[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 159 KB, 600x450, just_pedo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296206 No.9296206 [Reply] [Original]

Does liking lolikon make you a paedophile?

>> No.9296214

Yes.

>> No.9296209

Does it really matter?

>> No.9296210

no

>> No.9296211

Who cares?

>> No.9296218

No, it makes you a lolicon, how do people not know this?

>> No.9296220

Apparently yes.

>> No.9296224
File: 47 KB, 376x376, angry loli face.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296224

>>9296209
>>9296211
I see a pedo.

>> No.9296230

It's just a matter of time before it's going to be not enough and you'll go looking for real CP.

And after that it's just a matter of time before you rape a kid.

So yeah.

>> No.9296231

>>9296218
1: (Abbreviation) Lolita complex (sexual attraction to children, esp. young girls); (Noun or verb acting prenominally)
2: portraying children in an erotic style


sounds like a pedophile to me

>> No.9296232

Does liking 2D women make a 3D whore lover? Absolutely not.

>> No.9296240

>>9296230
Responding to a troll but;
I've never had the desire to rape an actual child and i've wanked to loli for years.

>> No.9296236

>>9296206
No. A pedophile is someone who is into prepubescent girls. A loli is generally in the early years of puberty.

>> No.9296238

>>9296224
No you don't.

>> No.9296242

Even the Japanese definition doesn't mention 2D in the slightest.

>> No.9296244

not this shit again

>> No.9296245

>>9296206
No, but now queue the inevitable debate and multiple logical fallacies

>> No.9296249

> Michael Briere, a lifelong paedophile in Canada who abducted, raped, and killed a 10-year-old girl, said in court, "for myself, I would say that, yes; viewing the material does motivate you to do other things. In my case, for sure. The more I saw, the more I longed for it in my heart. The more I wanted it. And that's the one time where I actually tried to do it..."

>> No.9296254

>>9296236
Does it make you a hebephile, then?

>> No.9296256

>>9296249
Sweet, I bet video games, movies and books cause you to kill when you play, watch or read about it.

>> No.9296257

>One rather disturbing trend in this anime porn crap is to showcase quite young individuals. Now, hentai ninjas defend this sickening theme by saying that because they're cartoons, they have no age. Excuse me, what? Does that mean that drawings of infants wearing strap-on dildos is acceptable behavior? Next, these cartoon wanking freaks might argue that the age of consent is 13 in Japan. Hey shithead, are you Japanese? No? Then shut the fuck up. And even if you were, that doesn't mean it's any less sick and reprehensible. In a last spasm of defense, they even use crap like, "Well, uh, would you rather pedophiles were viewing real child porn or cartoons?" Uh, what? Is that anything like saying, "Would you rather be poor and happy or rich and unhappy?" How about rich AND happy? How about pedophiles not look at real child porn OR cartoon porn? That would be none of the fucking above, Bob.

>> No.9296258

This thread is the bad type of shitposting.

>> No.9296259
File: 831 KB, 1149x906, tumblr_hijsadvX61qau4354325mo1_500.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296259

>> No.9296265

>>9296257
Wow, this person sure does like to argue, they are even arguing with themselves.

>> No.9296267

>>9296257
"Stop liking what I don't like."

>> No.9296272

>>9296256
Who cares. Looking at these images is immoral and reprehensible. That's why downloading them is illegal even if you don't produce anything.

The GTA DIDENT MAKE ME A MURDERER!!!!11 debate doesn't work because it's not just physically going out and molesting children that is the sole problem. Downloading kiddie porn means you downloaded kiddie porn.

>> No.9296275 [DELETED] 

>>9296257
The guy your quoting seems pretty frustrated

Think of the 2D victims, I guess.

>> No.9296288

>>9296257
Am I a hentai ninja?

>> No.9296289

>>9296272
Someone should definitely protect the 2D children who's lives have been shattered

>> No.9296291

>>9296272
>Downloading kiddie porn means you downloaded kiddie porn.

Exactly, and by downloading pictures for free you are clearly supporting the exploitation of children! Nobody would have sex with children if you guys just stopped saving these images. That's why pedophilia has only existed since the internet was created.

>> No.9296295

>Looking at these images is immoral and reprehensible.

Explain.

>> No.9296299

Yes just as long as you don't touch it's okay

>> No.9296309

Liking lolicon makes you healthy

>> No.9296311

Only if you get caught. But in all seriousness I think situations and purity aspect is what people like I feel like you should only be considered pedo if you actually go through with it.

>> No.9296312

>>9296291
But you are contributing to the problem, friend.

>> No.9296315

>>9296312
Care to explain?

>> No.9296322

>>9296257
this guy is pretty funny

>> No.9296323

>>9296315
He's just buttmade that he doesn't know where to download pthc.

