Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 106 KB, 1417x749, fffffff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71043658 No.71043658 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

12 core 5ghz boost confirmed

Intel btfo

>> No.71043693

16Cores @ 4.2Ghz doing 4278 Cinebench R15 nT.

For context:

i9 7900X with 10 cores has 2180CB
Ryzen 2700X with 8 cores has 1820CB
Threadripper 2990WX has 5180CB

INTELFAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH

>> No.71043703
File: 84 KB, 653x726, ffff.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71043703

>>71043693
BAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.71043845

>>71043658
X -- doubt

>> No.71043856

>>71043693
But what about games?
AMD BTFO

>> No.71043869

>>71043856
>12/24 @ 5Ghz
Cope

>> No.71043897

>>71043856
SOPA MACACO

>> No.71043908

>>71043856
>amd has so much raw cores for cheap, even if they were forced to disable smt, it wouldn't do anything

>> No.71043928
File: 185 KB, 1686x600, 1558439604668793241.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71043928

>>71043658
I accept it

>> No.71043948

>>71043658
single core performance >>> overall performance

>> No.71043967

>>71043856
same clock speed as intel but 15% better ipc and you still think that they will fail

>> No.71044073

>>71043928
based

>> No.71044181

>>71043948
>all you do is game
Pathetic.

>> No.71044209
File: 133 KB, 500x500, 1434661519414.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71044209

Why the FUCK can't they do something like this in the GPU space too?

According to latest leaks Navi will be hot garbage and won't do anything to change the current market prices.

FUCK AMD GPU PAJEET DIVISON

>> No.71044229

what ever,no different for old ryzen.
and more and more intels cpus going win,wait end of year.

tdp is just that high what is should be with more cores or clocks...none upgrade.!!!

looks same effect ike gpu sector, fury,vega and radeon vii...no different
well radeon vii was 7nm gpu, but not belive it! so lausy efficiency,and still slow!

ok, cputdp also same...there is anyhting new,just different name....i wonder how long amd can sell product with no profit..well looks that no longer...sooner or later its eat hole company and debt givens not tolerance more...end of 2020 is my guess.

hmm. i try really see different from ryzen 2000 series,but no....oh yeah... more cores..but is it only trend or commercial way.
you dont need more than total max 6 cores for gaming,even 4-core is enough. easily.
more than that is waist of cash, no matter how much its cost.

and,i still see not any goodies from amd 32-core cpu...erhh i mean where to use thouse??!! tell me..

200-cores cpu.... so what!

no help gaming,apzz or rendering...useless.

another hand, real pro rendering use always intels cpus...why??

well,buy them amd fans, you keep amd up and pay them callary...youself you give so little back.
except red fine main...lol

>> No.71044234

>>71043658
Death to Intel.

>> No.71044253

>>71043658
no way it will be more than 4.7

>> No.71044295 [DELETED] 

>>71044229
I think I've seen one of your posts before on /g/. Where are you from? Can't be India since your English would probably be a bit better

>> No.71044321

>>71044229
based strokeposter

>> No.71044342

>>71044295
inteljeet pasta

>> No.71044344

>>71044229
Reading third worlder posts makes me feel physically gross.

>> No.71044353

>>71043658
We're going to dance on Intel grave

>> No.71044360

on 4c boost and rest on gradual decrease seem to be really working well

>> No.71044362

>>71044229
I love this pasta

>> No.71044369

>>71044209
1. CPU market is much, MUCH larger.
2. Intel got extremely lazy, so that larger market wanted something fresh
3. AMD had enough resources to focus on either CPU or GPU.
No wonder they decided to focus their effort on larger market. Why wouldn't AMD do that?

>> No.71044397
File: 61 KB, 806x577, 1551620816421.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71044397

>>71044229
Based callary poster

>>71044295
It's a real injeet coping mechanism

>> No.71044407

>>71044397
Jewish streetshitters are so gross

>> No.71044420
File: 21 KB, 300x300, 1458597381222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71044420

DELTE THIS RIGHT NOW

>> No.71044431

>muh gamez only need 4 cores lmao

who is still falling for that shit ?

>> No.71044436

>>71044431
intards

>> No.71044462

>>71044431
dont blame them
they think game is OS that can only run 4 cores

>> No.71044470

>>71043658
If that's true, then I really look forward to Intel damage control™ slides. I want more memes like
>glue
>unreliable supplier
>red crosses for AMD, green check marks for Intel

>> No.71044485
File: 41 KB, 574x351, habbening.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71044485

>>71043693
>16Cores @ 4.2Ghz doing 4278
WOW. 8C @ 5ghz 2300+ pt zen2 might happen??

>> No.71044493

>>71044470
It's going to be some shit about chipsets overheating

>> No.71044509

>>71043658
It's our favorite shill adored shit
Always wrong, always wiping ass with hand

>> No.71044538

>>71043693
sauce us nigger

>> No.71044549

>>71044344
Yeah ameriturds have fats for brains

>> No.71044568

>>71044538
Its in adoreds video towards the end

>> No.71044787

>>71044538
>>71044568
>my very reliable source says 16C with 5ghz boost
>this source is very reliable guys, hE HaS nEvEr beEN wRoNg
I would love to see a 16C 5ghz boost CPU but it's highly unlikely. adoredtv loves to hype people up for more views, and from his perspective there's no consequence if he's wrong or is just making things up. "just trust me guys this source is never wrong, btw subscribe and donate to my patreon".

>> No.71044821

>>71044787
is he claiming a 16c with 5ghz is part of the info that has been fed to him?

>> No.71045007

>>71044787
The beauty of chiplets is that if one full die of 8 cores can achieve 5ghz, you can stick it together with another 5ghz chiplet and get a 16 core 5ghz cpu
Im surprised you dont understand this

>> No.71045027

>>71045007
I'm not.

>> No.71045029
File: 1.25 MB, 1002x1480, JUST_krzanich.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71045029

>>71043693
DELIDD
E
L
I
D
D

>> No.71045069
File: 284 KB, 108x147, 1537204806160.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71045069

>>71044397
>goand think_again
thats the best thing about it, seriously

>> No.71045111

>>71044485
well many people assumes that the ~2040 CB demo shown at CES was an 8c/16t 65W part. wouldnt be too far off to think that 2300+ is possible for an overclocked higher binned part

>> No.71045198

>>71044209
its going to happen with the next gen amd gpus where they will use chiplets

>> No.71045213
File: 1.69 MB, 498x278, tenor.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71045213

>>71043658
INTODDLERS BTFO

>> No.71045214

>>71045213
based

>> No.71045221
File: 176 KB, 2000x1743, 1541190392253.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71045221

So what if AMD has 5ghz now? Intel has achieved 5ghz for a long time now, goodjob for catching up
Meanwhile Intel innovated 5 new vulnerabilities which is more than enough to combat AMDs 5ghz
1 vulnerability (v) > 1ghz
5v > 5ghz
AMD is trash and always will be

>> No.71045235

>>71045221
This, intel has more vulnerabilities so intel wins again!

