/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6647891
Based. AIniggers get the rope.

>>6616448
>luddite
nothing wrong with technology, Glaze will get better over time. we're only in the pre alpha stages. as more and more people will get pissed off by data theft and scammers, various forms of data protection measures will also be developed. if machine learning/AI can also be used to counter this, I don't see why it wouldn't be a fantastic tool

>>6605360
>luddite

>>6602382
https://twitter.com/egoraptor/status/1631717906357579778

>Youtoober post
Using this to prop up some points but to mix my thoughts
>AI just isn't going to poof out of existence, regardless of how you want it to go away.
>You most likely don't hate AI art. Rather what it stands for. You will be in conflict when you see someone who makes actual good stuff about it.
>Current prompt-based image generators are counterintuitive to typical digital art workflow unless you're a photobasher or photo editor. Does not mean that it will be the scope of those AI tools forever (think improved AI assisted lighting, img2img based perspective generator, better filters for photobashing etc.), like nigger CSP's hand detection tool is amazing for speeding up hand drawings.
>Its going to get regulated. It just has to be. AI is too powerful of a tech and as much as it can be used for good, it can be used for nefarious purposes. (Pic related, also we already have issues with data privacy)
>Once the better AI tools start to exist, you'll be like a professional player with cheats on in a game full of noob ass cheaters.

>>6601890
Would you record your parents anon?