/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7144608
>you are wrong because my schizophrenia says you are
>no one gave a shit about women artists works because they just didn't ok?
>hehe ur redarted n stoopid
i google female artists of old and get 20 billion results


>no one gave a shit about their art
>BECAUSE THEY WERE LE WOMEH
All your art knowledge is what normies regurgitate so it doesn't surprise me you reason like an effeminate seeking validation in the victimhood of a whole gender to feel better about yourself. That's your whole argument.
No one was ever stopping women from pursuing anything and being in an """atelier""" didn't make the master.

You might as well simply projecting your own failure as an artificial cunt on the memed history of women in the arts.
>b-b--bbut if no one care about their work they can't be considered a master
Money is and was always the game, faggot.
Is the mona lisa a masterpiece? It's a fucking doodle but it's memed as one because it attracts and generates money.
Da Vinci was considered a fucking faggot and a beg his whole life. Van Gogh was considered a schizo retard his whole life.
Artists were always considered """"MASTERS"""" after their deaths because it would sell shit.

Post your work and shill your blog already, faggot.

Isn't it telling how every explanation as to why porn gets regulated on payment sites is always
>it's the neopuritan wahmen virtue signaling they just pretend to want to protect le children and that is so cringe because there is no problem with children being addicted to porn at 14 lol everyone watched porn with 14 its completely normal lmao no there is only black and white shut up puritan bigot do you have no libido kek omg stop baiting trolling me
We get it, you have invested interests or want to be le epic nsfwartist with 450k followers who clowns on people by writing le witty one liners and post clips of your videogames on twitter, yourself

But you're not really doing anything, you're only just coping like cunts do by calling everyone who disagrees with them a rapist or trannies calling everyone who doesn't want to let them diddle their kids, a transphobe.

If you were in any business, handled any money or knew that criminals exist, which apparently you either don't know anything about life or are purposefully overlooking and ignoring that, you would be reasonable about it instead of crying wolf.

People will not side with your porn peddling ass if you keep being unreasonable like that, because normies have become tired of and numb to the emotional manipulation by playing the victim card that happens every single time someone gets their little degenerate ass handed to them, but you will take this as an insult, a threat even, because you are unable to think without your dick and you're emotionally worse off than the average woman.

You should be grateful that anyone in the current year has enough integrity and honesty to tell you this shit straight up with no bs.
That you get uppity about it is your own issue.

But yeah, better respond with the usual ironic unironic ironic shitposts, that'll show how based you are and then you'll be rich and famous.

All this shit happens because kids are still allowed on the internet.

This thread is exactly why i hate interacting with women and effeminates
>say anything
>MUH FEEFEES I AM A WOMAN ON THE INTERNET YOU CANT DISAGREE WITH ME
I can't escape women even on the fucking internet.

>>6854796
According to mentally ill porn addicts and children that substitute their lack of real identity and personality with what they jerk off to; no.
>>6855243
>Why are you lording your 'cum jar knowledge' over me?
What are you trying to achieve by this? You're unironically projecting your own insecurities because you have no real arguments i.e. you argue like a child.
>Do you think being drowned to death in cum whilst imprisoned in a jar isn't horrifying?
>Do you find that erotic?
When put in an obvious erotic context, with the obvious reference to what is going to happen, you're only doing mental gymnastics if you try to portray it as something it isn't.
Nice bad faith argument though, kid.
>The 'ad hominem' being "you seem to have missed the jokes'.
You keep reiterating how i must hate sex and porn and try to make it your whole argument without actually arguing anything.
Again, you argue like a child.
>Welcome to the world of satire.
>You should check out two obscure little shows, called "the Simpsons" and "South Park", they'd really blow your mind.
Yes, yes, consume more popular media, i get it. What satire. But hey, greentext puritan bad, boobies cum sex good amirite?
>you'd notice he's displeased and sweating.
Ok, so you are also blind and unable to discern context or abstract emotions while giving it your own subjective meaning, that is also far removed from objective reality? Truly the average nu-audience in a nutshell.
>Then entire point here is that people find his jokes funny, because they're more than JUST "haha sex", they're "haha, cultural reflection and also sex"
No, they're not and Anon here explains it >>6855063

>>4993293
>meme1000twenty
>wants proven facts
>tries to be reasonable and unbiased
u get cancel now