>> No.71045277
File: 987 KB, 229x176, 1555082897139.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71045277

>>71045221
>1 vulnerability (v) > 1ghz
>5v > 5ghz

>> No.71045308

>>71045221
>5Ghz doesn't matter

>> No.71045315

when the fuck are they going to release this crap?

>> No.71045338

>>71045315
paper launch at computex for headlines
hard launch at 7th July, widely available aka pray you got the preorder by then

>> No.71045349

>zen 2 will likely be one of the most influential products in the history of computing

Alright, this is where I draw the line in the sand. This is the litmus test for how retarded AMD fansfags are. If this product doesn't live up to the hype I"ll never listen to AMD faggot redditors again.

>> No.71045357

>>71045349
t.r/Intel

>> No.71045420

>>71045357
Nope, just somebody who wants a good computer for cheap. I'm about 90% sure that:

1. These won't live up to their hype
2. If they do, they will priced accordingly
3. If they do, there is so much hype around these products that you gaming faggots will steal up all the CPUs for MuH FrAmEs

I need a 6+ core computer for music production yet I'm competing with 20 year old hypebeasts who want to play their neetbux games with more fps than their shitty reaction times deserve.

>> No.71045429

>>71045349
AMDrones are retards who always overhype AMD products.

>> No.71045507

>>71045315
Soon I hope. Multiple X570 boards being leaked makes it even more probable for an early launch.

>> No.71045530

>>71045420
Gaymers are the ones funding the mainstream DIY market, not music producers

>> No.71045567
File: 69 KB, 1338x1181, 1551945858457.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71045567

>>71043856
>But what about games?

>> No.71045592
File: 202 KB, 737x664, 1558277508505.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71045592

>>71045420
What you don't understand is that Zen 2 already won.

>> No.71045607
File: 13 KB, 632x535, 1558446129783.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71045607

>>71043856
>what about games?

>> No.71045667
File: 46 KB, 526x568, ptqLW1c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71045667

>>71045567
>golden sample 4.2 2600
>added aftermarket aio to cool it
>3400 ram with tuned subtimings
Ayylmao. I don't like intel as much as the next g0y but...

>> No.71045681

>>71045530
That may be but gaymers are also the ones who drive up the prices to feed their addiction. They gobbled up all those overpriced gpus when miners drove up prices. They gobbled up RAM when there was a "shortage". They'll gobble up AMD cpus, making them realistically unavailable until Holiday 19.

>> No.71045687

>>71045420
/g/ay is 90% r/amd if you haven't noticed.

>> No.71045705

ok, so...?

>> No.71045708

>>71043693
INTODDLERS BTFO

>> No.71045720

Does anyone on /g/ know if pcie 4.0 will ever be be passively cooled properly?
How do you even go about making a chipset more power efficient?

>> No.71045744

>>71044229
kek, motherfucker beat me to it

>> No.71045745

>>71045720
mod it and remove the fan and add more heatsinks or just dont run raid x4 nvme that will heat that shit up so it doesnt spin maybe

>> No.71045748

>>71045720
Change in process.

>> No.71045759 [DELETED] 

>>71045720
>pcie 4.0 will ever be be passively cooled properly?
new chipset will be between 15W-25W IF you use raid for NVME drives. no need for fan speed if you don't use itHow do you even go about making a chipset more power efficient?
don't use raid

>> No.71045774

>>71045759
>pcie 4.0 will ever be be passively cooled properly?
new chipset will be between 15W-25W IF you use raid for NVME drives. no need for fan speed if you don't use it
>How do you even go about making a chipset more power efficient?
don't use raid

>> No.71045784

>>71045667
2933MHz is Zen+'s minimal spec, 8400's is 2666MHz.
And 8400 doesn't have HT (there's 12 threads on 2600).
And 8400 is 50$ more expensive.

>> No.71045789
File: 83 KB, 751x849, goandmemeagain.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71045789

>>71044229
>>71044397
Hahaha, found his account on Disqus, he's a finnish autist.

>> No.71045797

>>71045667
>aftermarket AIO
It's a stock air cooler from the Retail package.

>> No.71045801

>>71043658
what ever,no different for old ryzen.
and more and more intels cpus going win,wait end of year.

tdp is just that high what is should be with more cores or clocks...none upgrade.!!!

looks same effect ike gpu sector, fury,vega and radeon vii...no different
well radeon vii was 7nm gpu, but not belive it! so lausy efficiency,and still slow!

ok, cputdp also same...there is anyhting new,just different name....i wonder how long amd can sell product with no profit..well looks that no longer...sooner or later its eat hole company and debt givens not tolerance more...end of 2020 is my guess.

hmm. i try really see different from ryzen 2000 series,but no....oh yeah... more cores..but is it only trend or commercial way.
you dont need more than total max 6 cores for gaming,even 4-core is enough. easily.
more than that is waist of cash, no matter how much its cost.

and,i still see not any goodies from amd 32-core cpu...erhh i mean where to use thouse??!! tell me..

200-cores cpu.... so what!

no help gaming,apzz or rendering...useless.

another hand, real pro rendering use always intels cpus...why??

well,buy them amd fans, you keep amd up and pay them callary...youself you give so little back.
except red fine main...lol

>> No.71045807

>>71045797
sssh don't make intel shills off themselves before Zen2 launches

>> No.71045811 [DELETED] 

>>71045789
pearls for pig

>> No.71045833

>>71045667
2600 is quite cheaper, has higher minimal RAM frequency requirement, has SMT, and was running with stock cooler in that test.
The game tested is also the most worst possible case scenario for AMD because it's a GimpWorse title that was built with Intel-biased compiler, so Intel technically has an additional help here.

>> No.71045850 [DELETED] 

>>71045801
what is this...trying pee eye and hypeting option what user never have joy...

its sure that ddr 5000 coming much much over 2020, maybe 2025,but anyway so late that ryzen 3000 and even 4000 series cpu is old..
so i wonder and think....who 'leak' this kind hypeting and 'commercial' ' news' from ryzen cpu out?
i call it cheat and pee eye commercial.

bcoz, its sure and pure fact that ryzen 3000 series NOT offer nothing new cpu market and i mean different for ryzeb 2000.

when you read ryzen 3000 fact paper specs,its same as ryzne 2000 model...dunno why this hypeting..

well its typical for amd selling politics but i wonder why hardware site push out ALL it...hmm

i just ask, read specs both cpus, ryzen 2000 and ryzen 3000 and tell me.. write here,plz
WHAT is different. there none!

tx

>> No.71045851

>>71045789
Wtf they guy speaks like a copypasta machine.

