Top Trad. Artist

[Anonymous No.3571473]

This latest wave of ic traditional artists is pretty good. I am feeling how they are evolving. State your personal best, not just between Brian, Chunbum, Jimmy and Illastrat.

[Anonymous No.3571478]

This is a poorly disguised tripfag thread, who the fuck would ever choose any of them as their best

stop promoting retards and trying to make drama

[Illastrat No.3571487]

Thx nigga, but why didn’t you use this? It’s my best.

[Anonymous No.3571494]

I do trad too

[Anonymous No.3571505]

>>3571478
Don't talk to illastrat, come on dude it's internet rule number one. Don't feed trolls

[Anonymous No.3571512]

Please kill yourself OP/illashit

[Anonymous No.3571518]

>>3571473
Just because you praised other shit art with your own doesn't mean you're not samefagging.
stop sucking your own digital 3 incher and go learn how to paint properly or accept that you're not good and stop. You only like the other retards' work because you've got a superiority complex and think not using a tablet makes you a better artist even with near zero skill.

[Anonymous No.3571587]

>>3571473
Wow all of the people in that image suffer from a mental illness of some kind, based!

[Anonymous No.3571591]

>>3571587
almost like there's some connection between artistic expression and mental illness

[Anonymous No.3571616]

>>3571587
>suffer from a mental illness of some kind
you're just jealous because you don't have any mutant powers

[Anonymous No.3571633]

>>3571473
One of these pictures is not like the rest

[Anonymous No.3571647]

>>3571633
honestly can't tell which you mean
there's two modernish ladies with bed sheets and two vaguely expressionistic faces.

is it mel gibson because he has a facial expression, or chun's lady because she doesn't have a face? idk

[Anonymous No.3571655]

>>3571647
>is it mel gibson because he has a facial expression
tfw it's Rowdy Roddy Piper

[Anonymous No.3571659]

>>3571494
not enough yellow in the pisswasser

[Anonymous No.3571717]

>>3571473
tfw I keep getting lumped in with these three degenerates

[Anonymous No.3571722]

>>3571717
isn't your art openly degenerate? i thought that was like a big part of the point, with your recent figurative ones anyway

[Anonymous No.3571733]

>>3571722
You guys are easily shocked if a guy painting naked women is degenerate.

[Anonymous No.3571737]

>>3571733
I wouldn't be surprised if Illastrat, Chun, and Jimmy's real goals with art are exactly what I'm doing, they just don't have the social skills or artistic skills to execute on getting friends and strangers to pose nude.

[Anonymous No.3571742]

>>3571733
maybe it was a different guy, i thought you were painting like gross sweat on their boobs and stuff

[Anonymous No.3571744]

>>3571733
It's pretty degenerate.

[Anonymous No.3571748]

>>3571737
>they just don't have the social skills or artistic skills to execute on getting friends and strangers to pose nude.
I mean I don't have that impulse. Not really that hard to see people naked. We got the intranettes now and stuff.

[Anonymous No.3571749]

>>3571742
I paint some sexual stuff occasionally, but no more so than if it were digital. If it were digital you'd just see it as run of the mill porn thread stuff, but since it's real people suddenly I'm a degenerate. Most I'd ever ask a girl to do is spread her legs open or squeeze a breast for effect, not actual porn shit. I still live with my parents maybe if I had my own studio I'd be doing more explicit artwork with my models but I like to think my work is tasteful for the most part.

[Anonymous No.3571750]

>>3571748
pretty sad excuse, man...

[Anonymous No.3571764]

[Anonymous No.3571767]

>>3571750
>sad excuse
for what?

I'm not a sadist ya doobus, I'm a masochist. I have no interest in capturing what someone looks like when they're awkwardly posing for me to literally objectify them or whatever.

Like if I was in the room with your nudey cuties I'd rather just focus on a CU of what their face looks like when you're not looking at them or something. Or a big WS of the entire room and how passively absurd the whole ordeal probably is.

[Anonymous No.3571778]

this whole thread is pure shit

[Anonymous No.3571796]

>>3571749
Like you maybe make it too obvious that what you're primarily interested in is opportunities to be around nudey cuties. And then you generally paint them looking uncomfortable and anxious on top of that. Like it isn't NOT "degenerate."

not to mention, who gives a shit if your art is "degenerate?"

[Anonymous No.3571809]

>>3571473
I am so honoured by your excitement OP

Thank you for grouping us traditional artists together

If we actually respected one another and listened instead of stomping each other down each of us would be a better artist and person

Let's stop saying "i am better than you "

[Anonymous No.3571811]

>>3571767
>>3571796
so what you're saying is you don't want women to undress in front of you so you can stare at their naked bodies for three hours... got it

[Anonymous No.3571816]

>>3571811
>so what you're saying is you don't want women to undress in front of you so you can stare at their naked bodies for three hours...
I'm sure it's a great time had by all. Do you play music or offer booze or drugs or payment for those 3 hours or you just awkwardly paint nudey cuties from Barnes and Noble or wherever in sober asexual silence?

[Anonymous No.3571822]

>>3571811
I kinda want to do a strip club study. That'd be a fun goofy gag. You think I have to tip if I just sit in the back and draw their armpits?

[Anonymous No.3571825]

idk I feel like doing nude drawing for 3 hours is a waste of the model's utility. They could be helping me with my ant problem.

Or I could put a panty hose over my face and show them a slideshow of all my memes while saying "do you see?" And then I could take a picture of their face and paint that.

[Anonymous No.3571843]

>>3571825
or you could get your grid out and trace another epic meme