/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6952746
>>6952823
>/ic/

Okay, short answers Anon.
Sexual attraction and arousal is complicated and "learnable". Fatfags, footfags latexfags, furfags, gurofags and a massive list of degenerates exist.

The male brain evolved to get aroused by companionship, the woman's face and body and NOT the pussy. Since you are supposed to look at her face/body while having sex.

Seeing an erect cock usually activates sexual arousal in both males and females. Why? Because humans are a community species whom evolved to share pleasures together, eat, dance, sing together and so on. This also goes for sexual pleasures and males are evolved to be the one that needs to initiate so that is a signal for others who are aroused but are unsure that the situation is safe enough to start looking for sex.

>I'm attracted to cocks and femboys
Cock envy is a thing and since you know how to "use" a cock you know how to pleasure it, we are evolved to share pleasures in safe environments.
Femboys are just girls with a dick, you might know they are guys but lower brain functions like emotions can and do override such reasoning, this is psychology 1.0.

>but not dudes generally
This is means you are no homo. Homosexual males tend to be attracted to the male body features, bony and sharper faces and body, thicker body hair, rougher skin and rugged features, no booba, etc. some even expressed that their preferred partner would be a man with a pussy. A cock is not the deciding factor.

>but I am not like that and I know some that are different from what you said
Again, sexuality and arousal is really fucking complicated and arousal by different stimuli is learnable.

That's all for your beginner sex-ed on the Internet now go away!

>>6758798
Elon NEVER wanted to actually buy Twitter, he just got into a pissing contest with Twiter moderators who refused to accommodate to his ego and so he started flexing his wallet to dunk on them constantly and it got to the point of offering to buy twitter just so he could fire the mods and he promised to pay way more than Twitter was ever worth.

Unfortunately for him the Twitter owners took him seriously and immediately accepted his clearly retarded proposal. Then Elon tried every single legal loophole desperately to back out of the deal that everyone knew will make him loose a considerable amount of money. However he couldn't find any legal justification to back out so he had to run with it now.

So yes Elon had one job but that job was one he NEVER wanted nor he actually cares for but now has to deal with all due to his own arrogance and astronomical stupidity.

>>6714428
>applying Baki logic to real life
Next you should try imagining yourself back to life after you died just in Baki. Surely it will work you just need to imagine hard enough.

>>6244353
If they kill all of the humans and only keep slaves/AI who will buy all the massive amounts of products they create using said slave workers and AI? How will the elite make the money to keep themselves rich if there is nobody to buy? If you kill all poor people and leave rich elite people around you are not rich anymore since only the elite remains and everyone else is rich around you.

>>6201983
>There's a reason all the best artists are drawing vtubers now.
But they are not? Where did you get this idea?

There are many Vtubers that are also artists in their and they are doing a lot of the drawing on stream because it is in their community. Plus Vtubers (even low key indie vtubers) are often commissioning artists to draw their avatars because that is one of the cheap and surefire way to provide new content their viewers, create merch to sell and just sate their fragile and precious streamer egos that is already held together by bandaids.

>>6101273
Solving a Rubik's cube can be reduced to extremely simple parameters like pictures and colors. It can be done by simple algorithms that were developed in the 1990s. Pre-programmed computers were already able to do that since then.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimal_solutions_for_Rubik%27s_Cube

>trained entirely in simulation
This means it was already pre-trained for a purpose with SPECIFIC parameters and has a solid model on how stuff works around the limited environment.

>system can handle situations it never saw during training

Read the full article
>"To overcome this, we developed a new method called Automatic Domain Randomization (ADR), which endlessly generates progressively more difficult environments in simulation."
The AI was already given a huge amount of random parameters about what could go wrong during training so it is prepared to compensate for many things.

>"This frees us from having an accurate model of the real world, and enables the transfer of neural networks learned in simulation to be applied to the real world."
As I said "we currently do not have a reliable model with which we can simplify the entirety of the real world well enough so that we can describe it in digital codes." They say the same thing I did, we can only do this in a very limited environment.

>Our method currently solves the Rubik’s Cube 20% of the time when applying a maximally difficult scramble that requires 26 face rotations.
>For simpler scrambles that require 15 rotations to undo, the success rate is 60%. When the Rubik’s Cube is dropped or a timeout is reached, we consider the attempt failed. However, our network is capable of solving the Rubik’s Cube from any initial condition. So if the cube is dropped, it is possible to put it back into the hand and continue solving.
It is still bad at performing something computers could do since the 90s and it can't even pick the cube back up when a human would be able to do that without any training.

>>4505679
>if you are /beg/
>Don't ever give advice.
>You can relate and share your hardships with other /beg/s, but never give them advice.
>If you MUST give advice, start the reply off with "I'm beg, but what worked for me is..."