>> No.9296345

>wikileaks.org/wiki/An_insight_into_child_porn

>> No.9296346 [SPOILER] 
File: 539 KB, 932x1399, f2fb135aeefcb65b545bdba9cbf77a71.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296346

People who hate pedophiles are just brainwashed and/or latent pedophiles who are repressing their urges.

It's like how super homophobic have a tendency to be closet homosexuals(or brainwashed by religion, just like who people are brainwashed by the media to hate pedophiles).

>> No.9296349

>>9296254
Yes that would be a lot closer.

>> No.9296350

>>9296206
does liking money make you a jew?

>> No.9296353

>>9296346
Please refrain from posting NSFW images.

>> No.9296351

>>9296345
>wikileaks

Going there is pretty much BEGGING to be put on a government list, especially is you are looking at an article about child porn.

>> No.9296360

>>9296209
Not really, these threads are made by asspained goons who were booted from their pay2post forum.

>> No.9296361

"Taylor, Quayle and Holland (2001) also argue that regardless of whether the children portrayed in objectionable images are physically abused during the creation of the images, victimisation occurs each time an image of a child is used for a sexual purpose (including sexual fantasy generation, arousal and masturbation). In effect, this activity encourages non-consensual use of individuals as sexual objects."
- "Internet Traders of Child Pornography and other Censorship Offenders in New Zealand" by Angela Carr (Dept. of Internal Affairs, Wellington, New Zealand, April 2004), citing "Typology of Paedophile Picture Collections" by Max Taylor, Ethel Quayle, and Gemma Holland in The Police Journal, vol. 74, no. 2 (2001), pages 97-107

"Child pornography, by itself, represents an act of sexual abuse or exploitation of a child and, by itself, does harm to that child."
- Kenneth V. Lanning in "Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis" (National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, 1992)

"Child pornography is not a computer crime. Every image depicts a child being abused. They are crime-scene photographs."
- Michelle Collins, the director of the Exploited Children Unit of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, as quoted in Edison/Metuchen Sentinel, The Examiner, and The Independent (New Jersey, August 30, 2006) in an article about a man who sexually assaulted boys and girls aged 2 to 8 and videotaped these acts plus placed hidden cameras in rooms where the children undressed

>> No.9296363

>>9296353
It's censored, besides there is nothing erotic in a little girl's chest.

>> No.9296364

"It cannot be emphasised enough that behind every horrid piece of child pornography is a tragic case of an abused defenceless child, somewhere in the world."
- Chris Ellison, Australian Senator and Minister for Justice and Customs, as quoted in The Age (Melbourne, Australia, February 23, 2005)

"It's chilling to realize that every photo on every page of every child pornography magazine... is a permanent record of the works of a child molester."
- William V. Roth, U.S. Senator from Delaware and Chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, in Spring 1985, as quoted in The Los Angeles Times (September 16, 1985)

"While little is known about the specific long-term effects of use in child pornography, the immediate trauma and effects of sexual abuse on children is well documented. Because child pornography is a clear record of child sex abuse, its victims would therefore experience the same emotional and physical consequences in addition to any harm resulting from the pornography. ... Child victims of pornography face the possibility of a lifetime of victimization because the pornography can be distributed indefinitely. Physical, psychological, and emotional effects of child sexual abuse are coupled with the possibility of the pornography resurfacing. Being photographed during sexual abuse intensifies the child's shame, humiliation, and powerlessness."
- "Child Pornography: The Criminal-Justice-System Response" by E. Klain, et al. (National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, 2001), http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/publications/NC81.pdf

>> No.9296366 [SPOILER] 
File: 79 KB, 1280x720, 1306977843266.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296366

>>9296353
It's censored and spoilered, nerd.

>> No.9296367

"It is possible that victims of child pornography suffer as severely if not more severely than other victims of sexual crimes. It is psychologically very devastating, because every time that image is looked at or shared that child is being victimized again and again. The Internet allows these pictures to be shared."
- Kelly Kennedy, a spokesman for the Wisconsin Attorney General's office, as quoted in The Fond Du Lac Reporter (September 7, 2005)

"It does not threaten the First Amendment for the Federal legislature to conclude, for example, that inducing children to engage in sexual activity can physically harm them, and consequently to prohibit the photographing of children who have been induced to do so, and to legislate against the publication and sale of magazines or films in which such photography appears. The publisher and the seller are principals in the abuse."
- "Taking on the Censors" by Robert Sabbag in Oui, January 1978

"The use of children in sexually explicit films is of course criminal exploitation of people who can't defend themselves, and it is cruelty to the children and an offense against the parental feelings of anybody with the slightest amount of sympathetic imagination. I think the makers of such pictures must be tracked down and imprisoned."
- "Dr. Ruth's Guide for Married Lovers" by Dr. Ruth Westheimer (Warner Books, 1986)

>> No.9296368
File: 543 KB, 1091x1600, LO1207049.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296368

nah since you'd once again have to lower yourself to real world terms of sexuality. once you go genuine 2Dcon there's no going back, it's basically sexual satori.

