/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>13555701
>We actually had regular tea threads back then, much more than Touhou yuri threads.
The "generalization" of threads does not magically make them more /jp/ than threads that are not. JAV has generals, but it's a relative newcomer to /jp/ and has very little basis in /jp/ tradition.

>It's inherently unfair because you can post worksafe yuri pairing but not the same for futa and guro.
This is the most hideously stupid fucking objection I've ever heard. First, yes - you can post pictures of SFW things, but not NSFW things. You can still link to guro, and if you put a big black box over the dick (or it's not shown) you can still post futa. People were able to discuss that weird series where futa panda Meiling fucks everyone without issues.

>You say this over and over again, but the moment a yuri thread was created in 2008 /jp/, there is already some people opposed of it.
You don't have to make a "yuri thread." It's like saying that yuri is banned from /a/ because yuri is "not popular," while ignoring the fact that yuri gets discussed every single fucking day in threads not explicitly labeled with a big "yuri thread" announcement on top (although "yuru yuri thread" might as well be.)

>And yuri discussion becomes a blip in 2011 and 2012, where trap and dick loving discussions are much more prevalent.
2011 and 2012 are the height of the /jp/'s shitposting wasteland era where people were more interested in meeting up IRL and sucking each other off than anything on-topic. I take it that's when you got here, because "victory through spam" seems to be what you think constitutes /jp/ culture.

It's like saying Alstroemeria Records can't be /jp/ culture because people don't make threads about it every single fucking day.