/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Id like to see the research put into gathering this data.

>/jp/
>intelligent

I assume /int/ made this?

What kind of retard made that graph a jpg instead of a png?

>/sci/
>/mu/
>Higher than /jp/

Why would you put arrange sequential data on a bell curve? What exactly is the x-axis here?

>>5856178
/g/

>/jp/
>/x/

also, gb2/int/

>>5856182
That's what I was wondering. Clearly I am not intelligent enough to interpret this graph.

>>5856178
The board that made this, which is most likely the board at the top of the list.

>/int/
>intelligent

typical threads:

>lol scandinavian master race

>argentina
>white

>my country is better than yours

>boards by intelligence
>/lit/ and /3/ not miles above everyone else.

Guys

>meta

do not feed the trolls

>/jp/
>intelligent
wwwwww

>>5856182
>What exactly is the x-axis here?
I assume the x-axis is the intelligence, the y-axis is the amount of people of the given intelligence in the general population. The position of each board on the x-axis is supposed to represent the board's average intelligence.
Hence /b/ is the most retarded and /lit/ and /sci/ being the smartest. Which is bullshit, /sci/ is stupid as fuck and while /lit/ is about average, they're pretentious assholes.

fixed

>>5856159
All boards should be on /b/ level.
/thread

Why /d/ is so low?

Why is /m/ so low? I think /m/ is decent. At least it's better than /fit/.

This graph is totally bullshit. That's not how graphs work.

It should be one line denoting the intelligence of a single board, not a single line with board names at every point because that doesn't make any fucking sense.

>/sci/
Have ANY of you ever been to /sci/? It's like a combination of /new/ and /x/

>>5856241
seriously, /d/ is like an oasis of intellectualism compared to /h/

>>5856225
/sci/ isn't that stupid, it's just mostly religion trolls and "I earn X amount per year"

>intelligent
>/int/
>/k/

yeah.. no.

Ignoring the absolutely incorrect "graph", if it can even be called a graph, I would say /sp/ is the best board.

That is all.

>>5856257
It was ok at first. And by "at first" I mean the first 2 or 3 days. After that it was just "athiesm" vs. religion, racism and general retardation.

/mu/ should be lower, /d/ and /jp/ should be higher.

>/k/ on the more intelligent side of the distribution
ahahhahhahahah

Remember, always check the scale of your graph.

So, I just visited /x/ out of curiosity. I was in the mood for some creepy stories, but I was quite disappointed. How is any of that shit scary? Bad writers, the lot of them.

>>5856301
They don't seem too bad, compared to /sci/.

>>5856318
They're the same bastards that kept invading us when we were talking to Cornelia-chan, making it harder for us to enjoy our last moments together.

>>5856292
>implying the y-axis of a bellcurve isn't probability density
Oh you.

>>5856295
So, I just visited /mu/ out of curiosity. I was in the mood for some good hipster shit, but I was quite disappointed. How is any of that shit good? Bad listeners, the lot of them.

>>5856324
That's not related to intelligence though.

>>5856332
It is, actually. The less intelligent a board is, the higher tendency of raiding. This is why /b/, /sp/, and /v/ are clearly the least intelligent boards.

>>5856350
Then we get raided and trolled pretty hard actually. Or at least whenever they do they're usually pretty successful, unfortunately.

Why is /d/ on the lower, negative side, scale of intelligence?

>>5856350

One could argue that the frequency at which they leave those boards is proof of intelligence, not a lack thereof.

>>5856363
/d/...
/d/ has changed...
It shouldn't be THAT low, though.

lol

>>5856362
/jp/ is actually one of the least responsive (active) boards to trolling. It just seems like we're more responsive because of the higher rate of raids on us. We arguably get raided more than any board aside from /x/.

>>5856363
Sounds appropriate for those that like dick nipples and shit.

I'm betting there's a thread on /v/ RIGHT NOW where they've switched /jp/ and /v/ around.

>>5856363
Hell if I know. They're pretty damn smart when it comes to their fetishes.
Hell, they made this.

>>5856362
They're successful in that they can provide more traffic than us. Also, a lot of us leave when a raid starts.

>>5856387

There's that, and there's the slower rate of posting. The 'raiders' are a lot more visible.

>>5856386
Tell me more, Anonymous.

why is /d/ stupid

I don't think the person who made that chart understands what the curve actually means.

Why is /d/ so low?
In my experience, its the intelligent people who develop the more fucked up turn-ons.

>>5856159
I'd have expected /jp/ to be further to the right than that, what with the tendency for autistics to have high IQs

/cm/ is actually smarter than /c/. You're way more likely to see "baka desu sakura-chan! X3" type comments on /c/ than /cm/.

>/new/
>not by /b/

This list has a mistake.

>>5856397
OH WOW
Lecithin, here I come

We are intelligent. We just hate everything and everyone. Reported.

>>5856292
You clearly have no idea of how a Gaussian function works, do you?

not all of /jp/ is autistic
and autistics aren't necessarily very intelligent
just some of them are
much higher percentage compared to normal humans though