>> No.9296372

In the future pedophiles will be accepted just like gays are now, shame we will probably be dead by that time.

>> No.9296370

http://translate.google.com/#auto|en|ロリコン

>> No.9296371

>>9296291
“I murdered someone! But in the process, I didn't encourage further murders, therefore it's okay!”

>> No.9296375

>>9296372
Only if we find some way to modify genetics or ageing so children can consent to this sort of thing.

>> No.9296376

>>9296372
Somehow I doubt this. The world seems to be getting more conservative regarding children and sexuality even though it is getting more liberal in terms of drugs, marriage, etc.

>> No.9296377

Fun fact: 'pedophilia' is natural in humans, to ensure the female has a good chance of reproducing. When a girl has her first period, it is literally evolution's way of saying 'I'm ready to fuck and make more humans'
If children are not 'psychologically ready' by the time they're on their period, then evolution has fucked up.

Which seems more likely? That you're a repressed fuckwit or that evolution/godwhatever fucked up?

>> No.9296381

>>9296346
The idea that people who dislike things always secretly like them is stupid. It is just and excuse for sensitive homos who can't deal with it that some people don't like them.

>>9296366
It is still against rules and on this board, we respect the rules. Plus, it isn't even a spoiler so using the spoiler function improperly makes it even worse.

>> No.9296382

>>9296377

That's hebephilia, not paedo.

>> No.9296385

>>9296371
>“I own drawings of fictional murders! But in the process, I didn't encourage further murders, therefore it's okay!”
ffy

>> No.9296386

>>9296381
I'll spoil you, anon

>> No.9296388

I can understand why people have issue with 3D

But people having problems with 2D doesn't make sense to me

>> No.9296389

>>9296372
its too bad were still stuck in a stage where the average person doesnt really knows what pedophilia actually is and they make it manymany times worse then it actually is

>> No.9296390

>>9296377
pedophilia is attraction to girls who don't have periods.

>> No.9296391

>>9296382
They've come to mean the same thing. Most people refer to wanting to fuck anyone under 18 as pedophilia.

If you're actually a pedophile by the literal definition p-please don't fuck toddlers. It's very lewd and distressing. Stick to the 2D stuff.

>> No.9296393

>>9296377
Of course it's natural. Plenty of things are natural, but that doesn't make them right. Hell, murder is VERY natural. And whereas true pedophilia (you need to look up the definition, by the way) is uncommon, every single one of us has undergone evolution and breeding so that we can be effective murderers. Yet murder is illegal in a social, ethical civilization.

The fact is, it's unnatural and harmful. Being a homosexual harms nobody. It's "wrong" only because of dumb, archaic prejudice. Pedophilia is actually wrong on the biological and psychological level.

>> No.9296397

>>9296385
I was just making the point that not proliferating a crime makes it okay.

In this case, downloading pictures is the unethical, immoral, illegal act. You don't have to be "supporting" anything for this to be the case.

>> No.9296403
File: 133 KB, 935x606, Headsigh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296403

>>9296361
>>9296364
>>9296367

Sorry for the regression, /jp/, but I need to post this reaction image.

>> No.9296410

>>9296397
Doesn't make it okay, even.

I have the dumb today.

>> No.9296414

>>9296397
>unethical, immoral, illegal act
Yes yes yes, please find me the part wherein someone suffers from my actions.

>> No.9296415

>>9296377
>If children are not 'psychologically ready' by the time they're on their period, then evolution has fucked up.
That's not how evolution works. Only a hundred or so years ago, the average girl had her first period when she was 16/17. Because of changes in our lifestyles and diets, things have gotten really messed up, and in some places like America, the average age is really low, down to 12, with many girls having it even earlier, at around 11.

>>9296391
>They've come to mean the same thing.
To the average dolt that doesn't know what the word means, yes.

>> No.9296418

>>9296393
What you're saying is the same as accusing heterosexuals of not being normal because some of them rape women.

P.S.: "Normal" doesn't exist. There's only "the most common". The rest are all evolutionary traits that may die or not in the future, and that may or not be accepted in current society.

>> No.9296421

>>9296415

I thought it was more like 12-13 down to 9-11.

I don't think I've ever heard of puberty starting that late, ever.

>> No.9296431

>>9296361
>>9296364
>>9296367

SOME PLEASE THINK OF THE CARTOON CHILDREN!

>> No.9296437 [SPOILER] 
File: 218 KB, 700x700, 34f45833d69c576504be5b745f694f3b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296437

>>9296364
>It cannot be emphasised enough that behind every horrid piece of child pornography is a tragic case of an abused defenceless child, somewhere in the world.

And clearly people downloading pictures on the internet is the motivational force behind this, right? People have had sex with kids all throughout history, it's not something new. In the early 1900's you could buy magazines of nude kids and nobody gave a fuck.

