/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>42498321
I'm very fortunate in that I can just follow the "mature woman" tag + relatively few individual freelancers and non-hag exclusives at studios I otherwise have zero interest in. As a result, my monthly acquisitions usually looks like:
>Madonna (+Monroe and other sublabels)
>Takara Eizou
>Center Village
>Ruby (mostly just for their BKD- incest hot spring road trip series)
>Planet Plus
>any other smaller hag studios that's featuring a freelancer I like
+
>Akarin
>Aika Yamagishi
>Nao Jinguji
>Julia
>Yuri Honma

However, it's not indiscriminate and there's still some curation involved. I also follow the release schedules and preview circuit which means I already know what I will be watching the following month rather than just stumbling on stuff when they release/become available on sukebei or whatever

>>42065759
it's possible that madonna will be having a really lean january with barely any releases, not even from the regulars. there's only 4 releases in the early batch (excluding compilations) and no MADOOOON!!!! either
>Kana Mito
nude model NTR series

>Marina Shiraishi
whispering temptation series (focus on lots of seductive whispering dirty talk)

>Ryo Ayumi
endless sex with son's friend series

>Yuria Yoshine
some kinda office lady and boss hot spring trip drunk rape/humiliation thing. Yuria has a new hairstyle with bangs here

one sir mentioned that aya ueha tweeted about big delays even for stuff that's already been filmed so i'm guessing it's all related to the new law. as predicted, there was a big lag between the law being instated and any discernible impact on schedules, releases etc

>>42046677
100% agree with your assessment. i always assumed that's how most people viewed these threads but evidently not

>>42046710
>he does it every thread to multiple people
you mean... engage in conversation/discussion/? I think you're over-exaggerating our villainy here kek we've always maintained the position that these aren't hag-only threads and that a healthy general has active discussion of all types but it's not our responsibility to hold back from contributing. if someone brings up an interesting prompt for a conversation, it's in everybody's best interests for serious engagement of all kinds.
being a hagchad doesn't mean i don't want to see other categories thriving or replying either; in fact, it would bring me great joy to see as many lolichads, slampigchads, goblinachads, bijinchads, etc etc all give someone (you)s if they've proposed an engaging topic for discussion alongside any hagposting because that just means a bustling and lively general. but, by your logic, some posters should arbitrarily be made to feel bad or discouraged from sharing their specific insights. the goal should be enriching discussion with as many angles and perspectives as possible and it's not our fault that you're hyperfocusing on the hags we share, nor is it our fault that we have so much to say and contribute