used

even webm or h264 aren't universal, but at some point need to try pushing something or we'll still be using gif for another decade

terrible compression, terrible palette, forced to use ultra tiny res and horrible fps for size-purpose, and this is supposed to be 2014

>> No.12019699

>>12019683
I thought GIF was actually okay for a block of stills. Ignoring the file size thing, of course.

>> No.12019701

>>12019638
>nicodouga
I don't have an account and never wanted to make one.

>> No.12019702

>>12019699
but you'll always have fucked up colors

>> No.12019703
File: 22 KB, 215x224, 1280843458809.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019703

>>12019686
Please tell me how webm intends to preserve per-pixel quality for images like this?

>> No.12019704

>>12019699
It's "okay," but it reduces everything to 256 colors while most high-quality images have thousands.

>> No.12019705
File: 1.99 MB, 1280x720, test.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019705

First thing i managed to actually make.
Still messing around with it.

>> No.12019706
File: 4 KB, 64x72, 1279380195398.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019706

>>12019703
"ANTIALIASING IS THE FUUTUUUREEEEE"

>> No.12019708

>>12019705
hope you'll never make more stuff

>> No.12019710

>>12019703
Lossless encoding. Pixel art's a unique style that I like, but it only arose out of our limitations.

>> No.12019711

Converting file formats barely counts as making something.

>> No.12019712

>>12019698
I think webm has a lot of potential, and as soon as they make it easy for the normalfags to abuse it'll be golden for the next 10 years.

>>12019703
I don't know. I'm not Stallman.

>> No.12019714
File: 2.83 MB, 540x360, pettan2.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019714

Pointless without audio, but whatever.

>> No.12019715

>>12019703
Short answer, it won't. GIF will continue to be the format of choice for images like that, until possibly a true lossless animated image format (like APNG) is widely supported.

>>12019710
>Lossless encoding
Which WebM doesn't have.

>> No.12019716

>>12019538
I don't know why, but watching this made me realize that I really want to be kicked by a girl, but only if it looks like she knows how to actually kick, which that girl definitely does. This is really hot.

>> No.12019718

>>12019686
I can decode gif, but it seems these webm videos are all too demanding for my hardware.

>> No.12019719
File: 2.91 MB, 848x480, kissx1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019719

>> No.12019720
File: 2.79 MB, 1920x1040, pls no bully anon ;_;.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019720

>>12019708

>> No.12019722

>>12019715
It does http://googlecode.blogspot.ca/2011/11/lossless-and-transparency-encoding-in.html

I converted your gif to webm online (but it wont post on here), doesn't look bad, even with lossy.

>> No.12019724

>>12019718
when I open a webm I see cpu usage for 8 different threads go up by 1-5% on my i7

feels pretty comfy to play

flash videos on the other hand often 100% only 1 thread

>> No.12019725
File: 582 KB, 444x333, 2hurape.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019725

>> No.12019728

>>12019722
It wasn't my GIF.

Let's see a lossless encoded pixel art GIF, then.

>> No.12019730

>>12019719
ok is this worth picking up or is this just cherry picked?

>> No.12019732
File: 483 KB, 320x180, 1367284892381.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019732

Sticking with .gif until there's archive support.

>> No.12019734

>>12019732
Both archives already support it.
It was supported instantly.

>> No.12019736
File: 2.94 MB, 848x480, kissx2.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019736

>> No.12019737

>>12019732
Please explain.

>> No.12019740
File: 2.80 MB, 1024x576, k-on with loop fuwa fuwa.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019740

>> No.12019742

>>12019732
it's because of people like you that there's been no progress

like people sticking with gif until every single browser supports completly superior format #8743

then because no one is using it, the demand is low and the support is never added

then we go sereval years again using a format with trash compression and 256 colors

>> No.12019743

>>12019734

I only get the 404 result from foolz. Must be doing something wrong.

>> No.12019744

>>12019724
When I open this one here >>12019720 cpu usage instantly caps out at 100% on my p4. The video fails to render at full speed and resorts to frame skipping to keep up. I'd say over 80% of the frames are being dropped.

>> No.12019745

>>12019732
Good news! There is archive support, now say goodbye to gif!

>> No.12019748

>>12019742
>256 colors
You keep repeating this nonsense, what fucking ancient program are you using to make gifs?

>> No.12019749

>>12019728
Do you have a reason to not believe in lossless webm..? It says right there that the format supports lossless, even beating PNG compression-wise. This was in 2011. Even without lossless, you can just crank the bitrate until it's pseudo-lossless. I can't be arsed converting something with the lossless parameter, I haven't familiarized yet.

>> No.12019751

>>12019744
play smoothly for me still with over 700% cpu ressources free (total 800% because 8 threads)

I didn't think p4 still existed

>> No.12019752

>>12019744
What kind of toaster are you running?

>> No.12019753

>>12019748
It's 256 colors per frame you damn nerdologue.

>> No.12019758

>>12019730
You're gonna be pissed after you watch it

>> No.12019759

>>12019753
>he doesn't know gif can do truecolor block-wise

>> No.12019762
File: 2.93 MB, 848x480, kissx3.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019762

>> No.12019764

>>12019758
Let me guess it goes nowhere or he doesn't pick a sister?