>Physical, psychological, and emotional effects of child sexual abuse are coupled with the possibility of the pornography resurfacing. Being photographed during sexual abuse intensifies the child's shame, humiliation, and powerlessness.

This is a cute false premise, seeing as how it implies that all(or even most) child porn is rape and not consensual(. Have these nerds ever considered that the reason the kids feel like victims is because THEY ARE TOLD THEY ARE VICTIMS? Do these people honestly believe that if an older man and a young girl who were in love, lived in the woods away from society, and had sexual encounters, that she would end up suicidal and depressed? It's the reaction the shocked and horrified reaction they get from those around them that perpetuate this feeling of shame and victimization.

>> No.9296438

>Does liking lolikon paedophile?
>lolikon
Jesus christ, it sure is summer. Liking loli makes you a lolicon. You can't like lolicon, you idiot.

>> No.9296433

You'd think if there really was a problem we'd all be arrested by now. Been doing it for over 10 years ever since I was 14, by the way.
Get out SA.

>> No.9296435

>>9296415
>Only a hundred or so years ago, the average girl had her first period when she was 16/17
You're going to have to cite that.

>To the average dolt that doesn't know what the word means
I assume anybody against sex with those who have entered puberty to be 'average dolts'

>> No.9296440

Thank You, Ma'am; We Do Indeed Appreciate Your Pleasant Screed

If you aren't addle-headed by all this advice as to what to post, it will be a surprise to me, but still I've got to put in my oar to say that it seems to me you cater mostly to men and boys while we women ought to have our say. Our needs are fully met in the household invention pages but we have other tastes. So for pity's sake admit no fiction. We want facts. Also cut out most of the technicalities of mechanics, chemistry, radios and airplanes. Give us more evolution, biology, anthropology, discoveries, facts about tracking wild animals, and adventures in the far parts of the earth. Give us the big accomplishments of men whose achievements thrill. Technicalities do not interest us. Your magazine should be devoted to a public that demands results, not experiments.

>> No.9296446

>>9296415
Do you have any sources for the period thing? It's a fact they've been occurring earlier, but that doesn't mean they happened around that age on average.

Roman married and bred younger than that, from what I read. So something's wrong.

>> No.9296450

>>9296440
GET OUT
>>>/tumblr/
>>>/something awful/

>> No.9296452

>>9296418
Look up the definition of "normal" or spend a few minutes thinking about its etymology. Maybe pick up your old statistics textbook.

If the idea of basing these things on numbers alone seems arbitrary, pick up a psychology or sociology textbook. There's a lot of debate about what makes things SOCIAL norms. Before anyone complains, it isn't something pseudoscientists have "decided", but a definition that applies to something that happens in society anyway.

>> No.9296462

Japan will never let go of cuteness and celebrating the young. It's too ingrained in their culture.
Even if doujinshi gets banished off the internet I'll always have my moe fix. Maybe that'll motivate me to learn how to draw even. Thank you.

Now liberalfags get out.

>> No.9296473

The concept of "child" didn't exist until around 200 years ago, and the very idea of "childhood" is a social construct. Before, young girls were just women who weren't fully developed. So if you wanted to have sex with them nobody gave a fuck, because there wasn't this notion of "save the innocent defenseless children".

Kids start masturbating when they are just a couple years old, they are sexual beings. In western society we like to pretend child sexuality doesn't exist in order to validate our narrow conformist world view.

>> No.9296470

>>9296438
See: the E-DICT definition, already posted somewhere ITT.

"Lolicon" refers to both a person and the materials, in both English and Japanese. And it can be spelt with a "c" or with a "k" because it's a romanization. In fact people didn't "settle" on "lolicon" until fairly recently (2004 4chan had /l/ - Lolikon for example).

>> No.9296472
File: 6 KB, 450x318, france.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296472

>>9296446
There are numerous studies out there showing it. Obviously, I doubt there is any reliable data for roman times because I don't think they were recording the average age of menarche back then. Here is a page that mentions it http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Menarche.aspx with a quote "Interestingly, this number has not been consistent throughout history. It appears that menstrual age has been decreasing from between fifteen and sixteen in the last half of the eighteenth century, to twelve to thirteen in the present day, at a rate of three months per decade (Tanner 1962)."

Also in Japan, as recently as the 1920's the average age was 15 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7327541 with it now being as low as 12 something.

I'm sure there are more resources out there if you google average age of menarche or something.

>> No.9296477

>>9296473
What even am i reading

>> No.9296483

>>9296462
Liberal feminists were the ones that were hellbent on raising the age of consent. Before they came and fucked everything up, in many states the age of consent was as low as 9 or 10.

>> No.9296487

>>9296472

Huh, it actually was that high. You learn something every day.

>> No.9296492

Oh look, it's this thread again.

