/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3469819
>all those things you posted arent good examples of anime to show to a normie to convince them it's aesthetically pleasing

I posted those pics as examples of differences in style among artists in response to his ridiculous claim that there is none if you used reading comprehension you would have noticed that as I say so clearly in my post.

>you just like them because they're fappable
That wasn't the reason I posted them though and they can of course be both fappable and aesthetically pleasing like >>3468446
>>3468449 are for example because its a highly subjective matter anyways.

>a normie will be like "yeah the body's hot but those faces look retarded"
What do I care what normalfags think, if they can't appreciate anime or any cartoon because of simplified facial features thats their problem and not mine.