/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.3379176]

Personality type of /ic/
What kind of people are in here?

[Anonymous No.3379178]

most of us are NGMI.

[Anonymous No.3379184]

>>3379176
it says on the site that I'm a "mediator" meeh figures.

[Anonymous No.3379186]

>>3379176
The one you posted

[Anonymous No.3379187]

>>3379176
Dug this up from /ic/ archives

[Anonymous No.3379189]

Here make yourselves useful and draw something

[Anonymous No.3379194]

>>3379189
so we draw the result we got from 16personalities.com?

[Anonymous No.3379197]

>>3379194
Yeaman do what ever as long as you say what personality you got

[Anonymous No.3379207]

>>3379176
sea food waiting to be boiled

[Anonymous No.3379208]

It seems I'm a logician too

[Anonymous No.3379227]

[Anonymous No.3379244]

istp

[Anonymous No.3379247]

>>3379227
>once went one week without showering or going outside
>once
>one
haha

[Anonymous No.3379342]

>>3379176
INTJ

[Anonymous No.3379346]

INFP

It's all bullshit either way.

>>3379227
kek, I love it.

[Anonymous No.3379348]

>>3379227
INTJ here, this is surprisingly accurate.

Also, I used to really like this girl who was ENFP, supposedly, INTJs and ENFPs really aren't liked all that much by others, but somehow make a good match for each other.

Dunno how accurate that is, but I have generally always liked more 'genki' girls who are a bit aimless and aloof.

[Anonymous No.3379352]

INTP

[Anonymous No.3379359]

>>3379176

[Anonymous No.3379362]

>>3379359
>>3379208
>>3379187
>>3379176
You people aren't exactly suited for art. Just saying.

[Anonymous No.3379365]

>>3379362
>have a logical approach to art and design
>lol u arent suited for it
hm

[Anonymous No.3379388]

>>3379362
>analyst
>constant improvement
>aren't suited for art
hm2

[Anonymous No.3379389]

>>3379365
You don't understand art, you are only there for the craft.

[Anonymous No.3379391]

>>3379389
I understand what vilppu means by feeling it, good enough for me. Piss off fag.

[Anonymous No.3379394]

>>3379391
You are angry, but your belief to be an artist is destroyed by your definition of art.
Once again, you are a mere craftman, you could be paid to in-between the work of real artists and that's it. You are the anomaly there, you don't belong.

[Anonymous No.3379396]

>>3379394
keep sniffing your own farts

[Anonymous No.3379403]

>>3379365
>>3379388
Art isn't about logic or analysis. It's about emotion. Creativity comes from being able to communicate raw feelings with your creations. Art also requires you're a visual thinker.

So sure, you can learn the craft and be skilled at drawing, but you'll run into the problem of not knowing what to draw, and your designs/pieces feeling uninspired or overly derivative.

Yes, anyone can learn the craft and be skilled at it, but that doesn't necessarily mean they are most suited for it.

[Anonymous No.3379405]

>>3379403
I literally have none of these problems and I am INTP/autistic.

[Anonymous No.3379413]

>>3379403
Blatant crabbery. Best artists are people with most logical, scientific attitude towards art, not emotional cunts.

[Anonymous No.3379415]

>>3379176
>Star-signs for neets

[Anonymous No.3379416]

>>3379389
>analyst
>You don't understand art
Hm3
Stop being angry because you aren't good at art yourself.

[Anonymous No.3379418]

Holy fuck, how did so many people fall for that bait?

[Anonymous No.3379420]

>>3379413
They're not though, and this has psychological backing.

MBPT is bullshit anyway, but what you do wanna get tested for is creativity, and visual thinking. Your personality really doesn't matter too much, but being analytical isn't a good sign.

[Anonymous No.3379421]

>>3379418
Truth hurts.

[Anonymous No.3379423]

>>3379403
logic and analysis gave us renaissance and people like davinci, michelangelo, bernini, reubens, etc.

"creativity" and "emotion" gave us the cancer that came afterwards.

[Anonymous No.3379426]

>>3379423
You are so mistaken my friend. Tge Rennaisance was the hippy movement of medieval times. Michaelangelos paintings of God in the Vatican are emotion and idealism incarnate.