>> No.12019765

You guys are arguing with a guy using Touhou meme gifs as his argument. It's obvious that he's hopelessly autistic and a lost cause.

>> No.12019766

>>12019764
like 99.995% of animes out there

>> No.12019767

>>12019764
No there's actually piss in it, like pissing

>> No.12019768

>>12019765
Touhou Project is just one big meme.

>> No.12019769

>>12019762
I guess licking a girl's navel really is lewd.

>> No.12019770

>>12019759
It's still 256 colors per frame. Relying on frame stacking is a waste.

>> No.12019771 [DELETED] 

>>12019748
Teeeeccchhhnically frames are still 256 colors, you just have multiple 256 color frames tied into one, resulting in 257+ colors

Gifcam: http://blog.bahraniapps.com/?page_id=21#comment-314
Apparently gifs end up looking bad regardless

>> No.12019775
File: 139 KB, 512x384, 2hus.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019775

I don't know if this will loop correct

>> No.12019776

>>12019748
Teeeeccchhhnically frames are still 256 colors, you just have multiple 256 color frames tied into one, resulting in 257+ colors

>> No.12019778

>>12019775
it did not, oops

>> No.12019780
File: 1.08 MB, 240x160, lesbians.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019780

nsfw

>> No.12019781

>>12019778
But it does.
looping is dependent on the browser not the file.

>> No.12019783
File: 2.26 MB, 478x391, educational programming.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019783

>>12019780

>> No.12019784

>>12019775
it doesnt looping dude

>> No.12019785

>>12019780
>>12019783
At this point posting the actual gif over Cheetus would be more of a disappointment

>> No.12019786

>>12019775
It loops fine.

>> No.12019787

>>12019740
thak you friend i am glad konfriends are posting pictures to

>> No.12019788

>>12019781
HTML5 video tags have an option loop parameter which browsers should be supporting and 4chanX should be implementing.

>> No.12019789
File: 2.89 MB, 1920x856, inb4 gb2 frz.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019789

I don't care if you hate frz or what but this is purely for quality.

>> No.12019792

>>12019789
What the fuck, why are their eyes so big?

>> No.12019794

>>12019792
cuz disney

>> No.12019796
File: 2.17 MB, 640x360, test2.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019796

>> No.12019798
File: 203 KB, 648x564, 2hus-looping.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019798

>>12019784
Works for me

>> No.12019799

>>12019789
Do the hair+dress transformation in Let it Go next

>> No.12019800

>>12019798
who come it not workin for me what the hell...........

>> No.12019802

>>12019788
4chan x is already using it

>> No.12019807
File: 316 KB, 1280x720, 1396663369160.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019807

>> No.12019810
File: 2.67 MB, 1280x720, HS.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019810

Is this good?

>> No.12019811

>>12019810
Not 2hu

>> No.12019814

>>12019810
cute

>> No.12019816

>>12019807
>>12019810
I didn't realize that so much people had such kind of animes in their HDD. I mean, wtf? Thought you guys were just being ironical with that or something.

>> No.12019817

technology newfag here, what program do I use to encode this and what do I use to make the images play when I hover over it?

>> No.12019821

>>12019817
ffmpeg. You need to know how to use a CLI

>> No.12019822

>>12019816
what dso you expexct haha.

>> No.12019823

>>12019817
ffmpeg

>> No.12019824
File: 128 KB, 1446x1165, 1396663062565.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019824

>>12019817

>> No.12019827
File: 5 KB, 225x225, s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019827

>>12019817
Use ffmpeg to convert files to .webm with the following command in the command line:

ffmpeg -i input.avs -ss [start time] -t [length] -c:v libvpx -crf 16 -b:v 1500K -an output.webm

If you want shit to run on hover get 4chan x.

>> No.12019829

>>12019824
This is so much easier than making gifs

>> No.12019829,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>12019527,1
WebM is better than GIF.

>> No.12019833

>>12019829
As soon as I hit submit i realized that things purely in text are something misunderstood.

I wasn't being sarcastic and I really mean that these are really simple to make once you get the hang of it

>> No.12019835
File: 11 KB, 607x179, save.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019835

>>12019827
>>12019824
>>12019823
>>12019821

What now?
Whenever I open the .exe it automatically closes.

>> No.12019839

>>12019835
ffmpeg -i YOU_INPPUT_FILE.avi -c:v libvpx -crf 16 -b:v 500K -an output.webm

Or something. There's no graphical interface, yo.

>> No.12019840
File: 193 KB, 1280x720, fuck.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019840

>> No.12019842

>>12019829
Come on now, you're making a goddamn video, you can learn at least that much ffs. Don't be a lazy.

>> No.12019843
File: 2.86 MB, 1920x1080, wow.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019843

>> No.12019844
File: 2.91 MB, 1280x720, HS2.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019844

>> No.12019847

>>12019835
double click that .bat file then enter the command in the terminal window that pops up. How can the internet be this old and still have people on it who've never used the command line?

