/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>20327236
It was. As mentioned by >>20327268, the track was caught up in the karaoke mishap. If you don't remember what that was, someone was uploading some licensed karaoke tracks to YouTube, claiming ownership, and offering them for free. The company that owned them sued the shit out of him for millions in damages and everyone who had used those tracks had to take them down for copyright reasons.

Here's the list of songs that were affected on their channel, posted by them to Twitter at the time. Only two have been re-done so far.

>>20328754
Wait, the screenshot from yesterday wasn't just a shopped meme? Amazing.