/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

ai art is so good

i hate the (a)nt(i)christ

>>6373833
Clearly good enough for normies, they see a "pretty picture", click like and move on. Without even the slightest care in the world. They don't even consider for a second, the image may not be as it seems.

>>6373829
How does hiding comments work? I thought it was a profanity filter that was hiding comments.

>>6373829
>Getting butthurt about artwork being compared to A.I
Why are artcels like this?

I think it's ok to criticize, even if I don't agree with them, but I wouldn't like to see someone offending me over nothing. Who likes that, anyway?

Also, I think that hidding the fact that you used AI not to get negative reputation is a b*tch move. Don't even use AI if you're not gonna admit you're using it.

>>6373837
You can actually hide comments on twitter from posts you've made, however, people can view the hidden comments by clicking this little funny button
>>6373838
Hello, /g/oodfriend, why must you come here to share your most valid opinions, when. >>>/g/ exists! Perhaps you are an explorer, exploring the vast endless depths of 4chan? in that case. Then carry on my good sir!

>>6373838
>trannoid weeb schizo shitting up ic threads
Don't you have an appointment with the doctor to check on that dripping pus between your legs?

>>6373829
wtf aibros??? i though it was artfags the ones who posted on social media purely for money and/or notoriety??????

>>6373864
This never made sense to me because they claim only the end result matters

>>6373864
ai generated images are too generic for them to make money off of it

>>6373842
Thanks Elon, that box isn't even showing up for me on PC.

>>6373842
But sometimes I see some well meaning comments also get hidden.

>>6373829
Why hide that an illustration was generated by a computer? AI shills were saying it’s just as valid as manually made art.

Personally, I think normies don’t fucking care, they want to look at pictures they think are “cool” and usually the more detailed, the better to catch their attention.

WE LOST

>>6373829
Verdaderamente... Todas putas

>>6373838
Go bavk to /pol/ Elsa. YWNBAW.

>>6374026
Please do not compare me to that literal troon.

>>6373829
>artists keep bullying AI "artists"
Lmao, is there now officially a stigma towards them? Outside their bubble, every single time they keep getting dogpiled

>>6373829
I don't read what people say.
It's either "That's good" or "let's start some shit" type of comments so nothing worth reading. There is no discussion on art or tv shows like there used to be on the old internet. Yes I would liked things to be different and share with nice people online but this kind of interaction is dead on modern social media.
Just become famous and get money. That's all there is to do.

>>6374058
No one like a charlatan. I'm working out in between studying so I can bash their faces in.

AI art gets more Likes than actual art...

>>6373829
lmao of course it's the diaper fags who watch CSM fall for this.
If you want to fish those likes and share just spam CSM fanarts with AI and you'll get away pretty easily.

>>6373829
The only way to improve is to recognize failure. Learning is a function of punishment/reward. Always leave negative comments up, especially if they are true, but even if they're just hating. Everyone respects an artist with a hide. The only time I'd delete anything is if it's genuine targeted harassment rather than criticism

>>6374058
>those hashtags
>not mentioning the use of AI
this guy's probably larping as a jap too

>>6374058
100% he said that right after my comment. I know he feels guilty as shit and he should be. Afterall if he truly didn't do anything wrong surely he wouldn't be groveling like this.