/jp/ - Otaku Culture

I want an eroge.

You can play as anyone, go after anyone.

KRAUSS/KANON.
NATSUHI/ERIKA.
DLANOR/EVERYONE.
FINAL DESTINATION.

>>4045187
I want a younger Eva/Krauss route.

Kyrie > Everyone

Her envy is the strongest

Siestas/Stakes/Jungfrau is the only way to go

>>4045193
I want a younger Eva/Natsuhi, she was in her prime just liberated from a temple, she was a pure miko, the preincess of the summer, and Eva was sly

>>4045187
Eroge? More like nukige.

>>4045202
>Siestas
I won't bother using them until 556 is added in an update
>Stakes
enjoy your NEE-SAN NEE-SAN NEESAN infinites
>Jungfrau
nothing wrong here...

>>4045181
I want a Umineko chess set.
Goddamnit, every time I read an EP I get the urge to play chess.

>>4045221
But there are more characters than needed for a standard chess set. Who gets to be a piece?

>>4045179
please cease and desist with your spamming on our board ano
n
ta
lk.c
om thanks in advance have a nice day many hugs from tiny loli

>>4045232
Battler is pawn, obviously.

>>4045232

You could have diffrent pawns. But well, you still coldn't fit everyone.

You're all fools.

The best thing to make is an Umineko styled game of CLUE!

It fits!

>>4045271
It was Joji with the hatstand in the subway.

>>4045196
Not according to Jessica's maths.

>>4045288
I hate R07 for that stuff.

>>4045232
White and Black each have different pieces. Obviously they play the same, they're just different for flavor.

Magic side:
Pawn: 7 Stakes & Goat-kun
King: MARIA
Queen: Beatrice
Rook: Virgilia & Goldsmith
Bishop: Ronove & Gaap
Knight: Furfur & Zepar

Human side:
Pawn: Parents + Kumasawa
King: Battler
Queen: Erika
Rook: Kanon and Shannon
Bishop: George and Jessica

I have no idea who the knights should be, just throw Nanjo and Gohda there.

It wouldn't be confusing to memorize because anyone who plays with it is obsessed with Umineko anyway.

>>4045323
I think Dlanor would be much better suited as a knight. After all, one of her themes is called 'Black Knight'.

Dlanor has a fucking rook on her arm guys

come on

>>4045323
Kanon and Shannon would make more sense as the knights, I think. Other than that, it's looking pretty good. Somebody make this happen.

>>4045329
You can add an alternative "troll side" with Team 34 & Bern. Pawns are Angeburgers obviously.

>>4045323

This is defenitely lacking Dlanor. Other it's good.

>>4045343
One knight is enough for Shkannon

>>4045343
And then what?
Does somebody pop up to switch your pieces for teh heck of it and the chessboard flips at random and you are forced to restart, and we will call his a masterpiece?

>>4045382
Actually, two games are played at once, with both the top and bottom of the chessboard, and flipping the chessboard counts as half a turn. Pointing, cackling, or saying "it's all useless!" counts as the other half. The entire game is played out this way, and no pieces may be moved except by the Game Master, who is a third person playing the game by himself. The winner is whoever can hold their breath the longest after the GM finishes playing by him/herself.

>>4045437
Fucking masterpiece, indeed.

Proposed troll side:

Pawn: Angeburgers
Rook: Dlanor (She deserves to have two pieces with calm and DIE THE DEATH expressions)
King: Bernkastel
Queen: Lambdadelta
Bishop: EVA & ANGE (kingside bishop is ANGE, queenside is EVA. )
Knight: Gertrude & Cornelia

>>4045382
I was thinking more like just regular chess, but with those character pieces. I suppose if they're character pieces, you could use them for any position you want. For example, make Battler a knight and Gohda the king, just for the hell of it. Changing the rules would be a bit much.

>>4045437
I would play this game, every day, until I got sick of it, which would be never.

>>4045437
We can call it witch chess.

>>4045462
It was more of a joke for the ridiculous umineko circumstances and it went over your head.

>>4045437
You know, a game of chess where players switched sides every five/ten turns would actually be pretty interesting.

>>4045474
Screw the rules, hold your breath?

>>4045479
is there an Umineko equivalent for this macro?

>>4045453
That also sounds pretty good. Bernkastel and Labdadelta would make a perfect king and queen. Angeburger pawns also sounds... reasonable, I guess? Goat-kun pawns might make a little more sense though. It also needs more Furfur & Zepar.

>>4045488
I think Umineko equivalent would involve George's foot and your head.

>>4045482
Not really, no.

>>4045437
ADDENDUM: Each person also has a little rubber hammer that is either blue or red, and whenever HAMMER TIME is declared (by whoever, really), the person with the blue hammer must try to hit the person with the red hammer as many times as possible before being hit once. This process is repeated ad infinitum, even after the game ends (especially after the game ends). If neither player concedes, another game must begin, no exceptions.

>>4045483
Nah. Witches play exactly by the rules. Fun part is that you don't know the rules. Your oppenent makes them up as she goes, then she cackles at you and calls you incompetent for failing to keep up.

>>4045221

>>4045501
The Joke missed you so bad, it killed your relative?

