/jp/ - Otaku Culture

36?

35,3333333333333

>>2680266
The Korean learns it with 36 at school.

It depends if you are using year as the name for a particular time period (the year 1945) of time or as a measurement for the length of time (I am 25 years old).

The period from the year 1910 to the year 1945 contains 36 years. However the length of time between the beginning of 1910 and the beginning of 1945 is only 35 years.

So there were 36 years in which Korea was occupied by Japan. But the occupation only lasted 35 years.

>>2680293
hey!
Then Korea presidential term is six years.
Write it to the textbook with six years; is there it?

>>2680293
The occupation time is the same no matter how you calculate it.

1910年から1945年までを36年間と表現することも日本では珍しくありません。

>>2680300
They're calculating two different things: the duration of the occupation and the number of calender years in which there was an occupation.

Think about a baby born on May 30, 2008. He has been alive in two years (2008 and 2009). However, it has only been one year since he was born.

The confusion arises because we use the word year to describe the different time periods from Jan 1st to Dec 31st AND ALSO to describe any other periods of the same length of time.

>>2680303
日本には、そのような表記は存在しません。
人の年齢の場合には、「数え年」と言うものが存在します。
Do not say a lie!

35

>>2680315
In the East Asia, an insect in the body of the person goes up to Lord of Heaven once a year, and there is a way of thinking to say that I report the act in the one year of the person.
At that time, only 1 gets old.
Therefore, in the case of the person, such a way of counting is possible.
However, other than the age of the person, We do not do such a way of counting.

>>2680342

It does seem unusual to me as well. The Korean textbook authors obviously chose this technically correct but very unconventional method in order to "add" another year to the occupation.

>>2680369
koreans aren't welcomed here.

>>2680342
I don't know about the other East Asian countries, but I know in China they traditionally add the year of gestation to your age.

>>2680389
You welcome blacks but not Koreans? Thats rather hypocritical.

>>2680432
In the case of the age of the person, a born moment is 1 year old.
Only 1 gets old whenever they greet New Year holidays.
This is how to count traditional age of the East Asia.
This is not applied to the history.

>>2680300
Jan 1 1910 to Jan 1 1945 = 35 years
Jan 1 1910 to Dec 31 1945 = 36 years

>>2680501
you're one day short there, buddy

They made a mistake in subtraction for 60 years.
Therefore they are the middle creating the excuses newly now.

35

>>2680501
Aug 22 1910 to Aug 15 1945

And what is this 36, apart from 6²?

What ho! More jungle-dwelling, buck-toothed scoundrels? The indignity!

1,945 - 1,910 = 35

Hey guys I can math good?

>>2680303
(″･ิ_･ิ)っ-̾
やっぱりお前チョンじゃん。他のスレでスコットランド系イギリス人とか書
いてたっけ？　スレを保存しておこうかな

>>No.2680443
>(″･ิ_･ิ)っ-̾ 05/30/09(Sat)07:32 No.2680443
>>2680399
>I am entirely British in origin, mostly Scottish.
I just thought that if we're going to argue over which culture is superior, I should put things in perspective for you.

lol liar korean. 嘘つき朝鮮人。

>>2680303
Korean are natural born liars

どう考えても３５だろ