[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 404 KB, 1263x800, 1598727206255[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4829580 No.4829580 [Reply] [Original]

LOL

>> No.4829586

Old meme, 0/10 bait, lurk more newfag

>> No.4829656

>>4829580
I unironically agree. Loomis has great info on learning how to draw heads and there are a few nuggets of valuable info in his figure drawing book, but everything else is pretty much "draw the rest of the fucking owl".

>> No.4829663

As ugly Hogarth's illustrations are, they're the most helpful for understanding anatomy, more than Bridgman, Vilppu, Loomis, Hampton, and Vanderpoel combined.

>> No.4829723

>>4829663
>more than Bridgman
nah.

>> No.4829731

>>4829723
Bridgman and Hogarth should come hand in hand imo. Balance the round with the block. (Plus Hogarth ignores the skeleton completely so you kinda need Bridgman anyways)

>> No.4829775

>>4829723
>>more than Bridgman
>nah.
bridgman is bad for "learning" anatomy, all the info requires you to already know the muscles beforehand and half the illustrations are too messy to make out unless you are already at a pretty advanced level

>> No.4830395

>>4829663
Hogarth's style makes him difficult to copy and learn from. Even his simplest construction uses some complex shapes that aren't easy to accurately rotate by imagination. If you can parse his prose you can learn from literally reading the book, but I like to try and copy the drawings in the art books I'm looking at.

>> No.4830400

>>4829580
True chads use Bridgman

>> No.4830481

>>4830395
>>4829663
>>4829580
IMO you gotta read them all anyway, but with Hogarth you understand how exactly the muscles behave in movement. Especially once you learn which muscle is which

>> No.4830626

>>4829586
t. loomis grinding crab