/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2212242

>>2212154
>they would ultimately go with the objectively easier and more advanced choice

>That's how long it takes to accomplish in 2d what can be done in 3d in a few shorts years or even months

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704746304574508552919095862

>Disney didn't exactly strike pay dirt with its new all-computers, all-the-time approach. The studio's first fully computer-animated feature, 2005's "Chicken Little," posted a middling $135 million at the domestic box office, and 2008's "Bolt" earned $114 million domestically. Production costs for films animated by hand or by computer _tend to be comparable_.

>The decision to use nearly photorealistic computer imagery, instead of the more impressionistic traditional technique, is _mostly a matter of aesthetic calculations_. Executives involved in making "Princess" say it cost slightly less than its original budget, which they declined to disclose.

(inb4 my hyperbole makes me "wrong")

Why aren't these 3D guys posting their work if it's so easy? Show us your models and show them moving fam. It's so easy!