/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4314676
cant tell what is happening, is the wolf eating the stars? the moon just exploded? is sitting in water? the reflection of the moon is also wrong, aslo the anatomy of the wolf looks wrong. Colors are ok

>>4314676
Better than 90% of /ic/
better than >>4314681 for sure.
also kek
>muh anatomy

>>4314676
Its shit, ugly colors, keep practicing though.

>>4314676
Read the sticky and practice literally everything

If you’re a first time poster don’t expect anything nice from anyone here. You’ll learn if you’re not an idiot though, good luck

>>4314681
Post work

Thank you so much guys. Really appreciate the honest reviews. Keep them coming. It'll help me a lot.

>>4314676
the generic '' black silhouette of a wulf howling at the moon " is an uninteresting theme that has been done to death already, im not disgusted by the /beg tier brushwork as much as I am by the subject matter

>>4314676
It's kitsch and /beg/ tier.

>>4314681
Nice joke smartass, everything in the painting is understandable unless you cognitive proble- oh...

>>4314926
>implying kitsch is a bad thing

a loomis thread died for this

>>4314676
wolves howling at moons is peak Chad
makes autists feel self conscious about their three wolf moon phase and seethe

>>4314676
What is the aluminium foil technique?

>>4315906
Wadding up aluminum foil and using it in place of a paintbrush. Its last year's social media art fad

Any other improvements/suggestions guys?

>>4314676
If this is unironicly your first painting then you got some pretty good intuition, keep it up.

>>4315681
This. The people who invented and pushed that term are all either kikes or extremely degenerate. Kitsch is basicly anything that has any beauty to it.

>>4315951
It really is. Thanks. :)

>>4314681
The wolf just ate a chunk of the moon now he burping out stars