[Anonymous No.3379434]

[Anonymous No.3379438]

tfw infp

[Anonymous No.3379487]

>>3379189
not falling for the barnum effect here

>>3379227
>tfw no one of those memers

[Anonymous No.3379496]

>>3379189

[Anonymous No.3379504]

>>3379189

[Anonymous No.3379505]

I'm a cute and fragile INFP

[Anonymous No.3379517]

>>3379423
davinci art is highly overrated because he convey no emotions, it's a craft he learned to make money, for rich people that just wanted photos before photos.

[Anonymous No.3379518]

>>3379416
>y.y.you suck!
hi little crab.

[Anonymous No.3379520]

>>3379413
Don't call people crab if you don't even know the difference between craft and art. Art is emotion, skill and knowledge is the tool. You are a mere tool user, without emotions you have no art to make, only utility pictures following your boss documentation and client wishlist.You are a tool.

[Anonymous No.3379538]

>>3379227
INTJ here
that's p accurate kek

[Anonymous No.3379551]

>>3379176
>tfw socially inept intp

its funny how one of the rarest personalities are intp's yet soo many are respoinding in this thread as one.

[Anonymous No.3379555]

https://youtu.be/gzv0KO9FheI

[Anonymous No.3379571]

>>3379178
underrated and /thread

[Anonymous No.3379574]

Part II:
https://youtu.be/km7ga7HON20

[Anonymous No.3379579]

>>3379348
It's because it's all pop-psych pseudoscience for normies and autists. MBTI was literally invented by two women who read an old-timey equivalent of a Wikipedia synopsis on Jung and made up some shit based on it.

The neckbeard horoscope.

[Anonymous No.3379585]

I usually get INFP, i.e. the beta bitch personality type. My extroversion score was 51% which is why this test said ENFP, but I could easily swing back and forth depending on the test or how I'm feeling.
I used to get INTJ/P when I was younger and even more autistic than I am now. But I eventually just decided to stop being an autist.

[Anonymous No.3379588]

Funny. Been doing this test for more than a decade, and I always get INFP.

[Anonymous No.3379589]

I'm aware it's pseudoscience and there's a fuck ton more than 16 main personalities, but INFP has always fitted me well (tfw you are actually made of feels) I guess if you happen to fit within the categories it's a bit more useful?

[Anonymous No.3379594]

>>3379405
>INTP/autistic.
>>3379585
>even more autistic
Wait... is intp autistic?

[Anonymous No.3379596]

>>3379594
Yes INTP and INTJ are both autistic. Like I said, I used to get INTP back when I was more autistic.
This is all bullshit anyway.

[Anonymous No.3379600]

>>3379596
>This is all bullshit anyway.
Yeah, we heard you the tenth time, faggot. Here, a (you)

[Anonymous No.3379626]

>>3379585

[Anonymous No.3379627]

>>3379585
Same story. Making an effort to connect with people is the only cure for autism.

[Anonymous No.3379645]

I'm an INTP too. When I began I naturally tended to study and think about art rather than actually doing it, but I cultivated a habit to prioritize drawing so the balance works out pretty well now.

INTPs have a stereotype of being like autists, who would presumably be into Scott Robertson type stuff, but personally I prefer Rackham, Bauer, and art like pic related. To the other INTP anons, where do your tastes lean?

[Anonymous No.3379672]

>>3379645
>“I have been impressed with the urgency of doing. Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Being willing is not enough; we must do.”

That's a quote by Da Vinci, also an INTP. I think if we tweak our natural tendencies in such a way we can become better at art

[Anonymous No.3379684]

>>3379176
No other ENFJ here?

[Anonymous No.3379765]

ISTP here, i think im geniunenly retarded for art
i cant look at a reference pose and say yeah this is how itll look like in a 3/4ths overhead, i can barely even imagine 3d shapes in my head, much less something as complex as that
all of my gains are just pure muscle memory, im not understanding things like actual 3 digit iq people do
i draw in the most autistic way possible because its the only way that makes sense for me (just regurtitated strokes since ive done it before, no construction, blockin or loomis balls)

im just too fucking stupid, i was born NGMI

[Anonymous No.3379767]

>>3379178
FPBP

[Anonymous No.3379788]

>>3379645
I'm INTP and I find that concept art shit really sterile and boring. I'm all for Kamome Shirahama right now and I like most of this kind of stuff. Ink and watercolor, rather loose and warm with textural hatching.