>> No.9296499

>>9296483
The concept of feminism is that if you're a male you're already a rapist by group association.
Meanwhile single Mom's are touching their dirty vaginas for justin bieber or something.

>> No.9296494

I'm not even a pedophile, but it makes me sad that moralfags have so thoroughly taken over 4chan.

>> No.9296495

>>9296452
You're the one saying evolutionary traits are unnatural. What the hell, dude.

>> No.9296505

>>9296487
Well, not as high as he said.

>> No.9296507

>>9296494
At least we still have /jp/

>> No.9296508

>>9296483

>hellbent on raising the age of consent.

That's clearly because all men are evil demons.

>> No.9296509

>>9296494
I blame SA.

>> No.9296512

>>9296507
>At least we still have /jp/

I guess you're not reading this thread.

>> No.9296521

>>9296509
I blame the times magazine and people posting maymeys on facebook.

Fucking rules 1 and 2, I know it was just a stupid Fight Club parody but what the hell happened to hiding your power level.

>> No.9296522

>>9296505
I said it was 16/17. We don't have data for a lot of places, or earlier times, and it was around 16 for much of the 19th century. I may have been exaggerating a bit when I said a hundred years ago, but that is because I sometimes forget that we aren't in the 90s any more and a hundred years ago was only 1912.

>> No.9296524

We've discussed the whole age at menarche thing before.

It was last year in a thread about Sanae.

Get with the times.

>> No.9296525
File: 51 KB, 314x475, 689355.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296525

To add to Sakura's point, this book claims girls achieved menarche around the age 15-16.

Contrary to popular belief, Europe (and America) never really practised early marriages. The laws often allowed for girls to marry at 12 (and boys a little older) but it didn't happen so often, and only among a few weirdos in the aristocracy.

In 16th century England, for example, the mean age of marriage for women was around 25. It rose to about 26 in the 17th century. In 17th-18th century America, the typical age was anywhere between 18 and 25. Europe was similar, and it had been this way for a few centuries.

>> No.9296526

>>9296522
Wow, what a fucking nerd.

>> No.9296527

>>9296477
Foucault.

>> No.9296528

>>9296521
>Waaaaaah! My secret club! Waaaaaaaaaaaah!

>> No.9296529

>>9296524
I like to take breaks from /jp/ dude.

>> No.9296530

>>9296525
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_marriage#History_and_social_attitudes

Hi.

>> No.9296532

>>9296529
You mean that there's things you would rather be doing than lurking /jp/ around the clock?

I don't know what to say. Everything I know is a lie.

>> No.9296533
File: 195 KB, 512x512, 1330829388409.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296533

>>9296530
>wiki

>> No.9296535

>>9296530
This backs up what I'm saying.

I don't doubt tribesfolk and the classical world married early. It's just that a lot of people do think that two or three centuries ago, marrying at 12 or 13 was the norm. It wasn't, at least nowhere relevant.

>> No.9296536

>>9296528
It's still a secret club, try talking about your animays outside of highschool in real life to see where that will get you.

It's my secret manchild club.

>> No.9296537

>>9296530
>Additionally, 20th and 21st centuries' historians have sometimes shown reluctance to accept data regarding young ages of marriage, and would instead explain the data away as a misreading by a later copier of the records.

Wow.

>> No.9296540

>>9296521
>maymeys

IT'S PRONOUNCED "MEEM", DAD.

>> No.9296544

>>9296537
AGE OF BRIDE: 12?
CAN'T SHOW THAT IN VICTORIAN ENGLAND

>> No.9296545

>>9296540
Sorry I don't speak weeabonese turbonerd assblaster.

>> No.9296548

>>9296540
Stop being silly son, it clearly shows here that it's pronounced me me.

>> No.9296549
File: 107 KB, 242x300, WAAHHH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296549

>>9296545
BUT IT'S A PERFECTLY VALID ENGLISH WORD!!!!!

>> No.9296551

Studying a recently published picture of Prince Lennart of Sweden, I saw that he was carrying a copy of /jp/. This photo has added interest as it is of the grandson of a famous monarch who is also a great scientist. All of which goes to prove the wide field the imageboard covers in race, language, and social position. I might also say that when I view your imageboard, I know that the advertisements it contains are to be relied upon as well as being an education in themselves. If some of your readers who are constantly kicking will take a year's log and classify all the threads contained in them, they will find that everyone gets a fair share.

>> No.9296554

>>9296548
I always pronounced maymey since at least 2007 fuck you guys

>> No.9296561

>>9296554
It's me me.

>> No.9296557

>>9296535
Depends on the society. The southern you went the lower it got. With the lowest being India, IIRC.

>> No.9296559
File: 9 KB, 195x240, fap..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296559

gene
=
gee-nee

>> No.9296562
File: 36 KB, 606x553, rustleface4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296562

>> No.9296566

>>9296554

I always pronounced pseudo as per-swaydo until I recently checked how to pronounce it out of boredom since a bunch of nerds keep using the word.

