/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>15670483
You cannot prove a negative.

>Just like he called his loved one annoying and dumped her?
Love is an illusion, a misunderstanding.
Mutual love is a mutual misunderstanding of being mutually loved.
Love is an illusion on both sides, and so long as both sides push the illusion of love towards the other side, love will persist. However, Erika stopped her pushing and love crumbled, so the boyfriend lost the will to maintain his love.
Just as people become disillusioned by their love over time, it only takes a crack for the illusion of love to break and to seek an alternative.

There was no proof that the boyfriend did not keep pushing love towards Erika, but there is evidence that Erika lacked love by looking for a negative that could never be proven.

>There's only so many coincidences you can encounter before having to conclude that the unknown perfume, the unexplained disappearances and the weird glances he's giving to that other girl all lead to one thing.
Those are called suspicions, not evidence. If he hangs out with a girl, is that proof of infidelity? Does looking at the side when a girl passes mean that he has burning desires to rape that girl?

Without love it cannot be seen and Erika lacked love to see that he was faithful.