/jp/ - Otaku Culture

It's Janitor-sama

>>10573080
Oh? It's not meido anymore? I'll still call him meido anyways.

I was trying to say in the previous thread, loli isn't illegal under that statue because nothing is considered obscene on the Internet due to the nature of it. It would be different if you were looking at this stuff in public.

Haven't 100% of the previous janitors been insufferable fucks who also frequent /a/?

Sorry for all the trouble janitor.

>>10573095
>loli isn't illegal under that statue because nothing is considered obscene on the Internet due to the nature of it.

You people come out with some right bullshit.

So since that's the same law that covers photographs, can I view photographic CP as long as I'm in the comfort of my own home?

I'm not sorry for shit.

>>10573120
I don't think anyone gives a fuck as long as they don't know about it and you're not shoving it into their faces.

>>10573120
That's covered under a different law. Note that photograph isn't anywhere in the entirety of the text. There is a reason it specifies it has to be obscene for depictions of children.

>>10573120

You can view photographic CP as long as you don't download it to your hard drive. Otherwise FBI agents whose job is to identify child pornography would be arrested.

>>10573120
Isn't there some sort of law in New York or some state near it which allows that? Where possession and viewing of ACTUAL CP is fine, but downloading/obtaining it isn't? I don't really understand how that law works in the first place.

But yeah, these are just drawn little girls. Who cares? No one is getting hurt or anything.

>>10573120
Photographs of naked children are always considered obscene. Cartoons, on the other hand, are accepted on the Internet community as not obscene.

>>10573141
Don't both using logic with that one, hes not all that bright.

>>10573138

>>10573147
Actually, there was this book in a public library that had a photograph of a naked child in it because it was not considered obscene, but for educational purposes.

>>10573141
(1)(A) and (1)(B)
OR
(2)(A) and (2)(B)

Obscenity is only (1)(B). Lrn2parse and logic.

Also read the whole page:
>the term “visual depiction” includes undeveloped film and videotape, and data stored on a computer disk or by electronic means which is capable of conversion into a visual image, and also includes any photograph, film, video, picture, digital image or picture, computer image or picture, or computer generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means;

Do you have ADHD or something?

This is THE child porn law. Just accept that your pedo cartoons are illegal and move on.

>>10573160

>>10573175
I'm stealing all your K-on images.

>>10573146
Hurr durr, what is caching? You can make a mens rea defense, but good luck with that when you have loli doujinshi saved into C:/encrypt_later/pedoshit/

>>10573147
Hahaha oh wow. Good luck putting that to the Miller test. I'm sure they'll bring in /b/tards instead of "average people", just for you!

>>10573167
Cartoons have artistic merit, dipshit. It also isn't obscene if you post it in a place where it's not considered obscene by the community, like /jp/. So it's exempted on both counts.

>>10573184
Have you heard of defense lawyers? They would do that.

>>10573180
K-ON is for everyone.

>>10573184
You are aware you can clear your cache, right?

>>10573183
Holy shit you're a riot. Next time Uncle Bill films himself fucking his teenage daughters, I'll tell him that cinematography is art. I'll also make sure he uploads it to Vimeo instead of YouTube, because that's where artists hang out.

>>10573196
Why are you making new ones anyway? I'm sure you already had those.

>>10573202
Cinematography isn't art. Drawings are.

>>10573191
Good luck with that.

>>10573199
Of course. Though if they can prove you received or sent it, you're fucked. Read (a) and (d)(1). Enjoy your ISP ratting you out, pedo.

>>10573222
That's why the law explicitly mentions "cartoons" right, dipshit? I guess that was a typo!

>>10573224

i'm pretty sure i've seen this exact discussion at least thirty times

>>10573231
They also say painting, but who ever heard of a painting without artistic merit? They are just covering all the bases, even ones that would always be exempted.

>>10573253

>>10573256
All photographs are art. Here, let me quote Wikipedia at you:
>Photography is the art
Doesn't mean all photographs have artistic merit, just as some shitty scribbles aren't art.

But whatever, you're the expert.
Just make sure you tell this guy and the Western District's attorney they're completely wrong:
http://www.monett-times.com/story/1904776.html

>>10573286
As soon as you tell those vendors who sell loli online that they are all criminals who are being ignored by the FBI. Or better yet, tell the FBI they aren't doing their jobs since you are so convinced that some cartoons are illegal child pornography no matter how ridiculous it sounds.

>>10573330

>>10573320
It says it right there in the Code of Laws of the United States of America, broppenheimer, and people have been arrested for it. I guess smoking pot is legal because I do it and so do all my friends, yet none of us have been arrested for it even when the police were around.

Some of you pedo freaks think photographs of kids being fucked is "ridiculous", because "nobody is being harmed by looking at it" and whatever other bullshit you pull out of your anusholes to justify being creeps. I just hope you get locked up before you ruin some poor child's life.

>>10573348
I'm not the one who just admitted to using illegal drugs. You are the one who belongs in jail.

>plea agreement

It didn't go to court, in other words.