[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 376 KB, 563x495, drawing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3483168 No.3483168 [Reply] [Original]

did she even improved in those 6 years?

>> No.3483172

>>3483168
Technically she did. Who cares?

>> No.3483186

>>3483168
tfw your hand is a can of spraypaint

>> No.3483190

>>3483168
Holy shit, this is bad. And I've been drawing seriously for 6 years myself and with the exact same amount of time improved much more.

>> No.3483196

>>3483190
pyw

>> No.3483225

>>3483190
I wouldn't be so quick to judge. It's hard to make a redraw look good if the original picture is so bad and the idea is so uninteresting.

>> No.3483229

This is the fucking dumbest question I've seen in a very long time.

>> No.3483234

>>3483168
those legs are triggering me, imagine being so bad at anatomy that you can't understand that if the knees are pointing inward the feet can't be pointing outward

>> No.3483263
File: 173 KB, 850x607, FACE Thank you 1522736519670.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3483263

>>3483234
>if the knees are pointing inward the feet can't be pointing outward

Adding this to my notes.
Thanks a bunch!

>> No.3483272

>>3483172
this

>> No.3483277

>>3483225
Nice shitty excuse that doesn't even logically make sense. You can make the shittiest drawings look good when redrawn, I've done it I've seen many impressive artists do it.

>> No.3483325

>>3483190

>And I've been drawing seriously for 6 years myself and with the exact same amount of time improved much more.

Don't lie, anon, it's bad for your spirituality.

>> No.3483452

>>3483263
I mean, they technically can be but it would be very uncomfortable and stiff. I just did it and it's pretty tough, but possible.

>> No.3483517

>>3483168
No she didn't. She lost whatever appeal she had going for her imagery and her anatomy is still messed up.

>> No.3483519

>>3483263
You shouldn't need to take notes about that.

>> No.3483850
File: 67 KB, 750x537, BAAB043B-E2EC-4CC9-A710-5FF6B75AFAFB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3483850

To any of the anons here, is this you?

>> No.3483862
File: 9 KB, 247x83, they.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3483862

>>3483850
unlikely

>> No.3483907

>>3483168
better than 99% of /ic/

>> No.3483911

>>3483168
The old one is way more stylish. The new one has no style, and the anatomy is still off. Looks like she tried to draw something more realistic but is still symbol drawing

>> No.3483920

>>3483168
yea

>> No.3483923

Yeah.
Proportions are improved, she can into foreshortening now, decent linework.
She did good the knees though.

>> No.3483949

>>3483519
>You should'nt need to take notes about that.

Adding this to my notes, thank you very much

>> No.3483974

>>3483168
she def improved

i bet it would be clear looking at more of her works

>> No.3484006

>>3483190
nice samefagging, OP

>> No.3484010

>>3483974
I wouldn't call her old image good but it is much more appealing than the new one.

>> No.3484276

>>3483168
in 2012 her arm is bending backwards

>> No.3484295

>>3483325
>oh no I'm insecure cuz I didn't improve within 6 years therefore everyone else is lying
I'm not. Drawn for 6 years, made more progress than OP pic. Anyone can improve more than OP with the same amount of time.

>>3484006
How am I same fagging? I've posted only twice. You're mixing me with someone else you retard.

>> No.3484326
File: 4 KB, 207x171, Q_1hax8aQceeY57qP7DiBA.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3484326

>>3484295
>I'm not. Drawn for 6 years, made more progress than OP pic. Anyone can improve more than OP with the same amount of time.

Do you want us to give you praise for something so common? Congrats, you were able to pull off the obvious outcome, given that you know how to learn properly. You're not special. That's the fucking 'joke' of the OP pic so no one needs you to clarify your probably mediocre improvement.

>> No.3484332

>>3484326
I'm anonymous, why in the hell would I need praise if I know no one, no one knows me? The point was that anyone can improve, you illiterate dumbass.

>> No.3484338

>>3484332

>>I'm anonymous, why in the hell would I need praise if I know no one, no one knows me?
>Implying being anonymous revokes all boosts from the ego gained by shitting on someone's artwork
I was focusing on the initial comment which gives nothing for the 'discussion' except point out the exact thing that makes the post funny.

>Holy shit, this is bad. And I've been drawing seriously for 6 years myself and with the exact same amount of time improved much more.
What were you trying to point out or achieve with this comment, you autist? I don't need a joke explained to me you flared nostril.

>> No.3484543

looks pretty bad. The 2012 piece isn't good sure ut its a lot more eye catching then the anatomically incorrect drawing on the left.

>> No.3484544
File: 135 KB, 918x871, drawthisagain2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3484544

did she improve

>> No.3484547

>>3484544
You can't improve on perfection

>> No.3487295

> no improvement at all
lol

>> No.3487418

>>3484544
Body structure yes there is improvement however the coloring is still atrocious, the image could be incredibly better with more contrast and shading that isn't so lazy.

>> No.3487444

>>3484544
Are you sure this is not 20:15 and 20:18?