>> No.9296569

>>9296566
I used to say hyper bowl for hyperbole.

>> No.9296571

>>9296566
I've never heard it said in real life, how is it meant to be pronounced?

>> No.9296572

>>9296559
>>9296559

I used the japanese romanized furigana ragatanga you nerd. Only a poster of superior intellect such as myself can speak Kanji dialect.

Get on my level.

>> No.9296580
File: 91 KB, 469x424, ;Þ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296580

>>9296562

>> No.9296581

>>9296569
Shit, same question for this, how is it meant to be pronounced? I've never heard it before.

>> No.9296592

Where's the problem to get married at 12yo? Girls already have shaped body and are sluts at that age.

>> No.9296584
File: 264 KB, 519x583, 1340784900488.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296584

>>9296562

>> No.9296585

I used to say subpoena "sub-po-ena". I still feel like the real pronunciation is wrong.

>> No.9296587

>>9296581
Bow like in Uwe Boll.

>> No.9296594

>>9296571
>>9296581
Fuckin americans.

>> No.9296601

>>9296581
>>9296571

hyperb o lee

>> No.9296596

>>9296571
pseudo = sudo as in sudowoodo the Pokémon

>> No.9296598

>>9296581
Hy per bow lee, I also used to pronounce queue kyuuee

>> No.9296599

Hi shitposters, shouldn't you be spamming the board? I thought you disliked any form of moderation. So don't spam the thread if you don't like it.

>> No.9296603

>>9296557
>at least nowhere relevant.

>> No.9296604

>>9296594
I'm not American, I just never interact with people in real life.

>>9296587
>>9296596
>>9296598
>>9296601
Thanks guys.

>> No.9296605

>>9296599
Shitposting a shitthread is like multiplying -1 and -1 = positive 1

>> No.9296607

>>9296599
I'm actually kind of busy today. I'll be back for more shitposting tomorrow.

>> No.9296611

Epitome = epi-tome

>> No.9296613

>>9296599
I was a shitposter.

Earlier today I quit, something I had been thinking for around 2 months now. The NSJ was the final straw. He was appointed by moot. When I went to him, all he said was that I should leave the board for the day and let you go without a day of being shitposted to death. He doesn't care about this place, and it's frustrating to be the only one trying to do something with no interference from the NSJ.

I did my best every day to keep this board in a sort of shitty level, but I'm just tired now. Too exhausting for no reward in any way, and absolutely no encouragement from the other shitposters.

I can tell you this because they removed my shitposter ID card, I won't be going back to being a shitposter. This thread is both burning a bridge and saying goodbye to you, the anonymous I cared for so much. I always came crawling back whenever I saw you enjoying good threads or trying to promote /jp/-related content, it was practically a reflex action by now. I will just be a regular anonymous enjoying the shitposts from now on.

So long everyone, I have no regrets. Good luck until I get replaced, and remember that the whole point of this board is taking it easy. Let the shitposters carry the burden of dealing with the janitors.

>> No.9296614

All this discussion of the oddity of pronounciation in The English Language has awakened a faint glimt of memory. Faint it is indeed, as I'm apparently unable to put my finger on the specific word which I have great difficulties pronouncing and in fact, still do. If I were to find this word in my register I can promise great entertainment as like it's containing mother, it sure is an oddity.

>> No.9296615

>>9296605
So, just because you don't like it, it is a shitty, unrelated thread? I guess it just proves how much of a spoiled kid the common shitposter is.

You should probably learn how to hide threads.

>> No.9296616
File: 38 KB, 514x530, rustleface6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296616

>>9296580

>> No.9296620
File: 29 KB, 180x282, Rustle 39.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296620

>>9296616

>> No.9296623

Oh, and also "premise". I used to say "pre-mize". It was kind of embarrassing when I learned the actual pronunciation.

>> No.9296624

>>9296615
No, you should probably learn how to hide posts.

This thread isn't otaku culture anymore than discussing Yuru Yuri s2 is.

>> No.9296632
File: 32 KB, 266x293, 1340360343173.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296632

>>9296620

>> No.9296634

I know that this is a bit late, but yesturday I discovered that I pronounced Cirno wrong.

I always said it like Zirno, but It's Sirno.

>> No.9296637

Is it bad that I fap to toddlercon every day?

>> No.9296639

>>9296611

eh-pit-oh-me, dum dum

>> No.9296640

>>9296637
Not at all.

>> No.9296641
File: 74 KB, 463x293, rustle face tracing number 243.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296641

>>9296632

>> No.9296649
File: 56 KB, 800x308, (TT ).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296649

>>9296641

>> No.9296646

>>9296624
Guess what, I see borderline or even off-topic threads being allowed everyday if they have some discussion in them. You're the type to complain when suddenly all off-topic threads get deleted and only strictly board related ones are left up, so I don't see your point.