>> No.71045900

>>71045789
>amd has bog problem it

>> No.71045934

what ever,no different for old ryzen.
and more and more intels cpus going win,wait end of year.

tdp is just that high what is should be with more cores or clocks...none upgrade.!!!

looks same effect ike gpu sector, fury,vega and radeon vii...no different
well radeon vii was 7nm gpu, but not belive it! so lausy efficiency,and still slow!

ok, cputdp also same...there is anyhting new,just different name....i wonder how long amd can sell product with no profit..well looks that no longer...sooner or later its eat hole company and debt givens not tolerance more...end of 2020 is my guess.

hmm. i try really see different from ryzen 2000 series,but no....oh yeah... more cores..but is it only trend or commercial way.
you dont need more than total max 6 cores for gaming,even 4-core is enough. easily.
more than that is waist of cash, no matter how much its cost.

and,i still see not any goodies from amd 32-core cpu...erhh i mean where to use thouse??!! tell me..

200-cores cpu.... so what!

no help gaming,apzz or rendering...useless.

another hand, real pro rendering use always intels cpus...why??

well,buy them amd fans, you keep amd up and pay them callary...youself you give so little back.
except red fine main...lol

>> No.71045951
File: 40 KB, 742x186, and i dont even like intel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71045951

>>71045784
>2933MHz is Zen+'s minimal spec, 8400's is 2666MHz.
This justifies running 2666 on 8400 and 3400 tuned on 2600
no wait....

>And 8400 is 50$ more expensive.
ram doesnt matter, aio doesnt matter, golden sample doesnt matter. I get it

>>71045797
yep you can totally run 2600 at 4.2 on the stock cooler also you will get a golden sample automagically.
(no to both btw)

>>71045833
>was running with stock cooler in that test.
stop posting

>> No.71045968
File: 9 KB, 275x183, 1335965452270.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71045968

If only they knew what they're in for.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSpf6_nTOwI

>> No.71045998

>>71045968
>turns pc on
>it flies away

>> No.71046026

If AMD does make a 5.9GHz capable 16c32t chip, I'd gladly drop $1000. Shit I'd take 4.7GHz all core with only a few cores capable of 5.0GHz boost.

>> No.71046037
File: 519 KB, 1280x1079, jXI5V5q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71046037

When are more games utilizing 4+ threads? I really hate modern games lowering their srandard to console "quality."
I like the moar corez nonetheless. Hopefully more applications adapt better to the evolving CPUs.

>> No.71046041

>>71045951
There are both stock and overclocked tests, you Intbecile. The "4.2GHz" is stock Turbo, not constant OverClock.

>> No.71046049

>>71045934
cont...
what is this...trying pee eye and hypeting option what user never have joy...

its sure that ddr 5000 coming much much over 2020, maybe 2025,but anyway so late that ryzen 3000 and even 4000 series cpu is old..
so i wonder and think....who 'leak' this kind hypeting and 'commercial' ' news' from ryzen cpu out?
i call it cheat and pee eye commercial.

bcoz, its sure and pure fact that ryzen 3000 series NOT offer nothing new cpu market and i mean different for ryzeb 2000.

when you read ryzen 3000 fact paper specs,its same as ryzne 2000 model...dunno why this hypeting..

well its typical for amd selling politics but i wonder why hardware site push out ALL it...hmm

i just ask, read specs both cpus, ryzen 2000 and ryzen 3000 and tell me.. write here,plz
WHAT is different. there none!

tx

>> No.71046069

>>71046041
I agree that the full stock config is still better than the 8400.
the 4.2 is not stock turbo as you clearly see it's manually OCd to 4.2 all core. its literally in the pic.

>> No.71046078

>>71046037
You been living under a rock? Plenty if games are using more threads. Not necessarily 12+, but stuff like Battlefield, COD, DOOM, even older stuff like WoW

>> No.71046134

>>71046037
This is actually a PC limitation, not a console one.
Thanks to Open GL and DirectX, only one thread can actually perform graphical operations as those apis are not thread safe.
Consoles on other hand can just use all the CPUs to interact with the APIs.
But with vulkan and directX12 you can use all the CPUs just like with consoles.
This is why for example doom2k6 can run well even with really shitty CPUs.

>> No.71046155

>>71045968
>15k rpm
sure thing shill anon

>> No.71046229

>tfw just bought 9700K
I really really hope AMDoredTV is wrong.

>> No.71046273
File: 139 KB, 1000x1000, bog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71046273

>>71046229
He bought?
Boozt ze AMD to 5.3gz.

>> No.71046306

>>71046069
>its literally in the pic.
>these useful idiots have been brainwashed so hard that even provided with clear evidence it is impossible to make them see reality
t.ex-KGB

>> No.71046321

>>71046273
>literally bribes physics
Im scared Intel bros, we dont even possess such a power

>> No.71046328

I already have the 2700x and I don't think I'll upgrade
All I care about now are APU for my side computer, too bad they're only fucking Zen+

>> No.71046394

>>71046229
>400 dollaridoos to be a threadlet

>> No.71046441
File: 87 KB, 280x275, Brehs+_c0bf5fb425062c67fd6496ea72137a1a.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71046441

>>71046229
please PLEASE remember the suicide hotline is just a call away

>> No.71046464

>>71046229
just remember anon, if you consider slashing your wrists


it's down the street, not across the road.

>> No.71046497

>>71043856
lmao, every single time

>> No.71046517
File: 14 KB, 504x273, mv2GllF.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71046517

>>71044209
Navi might actually be good this time around. Polaris is good too, I don't know why people still meme it.

>> No.71046531
File: 17 KB, 334x274, 1558103704937.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71046531

>>71046229

>> No.71046561

>>71046517
8*5*2*32 = 2560

>> No.71046564

>>71045349
>separating components with chiplets isn't revolutionary
You wish you had the glue. This shit is very important for the future, not everything scales well with node shrinks and it's also a good base whenever they decide to go tall stacking chips on top of the dies.

>> No.71046600
File: 519 KB, 952x644, 1504968272741.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71046600

>>71043693
RIP intel, we hardly knew ye

>> No.71046620

>>71043693
fffuuuuuuck

>> No.71046674
File: 893 KB, 728x626, 1557751673816.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71046674

>>71043693
2700x here, I feel emasculated. I wonder what it will even sell for when Zen 2 hits, might just turn it into a homeserver or some shit.

