/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4890715
>i-it's not against the rules
there's the rules and then there's the social norms we all implicitly pick up while frequenting a board. the purpose of /ic/ is to discuss art as a craft, meaning: techniques, fundamentals, practice routines and so on. there's probably a right-wing and a left-wing lifting culture or something, but that doesn't mean you get to make a "get ripped, racists, get fit for the fuhrer" general on /fit/. similarly, there is no such thing as a right-wing or a left-wing aesthetic. if you drew a different subject matter no one would even be able to tell what your political affiliation is. if you wanted to talk about subject matter you should make a thread with an op along the lines of "What do you like to draw and what does it mean to you".

>>4886948
lmao, should really have proofread that

>>4694379
your pride has become your chain. all you have left now are the dreams of a future that will never come to pass.

BAD END

>>4597783
>nooo you can't question whether all the people on top deserve to be on top
>corruption isn't real
>scams aren't real
>stop being jealous and entitled
>stop asking questions
>you must be fun at parties :))
note that the person I was replying to said "There are many other artists that market themselves as well/ just as skilled and this guy got to 143k followers in a years time.", which is why they were confused specifically by the outliers who skyrocket to success for no discernable reason.

>>4070256
this has to be bait, right?