/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5122199
my queen

Sakimi study general
/ssg/

>>5122199
>so where are the arms attached to?
>that neck and fingers
>shading with black

yep it's sakimichan

>>5122211
>so where are the arms attached to?
?????
>shading with black
????????
>that neck and fingers
???????????

Anon, be frank. Are you blind?

>>5122199
heh she really just slapped those clouds in heh, looked rather funny. she started to draw the clouds and soon after putting something down she goes, fuck it, *SLAPS PHOTO* dekimashita!

>>5122199
Who is that big tittied bitch
It's some coom gacha game anime isn't it

>>5122201
https://discord.gg/3bwdfRk

sakimichan fanclub

>>5122267
Not him, but sakimichan really does shade with black, and she does it on purpose
she has a tutorial on lighting and she says shadows should be saturated if your making it “stylistic” and desaturated for realism
she doesn’t always do it, it she legit thinks thing get greyer in the shadows irl

>>5122199
Why does the eyes have their edges so soft?

>>5122272
it's formidable, from azur lane, the coomeat of coom games.

>>5122278
Is that the one with the cowgirl gif that can't even stand up cause her tits too big?

>>5122283
Sì

>>5122199
It's a decent render, but my god her faces look shittier and shittier every day. Is she autistic?

>>5122267
>so where are the arms attached to?
try putting your left arm like she is doing without breaking it

>>5122267
no anon, but you might just be a retarded simp?

>>5122274
yikes

>>5122276
you do both idiot, black or black + color is still a change in value, go fucking paint and learn something.

>>5122312
>t. beg
the only reason to desaturate a shadow is due to complimentary bounce/ambient light, and even then it’s an increase in chroma from the light

>>5122326
yeah throw lighting buzz words around to make up for the fact THAT YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.

>>5122199
>she is master of lasso tool.
I LOVE MILKY MOMMY SAKIMICHANNNNNNNN

>>5122326
Another theorytard throwing around meaningless buzzwords.

Her shading and coloring looks great for the most part. Very 3D-looking and very readable. You'd have to be either deliberately trolling or extremely nitpicky to claim otherwise.

>>5122293
>>5122302
How about you try doing it yourself before you talk nonsense

>>5122199
Why is the plane in front of her hair?

>>5122276
>>5122267
>>5122302
How the fuck this is black? Her shadows are desaturated, sure, but they are nowhere near grey. If this is shading in black, then fucking Leonardo did it too

>>5122616
theres a lot you can hate on about her art, but her shading is perfectly fine

>>5122616
these larpers have never even drawn, let alone painted.
just repeating buzzwords to try to fit in

>>5122615
Because it's an Azur Lane character and she is literally an aircraft carrier, it's part of her fucking design.

>>5122625
Oh I see, I don't play video games so I wasn't aware. Thank you for explaining.

>>5122616
“shading with black” means mixing the base with black to get the shadow, resulting in a desaturated shadow, not literally painting R0/G0/B0

>>5122611
this proves nothing, blindtard

>>5122611
Not him, but look at the collarbones in those images and compare to op. Everything between sternal and acromial extremities is missing, you can’t raise the shoulder and have the collar sit flat at the same time since the clavicle needs to move on two axes to do so

>>5122641
Go find a mirror before you embarrass yourself any further

>>5122199
You niggers continue to keep posting this stupid bitch, how much is she paying you to shill her samefaced content? Fuck off.

Her shading always looked 'realistic' in a bad way to me, like I'm looking at a poorly lit photo of a guy in a kigurumi suit.

>>5122647
no u

>>5122290
Her right leg is made up entirely of jelly.

>>5122651
Shut up you stupid anime girl, now suck my cock.

>>5122663
imagine the ass smell

>>5122290
God I remember seeing this first on /ic/ and everyone started cooming

>>5122645
I too can redline. Top of the hand overlaps areas that you claim are missing.