[Anonymous No.3379792]

>>3379178

[Anonymous No.3379794]

>>3379788
>I find that concept art shit really sterile and boring. I'm all for Kamome Shirahama right now and I like most of this kind of stuff. Ink and watercolor, rather loose and warm with textural hatching.
Absolutely. Shirahama is one of my favorites too

[Anonymous No.3379798]

>>3379362
>"logicians are extremely creative"
>not suited for art
What gives faggot

[Anonymous No.3379810]

Another INTJ here, we make up about 50% of internet forum populations, unfortunately... for everyone. :(

This doesn't ever seem to happen in these threads, but I think it would be p. interesting if we post our types (or Big5) plus our art, plus art we love, and maybe how we work. I'd be curious to see any trends.

>>3379189
This looks like we're supposed to redraw all 16 of these motherfuckers (?), no way, I aint got tam fa dis!

>>3379487
It would only be the barnum effect if they were all combined into one personality, the types are pretty distinct and you can narrow it down pretty quickly by just reading the description.

>>3379571
Someone posted that in the last MBTI thread so I think everyone's ignoring it.

>>3379589
> there's a fuck ton more than 16 main personalities
According to what? You know, the point of a 'main' personality type is that there aren't very many of them. Why wouldn't there be fewer main types?

[Anonymous No.3379818]

>>3379810
>interesting if we post our types (or Big5) plus our art, plus art we love, and maybe how we work
posting work almost never happens, but yeah it would be cool to see.

[Anonymous No.3379933]

>>3379818
I'm ready to poast but since it was my suggestion I want to wait and see if others do it, to gauge general interest. Always a follower, never a leader.

[Anonymous No.3379968]

>>3379176
Im a INFP-T
>Mfw 670% of what they said is actually me
Or this thing is very accurate or Im a meme boy.

[Anonymous No.3379991]

>>3379798
self diagnosis born from pride. Irelevant noise. It's the same mentality that gave use those "creative people" comics. You are there.

[Anonymous No.3380059]

am i some kind of shitty hippie or smthg
enlight me

[Anonymous No.3380124]

>>3379818
I would get bullied, since only draw my waifu and nothing more.

[Anonymous No.3380158]

>>3380059
That's a bit of a literal interpretation. It's better just to know what the letters mean. You're introverted, you rely on theories and logic (the mind) more than senses and facts (the world), you rely on feelings more than rationality, and you're more laid back and messy as opposed to uptight and orderly.

[Anonymous No.3380205]

>>3379176
>intp
>I like thinking about imagination as an actual place
>when doing things from imagination I try to think a little before I draw, but mostly I just see what it looks like and go with it

[Anonymous No.3380214]

INTP-T, employed as a freelance artist

INTx friends ur gonna make it just quit video games and draw 10 hours a day.

[Anonymous No.3380216]

>believing in horoscopes of psychology

[Anonymous No.3380228]

This is even worse than the modern art pretend threads.

[Anonymous No.3380244]

>>3380216
Pray tell us your advanced super scientific theory on human personality.

>inb4 Big 5.. I agree, Big5 is better, but it isn't that different, really.

[Anonymous No.3380256]

>>3380244
not op but maybe human personality is too fluid to be categorized so definitively.

[Anonymous No.3380276]

>>3380256
My experience as a human is that there definitely are types of people. Some are introvert and logical, some are spontaneous and emotional, some are organized and bitchy etc.

I think there is potential for very specific correlations in behavior in different "types" of people. In the near future, big data will reveal these correlations and patterns in a revolutionary way, in my opinion. Facebook and google probably know things already that would be considered quantum leaps in many fields of human behavior.

[Anonymous No.3380539]

>>3380276
Sounds like something you'd buy into if you had a heavily autistic desire to categorize everything so that it isn't scary to your autism brain.

[Anonymous No.3380541]

>Art thread
>Nobody on here is a sensor

Also, you all are taking the wrong test

https://www.idrlabs.com/test.php

[Anonymous No.3380545]

>>3380541
>third one of these shit tests where I've gotten a different personality type
Completely valid.

[Anonymous No.3380550]

>>3380539
sounds like something you'd say if you were so scared of your own limitations that you decide that anyone could be anything if they REALLY tried.

So it's actually your choice to be mediocre.