>> No.12019850
File: 145 KB, 640x360, 1395787096544.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019850

>>12019842
anon are you toying with me
see >>12019833

>> No.12019852

Can you start and end on specific frames in ffmpeg?
Don't want to spend more time to crop out extra frames.

>> No.12019854

>>12019852
You need a timestamp I think, see >>12019607

>> No.12019855

>>12019816
The fact that you recognize them means you have no room to talk.

>> No.12019857

>>12019844
That is mean.

>> No.12019860

>>12019395
Right click
Video speed
Slow Mo
enjoy

>> No.12019863
File: 2.59 MB, 853x480, best-thighs.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019863

>> No.12019866

>>12019863
What the fug is this garbage

>> No.12019867

sigh, guess I'll go compile myself a new ffmpeg

just realized I didn't put it in libvpx support because I didn't care about webm

>> No.12019868

>>12019863
Source, please?

>> No.12019871

>>12019868
Not him, but it's Magi: Labyrinth of Magic.

>> No.12019872

>>12019762
Do I want to watch the ova or the anime of this and in what order thank you pls

>> No.12019873
File: 2.51 MB, 854x480, RemiliaSchrodingersKitten.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019873

>> No.12019875

>>12019736
>lick girls armpit
>get a mouth full of deodorant
gross

>> No.12019876

>>12019872
OVA first

>> No.12019877
File: 78 KB, 780x720, impicationarrow11 years old.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019877

>> No.12019878

>>12019868
>[gg]_Magi_-_03v2_[5B00728E]

Why are you plebs using ffmpeg for encoding? You should only use it to pipe a yuv4mpegpipe to vpxenc.

>> No.12019879
File: 13 KB, 327x367, 1392772210001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019879

that feel when I can't figure out how to copy and paste into command prompt

I feel stupid

>> No.12019880
File: 652 KB, 1280x720, test.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019880

That was fun. It seems to ignore my bitrate options though, but I'm using the Linux version so maybe the options are a little different.

>> No.12019881

>>12019879
Just type it you double nigger

>> No.12019883

>>12019879
You are stupid.

>> No.12019884

>>12019875
Nips don't wear deodorant

>> No.12019886

>>12019879
I know the feeling dude i know that ^V

>> No.12019887

Haha, this is fucking EPIC.

>> No.12019888

>>12019880
What settings were you using? You can set the bit rate with -b:v, for example -b:v 1M or 500k

>> No.12019891

>>12019879
All of your questions could have been solved by >>12019824 and google. It's really the second part that gets me though. The very first thing I do when I can;t figure something out is google it and 99% of the time I get an answer. You have a whole internet's worth of information and the tools to access it. Don't come to us with silly questions.

>> No.12019892

So the real question is : CamStudio or Fraps?

>> No.12019893

>>12019887
Just woke up?

>> No.12019895
File: 116 KB, 600x535, 1392049652001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019895

>>12019881

How do I type in this : " \ "

>>12019891

Is this correct?

ffmpeg -i C:\Users\FAGGOT\Downloads\ffmpeg-20140405-git-ec8789a-win32-static\Rick Astley - Never Gonna Give You Up.mp4 -c:v libvpx -crf 16 -b:v 500K -an output.webm

>> No.12019896
File: 248 KB, 423x590, 1343697132889.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019896

>>12019895
Nice image dude

>> No.12019897

>>12019895
Install Gentoo and compile ffmpeg

>> No.12019900

>>12019895
try it and find out you insufferable idiot. 2 hours ago I had zero knowledge of ffmpeg's existence and I've made a few of these already. If I can go from zero to functioning video then you can too.

>> No.12019902

>>12019895
Go ask there dude:
>>>/g/41184007

>> No.12019904

>>12019895
I think you need to put the file path into quotation marks because it has spaces in it, not sure though because I don't use Windows

>> No.12019905
File: 2.98 MB, 350x366, 1396406251777.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019905

>>12019895
I'm in tears

>> No.12019910

I'm glad ffmpeg doesn't have a GUI so I don't have to see the product of losers like this guy >>12019895

>> No.12019911
File: 59 KB, 500x394, me right now.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019911

>>12019896

>>12019897

>>12019900

>>12019902

>>12019904

>>12019905

>>12019910

/g/ won't help

>> No.12019913

Does this mean I'll finally have to get a new computer?
Then again, they do work properly on my media player, so I can just save everything.

>> No.12019914

>>12019911
You'll have to wait for a better tutorial or figure it out yourself dude. 4chan isn't exactly the place to ask for advices in the first place.

>> No.12019917

>>12019913
It means you need to install the latest stable release of Firefox

>> No.12019919

>>12019884
Please tell me this is a lie.

>> No.12019920
File: 577 KB, 1280x720, test.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019920

>>12019888
I installed it using apt-get so I'm probably using some old outdated version. -b:v wasn't doing anything no matter what number I put in. I just checked the man file and played around some more. This seemed to work better
>-b 2500K -minrate 2500K -maxrate 2500K -bufsize 1835K

>> No.12019922
File: 724 KB, 533x300, test.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019922

>> No.12019923

>>12019919
The smell of deodorants and perfumes in trains are obnoxious so no one uses them.

