/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>You are in heat
>Furry shit
Another work with good art ruined.

>>3564737
Source.

>>3564763
>catgirls
>furry
it's like I'm really in /b/

>>3564769
>You are in heat

>>3564775
Catgirls can't be in heat?

>You are in heat

>>3564784
Yes but this make them furries.

>>3564814
Not really, considering there is NO FUR except for the ears and tail..

>>3564823
Yes really.

Maybe if those ears and tails were some kind of accessory and if there weren't the heat bullshit, I would consider them not furries.

So how about the source on OP?

>>3564859
Heat is just an excuse to make otherwise innocent, pure, cute girls do naughty things.
No one really cares about heat, unless they actually did research over when Mikan's heat cycle would be.

>>3564859
>implying that 10% is furry, ignoring the decade-old rule.
We have a newfag on our hands here, boys

Sauce?

>>3564968
>Rule
Hahaha.

Looks like the only newfag here is you, furry.

How rude OP, clearly people are asking for sauce, yet you continue to ignore them. If you don't have sauce yourself then you should have said it. At any rate I reported your thread.

Sauce:
http://moe.imouto.org/pool/show/926

Whats the sauce for this?

>>3564998
I was out getting lunch, sorry.

What does /jp/ think about dog girls?

>>3564984

Why do people post /h/ and /e/ content without the source? This always leads to pointless replies such as this >>3564765 that >>3564959 don't >>3564979 add >>3565005 anything to the topic.

If you *don't have the source AND your picture is /e/ you should state it in your opening topic. I think some people do this on purpose just to get other people to bump their thread for them. To all the Anons that requested sauce, go to: http://archive.easymodo.net/ and click the 'view same' or 'iqdb' link. Most of the time it'll work and you wont have to put up with waiting for the source.

http://archive.easymodo.net/cgi-board.pl/jp/thread/3564737#p3564737

>>3565019
I just noticed this post. I guess I can forgive you, but I'll post this any way for future reference.

ITT: People who believe catgirls and the like are furry and don't wanna admit they're wrong.

>>3565044
Fascinating.

>>3565033
I don't know about in general, but I like dog Sakuya.

I like Horo less without her ears. If that makes me furry, so be it.

>>3565044
Trolling and you got trolled.

>>3565043
I can create charts too.

>>3565077
It's not furry, >>3565075
is a normalfag.

Furry is a sexual preference, no different than lolicon.

>>3565085
Lolicon are at least attracted to their own species. Furry is just sick.

>>3565085
Negative: See picture

>>3565043
I never accepted that macro. Here's the history of that image, /b/ had just got finished banning furry threads (which is surprising considering the fact that /b/ is home to millions of fetishes). The furries with no place to go went to the other boards. And just like the Jews that pretended to be white inorder to fit in, the furfags went and added text to this >>3565043 image. Let me repeat myself, they added text to that image that (originally) had nothing to do with furry measurement. To put this in layman's terms, that macro is only true if you choose to believe it's true. Legally there is no legit scale measuring what is (or is not) a furry.

For instance, going off the textbook definition of a furrie alone: is a person that's sexually orientated towards any thing with animal characteristics. Said characteristics doesn't have to be fur. The characteristics could be a tail or a paw.

>>3565102
That comic is retarded.

>>3565121
Your ideas are fascinating. Could you expand on them a bit more?

>>3565121
hay guise, let's make up history about a board we first visited in 2008
>and just like the Jews that pretended to be white inorder to fit in, the furfags went and added text to this
This is where your bullshit fell apart. The furries never went into hiding, if they went into hiding we would have been LUCKY. Instead, they just posted furry anyways and continued doing Furry Fridays.

>Legally there is no legit scale measuring what is (or is not) a furry.
>unnecessarily bringing litigating into this.

If you can honestly say that you can look at 10% and 70% and believe they fall under the same category of fetishism, I fear you are a retard. I can say this as someone who doesn't care for either.

>>3565140
Coming from a guy that saw this >>3565043 macro and took it seriously, I cant take you seriously.

>>3565145
Then you should probably get the fuck out, because about 90% of the site agrees with that macro and has for a long time, that's why the image still exists.

>>3564737
>The file could not be found. Please check the download link.

RAPIDSHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRREEE

>>3565147
90% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

Popular opinion != truth.

But even if you were correct, thanks for proving my point about the Jew/furry espionage that's taking place on 4chan. The reason why you're misguided is because they've been spoon feeding you this nonsense since you were a kid. They want tolerance and respect for their perverted fetishes. For all I know you could be one of them.

Cite one fact to back up this >>3565043 macro. I'm waiting.

>>3565188
To be fair, you haven't cited any facts either.

>>3565188
I'm waiting for you to do just the same.

Popular opinion defines definitions, especially in a natural language like English. There is no objective "truth" on whether 10% is furry or not, the only kind of definition you will find for it is "Furry - adj- Covered with, wearing, or trimmed with fur."

In a matter like this, it IS won by popular opinion, and since you are the only one arguing the other side, I'd have to say you don't have too much clout here, especially when you make credibility-destroying remarks about jewish/furry conspiracies (That shit will only work on /b/ or /x/)

what are all these words

>>3565121
>the textbook definition of furrie
I wasn't aware that any textbook mentions furries. It sounds like you're just trying to pass your own definition off as fact.

To be honest if liking nekomimi makes me a furry then so be it. I really don't give a fuck. But you won't ever catch me yiffing in a fursuit.

if you take away the ears and tail of a Catgirl you have a normal girl, if you take away the ears and tail of a Furry, you have animal cruelty.

Anyone have a nice and neatly structured archive to download? Moe-imouto isn't that great for saving a whole doujin.

>>3565259
So bad, I started downloading before this post and I'm still only at 17 our of 301 images.

There is a rapidshit on /rs/ of it, I don't know if the quality is as good as the moe.imouto one, it looks way too small (40MB)

> Download (228 MB), LQ (6.9 MB)
Don't have an account yet to get it.

banpu

http://rs467.rapidshare.com/files/276511395/_C76__NEKO_WORKs__NEKO_PARADISE__original_-_full_color_-
_eng_-_Sakinobashi_.zip

>>3565235
>But you won't ever catch me yiffing in a fursuit.
But that's because you'll be in a fursuit and we won't be able to recognize you.

pic related