>>5122651
post coom artist that doesn't have females with sameface, I'm waiting.

>>5122677
>post coom artist that doesn't have females with sameface, I'm waiting.

>>5122631
That's not what she's doing. open your eyes and realize that hue shifts to the red as her shadows get darker. This is why I put color panels in the image.

>>5122672
...do you know where the acromium extremity is and how the clavicle proceeds from it?
>top of the hand
wut

>>5122571
Not that anon but he is right. Sakimi's way of rendering skin with low saturation makes all of her pinups look like weird zombie versions of themselves.

The pic you provided is pretty much the first painting I see of her which does not have this weird quirk.

>>5122684
>wut
ESL pls andastand.
fucking hand and arm thing is retarded. I meant top of the arm, or shoulder, but not the shoulder that is part of the back, but rather shoulder muscle on the arm.

>...do you know where the acromium extremity is and how the clavicle proceeds from it?
Do I look like a medical student to you? Can you draw a realistic shoulder from imagination, or are you reference-only?

>>5122699
>not knowing the anatomical names of the muscles
Ngmi and ignored

>>5122699
why would you not use reference in today's age, we don't need to pay someone to pose for you for hours anymore

>>5122706
What he meant was are you limited only to what you see in front of you? Are you capable of drawing independently on your own and express yourself fully? Being a Referencelet means you are limited to what you may find through google, only a Chad may harness his creativity and draw from his imagination while fully expressing himself without any bondage from a reference.

>>5122706
>>5122684
Let's use reference. Explain to me how >>5122672 is less accurate than >>5122645

>>5122699
>fucking hand and arm thing is retarded. I meant top of the arm, or shoulder, but not the shoulder that is part of the back, but rather shoulder muscle on the arm.
>this is the person calling other people esl

>>5122719
pay attention to how the clavicle moves with the shoulder

>>5122717
visual library is your reference when drawing from imagination

>>5122740
This is not the pose in the image. Rise your shoulder directly up and actually touch your clavicle and see where it is.

>>5122731
No, I'm calling myself ESL, because I am....
I'm not making excuses. Yeah, I'm kinda angry that in English language hand and arm are two distinct words, while in mine it's the same thing. But it's totally my fault for tripping over it, and I fully admit that I'm an idiot.

>>5122785
look that gif frame by frame and find one where her shoulder is directly up

>>5122797
It's not up, though. It's literally only slightly raised as a part of circular motion. I posted an image where people had their shoulders up over here >>5122611

>>5122812
look at the black collar thingy on that drawing, it's not going up to the sides as if the entire elbow was following the arm and then compare with the first image of that mash up you did and see how the entire elbow moves with the arm

>>5122832
not elbow, the trapezius

>>5122199
why should i care? fucking Salamichan

>>5122832
>look at the black collar thingy on that drawing it's not going up to the sides
It is, though. Look at the overlap between the right shoulder and the neck.

>>5122199
The shoulder is completely dislocated from the joint between the scapula and clavicle, no amount of bargaining with redlines attempting to prove the extreme posture will negate the fact that the primary reason it looks disconnected from the torso is because the pectoral muscles are independent from the humerus in other words they don't exist otherwise the retarded looking boobas would be influenced by the pull and stretch of the underlying chest muscles. This chink has been plaguing this board with her cancer ridden fanboys who can't get enough out of riding her FTM hairy Frankenstein phallus. Kill yourselves.

>>5122898
Cope

Why are all of you hysterically running around in defense of sakimichan's art? Is it something so divine and superior that it cannot be criticized?

>>5122906
Yes, it is. If you don't see it you're just blind or filled with envy

>>5122906
>Is it something so divine and superior that it cannot be criticized?
I give you a serious answer. Sakimichan is literally one the best anime pin-up artists out there and most of the criticism against her is completely devoid of merit. Like in this thread, for example.

>>5122957
And we can suppose her six fingers and reversed penises will also be excluded from any form of feedback because none of us are making the same figures as her am I right?