>> No.12019929

>>12019923
More obnoxious than the BO of dozens of people who are all tightly crowded into the car? Yeah, no.

>> No.12019931

>>12019929
Everyone eats the same food and smells the same so they don't smell it.

>> No.12019932

>>12019929
What's wrong with natural human scent?

>> No.12019934

>>12019917
No, they do work on Firefox, but they're way too slow and use way too much CPU on my cute toaster.
I don't mind this change, though.

>> No.12019936
File: 2.79 MB, 800x450, kitkat_cap2.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019936

>> No.12019940

>>12019934
I wonder if these will even load on a mobile device. I'm too lazy to check.

>> No.12019942

>>12019940
People are saying yes

>> No.12019945

>>12019940
depends on which

some just don't like webm and only swear by h264

>> No.12019946

>>12019936
Alright I'll bite. What game is that?

>> No.12019948

>>12019946
スプラッシュガールズ!

>> No.12019952
File: 2.99 MB, 576x320, Kachidoki.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019952

This counts as /jp/ right?

>> No.12019953

>>12019948
I don't know why I didn't guess that. Thanks bro.

>> No.12019954
File: 2.72 MB, 1280x800, cm3d_01.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019954

The good old days of clipping skirts.

>> No.12019955

>>12019952
Don't worry, plenty of off-topic has been posted, we're going easy on people becuase this is one of two boards on all of 4chan that can even do this.

>> No.12019957

>>12019955
Who's "we?"

If you're a dev just use your damn capcode, if you're a janitor you should probably delete that post.

>> No.12019958

>>12019942
>>12019945
Yeah, I just checked on Chrome and it just allows you to open the file in MX Player. Works fine too.

>> No.12019959

>>12019954
I really don't want to sexualize the garupans but can you pls do Hana?

>> No.12019960

>>12019959
I only have the one in the video. I don't even know her name.

>> No.12019961

>>12019957
Stop with the paranoia, it's annoying.

>> No.12019965

>>12019957
Janitor is asleep that's why animu stuff is still there.

>> No.12019967

>>12019961
>paranoia
What? Who other than 4chan staff would be in a position to say "we're going easy on people?"

And I'm hardly witch hunting. I'm just conversing.

>> No.12019968

>>12019948
I was more like expecting a link but thanks

>>12019952
Yes. YES.

>>12019940
Someone on /g/ already posted a webm of him playing a webm on his mobile.

>> No.12019971
File: 57 KB, 300x375, 1383442740175.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019971

>>12019960
>Sexualizing a pure maiden and you don't even know her name

It's Miho.

>> No.12019972

>>12019968
>fucking mobile game again
Nevermind. Sorry for asking.

>> No.12019975
File: 2.77 MB, 1280x720, test.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019975

Just testing my freshly compiled ffmpeg straight out of git

not that it's special or anything

>> No.12019976
File: 396 KB, 238x320, nep_gif01.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019976

>>12019972

>> No.12019977

>>12019975
But that clipping though.

>> No.12019979

>>12019975
http://i.4cdn.org/g/src/1396667948002.webm
Great minds, anon.

>> No.12019981

>>12019977
it's ok, she removes the dress not long after and it stops clipping

>> No.12019982
File: 2.89 MB, 640x352, Peach V Orange.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019982

>>12019955
Well Kamen Rider IS a big part of Japanese culture.

>> No.12019984

>>12019976
Thanks for making these NepuAnon. They're so cute.

>> No.12019986

>>12019923
Holy fuck this is the most degenerate post I have ever seen, that is fucking disgusting. God damn pigs, no wonder they all smell like shit

>> No.12019989
File: 803 KB, 1200x720, 1394908560418.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019989

>>12019976
I wonder if there is a way to rip the models out of mobile games? I would surely have fun making games with that.

>> No.12019991
File: 2.78 MB, 215x345, 1383093064351.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019991

>>12019984
nepu is nice and all, but I could use some high res noire to replace my old gifs

>> No.12019994
File: 493 KB, 292x402, nepnep.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12019994

>>12019991
Get that slut out of here.

No just kidding, Nowa a cute.

Here have this as a present from /g/

>> No.12019997

>>12019994
I don't like your present

I liked it a lot better in >>12019541

>> No.12020003
File: 1.58 MB, 480x360, lolicatgirls.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020003

>>12019997
I'm still making webms over in the /g/ sticky.

I'm sure you can become more than competent enough to make it yourself.

>> No.12020006
File: 2.06 MB, 1280x720, HS3.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020006

>>12019810
Just testing how this loops

>> No.12020009
File: 460 KB, 500x500, 2hu_roulette_01.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020009

A new era of 2hu roulettes.

>> No.12020014

>>12019558
You really weren't here before captcha, were you

>> No.12020017

>>12020009
n-nice

>> No.12020021

>>12020009
Dat Kasen. Also Reimu getting pelted with coins reminds me of Tyrion's wife.

>> No.12020023

>>12020009
After all these years I still have no idea what touhous are.
I know it's a SHUMP right?

>> No.12020025

>>12020003
>rick rolled with webm
Fuck you.

