/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5148637
i kind of look like the OP picture but taller, and before you ask no I won't post my work. I don't want anyone finding out I post here.

>>5148637
BUMP LMAO

Why do artists draw girls with cocks

>>5148640
Go to bed Gill.

Aesthetics over realism

The muscles on the ribs arent muscles you retard, it's an average 6 pack

Sage

>>5148650
i dont know. it always looks disgusting

>>5148637
because this body is already unrealistic as fuck, try imagining a 6 pack on it, the abs would look long and aesthetically terrible

>>5148637
>It's just flat out anatomically incorrect.
nah nigga, the separation of the abs is largely genetic and can lead to an 8 pack

>>5148637
it's not, study anatomy more

>>5148827
now post a photo of it happening in life instead of your inaccurate, cherrypicked diagram

>>5148830
damn son, you're really dedicated to being wrong

>>5148637
Some people achieve eight packs, and ur an artist ur goal is to apeal not to be a fkin anatomy nerd.

>>5148830
and a flayed cadaver so you can see all the tendinous separations

>>5148834
I'll concede that it's possible, but it's certainly unusual, and the prevalence of it in art seems unwarranted

>>5148854
>Wtf bros why do people draw idealized figures with appeal

>>5148637
nobody tell him

>>5148637
Comedy gold
Your impression of someone consumed by the Dunning Kruger effect is oustanding. Keep it up.

>>5148841
Damn, humans have so very little meat.

>>5148637
You mean with the arch of the ribcage showing? I think it's a convention that comes from cape comics back when classical bodybuilding stressed the vacuum.

>>5148637
>professional

>>5148854
You're right and the rest of these midwits are wrong. Freak show specimens are not a free pass to draw garbage.

Let me guess. You just started studying anatomy?

this thread is just DYELs coping, next we'll have a body +vity thread

>>5148637
>>>/fit/

>>5148637
That's a six pack.

>>5148854
Yeah, I concede that people should be drawn overweight and disgusting like the average person.

>>5148854
t. female
maybe stop looking at shota and flamboyant twinks for once.

>>5148854
it should be obvious why idealized versions of humans, including very muscular and lean males, would be more prevalent in art then inferior versions. people draw what they find beautiful, and oftentimes ideal versions of things are what they find beautiful.

reposting
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4525496/

>>5148830
>>5148854
The literal state of the world we live in.. Degenerative eugenics are doing their thing, it seems. Imagine visiting our world as an ancient greek and learning that no one has an 8-pack like him and all of his kin do, except for the mandatory corrupt village fool that can't control his consumption habits

The literal state of the world we live in.. Degenerative eugenics are doing their thing, it seems. Imagine visiting our world as an ancient greek and learning that no one has an 8 year old fuckboy like him and all of his kin do, except for the mandatory corrupt village pedo that can't control his consumption habits

post unwarranted art

I’m assuming straight males because they suck at drawing men.

Anime is same way. They are good at a drawing girls but men all have incorrect abs.

>>5149237
imagine thinking that the ancient Greeks weren’t fat shits. Anyone who could afford to commission a sculpture would not have had the rippling abs and godlike bodies they paid for in the sculpture. Why do retards have this idea that the art portrays reality? It’s like thinking the 40s were in black and white. These majestic white Roman sculptures and buildings weren’t even white, they were painted and now they’re sun bleached from centuries of weather. I bet Rome looked pretty hideous all painted and gaudy with mosaics everywhere

>>5148827

Scott Eaton taught me it's a four pack and a 40-oz.

>>5149408
Do the abs being incorrect mean the drawing is bad?

>>5149408
Please, post your work. Enlighten us straight male artists.
Crabs, every single time lol.

>>5148854
please go get corongas

>>5148841
Is that Acland?

>>5149123
Dude, people also draw women with a perfect hourglass body and perky G-cup breasts all the time. Maybe you also think that’s trash, but OP’s question of WHY it happens is stone stupid.

>>5149237
>no one has an 8-pack like him and all of his kin do, except for the mandatory corrupt village fool that can't control his consumption habits
8 packs are genetics nigga, even top bodybuilders nowadays only have a 6 pack or even a 4 pack in some cases, arnold never got 6 defined abs to show no matter how lean he got because genetically he just didnt have the connective tissue separating the muscle that way
also you are stupid as fuck if you think 8 packs are somehow stronger or more functional than any other rectus abdominis configuration

>>5148921
kek

>>5149784
>8 muscles aren’t stronger than 4 muscles
LOL I guess it’s a coincidence that triceps are stronger than biceps and quadriceps are stronger than triceps oh wait your a fucking dyel beglet hit the gym once in your life retard i’d like to see you try to curl 3plaet

>>5148637
Because the average doesn't deserve art, only the gorgeous and horrendous.

>>5148933
they taste good tho

Why do so many retarded shit scrubs talk about what's correct and what's not correct? That's just flat out incorrect?

>>5154234
his hair is wrong and his jaw is more protruding and they just put basic ears on

>>5148637
urien makes me coom

>>5150441
the ab separation is just connective tissue, its not more muscles, this would be like saying biceps with higher insertions are stronger than ones with lower ones

>>5149408
Lmao, I'm convinced that every crab on this board is some dumb stinky pussy bitch from crystal cafe.

>>5154250
>A fucking shitty phone filter got some things wrong, oh the humanity!
Are you being serious right now?

>>5149358

>>5154774