[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 61 KB, 1024x576, 1583031953486.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4412613 No.4412613 [Reply] [Original]

itt ngmi posts
>what brush do you use?

>> No.4412616

>ngmi

>> No.4412620
File: 68 KB, 687x169, ngmi post.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4412620

>>4412613

>> No.4412623
File: 83 KB, 1440x499, 20200308_040347.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4412623

>> No.4412780

>posts anime reaction images
>uses the term "ngmi"
woah OP would you look at that

>> No.4412821

>>4412613
>anime posters (forgiven if its oc of any kind as long as its appealing, since its drawing)
>people calling other begs and generally bashing on people without giving any kind of suggestion
>redliner
>REDLINERS

>> No.4412839 [DELETED] 

>what pen is good for drawing
>buying my first tabled, is cintiq ok??
>photobashing bad

>> No.4412841

>photobashing bad

>> No.4412854

>pyw

>> No.4412856
File: 104 KB, 662x514, 1583064173201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4412856

>talent is real

>> No.4412884

>>4412613
>anyone can become a master if they practice long enough

>> No.4412887

>>4412613
The only types of posts that I'd consider truly ngmi are the people who literally say they're quitting, and the people with those horrendous progress pics where they still draw like /beg/s after 6+ years.
I could make fun of certain archetypes on this board who I dislike, but honestly I think there are many paths to making it and as long as you're working hard and improving then I think things will work out.

>> No.4412906

>photobashing is good

>> No.4412908

>>4412613
read the sticky

>> No.4412911

>>4412613
>anime bad western good
and vice versa

basically any divide and conquer post

>> No.4412946

>>4412613
>>what brush do you use?
This is such a pet peeve for me as well. But I think every beginner asks this question. Wouldn't say it means ngmi at all

>> No.4413326
File: 356 KB, 1000x750, k.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4413326

>>4412946
All I ever use is flat round brush with opacity on pressure. And I live off commissions pretty comfortably.

>> No.4413369

>>4412613
>what brush
>how do i draw like this
>i'm tracing for studying
>any mention of proportions as a concept

>> No.4413394

>talent isn't real

>> No.4413396

>>4413326
post more of your work

>> No.4413397

>>4413394
Wrong. That's a GMI post.

>> No.4413429

>>4413326
that cumstained paper texture is fucking afwul though. It's like it's made out of the floaters people get in their eyes.

>> No.4413436

>>4412946
That in itseelf is a very problematic question since it demonstrates a completely wrong way of thinking.

First of all focuasing on the tool is fucking pointless, but the first thing a beginner does is looking for the biggest fucking brushpack and get's lost playing with too many tools rather than focusing on the work.

Second of all it shows that you're looking for a beter tool, hack, guide or a shortcut to make a better art, rather than looking for a better yourself.

Getting lost in that thought process leads you to 5 minute tutorials.

>> No.4413486

>>4412620

>> No.4413622

>>4413369
>how do i draw like this
Also an annoyance

>> No.4413683

>>4413326
Are you the "ngmi" guy who likes to draw shotas getting tempted to fuck by old milfs?

>> No.4413687

>>4413683
damn it how the fuck do you guys manage to identify me

>> No.4413908

>what is this style called?

>> No.4414015

>>4413687
All thanks to 4chans the hacker

>> No.4414101

>>4413394
Imagine honestly thinking that you are more likely to succeed by putting stock in god's gifts over your own efforts.

>> No.4414145

>>4413394
>N-NOOOOOO IT ISN'T HARD WORK YOU WERE JUST BORN GOOD
The biggest ngmi cope in existence.

>> No.4414204

>>4413908
Holy shit I fucking hate these posts

>> No.4414358

>>4413687
Other than the boy and woman in your image, you have a recognizable lineart style. Even though I don't really like the subject matter you draw at all, I'm a big fan of your rendering skills and your knowledge of anatomy. Kinda like how I feel about Sunibee from the other thread >>4407650

>> No.4414387
File: 6 KB, 252x240, E0222A0D-D50E-473B-9753-7B6B8D90B8F5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4414387

>>4412620
This

>> No.4414399

blog?

>> No.4414432
File: 20 KB, 280x400, 582008362629.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4414432

>>4414399
>post blog
>no new notifications
What's their problem

>> No.4415010

>>4413436
autism but you aren't wrong

>> No.4415024

>any tutorials for drawing x?

