[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 875 KB, 1242x2017, 0250A87E-8192-4347-B2EC-45BCF33148ED(1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71157278 No.71157278 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

Enough said.

>> No.71157295

Idk that sounds racist

>> No.71157298


>> No.71157306

>disables hyperthreading

>> No.71157632

All cores are equal but some are more equal than others.

>> No.71157645

someone post the picture of Rome with Hitler superimposed onto the chiplets

>> No.71157647
File: 1.32 MB, 1433x1080, xtm0yacnsi031.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Innovative btw

>> No.71157672


>> No.71157679

reminder that amds "7nm" is comparable in density to intel's "14nm" and that they use different metrics

>> No.71157694 [DELETED] 

>not all cores are created equal
I agree. Kiketel cores are no where near ayymd cores in terms of performance dependability.

>> No.71157705

source? not that i don't believe you but i genuinely thought AMD had a more advanced manufacturing process which allowed them to produce 7nm chips

>> No.71157732 [DELETED] 

reminder that the "density" all intel shills moan about is related to inter-transistor density, not the actual node. Just yet another lying tactic from tech illiterate intelkikes.

>> No.71157756

isn't inter-transistor density what you want? i thought that, if it could be cooled, the more transistors the better

>> No.71157758

>Not all cores are created equal, ours spy on you aUM#$&U*(V&(*&&(@#@[email protected][email protected] HARDWARE ERROR
Intel is dead.

>> No.71157782

>not all cores are created equal

sure, some of them are created to process the mitigation of security flaws

>> No.71157798 [DELETED] 

>isn't inter-transistor density what you want
>the more transistors, the better
Imagine filling up a box by putting 500 balls inside a box as opposed to putting 100 bigger balls inside the exact same box.
The intel shills are basically complaining that in both cases, the box is full and that the density inside the box is the same.

>> No.71157814

>being retarded
yea I guess if you're retarded and don't understand dies or transistors your analogy makes sense

>> No.71157851 [DELETED] 

I hope you actually get paid for shilling 24/7 you stupid hasbarakike.
Where's the proof he other guy asked for, hmm?

>> No.71158160

i just want to read comfy white papers pls no bully me or each other

>> No.71158240

>some of them are created to provide NSA/Mossad backdoors

>> No.71158284

>Spreadfast app
Jesus Christ, Intel is seething as fuck to put out such bad damage control.

>> No.71158431

But some cores perform almost as good while being half the price.

>> No.71158590

Reminder that TSMC's 7nm is in fact comparable to Intel's 10 nm.

>> No.71158616


>> No.71159622
File: 1.16 MB, 2128x1714, WEW.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

> Intel's new marketing strategy is literally just cope.

>> No.71159690

keximus maximus

>> No.71159778

they can't be serious

>> No.71159814
File: 270 KB, 1920x1080, 1555269983877.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

What the FUCK do they mean by that?

>> No.71159861

If at first you don't succeed, redefine success.

>> No.71161702
File: 140 KB, 1038x1000, 1523433903969.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>Cores, clock speed, and caches don't matter!
Intel is worse than it's competitor than bulldozer at this point, at least AMD was cheap, Intel wants top dollar for less performance.

>> No.71162165
File: 115 KB, 992x1024, 1513187572438.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.