[Anonymous No.3380556]

>>3380541
>>3380545
Whenever there's a split between "logical" and "feeling" questions in these tests, the question is something like "Do you exclude these things (that would supposedly classify you as feeling) from something when you think about it, in favor of being "logical"?" or "Do you exclude these other things (that would supposedly classify you as logical) from something when you think about it, in favor of being "feeling"?" and there's no good answer for it if you exclude neither and consider the whole picture. Anything that treats empathy and logic as two mutually exclusive things is retarded.

[Anonymous No.3380561]

>>3380550
Sounds like you're projecting a bit. It's ok, it just means you've got a Projectionist personality type that is totally real and not junk pseudoscience.

[Anonymous No.3380566]

>>3379627
same, Except I'm more equal when it comes to thinking and doing

[Anonymous No.3380570]

>>3380561
Yes, I am projecting. I use my own thoughts and feelings to identify with your comments and locate the emotional agenda behind your perspective on the issue.

[Anonymous No.3380575]

>>3380541
I'm a solid INFP in that test too. Always have been in any version of personality type test. I'm a huge baby that doesn't want to grow up

[Anonymous No.3380584]

>>3380570
That's great, keep in mind that just because you can describe something it doesn't mean that you're actually any good at it.

[Anonymous No.3380587]

Everyone on this board is intp and enfp

[Anonymous No.3380616]

>>3380587
*infp
Extroverts are rare here

[Anonymous No.3380636]

[Anonymous No.3380651]

>>3380256
Very few things can be categorized definitively, but we have to be satisfied with rough categorizations in order to function in the world. If we refuse to categorize anything, we are lost without any picture of reality. So, if I want to talk about people's personalities in a general way, I sometimes use Big 5 (Reflect on how you'd describe someone you know, you're basically using Big 5 or MBTI without knowing it anyways, most of the ways you describe them are covered by these tools, you're just using different terms and drawing from personal experiece instead of statistics.) because it is the most scientifically valid thing we have thus far. It's not super accurate science, but it's something. As long as we use these tools knowing that they aren't perfect, I don't see how it isn't better than... I don't know, whatever you do.. not thinking about it at all I guess? Ugh, it isn't even definitive, the scores exist on a continuum ffs.

>>3380539
If you think categorization is autism, then fine, you can thank "autistic" people for building the world you live in, and you can thank yourself for being "autistic" otherwise you wouldn't get through the day.

>>3380556
It's about preferences, nobody is all feelz or all logic, but everyone leans one way more than the other, and differently in different contexts! Sounds like you did a test with Y/N answers. I think the gradient answers are better because, I agree, sometimes the question makes no sense, or you feel no preference, or you only feel a slight preference.

[Anonymous No.3380666]

>>3379765
Got ISTP too, weird. Think I got ISFP before? Been too long.

These sort of test are bound to be inaccurate with the approach of letting respondents to go neutral on questionnaires so I have my doubts about correctness of the results, plus it looks way to akin to horoscopes which are complete BS with their overly generic description of a person.

>i cant look at a reference pose and say yeah this is how itll look like in a 3/4ths overhead, i can barely even imagine 3d shapes in my head, much less something as complex as that

Yeah, 3D visualisation is a bitch. Was a lot easier to do when I was a kid, these days I can hardly can maintain even a still image from memory, making something up from scratch is hard as fuck.Or rather keeping it my mind longer then split second. Although I don't think that visualisation that I do\did ever was truly an image per se.

>i draw in the most autistic way possible because its the only way that makes sense for me (just regurtitated strokes since ive done it before, no construction, blockin or loomis balls)

It's alright, construction doesn't really fit for starting a concept or anything. First you need at least some idea what you are trying to do and then refine it with application of construction and such. Study more so you could use it all as a tool rather it being an obstruction to your goal.


Anyway this thread is autistic and I'm being a tard. Good thing I'm anonymous and nobody cares.

[Anonymous No.3380667]

>>3380651
I'm fine with categorization, I'm not so into it that I feel like I need it to understand people and especially not so into it that I'm going to subscribe to some unprovable, highly discredited pop-psychology because of a need to categorize people into some excessively vague archetype to try to understand them. I can understand personality traits without thinking of someone as a kind of person given a four-letter signifier that's been further sorted into its own group. I have an innate, biological ability to do more than that. I think most non-reptilians do.

[Anonymous No.3380717]

>>3380616
U
>>3380587
h
>>3380566
h
>>3379627
sweatie,
>>3379585
no.