>>5122906
Everyone in here is a crab that can't deal with a woman's successful career as a porn artist

>>5122906
Because we are right and you retards need to stir up lies to attack our muse

>>5122964
Can you point me to a six-fingered arm or a reverse penis in this piece? I'm waiting

>>5122975
This piece, none. Doesn't erase her past works

>>5122979
Ok, and?

>>5122199
Need more loomis

sakimibros, how can she make so much money when everyone told me there is no money to be made in anime art?

Sakimichan threads should be deleted on site, nothing bug crabbing and shilling goes on in these.

>>5122964
What.. What is a reversed penis?

>>5122981
search, first page, lazy retard

>>5122992
If you know, you know.

>>5123021
But I don't know, that's why I asked.

>>5123000
What am i supposed to find, you hard working, mentally healthy individual?

>>5123030
the six fingers and the reverse penis, what else, can't you read either?

>>5123034
OK, how is this relates to this thread here again?

>>5123039
some anon brought it up and some another asked to see them

>>5123042
Well, I'm neither of those, not sure why >>5123000
was directed at me.

>>5122975
>>5122979
>>5122981
>>5123050

>>5123051
"this piece" is kinda crucial distinction, don't you think? Why do we have to bring up other pieces of art, when we discuss this specific work? Also, just as a side note, I did look at first page, there was nothing, apart from one piece, literally made 10 years ago before she learned how to draw.

>>5123059
>>5123042

>>5123059
>Why do we have to bring up other pieces of art, when we discuss this specific work?
Not those anons but if I understood correctly you started with:
>Sakimichan is literally one the best anime pin-up artists out there and most of the criticism against her is completely devoid of merit
So anons mentioned a few instances of shitty works/mistakes to counter your "criticism against her is completely devoid of merit" when in reality the criticism is perfectly valid since she makes many mistakes, especially in terms of anatomy.

Personally I think OP's image is alright. It lacks life though and to be honest it looks like a polished turd.

how does sakimi do it bros? how does she manage to live rent free in ic's head? 5+ years and you guys can't accept she's better than every artist who has posted here.

>>5123243
this

>>5123243
Being better than people that despise actually drawing is hardly impressive

imagine. Sakimi is probably smelly af cause she barely gets out. Imagine her hairy armpits and sweaty snatch.

>So anons mentioned a few instances of shitty works/mistakes to counter your "criticism against her is completely devoid of merit"
I said:
>most of the criticism against her is completely devoid of merit
>most
I didn't say "every single one". I said most. The criticism that anon brought up is literally two drawings, made many years ago. Reverse dick drawing is like 2012 or some shit. Since then she actually improved quite a lot. Six fingers is a common mistake that many artists make, including classical artists, and isn't even worth discussing, as it's obviously just an individual accident and not a lapse in skill or a systemic error that is constantly repeated.

>>5123403
shill

>>5123403
SHUT
THE
FUCK
UP

>>5122199
felt bored so I played around with the colors to see if I could make it look better

>>5123527
Looks worse

>She's literally an aircraft carrier
I'll never get this nip shit

>>5123879
Coom carrier

>>5123879
Boats are grammatically female > boats are cool but not sexy > boats would be better if they were also sexy > boats as sexy females

>>5123879
I would coom to a boat

>>5123879
>eyes closer together
>render on the skin makes it seem even muddier
>head too small
>bigger mouth
>bigger waist
>plane goes vroom vroom
You just made it worse.
Maybe not much in a technical sense but in appeal.

>>5123906
Japanese works are gendered? This explain it then, thanks. Is this an extension of their train autism? Is there train girls?

>>5123980
You have legitimate problems, please don't respond to me ever again.

>>5124033
>doesn’t know ships are usually named after female names
Wew. Even in western countries it’s widely known that ships are usually referred as she.

