[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Search:


View post   

>> No.40578060 [View]
File: 943 KB, 820x994, 1644230797094.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
40578060

Just got this. Pretty sure its a popular onahole and most of you have it already, so instead of a review I'll just leave a short list of quick impressions:

-The comparisons to the Lolinco Virgo are extremely accurate. They're so similar to each other that it'd be far faster to list what's different about them instead, so most of these impressions will be just that.
-The entrance its nowhere near as appealing as the Lolinco. Literally just a hole. There's a modeled mons and butt, but they aren't part of the entrance itself.
-It has tits. Surprisingly they aren't just dead weight like I thought they'd be. They balance out the ona quite nicely and they even feel kinda nice to play with, especially if you like the idea that your onahole is actually a small fairy with big tits.
-The tunnels are incredibly similar, with the main difference being that its both looser and also wider in places. People call this a tight hole but that's not quite accurate. The Lolinco Virgo is tight; it's both narrow and the material doesn't stretch very easily. But the Eromaid is really just narrow. Its material is way more forgiving than the Lolinco and will let you stretch it without much trouble. And even then, its only narrow in certain spots. There are certain spots that are actually pretty wide, unlike the Lolinco which is narrow all the way through.
-Said wide spots are likely also the reason the hole is somewhat louder than using a Lolinco. It also keeps it from being able to create a particularly good air seal, but these kinds of holes really don't need that.
-The actual sensation of fucking it itself is, thankfully, different enough from the Lolinco that its worth owning both, despite the sensation also being somewhat similar. What differentiates it for the most part is the big bumps on it, as well as the wider chambers and what feels like a longer tunnel (but I didn't check the measurements).
-And of course it needs to be said, its a great fuck. By hand, by fucking it, front side, back side, tilting it, turning it, its a very, very high quality onahole experience and will never let your dick get bored. I didn't even need porn.
-Cleaning and drying is another place it shares a lot in common with the Lolinco, although there are differences here too. The fact that the tunnel can be a bit wider and much easier to stretch than the Lolinco means its way easier to get flowing water into the uterus, which is a very nice difference. However since the tunnel is (feels?) longer, you still have to work a bit to get in there, so the difference between the two is minimal.
-And finally for drying, it has the same exact problem the Lolinco does once again: the outer lips of the uterus. The solution is much the same as the Lolinco in any case, although I did find it the tiniest bit tricker. That might just be because I'm so used to getting the moisture on the uterus lips for the Lolinco by now. Thankfully the extra stretchiness of Eromaid helps make this more manageable.

I can see why this hole is popular, its an absolutely fantastic fuck with an interesting and fun tunnel comparable to a Magic Eyes hole while also being an entire 1000 yen cheaper. If you're the kind of person who only wants to own 1 or 2 holes, you don't need both this and the Lolinco. If you're a collector like me, they're absolutely both worth owning. Of course if you absolutely have to pick between the two, I'd say you can't go wrong with either. Maybe pick the Lolinco if your penis is on the shorter side, and the Eromaid if its on the longer side. I'm about 6 inches and both are fun and feel comfortable for me though, so do as you see fit.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]