/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

Who the hell reposted this?

And why the hell was this deleted?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,1
Maybe the "no anime adaptations" applies to Touhou along with light and visual novels?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,2
Hey, the "no anime adaptation" rule does make sense.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,3
No

No it doesn't

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,4
It does. It's supposed to regulate which LNs do you "read" *wink* *wink* kind of threads.

I don't think it applies to Visual Novels though.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,5
So it makes it easier for the janitor to mindlessly delete shit instead of using some common sense and getting to know the board he's in charge of. Great.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,6
No, it's so people stop making or bitching about disguised anime threads.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,7
It doesn't stop them since their threads were never intended to be serious. Are you familiar with the term "shitposting"?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,5
of course it doesn't apply to visual novels even though it says so it does. it doesn't apply to touhou either since you can just make touhou anime threads here.

so, what does it apply to? about 9 out of 10 of translated light novels in english. let's look at this another way, you can't discuss 7 out of 10 popular lights novels either. that's since light novel continue well after the anime series is over, but who cares?!


moot was such a genius moving light novel discussion to /jp/ out of the blue on a whim. the autistic moderation was even smarter for deciding to follow the advice of neo-/jp/ers who haven't even read a light novel before.

people actually fluent in japanese unlike the machine translating weeaboo visual novel readers were tripping over themselves to leave the 2ch ln board so neo-NSJ can delete there threads.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,9
Not sure what you are complaining about.
If it's a popular LN with an anime adaptation, then go post about it on /a/, you'll have a much more active thread there.
If it's some obscure unstranslated LN, then make it on /jp/, the only thing you risk is that your thread 404 because of lack of interest/activity.

Looks like it's always the same: "I want to do it on /jp/ because my friends are here and other boards are full of subhumans".

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,10
>I want to do it on /jp/ because my friends are here and other boards are full of subhumans

And the people who previously had every right to think that way with no ill intent have suffered because of other shitposters.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,10
the only subhumans are people who think the light novel rules make any sense. in fact, the rules for light novels are so stupid that they don't even apply the no anime adaptation to visual novels just to show the complete cognitive dissonance.

split hairs for light novels only and then make them bend over backwards to discuss a topic which is dead on /jp/

the brain dead weeaboo staff only added it to the rules because it sounds similar to visual novels. vntards just throw hissyfits about light novels since they read self-insert-choose your own adventure-picture books with endless dribble as dialogue and have an inferiority complex towards people who don't use machine translations.

i wouldn't discuss light novels with the people on /jp/ if i was paid.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,12
>i wouldn't discuss light novels with the people on /jp/ if i was paid.
I would. And in fact I've never had any of my rare LN threads deleted. The only problem is the lack of "interest" or rather the lack of people to talk to.

It's not like there's no other place than /jp/ to talk about Sena or Saten or whatever other character you LN reader "readers" *wink* *wink* like to discuss.
In fact, there is a better place for popular LNs with an anime adaptation.

[Anonymous No.]

These threads were all made after the rule change and didn't get deleted:
https://fuuka.warosu.org/jp/thread/S10185056
https://fuuka.warosu.org/jp/thread/S10194053

The rule is only there to stop disguised anime threads and not give the shitposters a chance to bother moot on /q/ by distorting the facts. Legitimate LN threads will always be fine on /jp/.

[Anonymous No.]

anecdotal evidence and random assumptions? perfect. no wonder the rules actually aren't butchered in your view.

you don't know shit about light novels don't use the word legitimate like your opinion actually holds sway. the rules now are worse for light novel fans than before that shit for brains moot decided to force it when he finally got around to changing the rules from all things otaku after 2 years.

i liked ln threads before you neo-/jp/ers came around, now i wouldn't even discuss it on /jp/ if it was the only topic on the board.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,15
O-okay

[Anonymous No.]

moot made that rule to keep subhuman crossboarders off /jp/. Sure, a few purebred /jp/ers can't talk about LNs now, but I'd gladly trade off two /jp/ers if it meant getting rid of one crossboarder. If only that idiot didn't allow LNs in the first place.

The janitor really needs to enforce it against VNs now, like Higurashi and Type-MOON works. It is the only way to be certain that we keep crossboarders off /jp/. I guarantee you that only a small handful of them have read the novels and that most didn't know about them until they watched the anime. I'll keep bugging moot until he clarifies the rules.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,17
Crossboarders should have some sort of star applied to their posts, just so everyone knows who they are.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,15
>i liked ln threads before you neo-/jp/ers came around

All two of them?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,17
that would be applying consistency and logic. if the retards who govern /jp/ could create actual law their bills would say "don't do things i disapprove".

the rules for /jp/ are and will always be whatever the moderation decide on their whim. that's why retard moot had all things otaku as his only rule while deleting 90% of otaku things.