>> No.71046684

>>71043693
For reference a similarly clocked 2950X gets around 3500-3600

>> No.71046694

>>71043856
>muh gaymes

>> No.71046716
File: 714 KB, 2560x1440, KESFgbz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71046716

>>71043856
What about them?

>inb4 we all pretend people play games at 480p on low settings with an GTX 1080ti

>> No.71046717

AMD on OVH servers when? I'm tired of Intel's bullshit.

>> No.71046753
File: 77 KB, 750x1000, pp,840x830-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71046753

>>71046531

>> No.71046774

>>71043658
Why the fuck would you ruin perfectly fine leaks by linking to and attributing them to that kiketuber? Just link them directly faggot.

>> No.71046788

>>71043693
>>71046684
It's because of fuckhuge cache and 2x256 bit AVX isn't it

>> No.71046831

>>71046716
anything above 360p is antisemitic. Everyone knows that when you need to show off cpu prowess, you need to lower the render scale(because obviously, cpus render textures, duh!) to shit and boost aliasing.

>> No.71046982

>>71046229
>double the price
>half the cores
LEL

>> No.71047059

>>71046831
360p is at the limit, we need 240p benchmarks

>> No.71047067

>>71047059
>240p benchmarks
CASUAL. WE NEED 144p BENCHS NOW

>> No.71047076

>>71047059
Anything above 60p is a crime against the gods chosen people

>> No.71047102
File: 486 KB, 675x482, 1488923970547.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047102

>>71047059
>>71047067
>>71047076

>> No.71047156

>>71045111
>well many people assumes
It's not an assumption. If you check the power consumption figures AMD released for their CES demo you will see that the power consumption of the Zen 2 8-core they demoed was similar to the 2700 (65w TDP) and way below the 2700x (105w TDP).

>> No.71047180
File: 25 KB, 960x383, https___blogs-images_forbes_com_antonyleather_files_2019_01_bench2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047180

>>71047156

>> No.71047204
File: 49 KB, 605x412, 1420404925629.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047204

>>71045420
>music production

>> No.71047233
File: 15 KB, 714x336, untitled-3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047233

>>71047180
Exactly shows my point. Ryzen 2700 uses 134 watts running Cinebench R15, the Zen 2 8-cure used 133 watts running the same test.

>> No.71047237

>>71046229
i hope it's from amazon anon

>> No.71047276

>>71047233
yeah, but an i9 can hit 5ghz with stock cooler at lower watts anon. Unless you OC, but everyone knows that when you OC more watt is due to the more heat, not dure to more power being drawn from the socket.

>> No.71047304

>>71047276
what stock cooler?

>> No.71047321

>>71047276
When you OC, it DO draw more power from the socket, but most of the extra power is used to create more heat.

>> No.71047322

>>71047276
Die you quote my post by accident? Your error and lie filled comment has nothing to do with the post you quoted.

>> No.71047325
File: 475 KB, 500x593, 1551158657078.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047325

>that other leak? y-yea I could have told you that
>4.2ghz 16 core so 5ghz confirmed

stop listening to this fraud

>> No.71047328

>>71043658
>only for $699
Yeah no one cares

>> No.71047349

>>71047325
He's not a fraud, it's AMD that keeps changing their plans just to make him wrong.

>> No.71047350

>>71047328
Still cheaper than Intlet

>> No.71047361

>>71047349
>t.adoredtv

>> No.71047365

>>71043693
Good thing the only game I play is Cinebench R15.
I have no need for 16 cores, so I hope the lower core count don't get axed clocks.

>> No.71047368
File: 1.49 MB, 2000x1367, 1467327921774.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047368

>>71043658
>adoredtv
>confirmed
Lmfao

>> No.71047369

>>71047350
Still dogshit memory latency

>> No.71047384

>>71047369
still less stutter/lag in gaemen

>> No.71047386

>>71047368
look at this shit. they all take it like its gospel

https://old.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/br8ye7/zen_2_building_up_to_computex_adoredtv/

>> No.71047398

>>71047325
>old stepping was 3.4 base, 4.2 boost
>mobo guys got new chips with newer stepping
thats what he said. only few days until he's proven to be right or wrong

>> No.71047417

>>71043693
>16Cores @ 4.2Ghz doing 4278 Cinebench R15 nT.
If that score is even vaguely correct, Intel is unbelievably fucked. It would mean the 16-core is more than 30% faster than the 2950x, on a mainstream socket no less.

>> No.71047418

>>71047368
I would remove gameworks from this picture, because its ruining the rest of the picture as it paints you as a nvidia bootlicker because it is an horrid tactic.
Put raytrace on it instead, or shadowplay, you know actual advantages.

>> No.71047429

>>71047398
this one is 4.2ghz boost too

>> No.71047432

>>71047384
Still making up lies

>> No.71047433

My x370 MB just got a bios upgrade, after almost ayear. This is it guys, this shit launches next week.

>> No.71047436

>>71047369
>Still dogshit memory latency
Maybe you should look into what happens to memory latency when you double L3 cache.

>> No.71047441

>>71047417
>It would mean the 16-core is more than 30% faster than the 2950x
eeh didnt the demo at CES already shown that 30% figure?
>4.2Ghz
mass suicide if there's plenty of room for overclocks

>> No.71047488

>>71047432
still believing that 6ms is insignificant and fps spikes are that only things that matter

>> No.71047491

>>71047441
Most probably 10% higher clocks, so 4.7 or 4.8 single core, 5ghz golden samples

>> No.71047495

AMD is gonna launch APUs at computex, Zen2 delayed once again.

>> No.71047496
File: 120 KB, 480x521, 1504275173842.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047496

>>71047488
R$0.05 added to your account. SOPA

>> No.71047506

>>71047495
that would be a meltdown if true

>> No.71047522

>>71047491
I'm gonna be crazy here, but what did he mean by [email protected]?
Because there was a sample with 3.3ghz base and 4.2ghz boost.
Imagine if that score is at 3.3Ghz?

>> No.71047528

>>71047495
stop Timmy. you had enough common sense fun

>> No.71047531

>>71047496
0.0000006 shekels have been deposited in your account rajesh

>> No.71047548

>>71046229
>actually getting gaslit by jewtel shills
yikes didnt think that really happened
next youre going to tell me you bought a gtx 1650 over an rx 580

>> No.71047550

is cinebench even an actual program or just AMD benchmark

>> No.71047557

>>71047304
He meant stock chiller.