>>12020009
At least put 1 image per second.

>> No.12020026

>>12020023
here's the "for normalfags" introduction shitty video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7lHJXPKoX0

hope it helps

>> No.12020029

>>12020003
My brain just started playing the song when I opened it.

>> No.12020030

>>12020026
Reminds me of Deathsmiles.

>> No.12020032
File: 2.88 MB, 1280x720, HS3.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020032

>>12020006
Increased the quality

>> No.12020037
File: 2.90 MB, 1280x720, littlewitchi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020037

>> No.12020038
File: 1.53 MB, 720x1280, noir_05.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020038

>> No.12020039

Audio when? Audio ever?

>> No.12020041

>>12020039
Yes thread was an sound file in the old thread.

>> No.12020042

>>12020039
it was working before, but moot made sure it stays off

would lead to too many problems with people posting episodes in parts, music, etc... followed by copyright complains amongst all the spam

as it is now, it's just a GIF upgrade, so it doesn't really bring new issues

>> No.12020043

Mods can you make a webm thread on /h/?

>> No.12020046
File: 114 KB, 721x480, dosh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020046

>>12020042
I think sounds still work, they just have to be under a certain size.

test

>> No.12020047
File: 1.71 MB, 720x1280, noir_06.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020047

>> No.12020049

>>12020038
>>12020047
Now shake the fuck outta her.

>> No.12020051

>>12020038
>>12020047
nice

>> No.12020053
File: 2.98 MB, 768x432, jojout.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020053

>> No.12020060
File: 2.56 MB, 1280x720, [loli intensifies].webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020060

>> No.12020062
File: 883 KB, 200x200, output.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020062

A bridge roulette for janniboi.

>> No.12020066

Why is it just /jp/ and /g/ that can post webm?

>> No.12020068

>>12020066
because techloligy

>> No.12020071

>>12020066
/g/ because technology

/jp/ because we are all intelligent and well behaved individual that won't spam the entire board with it

>> No.12020072

>>12019971

You mean Yukiho

>> No.12020073
File: 729 KB, 640x480, ok.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020073

test

>> No.12020074

>>12020072
Who?

>> No.12020087

>>12019789
wow they look so ugly

>> No.12020091
File: 80 KB, 689x567, 1396672185907s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020091

>>12020073

>> No.12020094
File: 2.71 MB, 1280x720, apinkeu.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020094

>> No.12020098

>>12020094
>korean spam
It begins.

>> No.12020102

>>12020094
Why post korean shit?

>> No.12020106
File: 609 KB, 960x720, my one and only friend.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020106

>>12020098
>Begins
I'm guessing you haven't seen the first 3 stickies on /g/

>>12020102
Look at the quality.

>> No.12020108

>>12020094
dirty 韓国人 pls go

>> No.12020110

>>12020106
>Look at the quality.
He asked you a question, Anon.

>> No.12020111
File: 1.27 MB, 1920x1200, grab.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020111

just checking if this works....

>> No.12020112

>>12020110
And I answered him faggot.
The reason I posted it was because it look sreally good, I don't care what it's from.

>> No.12020113

>>12020111
>/v/

>> No.12020115

>>12020113
Who cares?

>> No.12020116

>>12020111
>shitaku bookmark

Fucking kill yourself.

>> No.12020119

>>12020115
Me.

>> No.12020121

>>12020111
>Gamefags

>> No.12020122
File: 2.60 MB, 720x405, 1396673691300.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020122

>> No.12020123

So.

It's just high-def .gifs? That's not that neat.

>> No.12020126

>>12020123
heh

>> No.12020127

>>12020111
>dat rainmeter
>dat wallpaper
>rapelay
>that disgusting crime against browsers everywhere

Are you a troll or just horrible at computers?

>> No.12020128

>>12020113
>>12020116
>>12020121
I'm just pretending to visit those

>> No.12020130

>>12020111
What are you using to record your desktop?

>> No.12020132

Why does /jp/ get it?

>> No.12020133

>>12020132
special snowflake

>> No.12020136
File: 1.68 MB, 1280x720, HighJump.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020136

>> No.12020138

>>12020130
no idea what's best on linux, randomly tried ffmpeg with x11grab (as pictured)

something like

ffmpeg -f x11grab -video_size 1920x1200 -framerate 25 -i :0.0 -vcodec ljpeg test.mkv

then I converted it to webm

>> No.12020142

Are there any Aniki ones yet?

>> No.12020144
File: 1.99 MB, 960x540, bulletreport.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020144

>> No.12020146

I want toi try this out with hentai without getting banned

>> No.12020147
File: 494 KB, 1500x2400, 4636343.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020147

>>12020132

>> No.12020148

>>12020138
You mean, you just used the ffmpeg as in and recorded stuff? Silly me, never thought of doing that directly. I'll try, thanks.

>>12020144
>and yet another game I've never heard of.
Goddammit, seems like a fun game.

>> No.12020150

>>12020132
moot loves /jp/

>> No.12020153

>>12020148
it seemed a little sluggish though

and yeah, if your ffmpeg was built with support for it, it should work (I made a point to enable it when I compiled it earlier in case I'd need it)

>> No.12020156

>>12020126
Well I'm not wrong.