>>10221173
quality visual novel with anime adaptation thread. these guys are definitely bred from a higher class. they use manga pictures instead of anime screen pictures for their visual novel threads.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,20
>quality visual novel with anime adaptation thread. these guys are definitely bred from a higher class. they use manga pictures instead of anime screen pictures for their visual novel threads.

That's clearly shitposting and it will get deleted. The timing and nature of the thread is a little too perfect, so I wouldn't be surprised if you're ``post punk pup'' trying to prove your point.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,21
there isn't such thing as a visual novel thread with an anime adaptation which isn't shit. you just think otherwise than you're on the same level as them. you see manga pictures and pixy art and think "neat" if they're from visual novels, while you see light novel pixy art and you think "SHITPOSTER".

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,22
I thought of a few common examples off the top of my head, but they only seem to prove your point:
http://fuuka.warosu.org/jp/?task=search2&search_text=clannad&search_op=op
http://fuuka.warosu.org/jp/?task=search2&search_text=fate+stay+night&search_op=op
http://fuuka.warosu.org/jp/?task=search2&search_text=higurashi&search_op=op
http://fuuka.warosu.org/jp/?task=search2&search_text=steins+gate&search_op=op
We have had good threads, though. It's just because everyone posts in the VN general thread, except for shitposters and newbies who think it's fine to make a thread like, ``hello jp i watched clannad so sad ;__; so i herd theres a game??''

As someone said in another thread, we need posters to be less scared about discussing these things. We've discussed Touhou every day for four years and that's considered a core /jp/ topic, yet nobody discusses Fate Stay/Night, Clannad or Wanko to Kurasou because we discussed those years ago. Now they're entry-level shit for faggot crossboarders who probably started reading VNs after Katawa Shoujo blah blah blah...

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,23
by these things, i seriously i pray to god, you don't mean fate stay/night and the other examples you listed did you? years 5 almost of fate on /jp/ along with 3 before that on /a/. yeah, we need to discuss THAT some more. but, the most popular light novels which are actually fresh since they're continually being released should be shunned in there place?


*no anime adaptions period, also nothing related to spin off series is allowed either.
*pixy art for touhou goes to /c/
*idolmasters which appear in the anime aren't allowed on /jp/ they go to /a/

these rules should make everyone equally unhappy and be as logical as the malformed brains of the staff can create.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,24
My point was that, to say nothing of light novels, yes, we should be able to discuss popular visual novels some more.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,25
that sounds horrible and you sound like a neo-/jp/er. they discuss that shit on /a/, head over there with your pals.

/jp/ had already been talking about these visual novels before /jp/ existed. anybody who still wants to talk about them is a neo-/jp/er. the janitor needs to start deleting all visual novel threads with ties to /a/. it isn't neo-/jp/er visual novel fans get special treatment. they're still neo-/jp/ers and need to get purged.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,26
/a/ isn't for visual novels. I don't watch anime any more, why would I go to /a/?

I know we've discussed these things. I remember the Type-Moon threads on /a/ and /b/. That doesn't mean we can't discuss them any more. Your attitude is exactly why we're so hard-pressed for varied topics to discuss. Nobody wants to make a thread about Ever17 that isn't a dumb joke because we all played that VN 7 years ago. God forbid someone would be newer than that or didn't get around to playing it until recently.

[Anonymous No.]

Shut up, nerds.

The rule obviously doesn't apply to VNs.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,28
>B-B-But VNs are our culture! They've been here forever! They're exempt from the rules!

Board culture is just another term for shitposting. moot made that rule to get rid of crossboarders and shitposters like you.

/vg/ is a much better board for discussing your entry-level porno games (that you probably don't even play), they have had like 1000 Katawa Shoujo threads already. Even stuff without anime adaptations like Kamidori generates more discussion there than here. There is no need to have entry-level VNs on /jp/. You are just inviting more crossboarding scum to come over and shit up the board.

Why am I wasting my time, these shitposting faggots will keep making excuses because /jp/ - [i]my friends are here.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,29
Hahaha. Nice troll, friend.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,17
Is this post a parody?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,31
I don't even know anymore.

[Anonymous No.]

I'd gladly dump all VNs with anime adaptations if it meant getting rid of all the Umineko\Higurashi shitposters that talk about shitty stories from years ago as if it were the most profound thing on earth. TM can get the fuck out as well. It's all "cn shk kll srvnts?" shitposting and has long since stopped being funny. it's not. It's Atlas Shrugged with character sprites and is shit.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,33
I don't see you complaining about which Touhou threads.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,34
Eat my asshole, faggot. Touhou is integral to the board, VNs were an after thought. It make sense to regulate them differently.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,35
Touhou shitposters get more deluded by the day.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,36
Nice counterargument, failure.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,37
There was no argument to counter, fuckstick.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10218812,29
>>10218812,33
It's funny you'd say that considering Touhou brings up a thousand more shitposters to the board every year.