>> No.71047558

>>71047441
>eeh didnt the demo at CES already shown that 30% figure?
Yes, but that was 65w TDP, not 125w. This would imply the whole product range is 30% plus faster all the way to the highest TDP SKUs.

>mass suicide if there's plenty of room for overclocks
Remember, that's an all-core boost number.

>> No.71047562

>>71047550
except that its an intel benchmark

>> No.71047570

>>71047550
It pretty accurately presents performance at rendering software. Although, to be frank it's done on GPUs nowadays.
But GPUs don't have ECC, so Studios will still use CPUs.

>> No.71047577

>>71047548
No, he bought a 2080 over a radeon VII for 200 bucks more.

>> No.71047578

>>71047550
AMD is better suited for R15
Intel is better suited for R20
most simple form to put it

>> No.71047587

>>71047578
>source: your ass

>> No.71047590

>>71047578
That 16 cores is still gonna destroy anything Intelat r20, though.

>> No.71047602
File: 36 KB, 356x360, 1C1EFDE2-54B2-4C09-A728-F9824F17CD08.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047602

Yes AMD is now better. Are you happy AMDrones your processor is finally better? So I will buy AMD if I’m building a new machine. Glad you guys have been mindlessly shilling them when they sucked cock all these years. Really a good use of your life.

>> No.71047613

>>71044470
>We could attack needing a tool to install Threadripper!

>> No.71047625

>>71047590
it sure will. 256bit fpu gonna wreck some serious havoc

>> No.71047642

>>71045789
Bretty based :DDDD

>> No.71047646

I took the day off on Monday, just in case I need to be glued to my screen to buy it before it's gone.
I have a feeling we're gonna get a paper launch.

>> No.71047661

>>71047625
2x256bit. SOPA DELICIA

>> No.71047706

>>71047661
It's not fair, they need to gimp it on their desktop part so Intel can compete!

>> No.71047707
File: 30 KB, 349x415, 1324245058786.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047707

>AMD will save the cpu market in 2019
>Intel will save the GPU market in 2020

>> No.71047722

>>71046229
wew... at least you're not one of those faggots that bought the 7700K a few weeks before Ryzen and the 8700K.

>> No.71047732
File: 1.52 MB, 311x223, 1527701026336.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047732

>>71047707
what a time to be alive

>> No.71047744

>all those people laughing at Intel's death
Fuck you, seriously. Intel provided you with great processors for years when AMD couldn't compete. Have some respect...

>> No.71047761

So PCIE 4.0 is overheating the chipset.
Except there's nothing PCIE4.0 compliant yet.
OK, guys, I'll just take PCIE3.0 for now.
Only M.2 fags will care.

>> No.71047785

>4278
Beating a 7980X, holy fucks.

>> No.71047790
File: 124 KB, 1200x628, 1553318339174.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047790

>>71047570
>But GPUs don't have ECC, so Studios will still use CPUs
Radeon Pro's do, I'm sure the Quadro line does as well.

>> No.71047801

>>71047790
Oh, I didn't know GDDR and HBM came with ECC. My mistake.

>> No.71047814

>>71047761
>So PCIE 4.0 is overheating the chipset.
>Except there's nothing PCIE4.0 compliant yet.
So how is it overheating then?
afaik the overheating happens when you setup NVMEs in RAID

>> No.71047831
File: 238 KB, 802x744, 1538657688112.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047831

>>71043658

>> No.71047851

>>71047814
I guess they test their chipset for max load in the lab, hence why the fans, that won't ever be useful in real life.

>> No.71047859

>>71047495
>implying these APUs are Zen2
Here we go again. We won't be seeing Zen 2 APUs until next year. That's the only thing I'm extremely skeptical from AdoredTV given how there are still no desktop Zen+ APUs but the mobile segment got them with the 3000 series branding. I'd like to eat my shit and be wrong so they skip Zen+ altogether on the desktop, but there's still no confirmation that I know of.

>> No.71047883

>>71047707
>>Intel will save the GPU market in 2020
In your fucking dreams. No one can compete with Nvidia at this point. AMD has pretty good stuff for the low-mid range, but anything bigger is terrible for non-Linux.

>> No.71047893

This is bad.
I can see Intel go broke by next year at this rate.
10nm never.
A security flaw a week makes your lineup weak.
10 core shit will require new MB.

>>71047859
3300G or something is supposed to be zen+ 12nm with graphics.
50% chance that's all they launch next week.

>> No.71047898

>>71047744
Thanks Intel for raping my ass for more than 10 years with quad core feces.

>> No.71047920
File: 4 KB, 229x220, 4357.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047920

>>71043845
I don't, he's literally risking everything by doubling down on this with his source if he's wrong he won't hear the last of it. I think we're getting a 5ghz chip lads.

>> No.71047921
File: 281 KB, 1226x1048, Screenshot from 2019-05-21 13-28-01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71047921

>>71047433
>bios
[worried laughter]

>> No.71047931

>>71047744
>he thinks Intel is going to die
(lol delusional AMDtard

>> No.71047957

>>71047931
They're not responding to the threat at all, which is worrying given they couldn't make 10nm work with 10 times the budget AMD has in R&D.

>> No.71048026

>>71047921
Mine explicitly says not to upgrade if not needed.
Only change is new CPU support.
Except the supported CPU list doesn't list the new CPUs you'd need that bios for.
It's happening!

>> No.71048047

>>71047920
I'm gonna risk it, but given how this is a whole new process, it's quite possible 5Ghz isn't a limit at all. At least for boost clock.

>> No.71048128

>>71048047
5Ghz will be the rated boost, much like the 2700X is rated for 4.25Ghz, with 100 extra from XFR.
I'm willing to bet XFR will work wonders on the new process.
GloFo a shit.

>> No.71048175

>>71047920
I don't know why people are making such a huge deal out of this. We already saw how Vega on 7nm had a great boost in clocks. Zen was done on a fucking mobile process, 5GHz is not too good to be true.

>> No.71048181

>>71047602
Not really.
I want to see intel get it's butt off the fucking couch and go do a CPU that is actually significantly faster now.
I'm tired of being locked at the same shitty performance for 10 years.

>> No.71048211

>>71048175
Because if this gets a 15% IPC boost and clocks to 5ghz, then it's gonna be king of gayming for shit gaymes, which is the only segment Intel still can claim a premium for.

>> No.71048219
File: 475 KB, 1024x573, amd-iedm-2017-35-1024x573.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71048219

>>71048181
Intel should get some ground when they go tall, but they better do it quick before AMD beats them to the punch.

