/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>3393495
Who the fuck would want to browse /a/.

Get the fuck out /a/ devs.

Derek, is this safe?

>>3393501
ok, just post that image and I'm out of here

Who would want to browse /a/
?

>>3393503
I'm checking right now. It's supicious. s:

>>3393505
You mean the marisa get the fuck out of /jp/?
Too bad I don't have the pic now, posting from my work PC.

Protip: try using iqdb.

>>3393503
well, you can read the code and it doesn't use any greasemonkey gayness like unsafewindow.

KILL IT WITH FIRE

That's no image bro, that's a whole thread.

>>3393518
nope, it was a series of pics from one of the first episodes (maybe the first itself): the one in which onizuka goes to some girl student's home and break the wall between her two nearly divorcée parents' room

>>3393501
>>3393512
Well, I would like to discuss anime. But /a/ is full of bad threads so it doesnt really help..

>>3393527
Good times.

>>3393518
>the marisa get the fuck out of /jp/?
That image is fucking ugly.

>>3393538
Go to /bun/ or /ghost/.
But both are quite shitty too. But better than /a/ at least.

>>3393538
http://bunbunmaru.com/wakaba/general/

>>3393542
Drawn by Sai I think.

I saw it in his pixiv profile.

>Gore spammer

OH FUCK YES RENAI CIRCULATION.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Tgv83IKDtc

This would have been really helpful back when I lurked both boards.
Still, can tweak it to merge the boards still bearable, so that's got to be worth something.

Thanks.

>>3393546
The image would be fine if it was just the drawing. Instead it's got ugly fucking text on it and ends up as yet another terrible macro image.

>>3393552
Protip - You can use the no text version.

>>3393527
damn, that's why!
Dude, thanks a lot: I've been looking for that for,
well, a day :)

>>3393555
I don't use it at all because I'm not a faggot. People will still be using that shitty text-overlaid version though, I've hardly ever seen the no-text picture being used.

>>3393527
>February 21 2008
The wall has served us well, at the cost of our souls.

>>3393551
yeah, you just need to modify the part which makes the links (or simply add #merge=boardname)
It doesn't work crossdomain though, so you can't merge /b/ and /u/

>>3393556
No problem bro.

also
>:)
Stop that.

>>3393495
OP your script breaks the firefox extension so until that's fixed I'll stick to the usual /jp/

>>3393562
There you go faggot, enjoy. Though I will still go for the text one because it pisses off fags like you.

You can't tear down that wall, you will regret it.

>>3393583
>There you go faggot, enjoy.
I'm not asking for the fucking picture, you imbecile. As I stated before, I'm not the kind of braindead moron who thinks reaction pictures and green text are the height of wit.

Andatevene via, NGIfags.

>>3393575
Ah, right!
that's an easy fix: I add a div around each thread(which is the way it should be, and will be from what I saw in /test/) for better handling, which probably breaks the 4chan extension.
Thanks for the feedback.
I'll take it into account when 4chan will switch to the new code and I'll have to rework some routines.

That "tear down this wall" faggotry was the worst shit. I was glad to finally get away from fucking /a/

>>3393601
rosichi perche' come tutti i niubbi non hai lo spazio web gratuito su ngi.
Spazio web su ngi = oldschool

>>3393618

Non so di che cosa tu stia parlando, NGI mi sta sul cazzo a prescindere.

>>3393606
well, I think it was nice.
I really missed /jp/ contents when I still browsed /a/.
Unfortunately /jp/ is too slow and I give it a look once in a while and /a/ without jp is really really really really really shitty.
Nowadays I only browse /b/ and /g/, but they are always the same shit, same threads, same fucking comments, many times there are two identical threads around in the board... too many posters.
And that's why I was bored

Troppi Italiani in questo thread.

>>3393495
If you really wanted to make a shittier version of /jp/, then why'd you choose to merge it with /a/ instead of /b/? Not that there's much difference in the quality of the posts these days.

Oh /jp/, you so tsundere.

>>3393656
technical limitations:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same_origin_policy

Italiani, sul mio /jp/?

>>3393662
Tsundere means there's a dere part.

>>3393601
>>3393644
>>3393674
proof why 4chan is shit these days

>>3393642
>Nowadays I only browse /b/
Jesus Christ.

>>3393685

Giusto, quelli di NGI rovinano sempre tutto.
Adesso me ne ritorno su DioChan.

>>3393690
It's like watching a bad movie:
you know it's bad, your friends know it's bad, the fucking actors know it's bad, but it's awesome

>>3393642
>Nowadays I only browse /b/ and /g/,
So you're in it for the speed eh?

I think the past 5 minute rule before posting should return. Fast boards aren't necessarily good, slow ones aren't either. But when people cave into boredom and just spam spam away and post on impulse I've noticed a decreasing likelihood of substantial threads happening.

>>3393695

No dai, Diochan no.

>>3393710
I think it's more related to the number of users around posting:
since 4chan boards have no memory and no index (it's not like you ask about CRT monitors in the CRT monitor thread), the task to remember things is given to the users.

Here's what used to happen:
one user: I'd like to build a new pc, here's my rig: blablabla
reply1
reply2
reply3

There is only one rate my rig thread on the forum and there haven't been similar threads for a while, so people reply and a decent thread develops: some guy post some fact most in the board know, some other guy replies to it adding more information which is then stored by all the readers.

Todays, there are too many people making too many identical threads (of course they do: no way to track if today we already had a US vs EU thread and especially no way to post in it if it was already destroyed), so we have caturday 5:58AM and caturday 6:50 AM
The point is that this way we fraction the users between multiple threads, and users get tired and contribute less and less, because each thread is felt less unique and special.

Sorry for the wall of text.