/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>3122430

It's all true. The streets are paved with gold.

Gold roads would suck though.

No, seriously.

"no republicans."

You heard it here first, idiocy has a face, it's people who hate republicans.

>>3122458
inb4 200+ replies.

Troll or delusional weeaboo. Move on.

>>3122458

Fuck off, butthurt teabagger.

>>3122460
This isn't old /n/ or /r9k/.

>>3122461
both

>>3122460
keikaku doori.

>>3122458
Hope. Every single fucking conservative/republican I've met are nationalist overly-traditionalist bible-humping faggots that voted for Bush. Sure there are American republicans who aren't fucktards but they're extremely rare. I wouldn't hate a republican like Denny Crane or Rorschach if I met them in real life.

women are better looking? when is the last time these trolls have actually looked at an asian broads teeth

>>3122461
Op here. I don't believe those things in the image. I just saw it posted on /v/ and wondered how true it is

>>3122476
*nope

>>3122476
See >>3122464

>>3122483
And I was referring to the guy in the image.

too much sage right there
or maybe....butthurr?

>>3122494
im butthurr

>>3122430
It doesn't take much to be better than the USA, so yes.

>>3122497
No, I'm Butthurr!

>>3122494
Sage is not an insult around here, brah.
>>3122497
lol'd.

It's true. If you're a late teenager/adult middle class person or higher in Japan you have it better than most Americans of the same class. The society just functions better because they're not so obsessed about religion and traditionalism.

Republicans are out there working to make future children pure and non-slutty through abstinence. Democrats want to give everyone condoms and birth control pills and turn all girls into sluts. not that they aren't sluts already. The Republican party is superior.

>>3122510
It kinda does. Even when you disregard all the nationalism and pride a lot of Americans have it's still better than most countries.

>>3122532
Brb, becoming a republican.

this thread is bad and you should feel bad

US=UK>>>>>Japan>> Australia

>>3122535
Not really.

>>3122535
Americans are a first-world nation, but they're low-tier for a first-world nation.

First world, not so good.

>>3122532
>Republicans are out there working to make future children pure and non-slutty through abstinence.
THIS IS A LOT WORSE THAN IT SOUNDS
>Democrats want to give everyone condoms and birth control pills and turn all girls into sluts. not that they aren't sluts already.
THIS IS A LOT BETTER THAN IT SOUNDS

What's wrong with sluttyness if you take precautions to not get pregnant?

>>3122547

I lol'd. I'm not even American (French), but you're a fucking idiot. Saying America isn't better than most countries is ridiculous. It may not be the best, but it's certainly up there.

>>3122558
>What's wrong with sluttyness
Haha, oh wow!

GET OUT!!

OP here, can someone answer my question seriously? I thought you guys were educated about Japan

>>3122583
There's a reason why the word "slut" is an insult.

>>3122574
You should be able to figure this out yourself.

>>3122558
It turns people into nihilistic shits

>>3122562
If you compare it to the large amount of third-world countries, sure!

>>3122574
To answer the question: yes, it's better.

>>3122574
wwwwwwww

>>3122476
Will Wright is a Republican

>>3122571
Don't give me that kind of typical 4chan quick dismissal bullshit. Explain

>>3122581
Who?

>>3122583
Get out woman/femnazi/normalfag.

/jp/ only pretends to know about japan. outside of video games and anime they dont know shit

>>3122546
This, basically.

>>3122532
Your first statement contradicts your second statement.

>>3122588
People who think all liberals are some kind of closet psychotic serial killers are dumb. It's an extreme minority.

>>3122599
We don't, actually. We've never pretended to know, or care for that matter, about real life Japan.

ITT: Children who know jack shit on what their talking about but try to act intelligent anyways

>>3122604
it does? I don't see it.

>>3122591
Yeah, it's been popularized as an insult by bumb conformist conservatives. There's nothing really that wrong with slutiness.

>>3122562
You obviously know nothing.

>>3122464
I wish you were right.

I troll'd 4chan xD!!!!111

I maed an Yahoo account and did sum real stupid question lie k being a weeaboo and shit lol

them i posted a pic on 4chan and they got rage xD xD xD

U GOT TROLLED !!!!!1111

>>3122625
Yet polygamy is a crime in a majority of countries.

>>3122637
That's a pretty long time to plan a troll, bro. Considering the answers in question are from two years ago.

>>3122642
Imma a master troll and planned dis beforehand xD xD

>>3122637
>>3122649
I see we have the king of irony in this thread.

>>3122640
Anti-polygamy laws prohibit you from MARRYING more than one person. You can fuck as many people as you want if you're only married to one.

And monogamy is one of the oldest dumbest laws that I expect to be changed in the next 20 or so years.

>>3122691
this

>>3122691

Monogamy is a good law because it prevents the top 1% of men gathering all the women, leaving everybody else to wage wars to defuse their sexual frustration. Almost any woman will take the 20th share of a top-ranking man rather than the only share of an average ranking man.

>>3122691
Anti-bigotry laws only still exist because of tax and property reasons. Adultery laws exist in places, but are always struck down whenever challenged.

>>3122458 here.


Mission successful, returning to base.

>>3122712
That might actually be a good thing. Only the good ones would remain, and the rich and powerful wouldn't go around starting wars over oil and whatnot because they'd be happy all the time.

>>3122464 here

Fuck all of you.

>>3122732

Remembering that the places in the world where monogamy is legal these days are the durka lands of infinite bloodshed, maybe not.

>>3122712
Why would any man want so many women? Women aren't just obedient sheep these days that you can keep in a harem and take for sex when you want. Sure if polygamy was enabled we'd have a lot of cases where there's 1 man-several women but we'd also have 1 woman-several men cases so it would all balance out. And no rich/pretty would want to take ugly/poor people for spouses so the ugly/poor people will get together with each other.

>>3122756
>Why would any man want so many women?

You appear to be gay, sir.

>>3122759
I think you might mean polygamy, bro.

>>3122759
Bigotry is pretty much illegal in all 1st, 2nd-world countries. 3rd-world countries... well, you'd first have to find an agency that actually handles official marriage licenses in order to contest multiple marriages.

>>3122764
You think it's a smart idea to have so much women but these days it would take too much fucking money to fuel all their interests.

>>3122759
That's a very good point.
I guess you can't change human nature so easily.

>>3122772
And by bigotry, I obviously mean bigamy.

Because I am smart.

>>3122774
just dick them unconscious

>>3122774

That's why only the billionaire playboys would have multiple women. Even "successful" people who just aren't billionaires would be left with their left and right hand.

I'm quite serious about this when I say that monogamy laws are one of the best inventions of the western world, and that has nothing to do with religions and ghosts in the sky. It just ensures that roughly every man will get a woman and roughly every woman will get a man.

>>3122766

Yeah, of course I did. Sry about that. The places where polygamy is legal are insanely violent places, and while correlation and causation are different things, it still makes one suspicious.