>> No.71048223

>>71048175
Watch the boost clocks go to "only" 4.9 and the board explode in AMD IS FINISHED shitposting

>> No.71048235

>>71048219
Pretend to 3D stacking.
When you can't make your 2D stuff to yield.

>> No.71048239

>>71048219
I wonder how significant the gains from 3D stacking will be

>> No.71048248

>>71048223
Well, if the IPC increase is true, then 4.9 is more than enough.

>> No.71048273

>>71048239
Bruh, just by slapping some DRAM that close to the CPU will give it a huge performance increase.

>> No.71048274

>>71048239
Realistically speaking it should be a regression, because lower clocks.
But moar coars, I guess.

>> No.71048287

>>71048219
That's not how intel work.
Intel always create a new tech then stagnate and overprice it until another company come and kick their asses hard, then they rush and innovate until they're on top again, and the stagnation loop returns.

>> No.71048307

>>71046674
That's why I got a 1600. I can probably sell it for 80 bucks when zen2 hits.

>> No.71048313

>>71048287
Sure, but I don't remember them being that overpriced since Pentium4 era, and only thing that saved them was their laptop division with the core architecture.

>> No.71048315

>>71048239
Excellent latency all the way around, higher bandwidth, lower cost but completely kneecapped by thermal constraints
I’ll be a boon for laptops but it wouldn’t do much for desktops

>> No.71048342

>>71046674
Same here.
I jumped on 2700x from 1600x because higher clocks.
Now this was reasonable because I could sell the 1600x with the 2700x cooler for 100€ less than I got the 2700x.
But I feel I won't sell my 2700x for much.

>> No.71048481

If AdoredTV is accurate, lol, then Intel is fried.
I bet they thought they'd be selling us 4 cores 10 nm chips by now.
They had to up clocks so much it made 10nm yields even worse.
And now they have to put out 16 cores on it?
What worries me the most is that they're not even considering a chiplet architecture.
Intel chips supply misery isn't going anywhere.

>> No.71048529

>>71048481
Intel just could go the way of IBM and basically drop out of the consumer space to focus on business and enterprise sales which is where the money is

>> No.71048553

>>71047398
old stepping were barely working chips with unknown cores.
The new chips that came in are the 12 and 16 cores, of which, the 16 core is 3.3/4.2 base and boost.

>> No.71048575

>>71045420
>music production
>ryzen
Impossible with such latencies.

>> No.71048584

>>71047386
AMDoredTV is an Intel employee under the misinformation department.
It's all working as planned.

>> No.71048624

>>71047707
>Intel will kill their gpu development and branch it off as another xeon in 2020*

>> No.71048666

>>71048481
>chiplet architecture
shit takes time to develop. Amd would probably be on zen5 or zen6 by the time Intel's chiplets hit the market

>> No.71048685

>>71048313
The longer intel is left alone, the higher the price gets.

>> No.71048700

>>71048575
Elaborate

>> No.71048797

>adoredtv
>lol i have this information but i won't give you any of it
>also look at those numbers that are 100% legit

>> No.71048800

>>71048797
see you in the next thread

>> No.71048830

>tfw still using i7 920
>tfw it's still plenty fast
I'll never upgrade

>> No.71048831

>>71046788
Naw anon the CORE IMPROVEMENTS have -nothing- to do with the increase in performance!

>> No.71048847

Intel, might as well cancel their 10 cores at this point.

>> No.71048854

>>71048830
>>tfw it's still plenty fast
How are horses treating you?

>> No.71048894

>>71048854
Just fine thanks. I don't game so I have zero need to ever upgrade.

>> No.71049027

The competition can't compete

>> No.71049115
File: 673 KB, 1196x676, 76d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71049115

>>71043658
OY GEVALT
DELETE THIS ANTI-SEMITIC PROPAGANDA YOU STUPID GOY

>> No.71049421

>>71047433
Would they not need to implement BIOS so AMD can taut 3000 ready boards WHEN they launch?

>> No.71049451

>>71049421
Well, yeah, that's what I'm saying?

>> No.71049454

>>71043693
ANUDDA SHOAH AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH

>> No.71049483

>>71049027
kek

>> No.71049528
File: 156 KB, 800x1012, moar clock.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71049528

my take on it
>zen 2 announced, insane gainz and clocks
>its Paperlaunch, one more month Intel headcanon
>Post launch, the board will even more go down the drain

>> No.71049571
File: 482 KB, 787x520, 1558442919726.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71049571

>>71043693
>32 cores loses to 16 cores

>> No.71049588

I bet even AMD is holding down on it because Intel a shit, and they can't sell it for high monies if there's no competition at all.

>> No.71049595

>>71043856
Who cares? The human eye can only see 24fps anyway.

>> No.71049622
File: 813 KB, 1522x869, 1f1aad2d3c3b2sd4a7d2bdbmkd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71049622

Lmaoing @ all the drones thinking they will get 5ghz 8c/16t for $200

>> No.71049671

>>71048700
He cant hes a retarded intel marketer who comes here and spews the same memes every day

>> No.71049722

Reminder it doesn't matter how bad Zen 2 will be, AMD will still outsell Intel pozzed housefires.

>> No.71049733
File: 1.02 MB, 1920x1080, Screenshot_2019-05-04-23-58-04-420_com.google.android.youtube.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71049733

imagine still believing an unemployed swedish boomer leeching off welfare that has been proven wrong multiple times in the past

>> No.71049735

>>71043897
UMA DELICIA

>> No.71049745

>>71049735
UMA DELID CIA

>> No.71049760

Meanwhile in the real world Intel is a pozzed piece of shit and AMD is taking servermarket share, where the bigbux lie

>> No.71049786

>>71047418
how is shadowplay an advantage when relive has lower overhead and better bitrate?

>> No.71049788
File: 131 KB, 1280x720, riptel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71049788

THANK YOU BASED AMD INTEL POZZED HOUSEFIRES BTFO


https://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Electronics-Computer-CPU-Processors/zgbs/electronics/229189

https://www.amazon.ca/Best-Sellers-Electronics-CPU-Processors/zgbs/electronics/1233052011

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Best-Sellers-Computers-Accessories-Processors/zgbs/computers/430515031

https://www.amazon.com.au/gp/bestsellers/computers/4913338051

>> No.71049799

>>71046600
>we hardly knew ye
I wish I could say I hardly knew the feeling of having Intels circumcised dick up my ass

>> No.71049816

>>71047102
Nice OC

>> No.71049835

>>71049788
>second best selling CPU in Australia is a digital thermometer

>> No.71049848

>>71049733
what's next? you call him a scottish subhuman in every thread he's mentioned?