[Anonymous No.3380735]

>>3379176

[Anonymous No.3381473]

>>3380244
>Big5 is better, but it isn't that different, really.
Except for the fact that, you know, big five is supported by empirical evidence across a wide variety of studies done on a variety of cultures whereas MBTI has been consistently proven to lack both validity and reliability.

[Anonymous No.3381496]

>>3379178
KEK

[Anonymous No.3381546]

>>3379176
Arhitect INTJ-T

[Anonymous No.3381623]

Let me preface everything with the fact that someone say my S-Pen and fountain pen and said "do you do drawing?" is the only reason I'm looking on this board.
>>3379227
I approve.
>>3379189
I'm 0% artist. I only drew this on my phone this while driving half way through my state, so posting just to represent.

[Anonymous No.3381625]

>>3380735
that is some decent intuition you got there. I believe intuition is directly correlated to your wizard level.

[Anonymous No.3381626]

>>3380539
nice categorization there, buddy

[Anonymous No.3382445]

>>3379765
istp here too, you just have low iq
sorry, keep grinding i guess

[Anonymous No.3382501]

isfp here

[Anonymous No.3382732]

INTP is the most common type on 4chan in general.

>>3379403
Thinkers have emotions too. Everyone does.

[Anonymous No.3382733]

Chinese.
I like to get away with as much cheating as possible.

[Anonymous No.3382749]

>>3379810
>Another INTJ here, we make up about 50% of internet forum populations, unfortunately... for everyone. :(
>>3382732
>INTP is the most common type on 4chan in general.

where's this data coming from? as an intp/j i am concerned.

[Anonymous No.3382757]

>>3382749
There have been polls on many different boards and INTP is consistently the most common type here. Here's one from /r9k/. https://www.strawpoll.me/6088804

[Anonymous No.3382760]

[Anonymous No.3382767]

>>3382757
>>3382749

Nevermind, that poll doesn't look legit. But you can look up others to find the same thing. Introverts and intuitives gravitate towards 4chan. So the most common types are INTP, INTJ, ISTP, ENTP and INFP. I imagine there are many NFs here on /ic/.

[Anonymous No.3382884]

>>3379227
INTJ-A here, yeah pretty much I seem rather unemotional and unaffected but it just kills me seeing innocent pure people being hurt.

[Anonymous No.3382896]

>>3379415
these people come from r9k. theyre the only ones who are genuinely obsessed with this shit

[Anonymous No.3383058]

>>3379505
Marry me.

F or m?

[Anonymous No.3383091]

>>3382749
I posted the comment about 50% of forum pops.. I was exaggerating, but it's based on the fact that INTJ is the biggest subreddit despite being only 1-2% of regular population. Yeah, maybe 4chan is more INTP.

>>3382760
> In an age where barbarians are extinct... in a world ruled by barbarians.

That's pretty contradictory, unless it's the subject's interpretation of the world...

[Anonymous No.3383096]

>>3379394
its painfully obvious you're taking out some personal stressors out here. I guess my logician brain combined with my empathy lets me see that but I make the choice of ridiculing you for your torment. enjoy the slice of hell you call your life

[Anonymous No.3383100]

>>3379627
Also ENFP-A here. Not autistic as far as Im concerned, albeit some folks think I'm bonkers, probably because some of my weirder quirks and opinions. I'm sure if I were more introverted people would think of me as creepy instead of charmingly excentric. Well, at least I hope they think of me as charmingly excentric. Probably wishful thinking. As long as they don't openly despise me it's fine I guess.
/blog

On another note; It's interesting a lot of you are XNFP types. What's the correlation to making art? The wish of self expression? The desire to create?
I mean there are like a lot of archetypes that would also fit into this.

[Anonymous No.3383173]

I am at 50 % extroversion/introversion so I consistently get either intp or entp, but in the end I am doomed to be a failed normie. I am surprised to see so many XNTPs here. What kind of jobs or studies are you pursuing, fellow nerd/sociopaths ?

[Anonymous No.3383278]

>>3379176
INFP=T
>tfw my judging and feeling changes every time i take this test

[Anonymous No.3383288]

>>3379227
>cried for 4 days when a celebrity they liked died of old age
or just died ;_;

[Anonymous No.3383305]

>>3383058
Sorry, Anon. I'm my waifu's property since 2013.

