/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4479892
i think there might be 2 issues here but don't take this post too seriously as advice.. first of all the armor is making the hips read as though they are far more exaggerated than they might have meant to be if >>4479951 is the correct way its meant to be read. second, if it isn't the orientation is exaggerated but the head doesn't follow this exaggeration through. left image attached s what it looks to me like you are doing and right looks to me what you are doing and middle looks like a more 'natural' pose given the exaggerated torso configuration.

>>4480248
the legs are broken but it really depends on what they want to achieve. what you might want is to fully break the other leg too

over all there's a reason why you need to learn te rules to break them because stylization is redesigning the rest of the figure such that the pose is in a warped reality in which it 'makes sense'.