Well you can pause them. That's sort of different.

>> No.12020159

>>12020156
>He can't pause gifs

>> No.12020160

>>12020156
Does this look like a slightly better gif to you? >>12020136

>> No.12020164

>>12020160
No. That looked like a normal gif. Just bigger.

>> No.12020172 [DELETED] 

test

>> No.12020175 [DELETED] 
File: 1.16 MB, 1400x1400, 1388473998331.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020175

>>12020172

>> No.12020176

>>12020153
Alright, download that and I.. have absolutely no idea about how it works exactly.
Geez, no wonder why webm isn't used that much, how do you expect casuals to work their way around that shit?

brb googling everything.

>> No.12020182
File: 2.89 MB, 1280x720, qualitytest2.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020182

>>12020175
What?

>>12020164
You must have some jacked up eyes then bro.

>> No.12020187

>>12020176
converting to webm is pretty simple really

bit more work if you want to get best quality for the filesize limitations though

>> No.12020191

>>12020187
I'm the kind who want to know what I'm using.
Sure, I could pretty much just follow step-by-step tutorials to convert stuff and make my own webm now, but I still have absolutely no idea about how the fuck ff___ stuff works and how to use it, and it bothers me.

I'm just reading the whole documentation. because I'm a bit curious and it sounds fun actually.

>> No.12020193
File: 2.88 MB, 620x349, output.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020193

>> No.12020196
File: 2.89 MB, 1920x1080, 1396652537685.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020196

>>12020160
just slightly better

>> No.12020197

>>12020193
you know the rules

stream that entire movie in sereval split posts

whatever you do, don't take my request seriously.. and I hope no one ever does

>> No.12020199
File: 2.81 MB, 1024x576, who_am_i_quoting.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020199

>automatic bullet time

>> No.12020201
File: 2.25 MB, 1280x720, REMOVE YOUKAI.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020201

>> No.12020206

>>12020201
That's the kind of stuff who works only with the sound.

>>12020199
game?

>> No.12020209
File: 3.00 MB, 512x288, 2hoo.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020209

I tried

>> No.12020211

>>12020209
what settings did you use? How big was the source file?

>> No.12020214
File: 2.83 MB, 1280x720, Shuttle.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020214

>It's just a slight improved gif guys, what's the big deal?

>> No.12020216

>>12020201
And I was just thinking it was a shame nobody'd done that yet.

>> No.12020219

>>12020216
The real thing will be when I can put sound in it.

>> No.12020220
File: 96 KB, 1366x768, source.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020220

>>12020211
I used this
>ffmpeg -ss 1:01 -i 2hu.mkv -to 1:31 -c:v libvpx -an -s 512x288 -b:v 300K -crf 4 2hoo.webm
The source file was the whole episode, pic related

>> No.12020221

>>12019982
That is amazing.

>> No.12020223
File: 154 KB, 600x600, reisen_youmu_koshi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020223

>>12020206
>game?
Burunyan Man

>> No.12020226

>>12020220
are you telling me that the .webm is 20 minutes

>> No.12020227

>>12020226
>-ss 1:01
>-to 1:31

>> No.12020229

>>12020227
whoops, missed that. Say, do you know what the record for longest webm so far is? I've seen one that is three minutes on the /g/ thread.

>> No.12020230

>>12019577
Because we will try to break it, and that's what moot wants at this stage.

>> No.12020231

>>12020229
technically you could just make one as shitty as the average gif

~256 colors, like 320x240, 15fps, plus bonus artifacting

it'd last quite a while as webm

>> No.12020233

>>12020231
Good point. Then again, the big thing everyone is pushing for is quality, nobody wants a shitty webm.

>> No.12020240

>>12019597
IE doesn't support webm. What's your point?

>> No.12020243

i really want to make a program to make making webms easier. but im too useless

at least the process isnt too hard on its own

>> No.12020244

>>12020243
Someone made a python script and posted it on /g/.

>> No.12020250

>>12020244
A script for Linux users or Windows users? I've noticed lots of linux users posting stuff but not that many windows users yet.

>> No.12020251

>>12020250
Both. I'm using it to encode a file as I type.

>> No.12020252

>>12020244
I feel like it'd only make it harder

what's the point of python script for this

>> No.12020253
File: 2.56 MB, 1920x1080, h.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020253

I really should try watching this again when I'm high

>> No.12020256

>>12020252
It comes compiled for you.

>> No.12020258

>>12020251
Silly anon, next time forward the post to the script.

>> No.12020260

>>12020250
I'm on Windows and I've made two or three of these. You shouldn't need a script anyway; it's literally just filling in blanks in an ffmpeg command.

>> No.12020263

>>12020258

>>>/g/41186962
You need the base files from ffmpeg.org to use it.

>> No.12020273
File: 682 KB, 960x720, Flanfly720.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020273

Lost my original flash

>> No.12020281
File: 2.90 MB, 600x450, Raging Sakuya.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020281

Finally got it under 3 MB.

Looks kinda bad, but I need sleep badly.