[Anonymous No.3383313]

>>3379346
INFP too, same

But also m-maybe things will improve

[Anonymous No.3383531]

>>3379551
INTPs are the type who would take stupid personality tests and frequent such places as this

[Anonymous No.3383535]

Intp female

[Anonymous No.3383616]

INFJ

[Anonymous No.3383634]

>>3383535
marry me?

[Anonymous No.3383690]

>>3383634
Why?

[Anonymous No.3383695]

>>3383690
are you female?

[Anonymous No.3383697]

>>3383695
am I?

[Anonymous No.3383702]

i took these tests every few weeks or so and the results seems to go back and forth between infp and intp. kinda weird how that happens, since from what i heard they're supposed to be polar opposites

[Anonymous No.3383887]

Female INTJ. The analysis given to me is accurate except at mentions of the tendency to judge others negatively. I might be excessively private, but I like everyone.

[Anonymous No.3384210]

>>3379684
here

[Anonymous No.3384351]

>>3383702
INTP and INFP are pretty similar, especially on the outside before you get to know them. Whereas INTP and INTJ act like opposites but are more similar on the inside.

[Anonymous No.3384356]

[Anonymous No.3384365]

>>3384356
ISTP here

[Anonymous No.3384371]

>>3384356
INTJ-A here

[Anonymous No.3384512]

intj

[Anonymous No.3384573]

[Anonymous No.3384581]

infp girl

>>3384351
god this was me 4 years ago I'm glad I've cut the creepy shit

[Anonymous No.3384582]

>>3384573

[Anonymous No.3384653]

>>3384356
INTJ here. God damn why do I waste time on this faggy shit? Someone save me, please.

I guess I got a bingo with the free space.

I don't hate rules and laws, I just don't feel an absolute necessity to follow them, you know?

[Anonymous No.3384657]

[Anonymous No.3384661]

>>3384581
too bad, sounds fun

[Anonymous No.3384663]

>>3384653
>>3384657

Well this is awkward, I scored better on the intp card.
I think this card is broken... focusses way too hard on the P/J split, ie orderliness, organization, industriousness, etc. And J is my weakest trait.

[Anonymous No.3384665]

>>3379178
Based

[Anonymous No.3384667]

>>3384663
Fake it till you make it is in no way an intj trait. I hate the idea of doing a poor job at something because I lack the skills and experience. If it's something I take seriously, I make sure I'm competent befoe expecting others to rely on me or pay me. I feel any judging type would be the same.

[Anonymous No.3384671]

On every board these threads are dominated by a few types and half of it is always intp which is apparently 3% of the general population.
Why does 4chan in general attract this kind of person?

[Anonymous No.3384680]

>>3384671
intp is nerds, male nerds specifically, girl nerds get infp

[Anonymous No.3384687]

>>3379176
INTJ

[Anonymous No.3384690]

>>3384671
I'm sure this has all been dissected ad nauseam all over the place, but basically, these types have a tendency towards isolation, a thrist for information, a fascination with theories that explain the world and seeing, discussing, and analyzing these theories, and patterns (even when they don't mean anything). Also, self involvedness/heavy introspection.

So the type theory satisfies the search for meaning, and introspection, while the internet provides and endless pool of info and a poor, but low risk solution for the isolation. Also, 4chan is a fringe community, and these types tend to be independent-minded.

But there are a fair number of Feelers and Extroverts here on ic because of the artsy bias. Also, for the same reasons as above, the intps and intjs are participating more in this thread, making multiple posts instead of just posting their type and leaving, so they appear more numerous than they actually are.

[Anonymous No.3384694]

>>3384661
u say that but guys get tired of the self hate, moodiness, and needing of constant reassurance real quick
at this point I'm like a.. toned down version of that u feel me, relationships have been much more fulfilling since

[Anonymous No.3384695]

>>3384690
i already explained that it was nerds, calm down ya nerd

[Anonymous No.3384696]

ENFP Where we @?

A couple years ago I took this test and got intp/infp over and over. I am pretty sure why. I was extremely anti-social and insecure, and afraid to look at my flaws. So I answered questions while picturing this lone wolf that didnt need people. Basically, I was preaching to the choir, and got the choice I wanted.

[Anonymous No.3384699]

>>3384665
What does based mean in this context? I always see it but never understand. I am not a native speaker.