>>5122631
There would be no hue shift if she did that

>>5122199
i dont get the appeal of this artist for normies. sure her art is nice but its literally the same image every time just a different character

>>5124062
Maybe you’re autistic?

>>5124049
Boats are grammatically female in most European languages, i think. English lacks grammatical gender but it is still commonplace to refer to boats as female, while in german boats are grammatically male.
Boats arent gendered in japanese (or chinese, azur lane is actually chinese) but no one needed the grammatical gender excuse for mecha musume before, it just happened to line up in an amusing way.

>>5124062
>consuming the same shit over and over but in a slight different flavor
welcome to normies

>>5124076
Thanks for the explanation. Is there any reason they don't just create "real" girls and antropomorphise boats and mechs?

>>5124088
For that game? Because its a game about shooting things and putting 20th century naval trivia in to cute girl designs. For the mecha musume genre (if you can call it that) in general I dunno. Its a whole thing. Historical tanks, planes, guns etc, as well as redrawing sci fi stuff as cute girls. Its japs japping. If I had to guess i would suggest its probably about the challenge of anthropomorphising something so distinctly non human and incorporating elements of its real history and physical design in to the anthropomorphic representation.

What WOULD an AK47 look like as an anime girl? These are the questions that keep mecha musume artists (and those people in the venn diagram crossover of gun and anime otaku) up at night.

>>5124096
>What WOULD an AK47 look like as an anime girl?

>>5124096
>What WOULD an AK47 look like as an anime girl?
https://girlsfrontline.fandom.com/wiki/AK-47#Normal

>>5123527
Looks better

>>5122957
>Sakimichan is literally one the best anime pin-up artists out there
You're confusing popularity and cheap tricks with art quality. Don't even dream of becoming good at art, you're probably one of those people who sees absolutely no difference between a nicely shaded picture and one that's just dodge/burn tool spam. Right?

>>5124358
I dunno, Anon. If her art wasn't considered good, i doubt she would be where she's at.
In the end, art is subjective, and if many people like something, that defines it's value.
You can't do the whole
>BUT MY ART IS BETTER BECAUSE ITS MORE REALISTIC
Art don't do like that.
Also pyw.

>smudgetoolchan

lmao@incels who've never seen a woman irl

>>5124358
I'm willing to bet none of those posting here have come even close to meeting the consistency of quality and frequency of releases she has over the years. Her anatomy can be highly questionable and poses are uninspired, but calling it "cheap tricks" to discredit everything she's doing right to focus on what's wrong just makes you look insecure.

>you're probably one of those people who
Ah, projections. Definitely insecure.

>>5124057
there would, since black paint doesn’t exist

>>5124374
>>5124462

Again confusing popularity with art quality.

>>5124374
>pyw
Come on, how would you know it's really mine even if I did post something?

>>5124759
Art quality is arbitrary, therefore it can be anything.

>>5124462
I call years of consistency and frequency of posting erotic pictures with questionable anatomy, uninspired poses, copy pasted backgrounds, identical colouring and identical faces "cheap tricks". And I don't deny that it makes her money.

>>5124770
>Art quality is arbitrary, therefore it can be anything.
What a nihilistic thing to say.

>>5124782
True, though. What makes, let's say, Michelangelo's art more 'quality' than, say, yours? It's all a human construct, so you came up with an arbitrary plank "I say that whatever looks closer to Michelangelo is closer to the highest artistic quality". Cool. But that's like, your opinion man. And I might think that whatever comes closer to your /beg/ stuff is more quality. Who's right? Both and nobody. "But anon, Michelangelo looks much better than my stuff", you might say. It looks like something different, that's all it does. Mashed potatoes and roast potatoes are both fucking potatoes, but one isn't any better than the other unless you decide it is. So thinking that 'art quality' is a concrete thing is total bullshit. Just as well may be measured in the amount of followers you can get with it on twitter. It's all bulslhit.