Look man what is the point of the thread then? You realize the term /beg/ is constantly thrown out at everyone and your statement would just be used by people to argue about who that rem applies to and after failing then then it would devolve on what that term actually means.

Then the other thing is that if /beg/s can't give advice to each other then who should? Obviously the 90% of visitors are /beg/s so that means 90% of the threads' trfafic would be pointless. Maybe sometimes a few more knowledgeable people come and help out but that is like once in a blue moon which would mean actually advice will be way less.

You a openly just policing people here and trying to force a "class divide" between who is /beg/ and how is not when the term itself is incredibly vague and this is an Anonymous board. Thus any effort to classify or identify people runs counter to the very foundation this site was based on.

>>4218166
>>4218173
>>4218172
Fug off with your shitty gatekeeping. Putting everyone and their mothers to /beg/ will only make more posts missed for posters that actually need it. It's like you people have this weird idea that posting at /int/ is like being in the cool kids club or that posters there are above the plebs or something so you try to keep everyone out of it for no reason but to make yourself feel better. While the /int/ thread is a content starved desert cause nobody posts there anymore.

If you do not want people to post then do not make /int/ threads, otherwise just deal with it and give people better advice than going back to /beg/.

>>4200817
>So what? It's up to you to include a watermark, and a person who genuinely likes your art will start to ask who this talented artist is. In fact, people will get even more interested.

No that is not how this works. People that are "genuinely interested" are an extremely low percentage of the traffic that random clicks generate. The vast majority does not care about the source of the image the just click on the image, if they like it they maybe save it and then move on with their day and it ends there, this is the reality of the world we live in. Furthermore that is how click traffic is made, that is how the ad revenue come in that is what algorithms are looking for.

Reblog channels basically serve as the "middleman" in the traditional commercial sense one that collects goods together and hands them further to those that need it in one convenient and comfortable place. The difference is that they pay nothing to the original creator they just take it and throw it out for everyone. That is why creators are realizing that since they have no choice but to paywall their stuff because others will easily profit out of their hard work while giving them nothing and without even their knowledge.

Geez it's so damn simple. it's like you have never been to the Internet before...

>>4188383
>Should they bring back art in the Olympics?
No because art is largely subjective. You cannot measure it clearly like you can measure the time it takes a runner to run from start to finish. Or a jumper to jump the highest or a thrower throw the farthest etc.

In case of subjectivity the winner will always be determined by the group of people that are selected to judge it and that means selecting the winner only comes down to personal bias. Personal bias is not an objective way to measure an accomplishment.

Now you will ask, "But what about assement by a crowd? Using a large enough group of people will drown out the personal biases of a few people." Yes but if you have ever in your life seen any political campaigns or movie reviews or ideological crusades you know that assessment by a crowd brings up worse problems of pandering to the common basic interests of a largely uninterested crowd instead of aiming to an expression with meaning.

>>4178367
Not all artists are teachers. Teaching (as you should know) is a completely different skill, it requires a lot more experience in being social, which is (as you should also know) something your average artists is the exact opposite of. Especially if they are not being paid for, I mean everyone only has so much free time to do stuff, like they are not going to write you a detailed paper on how they "learned to draw over several years" just cause you (a random nobody on the Internet) asked.

Also stop being an ungrateful faggot and think rationally for two minutes before you make generic hate post demanding sympathy and validation on 4chan of all places because your did not get the answer you wanted.

I swear to god...

I'm terrified about my art being replaced by a robot. How much longer do I have, /ic/?

>>3929501
>eople who take great offense to the fact that you never replied to their email and will stir up twitter drama over it. So you have to regularly post stuff like 'I'm super sorry if I didn't replied to your pm/note/message/email/etc on siteA/siteB/siteC I just don't have the time to stay ontop of it all and it's too much'.
Holy shit it is the BIGGEST problem to me.
those people staight up the most dangerous ones - they super active and quickly can become your haters if you dont reply their posts even.
I had 2 situations like this.
One time i was spammed with messages like "HI!:) HI IS EVERYTHING ALRIGHT? HI ARE YOU BUSY?? HI...WAS WONDERING AM I BOTHERING YOU? HI IS SOMETHING WRONG???" when i didnt reply the guy quickly enough.
They feel like they can explode in any second if you do a wrong move or wont reply them.

The one i mentioned ended up blocking me from every site. what an annoying brat. Your career is a very fragile thing in the internet and such people are one of your enemies so if you feel you getting one of them - just dont even start a very first talk with them. Because after that they hook you and then if you wont reply or wont reply quickly enough - they can get pissed off.

>>3204231
>Look, I know that I aren't good as other artist, but either considered myself bad. I see other artist that have a lot of problems, and probably they draw worst than me, but they make commissions and people pay them, so at least I wanna try.