[Anonymous No.3384704]

>>3384699
Bitches
And
Sex
Every
Day

[Anonymous No.3384705]

>>3384695
Lol, but I have to describe how the nerdiness intersects with the internet, type theory, and forums.
I haaaaaaave toooooooo!!!! It's a disease, anon, I can't help it. Doesn't every question deserve a rambly overexplanation?

[Anonymous No.3384707]

>>3384704
It means that the poster slammed someone with the power of an army base, you know, like 'all your base are belong to us'.

[Anonymous No.3384909]

INFP bingo where?

[Anonymous No.3384917]

where is the istp bingo

[Anonymous No.3384924]

>>3384663
It's almost as if people are more complex than a set of made-up types

[Anonymous No.3384934]

It's almost as if people think they knew a damn thing about psychometrics.

[Anonymous No.3384954]

>>3384694
I am intp male and have had two infp gfs and I think it's an almost perfect match. The intp has a perspective that seems to have an almost magical effect on infps. It's like the infp is lost at sea (sea of emotions) and the intp with the anchor in thinking function, provides a clarity that the infp desperately needs. They just light up and change their whole outlook on things, like they woke up from a difficult dream that was their life.

[Anonymous No.3384960]

>>3384924
Yes, but also these bingo cards are just made by randos, so I'm sure there are better ones and worse ones out there.

[Anonymous No.3385028]

>>3379227
>INFP
>literal baby
>Will turn to dust if you stop believing magic exists
fucking lost

[Anonymous No.3385031]

>>3379362
Post your meyersbrigg

[Anonymous No.3385055]

>>3384954
holy fuck dude
infp male and that sounds like the sickest experience. Do intp girls do this? where are the intp girls at?

[Anonymous No.3385065]

>>3384909

[Anonymous No.3385074]

>>3380059
>less hippy
>more monk on the mountain type
literally the tortoise from Kung Fu Panda

[Anonymous No.3385078]

>>3384909
I used get INTP before but way more of these apply to me so I guess I'm INFP now

[Anonymous No.3385102]

>>3384954
I know exactly what you mean, one of my pals is an INFP like that

[Anonymous No.3385105]

>>3384909

[Anonymous No.3385115]

>>3384909
I wanna see the results if they put "struggled in school" on there

[Anonymous No.3386550]

>>3384657
:^[

[Anonymous No.3386553]

>>3384582
>tumblr special snowflake

[Anonymous No.3386678]

>>3379176
Dongt mean to brag but im INTP

[Anonymous No.3387534]

>>3384351
INTJ and this image just gave me anxiety because all of my ex were like this.

[Anonymous No.3387562]

>I have been making no mere joke, no facetious sophism or paradoxical proposition. I assert that the judgment of identity depends on conceptions, never on mere perceptions and complexes of perceptions, and the conceptions, as logical conceptions, are independent of time, retaining their constancy, whether I, as a psychological entity, think them constant or not. . . .

>I have already shown that the continuous memory is the vanquisher of time, and, indeed, is necessary even for the idea of time to be formed. And so the continuous memory is the psychological expression of the logical proposition of identity. The absolute woman, in whom memory is absent, cannot take the proposition of identity, or its contradictory, or the exclusion of the alternative, as axiomatic.

>Besides these three conditions of logical thought, the fourth condition, the containing of the conclusion in the major premise, is possible only through memory. That proposition is the groundwork of the syllogism. The premises psychologically precede the conclusion, and must be retained by the thinking person whilst the minor premiss applies the law of identity or of non-identity. The grounds for the conclusion must lie in the past. And for this reason continuity which dominates the mental processes of man is bound up with causality. Every psychological application of the relation of a conclusion to its premisses implies the continuity of memory to guarantee the identity of the propositions. As woman has no continuous memory she can have no principium rationis sufficientis.

>And so it appears that woman is without logic.

[Anonymous No.3388053]

>>3384909
welp

[Anonymous No.3388057]

>>3388053
>goth

[Anonymous No.3388074]

>>3384909
I was about to mark almost everything here and then I figured, what's the point. I just want a few friends to talk to. ;_;

Have a nice evening all of you. /blog

[Anonymous No.3388076]

>>3384909
>>3388074
I invite you to mark your bingo, Anon. In fact, If you don't mark your bingo, I will cry.

[Anonymous No.3388114]

haha lol!

[Anonymous No.3388156]

>>3388076
Don't make me cry!