>> No.71049856

>>71049733
everything in that image is true except the 480x

>> No.71049882

>>71049622
Are they comparing the costs from when each manufacturing process was cutting edge technology, or are they comparing the costs all at the same point in time? If it's the first, are the values adjusted for inflation? Is the 7nm an observation or a prediction? Does the chart assume that manufacturing technology never advances?

>> No.71049913

>>71049835
Still better than Intel LMOA

>> No.71049939

>>71043967
Too bad my company only gets servers from macrologic or nutanix

>> No.71050000

>>71049788
>He removed Germany because the 9900K is on #2
Lmao

>> No.71050031

>>71049848
Found the patreon supporter

>> No.71050047

>>71050000
Perhaps I should post amazon india too

https://www.amazon.in/Processors/b?ie=UTF8&node=1375391031

>> No.71050095

>>71050000
nice quads

>> No.71050194

Until at least one Zen2 CPU won't have a 4.5Ghz base clock I'm not going to care.
Frequency is the most important factor in most applications and games.

>> No.71050316

>>71048481
The intel/dell enterprise leak has some chiplets on it. For the rocketlake/tiger lake generation there's a 10NM igpu that's paired with a 14nm cpu on the desktop or a 10nm cpu on the laptop. That's a pretty heavy hint for chiplets but doesn't give much information, don't know where memory or IO is located for example. But I predict it means the desktop will probably never see 10nm cpus for the high performance parts.

Satan says so >>71048666

>> No.71050318
File: 1010 KB, 1314x9536, oyyvey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71050318

>>71050194
>frequency is the most important factor
yeah, that's why this 5ghz 8700k is neck to neck with a 2700x that costs 100 bucks less.

>> No.71050345

>>71050318
but muh 720p benchmarks

>> No.71050356

>>71049671
I love this guy, doesn't know the difference between core to core or memory latency when we know zen pretty much never snoops other core's L3 and goes for memory most of the time and it's the poor memory controller that's the main problem with latency. The snoop latency being bad is a real meme for epyc.
Last time I saw he was saying he was getting input lag for video games as well, because the the 30ns memory deficit becomes a very noticeable 20ms to the end user.

>> No.71050361

>>71050318
>281 vs 293 fps
DUDE BTFO LMAO

>> No.71050514

>>71050318
>what is cherry picking

>> No.71050572
File: 81 KB, 444x444, 1502143993622.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71050572

>>71050194
Cool man. Arma 3 is the best.

>> No.71050588
File: 35 KB, 640x684, 827.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71050588

The wait has been so long and the hype just keeps on escalating. If this turns out to be even remotely true then AMD just snatched the entire market from gaymers to the server customers.
Well that is unless they do something retarded like price themselves way too high. You never know how these things might go.

>> No.71050616

>>71047386
>People who refer to Youtubers by their real name and not their channel name

Friend simulator.

>> No.71050636

>AdoredTV

Love this guy, his leaks are the best. I was so awesome to pick up my $349 12 core in January this year.

>> No.71050659
File: 224 KB, 808x805, 1511207483070.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71050659

>>71050047
>Most sold is Core2Duo E8500

>> No.71050665

>>71050636
Cant wait for you to get btfo in 5 days, ive been screencapping every single post youve made in the last 6 months

>> No.71050694

>>71050665
Impressive considering that was the first time I've posted about this retard since his CES leak turned out wrong.

>> No.71050724

>>71043658
This guy gets paid to lie so successfully he should consider a career in politics.

>> No.71050739

>>71050659
that thing was a beast back in the day i tell ya what

>> No.71050752
File: 220 KB, 737x664, 1558219823433.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71050752

>>71050588
But servers belong to Intel!

>> No.71050754

>>71050739
>t.indian

>> No.71050763
File: 223 KB, 1645x977, predictionsryzen.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71050763

>>71050665
me too

>> No.71050782

>>71045221
AMD hit 5Ghz first.

>> No.71050847
File: 34 KB, 240x180, there-be-a-shit-storm-a-brewin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71050847

>>71050665
>>71050763
Imagine the amount of shitposting. The shitstorm is going to be colossal.

>> No.71050866

>>71050588
>Well that is unless they do something retarded like price themselves way too high. You never know how these things might go.
I think they'll keep prices low to drive intel out of the market as fast as possible. Then for Zen 2+ or Zen 3 they will start raising prices to a more profitable level.

>> No.71050969

>>71050847
I still remember the ryzen1 launch. /g/ was unusable for two or three days of non stop MUH GAMES posting.
I don't think the video game situation will be overturned and it's going to fuel the intel shillstorm. If zen2 rumours are true then the tech side of the internet is going to be useless for a week.

>> No.71050990

>>71050969
>If zen2 rumours are true
They're not

>> No.71050993

>>71050752
They belong to the rightful ruler.
This is like King Richard returning to England to dethrone prince John.

>>71050847
Either way this goes, it's going to be a shitstorm of great magnitude. Either it lives up to the hype and goes Treblinka on Intel, or it ends up being the biggest disappointment and dooms people yet to another year or two of waiting.
Also it might be few weeks or months of patches that radically change the performance, so tech sites will be churning out benchmarks left and right. It's going to be crazy.

>>71050866
Yeah that would be the sensible solution, but you never know what marketing jews they have there. They might think that since their product rapes the crap out of the competition, they can skip the phase of trying to win over market and just skip to the point of maximizing their profits.
I don't think they'll do something retarded like that, but I wouldn't really be all that surprised to see a plunder like that happen.

>> No.71051002

>>71050969
They are still shitposting to this day. The last 6-7 years have been particularly terrible for this board, maybe Bulldozer was too easy to shitpost and people learned form that.

>>71050990
Nice counterpoint.

>> No.71051013

>>71050993
>ends up being the biggest disappointment and dooms people yet to another year or two of waiting.
There is 0% of this happening. Even if they kept 2700x clocks, it's still at least 4 more cores with higher IPC.

>> No.71051058

>>71051013
It honestly doesn't matter. The tech illiterate /g/-residents will keep shitposting and shilling both ways.
Radeon VII was priced similarly to 2080 and had similar performance compared to the 2080. Yet, the shitposting after its reveal was pretty damn autistic.

>> No.71051091

>>71051002
The last years have been terrible for the entire internet. The rise of influence companies and click bait has made the entire internet a useless shithole and you really have too look for anything productive. Even 4chan is relatively good in terms of decent discussion even if less than 10% of threads are genuine.
Influencers are the bigger cancer though, can't believe a word on the internet, it's the difference between actual lies (and twisting the truth) over people just being stupid.