>>5124923
>What makes, let's say, Michelangelo's art more 'quality' than, say, yours?
are you retarded

>>5122199
Just found her work last week. Been doing digital art for a living for 20 yrs and figure drawing all this time. Fan of anime since Gatchaman.
She makes more in a month than I all year, and she draws what she wants, when she wants.
I could care lass about the shoulders and black shading, what she does works.
fml

>>5124966
Nah, really, what? Closeness to the human figure? To representation of reality? Control of values? Shapes? Who the fuck decides that's what makes one art more quality than another other than you? If anything, the one on the left is the perfect representation of something, a way better, more masterful representation than the dude on the right. I say, the art that's got none is more quality than both of these - the fucking Square. Why should I listen to you? Maybe fucking Michelangelo himself thought his art sucked dick. It's all bullshit. If you think that anything made up by humans is a fact, you're probably one of those retards who thinks god is real just because it's written in some old book.

>>5124923
Art quality is not arbitrary. Healthy people all over the world in all cultures like very similar things in their architecture, music, art, clothes and homes. And those things compose only the tiniest fraction of all possible things that you could conceivably make. All the rest is universally deemed less beautiful and pleasant. There is a common sense of aesthetics that is rooted in the beauty of nature and the forms found in it.

Fucked up people from dystopian modern societies "like" all kinds of twisted edgy trash that healthy people don't, and it seems to be some kind of psychological compulsion for them, like a bizarre rebellion against the qualities that people have been doing for tens of thousands of years out of their free will and joyfulness. I never met a happy person in real life who thought beauty or art quality was arbitrary. But unhappy, bitter people and all kinds of substance addicts seem to always cling to this idea, as if as an acknowledgement of their own "validity".

I'm not talking about sakimichan.

>>5125007
Sure, people find some things more pleasant than others. I'm not talking about beauty/appreciation here, just quality, whatever the hell is it aside from 'be closer to this standard I think is the highest'. You're just saying that whatever's the most pleasing to the most people/popularity = quality. Which is the exact thing the anon tried to argue against. Heck, Sakimichan just might be producing the best and the most popular art on the web right now after all.

>>5124923
Actually, quality in Art can be defined by intention. Same with the potatoes.
If you're trying to follow a roast potato recipe, but you end up with mashed potatoes, your potatoes are wrong and bad. That's the reason why people use "my style" as a crutch, it's just a way to cover your fuck up by saying it was your intention all along. That's the reason why most of /beg/ suck, they are aiming at Sakimichan and landing at the image you posted. That's bad art.

>>5125000
Again the quality of this piece has to do with its intention, is it successful as abstract art? Yes, but if the artist said they tried really hard to recreate Monalisa in a realistic figurative way they missed by a long shot.
You excel at art when you manage to create exactly what you idealized and expected. Sakimichan isn't aiming for realistic proportions, just for a sexy well-rendered figure, and in that she succeeded.

>>5125219
/thread, that should be the end of all sakimichan threads from here on out. Shut the fuck up rest of you coping crabs and get to drawing

>>5125000
Some art is good, some is not. Yours is probably not. That square is not art. Cry some more.

>>5125219
You and I have drastically different definitions of sexy

>>5124033
>You have legitimate problems, please don't respond to me ever again.

gonna cry? gonna piss your pants pp boy :(

>>5125364
Yes, people usually do. That's why discussing aesthetics is pointless, you won't find a common ideal between EVERYONE.
Different interpretations are born from that, you can find a piece of art absolute garbage, but it can still be successful because it reached its goal set by the artist. If one of her goals is to reach a large following and get paid for that, it is clear as day that she managed to do it.
As the other anon said, get over it, and start drawing your own thing.

>>5122199
6 finger artist, why /ic/ still bother giving her attention?

>>5125568
Oh I don’t draw I’m just here to argue and dunk on retards

>>5125576
pyw

>>5125640
Ok, give me half an hour for me to take a photo of my cum

>>5125645
Is this the best art you can produce? I'm not surprised.

