[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Search:

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
>> No.1432449 [View]
File: 14 KB, 610x403, 1223540032882.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1432449

Also see pic for practical validity of IQ in a general sense.

>>1432439
No, it most certainly is not ok. I will mail you on Saturday anyway.

>> No.1373119 [View]
File: 14 KB, 610x403, 1222473184441.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1373119

>>1373114
It most certainly isn't.

>> No.1357938 [View]
File: 14 KB, 610x403, 1222210219643.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1357938

>>1357910
The science behind IQ testing is solid.

And if environment were the major factor the transracial adoption studies would highlight that, as would studies of twins brought up apart, but they dont.

>> No.1320572 [View]
File: 14 KB, 610x403, 1221648653034.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1320572

>>1320566
>the concept of IQ as a one dimensional metric for something as vague and undefined as "intelligence" is both suffocating and ignorant.

Not the guy you're replying to, but fuck I've gotta reply to this. See pic.

>> No.811206 [View]
File: 14 KB, 610x403, 1213281187194.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
811206

>>811197
Hahahaha, oh wow!

Now you've lost the argument, you resort to the 'BAWWW, IQ IS WRONG!' bullshit.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]