[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Search:


View post   

>> No.29559513 [View]
File: 194 KB, 433x600, 1219612337815.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29559513

>>29537427
That's actually something like how the level drain spell used by high tier nymphomancers in the setting works.

>> No.20276522 [View]
File: 183 KB, 433x600, 1219612337815.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20276522

>>20276498
>This is speculation on the part of the author, but perhaps the reason may be more fundamental than that. In actuality, the spell has no attack capability. Instead, the true nature of its effect is to “annihilate the existence of monsters”. To “annihilate” living things, especially monsters, which have tough vitality and are made up of complex structures, requires an extremely advanced and difficult spell. It was probably only possible for the chief god precisely because she possesses the power to create life and had created the monsters herself, and thus, she knew absolutely every little detail about them. This spell, which is a version altered to enable use by human casters as well, presumably may have a complex spell formula with numerous conditions and *constraints. In conclusion, couldn't it possibly be that “evil obliterating spell”, which has the power to annihilate “monsters”, just isn't able to recognize the current monsters as “monsters”?

>“Oh, holy light!
>Purge the wicked in the names of the gods!
>...Huh? W-Wait! Wait!”
>~excerpt from the records of a certain cleric~

<><><>

>Translation notes:

>* 悪魔 akuma, meaning “demon” is translated as demon here, but it's talking about demons in general and not the specific “demon” race, which is デーモン dēmon.

>* 誓約 seiyaku, which means something like “oath/vow” was used in the original text, but 制約 seiyaku a homophone meaning “constraints” seems to make more sense in context.

<><><>

>Perentie note:

>The reference to the chief god creating the monsters is probably reference to the past or perhaps original chief god (albeit we have no reason to think the current chief god, despite being inexperienced, might not have made some life as well). The point remains that the spell was possible because at the time the chief god was the one who defined what the monsters were and knew everything about them, but once the current Mamono Lord came to power she changed all that.

>> No.20248254 [View]
File: 183 KB, 433x600, 1219612337815.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20248254

Today we have two more basic spells before moving to some big spells. http://monstergirlsredux.com/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=1653

<><><>

>Spell Break

>Difficulty: 1 out of 3
>Mana Cost: 1 out of 3

>A spell that dispels magical effects cast on a target. Spells with ongoing effects invariably leave the caster's mana in the target's body to maintain the spell, and the effects of such spells can be ended by causing that mana to disperse.

>However, to dispel a spell requires as much mana as is being used by that spell, or perhaps even more. Also, this spell is by no means omnipotent. Only spells that are “temporarily” active can be dispelled. For example, it's possible to dispel spells that are used to temporarily boost physical abilities using mana, but the kind of spells that restructure the body to permanently maintain high physical abilities cannot be dispelled. It is also powerless against spells that are constantly active as part of a race's ecology, as well as spells that have been applied with affixation processing to magical items, magical creatures, etc. In other words, the “protective mana” that safeguards her partner during sex that all monsters possess, the flotation of the sort of races that constantly use mana to fly, and so on, cannot be dispelled. Neither can beings that came to life from mana dwelling within objects be returned to mere objects with this spell.

>Furthermore, changes that were produced directly by the effects of a spell can be dispelled, but it has no effect on the phenomena that occurred along with that. For example, suppose that a target has been magically implanted with lust like that of a succubus and she is copulating with a man. It would be possible to extinguish the lust she had been implanted with using “spellbreak”, but even so, once a woman has known devilish pleasure, it becomes engrained in her body and mind, and will never disappear. Even if the effects of the spell were the impetus, the desire to continue immersing herself in sex and pleasure that newly sprouted from having known devilish pleasure, and the gradual transformation of her mind and body into that of a succubus cannot be undone because it is no longer due to the spell's effects.

>The various spells that monsters use to charm men can also be dispelled with “spellbreak” in some cases, but the charm monsters possess that enthralls human men is ultimately something a monster is inherently endowed with due to monster ecology itself. Spells only support it. If a man has beheld a monster's uncanny beauty, exchanged words with a monster who tempted him in a lovely voice, reached towards her soft skin which looks as if just touching it would feel wonderful, or simply received pleasure from a monster for even the briefest moment, then the fact is that he will be charmed by that, and the lust aroused in him will no longer have anything at all to do with the effects of a spell. If a man has “directly” come into contact with a monster's charm in any way, shape, or form, then it will already be too late even if the spell is dispelled.

>“I'm fine now that you broke that spell the succubus put on me.
>You've saved me... haven't you...
>Aah... You look very yummy...”
>~a human female knight who had been captured by a succubus~

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]