>>5125787
I doubt you can do better

>>5125791
I can. Will post my stuff after you post yours

>>5125834
Here is me tracing my photo cumming

>>5125845
here's the suff I posted in /beg/ yesterday

>>5125857
6 fingers > 0 toes

>>5125865
I'm not the Anon that posted the art, but may I ask where the sixth finger is?

>>5125872
In sakimichan's vagina

>>5125903
Oh.

>>5125903
B-but you traced a penis. That's literally the best you can do...

>>5125922
I like my penis better than a hand with 6 fingers

>>5125927
it looks pretty pathetic. there's nothing to be proud off, really

>>5125935
Your mom disagrees

>>5125937
my mom is dead. are you a necrophile?

>>5125940
Yes

>>5125941
ok. i was kidding. she isn't actually dead. but i'm glad we learned something about you today

>>5125943
Corona can fix it

>>5125946
nah, she's already vaccinated

>>5125948
That's even more worrying.

>>5125948
Your mom is so fucked

>>5125950
>>5125952
so, anti-vaxxers are the ones that hate on Sakimichan. good to know. great penis drawings you got there, friends

>>5125956
I don't need vaccine, doing just fine

>>5125956
No, I'm not even anti-vaccine in general, It's just worrying that your Mother is a guinea pig for a vaccine that doesn't protect you from anything.

>>5125966
>doesn't protect you from anything.
so you're a covid denier?

>>5125968
Yes, I can see how what I said could be interpreted in that manner. I meant how it's still pushed/encouraged for those who are vaccinated to wear face masks and take the same precautions as those who aren't vaccinated.

>>5125968
The covid exists, your mom is a guinea pig, learn to read, retard

>>5125977
>>5125978
I am glad that Sakimichan haters are both skillful in tracing penises and knowledgeable about randomized controlled double-blind vaccine trials. You are obviously very valuable members of society

>>5125985
As valuable as someone drawing imaginary people with 6 fingers and reversed penis

>>5125987
>drawing imaginary people with 6 fingers and reversed penis
All the time or only in a select few instances out of a giant body of work?

>>5125985
more valuable than people who produce this trash "art" from the gutter.

>>5125991
Would make a difference?

>>5125995
yeah, it would....

>>5125992
define what you consider to not be trash

>>5126000
anything that is not hot garbage

>>5125985
There is really no need for insults, also, if you could show me an instance where I was hating on Sakimichan, I would greatly appreciate it.

>>5126014
Where did I insulted you?

>>5126008
have any examples?

>>5126015
kill yourself ESL

>>5126015
Well even if you feign ignorance, it's obvious that you were being sarcastic when referring to the other Anon and I as, "obviously very valuable members of society."

>>5126019
of what?

>>5126025
it's not an insult, if it's truth. anti-vaxxers are very far from valuable members of society, and you admitted to being anti-vaxxer.

>>5126021
why would i do that?

>>5126032
>>5126008

>>5126040
my penis

>>5126040
and your not dead mom

>>5126041
so, your scope of interests in life is limited to your member? that is all you think about, that is all that your life revolves around? you draw your penis, you think about your penis, you admire it, it's your only source of entertainment in the world. you see your penis in the bowl of cereal, you see it in cinema, you see it in the faces of people on the street, you see it when you close your eye late at night. but for some reason, not in Sakimichan's art. so Sakimichan's problem is literally that she doesn't draw your penis.

you know what, that actually explains a lot. thanks.

>>5126033
Well, it's not exactly as if insults need to be lies. Also, as I stated, I'm generally not anti-vaccines, even I have gotten my fair share of flu-shots and all that jazz, hehe. It's just that you still have to act as if your life is in imminent danger, even once you've taken the vaccine. In my personal case as well, I see no reason for why I should take the vaccine, as I am both young and healthy, on top of living in a State with one of the lowest amount of cases, and less than 50 people per sq. mile.