>> No.12020285

>>12020263
Good for educational purpose, won't use it though. It just feels better to use directly the command prompt for now.

>>12020273
>flanfy intensifies
I feel that the flan threads are going to be awesome now.

>> No.12020296

>>12020281
It's 3:23 long, you can't get much better than that. Good job.

>> No.12020297
File: 2.93 MB, 384x216, raioh1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020297

>>12020285
I'm too much of a simpleton, so I just use virtualdub to do everything.

>> No.12020299
File: 2.82 MB, 640x480, cirno_having_a_seizure.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020299

>> No.12020301
File: 2.94 MB, 1280x720, IK2.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020301

>> No.12020306

>>12020240
IE at least supports it if you install the codecs.
http://www.webmproject.org/ie/

I understand it's the same with Safari on OS X, although I haven't tried it myself.

>> No.12020317

>>12020243
Use firefogg if you're just wanting to dick around with it for now. AFAIK you can't crop the time with it, but sooner or later with the popularity of this thing, either firefogg will be updated, or some one'll make a program with a nice GUI for ffmpeg or whatever.

>> No.12020331
File: 2.97 MB, 640x360, test9.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020331

Finally got it below 3MB

>> No.12020334
File: 2.98 MB, 512x288, more 2hoo.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020334

>>12020209
Now I did the openeing for the first one, which is shorter, but required a lesser bitrate in order to fit.
Video encoding is fun.

>> No.12020364

>>12020233
It'd work for old black and white movies that are subbed, and linedrawing gifs. I expect a variable bitrate could make flashtoons webm-s that are really long.

>> No.12020366

How do you set the resolution?

>> No.12020369

>>12020366
-s <width>x<height>

>> No.12020372

>>12020366
-s <height>x<width>

>> No.12020374

>>12020369
>>12020372
Thanks.

>> No.12020401

I wanted to convert some of my /jp/ swf files to webm but ffmpeg can't pick up swf flash video
If it's a flv it has no problem
This sucks

>> No.12020412 [DELETED] 
File: 199 KB, 512x384, washer.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020412

I had to go to the lavomatic but somebody stole the cup where you put the washing powder so I had to craft one myself from paper magazines.

>> No.12020454

>>12019792
>complaining about big eyes while half of this board is animu

>> No.12020454,1 [INTERNAL] 

I bet moot was payed by Google to shill this shit.

>> No.12020506 [DELETED] 

Wanna touch the soft butt.

>> No.12020525

WebM now appears to be disabled in this thread, too.

Thanks for hosting a few of us crossies for the day, /jp/.

>> No.12020531

When I Expand all Images in this thread the webms run slow as fuck and when I do it in that 2000 posts /g/ thread the browser just crashes.

Why is firefox so shitty?

>> No.12020533

>>12020531
It's not likely Chrome or another browser would do any better. It's loading hundreds of compressed video files at once.

>> No.12020534

>>12020531
u mena why is 4chanX so shitty?

>> No.12020537

>>12020531
webm need a lot more ressources than gif

for me, one webm generally use a varrying ~1-7% cpu for 4 different cores at once

multiply that by sereval webms, and your cpu will be maxed before you realize -- not really firefox's fault, it's just a lot of computing work to decompress regardless of browser

>> No.12020538

I found this guide for using virtualdub + external encoders for making .webm thingies. You can even use the filters normally, so you can resize easily.

http://containerchan.org/tb/demo/res/16.html#266


Damn and I just made a nice one. I hope moot enables it again.

>> No.12020550

>>12020538
That's what I've been using, it's pretty nice.

>> No.12020557

>>12020538
Post there >>>/g/41175103

>> No.12020603
File: 72 KB, 1280x720, 1395198379471.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020603

>>12019321
Kill yourself

>> No.12020607

>>12020603
you came here in this mostly dead thread just to say that?

such dedication

>> No.12020615

>>12020607
Gotta keep up the quality of /jp/.

>> No.12020618

>>12019705
Wow it's like I'm really streaming it

>> No.12020722

The limit on these is really only 3 MB?

>> No.12020726

>>12020722
You can get around 30 seconds of 720p if you know how to set up your encoding. I'd post one but well you know

>> No.12020748

>>12019336
someone in the sanae thread had sound
i hope it gets allowed soon

>> No.12020748,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>12020454,1
Of course he is. Look at all the shitty posts promoting webm itt. It's so easy to spot these people. It's almost disheartening to see your whole board dynamic change because of some chan-sponsored shitty posters.

>> No.12020748,2 [INTERNAL] 

>>12020748,1
it's not a board dynamic change (:
sneek peek of the /jp/ of the future (:
if you dont like it get out (:
movie general now (: with webm (:

>> No.12020748,3 [INTERNAL] 

>>12020273
OMG...

>> No.12020780

>>12020748
I think sound only works in .ogg format.

>> No.12020784
File: 32 KB, 674x532, shit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12020784

>>12019752
It's true suffering.

>> No.12020794

>>12020784
Even my phone is twice as powerful as this.

>> No.12020795

>>12020538

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeM3SUp-HRg

>> No.12020815

>>12020784
>windows xp
reminder that only 3 days left until microsoft completly drops their support for it

>> No.12020816

>>12020815
I thought they dropped it already sometime last year?

