[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 536 KB, 720x900, okuu of Niwakas With Attitude.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687717 No.10687717[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

This is the designated thread for discussion of the NEET/Hikikomori lifestyle!

How's your weekend, NEETs?

>> No.10687722

>>10687706
Do you mean that literally?

>> No.10687729

Pretty okay, I took it too easy and won't get autismbux this month. I may or may not get into trouble for that.

>> No.10687730

Why do these keep getting deleted?

>> No.10687730,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>10687730

The janitor is throwing a tantrum or something

>> No.10687730,2 [INTERNAL] 

>>10687730,1
He does this with everything he doesn't like. He was deleting light novel threads too before they were banned by the rules, remember. I guarantee you soon they'll take NEET threads out of the rules too!

>> No.10687730,3 [INTERNAL] 

<@ALTERNATIVE> I'm asking them to cut back on deneeting them for now, but we may make a rule change in the future
<lorde_gloome> why do you wanna make a rule change without even asking the users
<lorde_gloome> you should make a sticky
<tyc> I mean not amongst general users obviously, but I mean among staff
<lorde_gloome> instead of consorting with VNTS and his evil plots to make /jp/ shitty
<@ALTERNATIVE> we have to discuss it first before we ask anyone
<@ALTERNATIVE> if we decide we don't want to change the rule then there's nothing to ask about
<lorde_gloome> okay
<@ALTERNATIVE> it may just be a tweek to the current rules
<@ALTERNATIVE> twneet

NEET threads are OK for now, fuck yeah

>> No.10687730,4 [INTERNAL] 

Doesn't seem like a huge victory. 'Cut back on deNEETing'? As in it can still continue just not fully?

>> No.10687730,5 [INTERNAL] 

>>10687730
jannieboyo is steamed as HELL

>> No.10687730,6 [INTERNAL] 

>>10687730,3
>but we may make a rule change in the future

hahahaha, nailed it

>> No.10687730,7 [INTERNAL] 

someone dox this lorde_gloome nerd

>> No.10687730,8 [INTERNAL] 

I can totally see moot making a superfluous /neet/ board.

If there's a problem, throw a new board at it.
- tagline in the 4chan staff room

>> No.10687730,9 [INTERNAL] 

>>10687730,8
No, that's the exact opposite of what they do. They refuse to create new boards. They only do it if someone is spamming /b/ and /v/ enough.

>> No.10687730,10 [INTERNAL] 

>>10687730,8
think for a few seconds, what's wrong with a new board? 4chan would be a better place with a new boards. it's shit because the retard moot wants to keep everything on /b/ and nobody wants to fucking go to /b/ who isn't brain damaged. that's exactly why /r9k/ and /v/ turned into what they are cause there wasn't other boards for it besides /b/.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action