/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6077164
>double standards of twatter
Not unique to it.
It's a general double standard.

This isn't about whether you agree or disagree, if i wanted someone to agree with me i'd talk to myself.

The undeniable objective truth is that;
You're free to draw what you want, but morality still applies.
So, if you age up a fictional child, you're a pedophile, because the character it originates from is a child.
Aging it up doesn't make the SOURCE of the character an adult.
It's the same as jerking off to childhood pictures of your wife but claiming it's ok because you already had sex with her as an adult.

The issue arises when the double standard gets applied for selfish reasons; which i already posted about.
>thing i like good because fiction
>but thing i dislike bad even if fiction
But sexualizing a child is ALWAYS BAD no matter the loopholes you go through to not call it a child, no matter if she's legally 5000 years old, no matter if you slap tits on her or "age her up"; the main original source is still a child.