>> No.12020817

>>12020816
think they were just announcing back then

but gets in effect on april 8 2014

>> No.12020821

>>12020815
I don't really care. XP is the last windows for me.

>> No.12020825

>>12020794
>>12020815
stop bullying him

>> No.12020826

>>12020825
it's for his own good

>> No.12020828

>>12020116
What's wrong with Sankaku? It's better than Gelbooru and Danbooru combined

>> No.12020883

>>12020301
That is pretty amazing for a minute long video. What encode parameters did you use?

>> No.12020886

So is this already over? Will moot implement it in all boards or he was just testing it?

>> No.12020903

>>12020886
Just a test probably. I'm worried they're gonna hold back on it though, since it has problems on a few browsers.

>> No.12020966

>>12019880
sauce?

>> No.12020972

>>12020603
This isn't touhou.

>> No.12020976

>>12020966
Akuma no Riddle

>> No.12021005

>>12020976
thanks kind anon

>> No.12021496

>>12020815
Who cares. 2003 aka XP done properly still has at least one year of support left.
Also, vanilla Opera 12 works with webm's just fine minus looping. Feels good.

>> No.12021777

>>12020972
Good

>> No.12022300
File: 53 KB, 776x580, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12022300

>>12020784
Your suffering shall be preserved and stored in jars to be consumed with honey and bread at a later date.

>> No.12022300,1 [INTERNAL] 

http://www.webmproject.org/about/supporters/

Look at all the money to be made. No wonder moot is shilling the fuck out of this.

>> No.12022610

How about Goldberg McShillstein stops spamming "inb4" like it's 2008 /b/?

>> No.12022610,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>12022300,1
>FSF

Maybe moot isn't so bad after all.

>> No.12023010

>>12019468
I want to fuck momiji

>> No.12023344 [DELETED] 

1

>> No.12023359

I keep trying to upload but it says 'corrupted or unsupported filetype'. Yes I made sure audio was disabled. Doesn't work with webms I was able to upload on /g/.

>> No.12023377

>>12023359
It's disabled now. Wait until it rolls out officially.

>> No.12023544

>>12023377
>until

>> No.12023545

>>12019989
No lewd please. I don't want my waifu to be violated.

>> No.12023557 [DELETED] 
File: 93 KB, 577x575, orinface-02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12023557

>>12023544
Are you bullying me?

>> No.12023563

>>12020127
That's not Rainmeter, it's Debian Linux with KDE.

>> No.12023565

>>12023563
You mean Debian GNU/Linux, right?

>> No.12024223
File: 2.52 MB, 640x360, Lumia.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12024223

Finally. Sound is still disabled, though.
I guess moot fears the RIAA

And cannot post them using QR on 4chanX

>> No.12024229
File: 773 KB, 600x500, 1396797830581.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12024229

>>12024223
Update your ricerscript or use the inline extension.

>> No.12024240
File: 2.98 MB, 280x160, Lumia.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12024240

>>12024229
Woah, they're fast. Thanks.

And this is the .gif for comparison.
Damn, the .webm version is more than double res, kept all frames, no shitty compression artifacts, a bit longer than the .gif and with better filesize.

This scares me, its like when MP3 came out and my trusty diskman suddenly became obsolete. Fucking technology man.

>> No.12024377

>>12024240
This is years old, and so are even files I posted that were result of previous discussions about it. Hell GIF is likely older than pretty much all the posters here. This can't even beat H.264, plus there's more efficient methods actually usable that jewt left disabled/blocked on purpose.

>> No.12024390

>>12019658
>>12019719
Man I wanna watch this, but I can't find sauce since they're not images...

Drawback of using webm?

>> No.12024399

>>12024390
>Drawback of using webm?
It's not retard-friendly.

>> No.12024402

>>12024390
Source is both Boku no Pico.

>> No.12024642
File: 762 KB, 600x500, test_1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12024642

>>12024229
Remind me that interpolating 10 fps to 60 is a very bad idea.

>> No.12024745

>>12019608
Why can't we just have 24 minutes of this?

We should kickstart it.

>> No.12024849

>>12024642
That's honestly not too terrible.

>> No.12025181
File: 2.75 MB, 1024x576, momiji.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12025181

Test. Looks a bit artifacty here and there.

>> No.12025247 [SPOILER] 
File: 2.86 MB, 320x240, ピンキ.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12025247

Test spoiler

>> No.12025660
File: 330 KB, 640x360, huh.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
12025660

>> No.12025992

>>12024223
video lnik?

>> No.12026014

>>12024399
Sounds like a good thing to me.

>> No.12026019

>>12024399
And then there will be more people screaming for sauce and further derailing the thread, is that good?

>> No.12026019,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>12019470
where is this from
i have loads of precum now

>> No.12026019,2 [INTERNAL] 

>>12026019,1
please help
i need to m asturbate

>> No.12026019,3 [INTERNAL] 

>>12026019,2
Shut the fuck up pedophile

>> No.12026019,4 [INTERNAL] 

>>12019829,1
nope

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action