>> No.4415242

>>4413394
It's real
>t. actually have it

>> No.4415244
File: 10 KB, 547x412, 14575647686789967.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4415244

>>4414432
>ask someone for their blog
>don't follow them for two weeks or else they will know that I came from 4chin

>> No.4415252

>Is 3d model cheating?

>> No.4415254

>>4415252
>used to trace design doll models
>stopped doing it like half a year ago
>immediately got better at drawing from imagination
3d is a meme

>> No.4415257

>>4415242
No, you don't and your work shows.

>> No.4415373

>>4413326
If you think your skills (usage of your brushes) have anything to do with your success when it comes to commissions for normies that fap to pedo shit, then I have very bad news for you, NGMI.

>> No.4415377

>>4413687
You draw unappealing old women. It's pretty easy.

>> No.4415536

>>4415373
are you okay?

>> No.4415637

>>4415536
what do you mean? I'm just redpilling you.

>> No.4415666

>>4412613
legit question if getting accustomed to a new program

>>4412856
not the only defining trait, but it is true

>>4412884
this statement is also true

>>4412906
this statement is true for CA & CD

>> No.4415719

>I'm gonna take one of proko's courses
Lmao oof

>> No.4415835
File: 1.96 MB, 400x225, 1573860932085.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4415835

>>4415637
I see I trashed your bad drawings in another thread too hard

>> No.4415895

>>4415666
>legit question if getting accustomed to a new program
It's a legit question but it also means you're legit retarded. Pick up the tool that draws lines and get to work lmao

>> No.4415903

>>4415254
>got better at drawing by practicing with the aid of tools
woah

>> No.4415945

>how do I be a complete clone of [my favorite artist]?

>> No.4415960
File: 496 KB, 500x455, 1478263747806.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4415960

>i use pressure opacity
This gets me every time, its so funny.

>> No.4416602

>>4415960
Turning off pressure opacity is damn comfy.

>> No.4416710
File: 135 KB, 1280x1803, 068.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4416710

>>4413369
>i'm tracing for studying
I did this with a flower in a how to draw book, after tracing it nonstop I could free hand draw it.

Stop pretending muscle memory and memorization through repetition isn't a thing.

>> No.4416722

"bridgman is shit", "hogarth is shit"

>> No.4416853

>>4415835
Nah, I haven't posted anything in a while and I don't think you commented on them in the past. I would have noticed.

Why so butthurt tho? I didn't trash your stuff. I just told you the truth. People don't like you because of your skills. They like the subject matter. It's always been like this with fetish fandoms.

>> No.4417303

>>4416710
>after mindlessly tracing one image, I can now reproduce that image any time I want!

Great. Now draw that same kind of flower from a different view. Good luck, retard.

>> No.4417309

>>4416710
Can you draw something else though?
Can you draw a fit girl using a ref of a male bodybuilder in a different pose?

Or are you going to memorize every possible pose from every possible angle?
This is a crutch and the more you rely on it the harder you depend on it.

Using reference isn't about dumb tracing and replication, it's about looking at one picture to make another, like checking the muscle details on ripped guys and applying it to slim girls. That's the actual reference.

>> No.4417312

>>4416710
NGMI, why trace when you can ctrl+c ctrl+v?

>> No.4417315

>>4416710
Based, is this Hotengeki's book?

>> No.4417395

>Loomis good

>> No.4417526
File: 314 KB, 586x640, yes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4417526

>>4417395

>> No.4417541

>>4417395
Your drawings show that you didn't read loomis (or any drawing book )

>> No.4417716

>>4417315
Yes.

>> No.4417851

>>4417309
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qP--30V8ZA4&t=212s

>> No.4417859

>>4413687
I could tel right away it was you, grannyposter

>> No.4419605

>how do nips do this?

>> No.4419683

>>4415960
I use pressure opacity in trad.

>> No.4419745

>>4417395
Wrong, but
>if you don't read Loomis you can't learn to draw
definitely applies.

>> No.4420164

>>4415244
Devilish, also checked

>> No.4420214

>>4413326
You're at the point I wish I was, good job

>> No.4420546

>>4412613
>I don't need to know the muscles' and bones' names

>> No.4420589

>>4420546
You literally don't.

>> No.4420591

>>4420589
You don't need to know their names but you HAVE to know their shape and function

>> No.4420606

>>4420591
Their names are their shape and function

>> No.4420660

>>4420591
Well, yeah... but the post was about names.

>> No.4420663

>>4420606
Not always, also it's all in Latin.

>> No.4421204

>>4420606
>not being familiar with 80% of muscle names from liftan