>> No.71051124

>>71051058
I don't think you understand anon. +/- 4% performance is an absolute victory/loss and up to 10% is a reason to kill yourself.
There's no more trading blows when it comes to headlines and shit posting.

>> No.71051142

>>71045221
>not "more is better"

>> No.71051148

>>71050356
Any idea if Zen2 will have a better memory controller. I don't think the L3 cache thing is going to be solved in this revision of the architecture.

>> No.71051217

>>71051148
yes. IF doubled BW and 4000mhz ram. I have a sampe running at 3600mhz.

>> No.71051269

>>71051091
>The last years have been terrible for the entire internet.
This too. There's a lot less genuine people out there.

>> No.71051300

Don't forget double the fucking L3 cache per chiplet so it's some insane amount, like 32MB on 8/12/16 core ryzen 3000

>> No.71051340

>>71051148
Doubt it's any better this time. AMD's ip blocks are fully tuned to server and I think the memory controller they're using is still based off the third party one they put in carrizo. The most likely thing is ryzen3000 is using the same memory controller as epyc2 but they'll be tuning it for desktop and video games. For cache the point I was trying to make is that the l3 cache is pretty good but some people have looked at zen's latency charts and speculated that the proposed ccx latency is suspicious and too similar to a memory access times. On the other hand double cache size to 4MB per core is immense but will affect the performance on a per software basis so it's not a singular performance increase.

>>71051217
IF is not the memory controller. It's certainly good that it can handle higher bandwidth memory and probably use tighter timings but the performance that comes out of it has been so very far behind intel's imc and there's very little evidence to say it's going to be any better this year. The only statement from amd was "epyc's AVERAGE access latency is down" which will include jumping to other die's imc which was terribly slow and is reduced solely from using a singular i/o die and no change to the imc.

>> No.71051476

>>71047102
>the eternal pixel Jew stealing your definition
Kek

>> No.71051612

>>71051340
I not said that is the same you dumb fuck. just that IF doubled and memory goes up to 4000mhz

>> No.71051723

>I'll buy whatever is best at the time
>feels good not being a braindead brand shill

Can't wait to replace my 9700k with a 12 core CPU that runs cooler.

>> No.71051736
File: 308 KB, 700x876, tfw waiting.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71051736

>>71051217
>I have a sample running at 3600Mhz
>I have a sample
Anon, that sounds like "my dad works at nintendo" tier.

>>71051340
>I think the memory controller they're using is still based off the third party one they put in carrizo
>carrizo
>tuned for desktop and memegames
>ccx latency linked to memory access
>AMD talking averages, and not disclosing worst case scenario. And talking about servers too.
>windows possibly allocating threads like a retard too
>DPC latencies from all other components as well
I just want a comfy audio workstation with low latencies for multituple instruments in DAWs, and not freezing them all, all the time.

>> No.71051938

>>71047368
>Implying that any tech company wouldn't try to market their products in Israel
>Actually trying to make AMD sound jewish in an implicit comparison to Intel

>> No.71051980

>>71047398

Regardless, AMD doesn't just come out with 1 product with a certain number of cores.

Worst case scenario, the 4.2Ghz wasn't an ES and instead was the low-clocked 3800, while the 3800X or 3850X will reach at a minimum 4.7Ghz.

>> No.71052034

>>71051612
Neither of that is very relevant to the imc performance either. Regardless, post the sandra results from your supposed sample already.

>> No.71052146

>>71051938
Fuck off pol stormfag

>> No.71052184

>>71052146
/pol/ is a pro-zionist, pro-israel board. But nice try reddittor.

>> No.71052213

>>71052184
No it isnt, plebbitor

>> No.71052268

>>71052213
It absolutely is, you kike-loving TD_fag.
/pol/acks love mossad now.

>> No.71052277
File: 324 KB, 430x306, 19-05-21_15.46.08 Limited.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71052277

will this be the CPU that makes me upgrade from the eternal 2600k?

>> No.71052282

>>71052268
Stop projecting

>> No.71052305

>>71052277
>eternal
fucking boomers

>> No.71052336

>>71043658
I'm not sure i believe this 5GHz single core boost, 4.8? Maybe but i'll be happy with 4.6GHz single core boosts (stock) and 5-10% higher IPC than Zen+

>> No.71052349

>>71046774
Because theyre directly from him retard.

>> No.71052377

>>71052336
Looking at the clocks gains from Vega alone, I'd say it's stupidly likely they'll get at least 5GHz on good binned parts.

>> No.71052379

>>71052305
kys stupid zoomer

>> No.71052403

>>71044209
Can't compete with CUDA yet.
People are too stupid to take advantage of multicore cache locality boosts though so AMDs hacksaw method will get them close enough in the cpu market performance-wise.

>> No.71052407

>meanwhile on intel
>>71036249

>> No.71052408

>>71052379
Dude im telling you zoomers are ruining everything. Its like illegal immigration but worse because we make them in-house.

>> No.71052426

>>71052277
>tfw 2600 non-k

>> No.71052454

>>71046517
>Polaris is good too
This, I really hope Navi is a good replacement for it. The only reason why it got all the hate was due to currytech overhyping it by claiming it would be a "1080 killer".

>> No.71052507

>>71052454
People still buy 1050ti even though 570 is cheaper and more than 50%/60% faster(in some cases, double the perf).
I'll just be waiting till navi goes on sale.

>> No.71052538

>>71052507
Well, that's kind of expected, even when nvidia released that piece of shit called Fermi, retards still bought that housefire instead of the AMD alternatives, which were actually competitive back then.

>> No.71052892

>>71047883
Dumb monkey. Amd competes and beats everything nvidia outside the 2080ti which is a meme card that might as well not exist at that retarded price.

You're one of those drones that buys a 1050ti because nvidia has the best card at 1200 dollars which ours exactly what nvidias tried to achieve with the 2080ti. Not to actually sell it but to be the guy with the greatest l fastest card so plebs associate nvidia with more speed even though amd btfos nvidias every other card

>> No.71053204

>>71052892
Jesus fucking Christ stop drinking the shill koolaid. I never said AMD doesn't compete in almost every segment. It's just xbox huge dies are still competing with 7nm AMD cards. The moment they jump to 7nm is fucking over.

>> No.71053216

>>71052892
Current AMD GPUs are all housefire garbage.

>> No.71053364

>>71050724
He gets paid by AMD to shill for them.

>> No.71053720

>>71044209
AMD GPU market is solely Microsoft and Sony. They are pretty ok with what they got. from now on, AMD GPU for graphics on PC will be dictated by what we get on consoles. To get better performance from it will be up to the developers use decent APIs instead of the DX11 garbage.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action