/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7185611
Are you her gynecologist??? asshole

>>7181095
yes uff power on your knees, fucking fagot

>>7180155
Are we pretending to be retarded again? I can't tell anymore.

>A redundant general thread full of shitposts remains up for several weeks
>A productive Ai thread gets deleted in a matter of days
Really makes you think.

>>6966720
Either you didnt read or you are too retarded to understand what I just explained. I genuinely want to believe you didnt read and you're just messing with me, because your whole argument evolving into 4chan verbose in the middle of it gives me that idea.
Im going to leave this at that, have yourself a (You) and continue being a retardo around le heckin forchan.
>Anon, what am i feeling right now? You can probably tell, no?
Tone of voice doesnt have anything to do with how the writer feels, but if you ask me, you give me the impression you are kind of sort of assblasted right now kek.
Cheers, anon.

>>6875093
>but if you're trying to infect the whole site with your gpu farms running 100% 24/7 because "hue hue I can", you're just a faggot.
It's almost like they want to share their work just like anybody else who creates a piece of art.

>>6773617
>>6773634
While I appreciate the input on calling this idea basic, cliche and kind of stupid, I think you two are missing the point: Im not trying to be "stunning" or "edgy", or reinvent the wheel, I am fully aware of the fact this idea is pretty tame and in execution is even more tame, but as basic as the idea itself may be, I still want to do it, not because I want to piss off the masses, but because I want to make a wholesome, bitterwsweet, albeit silly love sub-story, if I piss off the masses in the process because of the age gap or some other stupid argument, then I'd be happy to double down, that's all Im saying.

>>6602712
>how do you draw that conclusion from this picture
Because if you read it you'll understand why he calls Artists retards and you continue to demonstrate his point by not being able to comprehend his grievance.

>3-4 months or so
>The most it has done is spam art sites, appeal to dopamine-hungry people in social media and threaten weak, creativeless "artists" with the art equivalent of fast food.
>The most attention it gets is either awe from the technologically illiterate or outrage from the gulible artists.
>outside it's own niche, it's spark has been dying down and the art itself being contained in their own set of rules.
>all AI apologist do is live in the future and shout "any moment now!!" over and over with baseless speculation
I am so very terrified of the future...

>>6378528

>>6148475
>the same "look at my assets" character design on all of them
Are you really going to make me explain you what is so wrong about this design?
Colors arent much of an issue except for the right one since the presence of blue so abundant it lacks harmony. Art style is a debatable matter, but you can say it compromises the overall presentation to a considerable degree.

What really kills off all three designs are the design choices. Not only they show generic and bland that do little to nothing to portray whatever the character she is supposed to be, but the fact everything previously mentioned is foreshadowed and alineated by hedonistic design choices such as showing off her disproportionatedly huge asses and thighs, which really paints this designs as a very poor attempts to be something interesting hampered and sabotaged by pure hedonism coming from the author. I'd be forgiving if the characher's evident design choices were hedonistic for the sake of a good character design (like a seductive succubus for instance), but in this case, it is hedonistic for the sake of hedonism.

>>6122566
>Look at me. Look at meeeeeeeee. I have a Bagina :) Give me attention nao
>bixnoodmuhfugga
>Muhdick
>Noooooooo not that type of attention!
>Halp! Feminism! I'm being raaaaaaped!
>All men are pigs!
It's all so tiring.