[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 364 KB, 978x835, 2019-08-28 12_26_00-Window.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4088945 No.4088945 [Reply] [Original]

.. these aren't even close to the dimensions of the human upper body? This is from one of the patreon stuff from Krenz Cushart.

It's probably just for the rotation-exercise.

Do you have made your own mannequins with it's own dimensions for structural posing or do you use what someone taught you?

I'm using my own for the torso, with the dimensions from real people and i'm doing fine so far.

>> No.4088947

>>4088945
Fuck off my board, ESL nigger.

>> No.4088953

your mcdonalds must be closed for maintenance you miserable fuck

>> No.4088956

>>4088947
>>4088953
lolwut

>> No.4088957

I would suppose that Krenz knows the human ribcage isn't square

>> No.4088960

>>4088957
But are you sure...?

>> No.4088977
File: 174 KB, 958x1211, krenz-cushart-150504.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4088977

>>4088945
Looks fine to me.

>> No.4089021

Yes, you hope he knows that these aren't even close to the dimensions of the human upper body.
Any other question?

>> No.4089034
File: 112 KB, 1152x824, Photoshop_skFhQhTvIC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4089034

Yep, it doesn't work

>> No.4089041

There are more threads in this board dedicated to celebrities than actual art threads
wew

>> No.4089393

>>4089034
It seems to work for the bottom row version tho

>> No.4089406

>>4088945
Yes, and the cranium is not a sphere, yet methods like Loomis heads and Krenz's construction have tons of applicability. Nitpicking celeb artists won't make your own art any better, go draw

>> No.4089414 [DELETED] 

>>4089393
the bottom version's box goes to the pelvis, though

>> No.4089416

>>4089393
the bottom box reaches the pelvis

>> No.4089468

>>4089034
where did you get this model from?

>> No.4089512

hope you're not serious. first of all, i'm drawing all the time, therefore i know that at some point it's a good thing to settle down on certain methods and systems. the mannequin and its dimensions for instance. if i would just take what krenz displayed my figure drawing would go downhill.

good thing i'm not that dumb, and i even think he's aware, it's just been a simple method to show how to rotate the body in space. i'm moreso interested in /ic's mannequins.

than there is the rest of your bullshit; loomis cut the sides of the sphere and krenz construction (from this example) is borderline useless. but go head and use it for your art.

>> No.4089524

>>4089468
Anatomy360

>> No.4089551
File: 333 KB, 668x590, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4089551

>>4088945
If you want something similar with boxy divisions, but more accurate, you can try Robert Beverly Hale's proportional system.

>> No.4089567

neat, thanks!

>> No.4089596

just tried it out on my figures, it makes em look clinched in height, could be some issue with my perspective tho, but if i'm just stretching the height of the ribcage it looks fine