>>4045482
Now that I think about it, that really would be fun to play. Just as you're about to lose, the chessboard is flipped and you gain the upper hand. It would require a lot of concentration to win a chess game played like that, but goddamn if it wouldn't be more interesting and fun to play.

>>4045530
No, it would not.
The mechanic does not make sense and just ruins the pace and thought process.

>>4045515

This an excellent way to simulate Red and Blue Text. Good job.

Anyway, Umineko is more like a LARP.

>>4045530
So the people who enjoy Umineko are those who enjoy senseless masochism?
How about having the chessboard rotating constantly and the table going up and down while you concentrate, or when you move a pawn at the opposite end, the piece it promotes too is decided randomly or can just vanish by bad luck?

>>4045541
I think it would be pretty fun since you're basically fighting your own strategy with a strategy that someone else set up for you.

Both players would purposefully set themselves up to be in god awful positions, like exposing their kings, just to take it as soon as their next however many turns are available. It'd be a clusterfuck of ruining yourself until somebody just barely ruins himself the least. You could interpret that to be similar to Umineko, but that's a stretch, all things considered.

>>4045579
Chess does not work that way.
You add unnecessary moves that stall the game a 100 times over(since when it flips, you can just ruin positions till it flips again)

>>4045541

I'm a pretty good chess player and I don't think I can completely dismiss it as a failure without trying it, the implications are simply too complicated to dismiss offhand. A game like that would start involving intentional bad play and plans far more complex than in ordinary chess.

>>4045590
>>4045596
Of course, those theories only work if you plan to stick to 1 side. If you want to be the white pieces, and you want to win with the white pieces, then you're too narrow minded. If you want to win regardless of what color pieces you're using, and your opponent feels the same way, then of course it's going to be more fun.

>>4045596

Since you would still lose by checkmate you can't ruin it too much. Also you can'T move in to checkmate in x turns if this x would be greater than the turns till the board flips again. I would like to try it, I guess.

>>4045610
Your ideas of fun are way too fucked up.
It's like people playing reversi, switching sides at random and trying to have equal pieces instead of winning or losing.
Senseless masochism with circumstances that ruin your train of thought.

>>4045437
Super addendum!
Doing the following act as a full turn:
>Smashing your opponent's head against the playing surface.

>Declaring hammer time.

>Donning a cape.

>Dying.

The following act as half a turn:
>Flipping the chessboard.

><Good>, <see you again>, <Cool>

>"BEAAATORIIICHEE"

>Citing Any of Knox's 10.

>Sipping anything, imaginary or real.

>ahaha.wav

>"Useless! It's all useless!"

>Calling your opponent incompetent.

>"Nyeh", "Uu", "Uryuu"

>Solving the epitaph.

>Both players would purposefully set themselves up to be in god awful positions, like exposing their kings, just to take it as soon as their next however many turns are available. It'd be a clusterfuck of ruining yourself until somebody just barely ruins himself the least.

I don't think that's true. Sure, you might get a few weak players that actually try that, but you're forced to switch every x minutes. 'Just trying to survive till you can get back to the other side' won't cut it if the other player immediately continues attacking you.

>>4045677
The point is:
The nature of the game does not change, since you aim in the end for an advantageous positioning each turn in the chessboard.
Switching just STALLS the process. For no really good reason.

>>4045627
Okay, I understand that my idea of fun is more than a little bit masochistic. Be that as it may, it still sounds like a good idea to me. I'll need to try this out with somebody pretty soon, to see if it'll really work.
Also, whats wrong with reversi? It's fun to play every now and then. And this version of chess isn't very similar to reversi, perhaps you should have chosen a better comparison.
Still, I'm not going to try to protect or attack this new version of chess until I've tried it for myself.

>>4045677
It'd be relentless offensive on both sides, regardless, with 0 disregard for actual strategy since any attempt at trying to build up to a long-term one is pointless. Ultimately, it'd just be a fight of whoever can adapt the best to their opponent's stupidity.

>>4045704
The circumstances of REVERSI I pointed out is the problem, not the game itself.

>>4045705
You can do it in normal chess too.

>>4045692
In that case you're right.
How about we make the switch happen randomly?

And of course I'm not saying that it would be a 'more fun' way of playing chess or something silly like that.
But I can imagine it being a fun way to play, even if it's just one game.

Generally the trend would be towards playing your best still because you would never know when you have to play either side. But there would be the addition of people adding in intentional (hopefully hidden) weaknesses they can take advantage of. Imagine just how complicated it would get- you're moving forward a plan, taking the other side's pieces and suddenly you have to play from that position in four more moves. You would be like "oh shit, I better pull back now." Yep, it would be crazy. Not sure if an end game would be even possible.

>>4045735
The line that separates a good chess player and the others is how far you can plan ahead and adapt.
Random switching just stalls the process each time.

>>4045323
>Erika
>Queen

No, Ange. It makes more sense.

I kind of want Battler and Beato to be the king and queen.
Battler being all 'useless' whilst getting defended by Beato.
Ronove and Virgillia for Bishops.

>>4046361
Cape Battler is the optional king of the black side, no one has said there aren't optional pieces. Maria/cape-battler for kings, ande/erika as queens and so on