>> No.9296654

>>9296637
I do too.

But the comments of the boorus make me burst out in laughter often when I'm just about to cum.

>> No.9296651

>>9296634
It's Chirno

>>9296615
Sorry I can't just ignore feminists in MY home.
Women are shitty and want to ruin anything good man has going in their life, also they don't want to compete with younger girls for the same few bunch of Alphas they chase after.

Touhou is lolicon by definition in a non sexual way, since Zun has a quite natural obsession with young girls in frilly dresses.

>> No.9296655

>>9296646
Discussion's over, we all came to the same conclusion.

The answer is no. And there's nothing to be ashamed of.

>> No.9296659
File: 34 KB, 515x491, rustleface8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296659

>>9296620
>>9296632

>> No.9296661

>>9296646
But this has been discussed to death!
Someone still hasn't brought up the Niponese obsession with Betty Boop in the 70s and the cult of cute, other than that this thread is done.

There's a lot of liberal shaming going on here, that's shitposting and not discussion. It pisses me off.

>> No.9296668

>>9296655
I was still discussing societal differences, but I guess with the meme and rustle spam the other posters just left.

>> No.9296675

>>9296668
I am guilty of that and genuinely apologize.

>> No.9296674

>>9296655
>The answer is no

It's yes, pedo

>> No.9296677

How dare people have insightful, on-topic arguments! We're only allowed to have the same discussions exactly once!

*goes to STG general #39372 and asks how to beat Misdirection*

>> No.9296682

>>9296668
I was arguing with you, and I fell victim to the same bullshit.

The shitposters are always the only winners.

>> No.9296683

I didn't even read the thread.

Would you a child if it wasn't illegal?
Well there you go.

>> No.9296680

>>9296674
Feminist

>> No.9296688

>>9296683
Yes, and I don't even like loli.

What does that make me?

>> No.9296689

>>9296677
Fine, I'll hide this thread. Feminism is my weak point.

Please, resume your discussion gentlemen.

>> No.9296687
File: 479 KB, 1600x1200, 1339056865104.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296687

>>9296683
Only if it's this girl.

>> No.9296695

>>9296687
My genuine katana could cut through that no problem.

>> No.9296691
File: 111 KB, 600x600, 1327949869028.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296691

>>9296687
>3d

Jesus fucking Christ at least spoiler that shit, I almost threw the fuck up.

>> No.9296693

>>9296689
Don't hide it just yet. What's your favorite Haruka picture?

>> No.9296698

>>9296688
>Yes
>and I don't even like loli.

LMAO IM NOT GAY BUT I LOVE FUCKING MEN

>> No.9296700

It doesn't where I live so I don't really care.

>> No.9296704

>>9296698
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_who_have_sex_with_men

>> No.9296706

>>9296677
I think there should be a challenge where you try to beat Misdirection while shooting Sakuya the whole time.

>> No.9296707

I have to admit I once got aroused. But all I did was slightly rub my crotch on her legs. It was conceived as playing.

>> No.9296708

>>9296691
3D little girls are the closest thing to 2D.

>> No.9296710 [SPOILER] 
File: 1.51 MB, 800x1134, 19efee433a92b34b74eee4993ee5f874.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296710

>>9296683
>Would you a child if it wasn't illegal?

In a heartbeat.

>> No.9296711
File: 57 KB, 397x393, 1327949361937.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296711

>>9296704
I don't even need to open that shit to know it's bullshit. Oh my god just come out of the closet faggot.

>> No.9296720
File: 8 KB, 176x137, 1333436258766.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296720

>>9296708
>imperfect disgusting beings are the closest thing to perfect beings

Why would I want to fap to disgusting, ugly shit?

>> No.9296723

So, suddenly /jp/ became full of normalfags and moralfags?

Shit, what the fuck did i missed?

>> No.9296734

>>9296720
But 3D lolis have blemish free skin and smooth bodies like 2D.

>> No.9296737 [DELETED] 

9296711
I used to take showers with my best friend in high school. I had sleepovers all the time. We ate chips, played video games and took a shower together at the end of the night. Then he realized that shit was gay and stopped.

I miss those days.

>> No.9296740

>>9296734
Look at the disgusting shit in that picture. Her face looks like it's been shot with a gun several times, on top of that, she has no figure or anything good about her.

>> No.9296742

>>9296737
Did your boners ever touch while showering?

>> No.9296745

>>9296740
>no figure
That's kind of the point of lolis.

>> No.9296748
File: 199 KB, 666x1000, 1341318428056.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296748

cute not pedo

>> No.9296750

>>9296723
It's the newest storm of le epic trollz migrating from /a/ and /v/. Don't worry. Most of them will get bored after two weeks and return to their ghettos.