>>5126061
i dont see my penis in everything, i see my penis under my pants, if you see my penis in a bowl of cereal you should get checked out asap

>>5126061
no, but i do see your definitely not dead mom in my bowl of cereal, in the cinema, in other's people face, at night, she is everywhere, i see dead people

>>5126073
but that's the only thing you can draw and the only thing you can give as an example of art that you admire. your life is that pathetically limited.

>>5122271
BASADO

ABSOLUTE PHOTOBASHING QUEEN

>>5126080
who said it was the only thing i can draw, i can draw me fucking your dead mom's head

>>5126089
do it

>>5126091
cant post guro

>>5126089
Jeez dude.

>>5126093
i allow it, now do it

>>5126096
jannies wont

>>5122645
Who the FUCK cares about anatomical accuracy as long as it looks pleasing to the eye and doesn't completely miss the point?

>>5126099
are you scared?

>>5126102
yes, i dont want to piss my little janny, she is reading what i'm writing behind me, sleeping on the floor it not fun, specially now

>>5126100
It's not pleasing, it's disturbing and goes against God

>>5126107
so you're anti-vaxxer, can't draw, and a little bitch to boot? why should people care about your opinion again?

>>5126114
because i have a penis

>>5126116
there's no proof of that

>>5126117
there is

>>5126118
not in this thread

>>5126120
exactly, if i didn't have a penis there would be a penis in this thread by now

>>5126122
that is a logical fallacy, don't you know the basics of thinking straight?

>>5126129
im bi

>>5126131
it's not the reason why you can't draw anon

>>5126137
i know its not the reason i cant draw, but whats the real reason

>>5126138
because you don't like Sakimichan, obviously

>>5126141
well its not just that. i cant really tell you because i promissed to never speak to anyone about her again

>>5126145
looks like you're just afraid of facing the truth

>>5126149
what?

>>5126158
Sakimichan is literally the best artist you've ever seen?

>>5126164
what, that's absurd, she is just a fem

>>5126182
then why you like her?

>>5126191
i dont know, i just do, but i still think taj is better

>>5125000
I get what you're saying but you're still retarded. Art is about the end user experience, if we're gonna put it clinically, and technique can help elevate that experience. Things like good lighting, anatomy, facial expression, perspective, can illicit certain emotions, and importantly, emotions that CAN'T be evoked by lesser quality art. also who gives a fuck about what Michelangelo thinks about his own art, read "The Death of the Author" by Roland Barthes sometime you trog.

also what does god have to do with it lol. you must have been brain damaged by going through college and drank up every pisspoor opinion your professors had about art and how quality doesn't matter. critical theory is the death of goodness, so I hope you die.

however if this is bait, you mega got me, so good on you for that I cant even be mad lol. Very high effort bait, a bait that took a lifetime to build

>>5126225
>you're wrong
>but art is about the end user experience
>but lesser quality art can't do shit
So art is subjective????
And pic related is shit quality yet it evokes retards to sperg out because
>muh art school im 654165413658463 burgerbux in debt this is bad i can do better yet i won't post my work
Consuming books and parroting words dont maek u smort

Holy shit guys this is the first time my threads reaches R:200. Anyway I made this thread for us to discuss saki technique and style but you all went of topic and please consider kys!!

>>5127753
sweaty arm pits ugh

>>5123527
this is so much better. i never understood sakimichans dull-shadows-fetish. maybe its easier/faster since no one seems to care

How has nobody pointed this out yet? Either she's gigantic and those are normal sized jets, or those are tiny jets and shes normal sized.

>>5125000
it's not something you have to explain to know that it's true, that some art (qualitywise) is better than other. you can argue literally everything in life is subjective and arbitrary if you really want to, but that's just makes you an obnoxious pretentious faggot.

>>5130239
It's like you know a well-done steak is more quality than medium-rare, right?

>>5128100
>so much better
ugly cartoony colors, eyes melting saturation. anon, you have no taste