/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7025185
>asks question in bad faith
>yo wtf why aren't you giving me the answer i already implied the answer of fucking sperg
Oh, poor new discord sister seething that his bait thread isn't going as planned

Also yes, my brain dick is bigger than yours
I am simply born with talent and the right genes

>>6078501
>muh cosplayer
If a whore cosplays as a dog, they're cosplaying as a dog and sexualizing it
if they cosplay as a 5 year old child, they're sexualizing a 5 year old child
>Morality is subjective
low iq take
>The argument isnt "it's morally wrong vs amoral" you moronic busybody. It's: "Is this image is pedophilic"
No, it isn't.
The argument is
>Where does the morality in this image fall in the content of adult sexual content
>but muh titties
the original character it's taken from is a 5 year old child
read the thread, pedo

Also you have no right to even talk about this stuff because
>ethics bad
>rules bad
>morality bad
>wow i love consuming products
>"WOW A TREE MADE A SOUND WHEN IT FEEL IN THE FOREST BUT YOU DIDN'T HEAR IT! CHECKMATE! IT DIDN'T HAPPEN! AM I SMART YET?"
but the most retarded take of all the garbage you wrote
>Massive titties and mother-bearing hips is the ANTITHESIS of pedophilic desires
>Even if the depicted age of the character is 12
But is it based on the depiction and design of a child?
You should seek the indefinite termination of your existence
>>6078615
Calling me a troll won't magically make the shit pedo cope pseudo-arguments right.

Imagine taking a dog and dressing it up in people clothes.
It would still be a dog.
Imagine taking a plane and installing monster truck wheels on the sides.
It would still be a plane.
Imagine taking a 5 year old child and aging it up solely for porn consumption.
It would still be a child you're sexualizing to sell porn
And for the last time;
It wouldn't be an issue if the character that has been sexualized for porn consumption didn't actually come from a depiction of a 5 year old child.
Only way to argue this is to draw her aged up and post it on your socials, because no amount of dishonest low iq arguments will ever make you right.
The minority who will complain will give you a huge number boost, so it's a win-win.
If you say
>but muh esjaydabliumoralfags
Then you admit you're wrong.