>> No.9296752

>>9296745
>point of 3d lolis

ftfy

>> No.9296754

>>9296723
I blame Zorak, regardless of the fact that it is unreasonable to assume it is all the work of a single incompetent SA mod.

>> No.9296758

>>9296750
They may be actual normalfags. Someone posted a /jp/ raid thread on /b/ 2 days ago.

>> No.9296760 [SPOILER] 
File: 191 KB, 326x368, c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296760

Hey mister, can I borrow a dollar to buy some ice cream from the ice cream truck? My parents aren't home and I don't have any money..

I'll be your bestest friend forever, I promise!

>> No.9296762

>>9296752
What 2D lolis have figures? They all have boy hips and flat chests.

>> No.9296767

>>9296760
borrow THIS! *whips it out*

>> No.9296769

>>9296760
>>9296748
>>9296687
>3DPD
Yeah no, get that shit out of here.

>> No.9296775
File: 328 KB, 506x343, 2752e4642adbfd34008e592b5d2e0b69809.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296775

>>9296762

>> No.9296779

>>9296769
>Yeah no
Stop contradicting yourself!

>> No.9296780

Well a pedophile is the act of loving children. So I mean if you really truly are attracted to 2D cartoon children exclusively and not real children then I guess technically you are not a pedophile, just a lolicon. But I think whether you admit it or not, you like real children too. Think to yourself "If a cute girl wanted to and it was legal would you want to do it?" I think we both know what the answer to that is. Just because you are a pedo doesn't really mean anything though. Most pedophiles never even do anything to a child or anything anyways. Just control your urges and you will be alright.

>> No.9296784

>>9296775
That's just Korean artists plausible deniability so they don't get called pedophiles.

"B-But look at their hips.. and the lore says they are really old and stuff..!"

>> No.9296785

>>9296775
I can single out images too, your point?

>> No.9296790

>>9296780
> I think we both know what the answer to that is.
That just means that you will only take one answer regardless of what the other person says.

>> No.9296794
File: 145 KB, 227x438, ^_^.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296794

>>9296659

>> No.9296797

>>9296769
Sup /a/ try-hard?

>> No.9296801

>>9296785
So you ask what lolis have figures, I give you a picture to which you just go "YEAH WELL I CAN SINGLE OUT IMAGES HURRR"

>> No.9296809

>>9296780
Fucking retard liberal fag.
Go ask any male if he could have sex for free with absolutely no consequences with a relatively attractive female and then disappear.

Who the fuck in his right mind would say no. Seriously.

>> No.9296811
File: 18 KB, 425x282, sick little girl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296811

My tummy hurts, can you kiss it?

>> No.9296812

>>9296801
One exception doesn't prove the rule. Most loli pictures have no figure, that's kind of the point. They are supposed to be children after all.

>> No.9296816

>>9296785
Back in the day there was that huge assed big boobed loli CG set that got posted all the time.

>> No.9296817

>>9296780
So it's finally coming around full circle again..

You guys are retarded.

>> No.9296821

I would.

>> No.9296822

>>9296797
You're getting up there with the "fuck off with your spoilers" guy. Keep at it, anon!

>> No.9296837

>>9296812
Not really look at most swimsuit pics, they are pretty curvy, just flat chested.

It's a matter of opinion.

>> No.9296835

>>9296809
Asexuals, Homosexuals, Eunuchs
It's not like every man ever is just waiting to fuck. I honestly don't even believe that every heterosexual would take you up on that.

>> No.9296843

>>9296797

>He thinks only /a/ hates 3D.

SURE is summer.

>> No.9296844
File: 51 KB, 654x1000, loli_su 47541 - idol photo school_uniform hat kurahashi_nozomi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296844

Hi guyz I posed in playboy at age 11 and grew up to be a perfectly normal human being who even continued nude modeling as an adult.
U mad?

>> No.9296846

>>9296844
pics pls

>> No.9296847

the only real answer to all this stuff is

who the fuck cares just fap and shut up

>> No.9296852

>>9296760
>>9296811

Fuck off, annoying little shits.

Seriously, it isn't cute when 3D does it. I'd be more likely to physically abuse these kids than sexually abuse them.

>> No.9296859

>>9296835
>Asexuals
Most asexuals are just conformed ugly males who got fed up with rejection.

I still think you're full of shit unless the man has some sort of erectile dysfunction or is religious. Fucking a female with no consequences would be the ultimate form of masturbation, or sex toy.
Who doesn't masturbate.

>> No.9296865
File: 53 KB, 600x324, vapid.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9296865

>>9296835
>>9296859

>> No.9296876

>>9296859
>Most asexuals are just conformed ugly males who got fed up with rejection.
I don't see what that has to do with anything. Hell, even you imply that they actually exist.

>> No.9296877

>>9296865
BUT you're not spending any money.

It's consequence free sex.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action