[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 162 KB, 633x758, amdloodie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
71001984 No.71001984 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

Holy shit
>zen/zen+ can't even beat sandybridge
>The absolute state off amd poorfags defending Performance from 2012
Can't believe i fell for the ryzen meme

>> No.71002019
File: 10 KB, 224x250, AMDnogi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

AMD Drones will defend this

>> No.71002104
File: 33 KB, 452x678, 1555054149099.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.71002127

>under 3000 views
>fat spic with annoying voice
>videos all clickbait ending with ! or ?
>most videos under 4000 views
disregarded, I smell a cheap slut for PR
he probably dickered the settings

>> No.71002158

You're late at least 10 months
it's funny to see these threads popping up before zen2 release, because inteltards knows, this is their last chance to say anything

>> No.71002201

I have a 2600x myself, yet you or i can't deny that ryzen only can compete with sandybridge in his Tests

>> No.71002257

now apply security patches for intel CPUs :^)

>> No.71002275

Zen 2 16cores better be good.
I already highly regret changing my Xeon to a 1700x. Could have just went with a 12C/24T E5 V3 Xeon X99 upgrade instead for cheaper...

>> No.71002280

Yes that's why i went with amd, because i need the ssd iops, but still ryzen is miles behind in Performance and only can compete with throwing threads at everything

>> No.71002289

intel's security patches drops performance

>> No.71002354

Not as much as AMD pajeets make it out to be.
Even the fucking E3 V2 Xeons are able to reach parity with the R7 2700x.

>> No.71002396

on video games and applications which are optimized for single core?
why this is news? it was established since zen and zen+ release
feels like thread is made to move everyones' attention from intel vulnerabilities and stop thinking about upcoming zen2

tl;dr: is this advertising (shilling) thread?

>> No.71002465
File: 143 KB, 1210x1078, 1700OC.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Not shilling, just pointing out that AMD fanboys are fucking over-hyping everything. Gotta bring people back down to earth and get their heads out of their asses and not gaslighting everyone.

Even GamersNexus pointed out that the 5Ghz rumor floating around is bullshit multiple times in their news recaps.

>> No.71002474
File: 30 KB, 297x406, smug look down.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Tons of us upgraded from a 2500k or 3570k to a 1600/X or 2600/X and got massive performance improvements.
Averages might only be able 20% higher at best, but 1% lows improved by like fucking 500% a lot of the time which is massive. Stutters are gone.

>> No.71002516

Yep, same thing here. 3570k to a 2700X

>> No.71002524

That's because you had a thread deficit running background shit and just needed more threads for the scheduler to throw around. People running i7s didn't have nearly as much differences.
Hence why AMD quickly dropped the R3s in favor of APUs because people jumping from i5 and i7s actually sometimes had less performance.

>> No.71002530

why now tho? why before zen2 release and after more leaked intel vulnerabilities?
why not 5 months ago? or after zen+ release?
very '''convenient''' to point it out now

>> No.71002595

I've been pointing out my 1700x buys remorse every time I got around to posting in one of these threads since when I bought the damn thing at launch. I also posted about all the fucking black screen shit until Asus finally fixed it in bios at version 4801.
It's not just "now"

I have fucking 2200G/2400G 1600x and 1700x systems but I'm not stupid enough to try deluding myself or trying to gaslight other people into thinking that AMD is taking any performance crowns home when I also have E5 Xeons. They are a budget option.

>> No.71002631

You would have even more improvement if you would go with the newest inturd cpus
I only posted this because this video was uploaded a few hours ago
This shit proves nothing, my 2600x goes up to 4.2ghz stock boost and if i would overclock it i probably would get 4.2 all core, that's like 400mhz more than your first gen ryzen only because they fixed the bugs and improved a low power process
7nm is leading Performance process which will bring quiet a boost in clocks anyway
Also i wouldnt give a shit about gamers nexus speculating because they are just Benchmarking unboxers without the needed education to make such claims

>> No.71002653

>You would have even more improvement if you would go with the newest inturd cpus
7600k was objectively worse than the 1600X. Stills stutters like shit, just gets higher averages while stuttering like shit.
And anyone who got a 8700k instead of 2700X now just has a 8600k because of the new vulns.

>> No.71002690

>I have buyers remorse
and anyone should care because..?
there are very few dumb fucks, like you, who buys AMD for single core performance. Usually they just get fully built desktop after consulting with someone in computer store.
>I only posted this because this video was uploaded a few hours ago
did you meant to say
>because I uploaded it few hours ago
no one fucking cares, this topic is old news
and probably it's just a coincidence that video and this thread are made just before zen2 release and after new intel vulnerabilities, now that intel filled their CPU stock back up, they have some stuff to sell :^)

you can't be more obvious

>> No.71002692

>ivy bridge dabbing on poozen

>> No.71002694

>4.2ghz all core
Only if you have a golden chip, GamersNexus tested multiple chips and couldn't get a single one of them up there. Other channels haven't had much luck. I'm not saying you can't, but most people can't. AMD already pretty much has the 2700x pinned for all it's got out of the box.

You need LN2 to just barely hit 5.5ghz on a zen+. Zen2 isn't that much of a radical architectural change.

They are making an informed and educated guess instead of grabbing on to thin air. Other channels have also cited why they also don't believe the 5ghz rumor.

>> No.71002698

it is anti-semitic to talk about 0.1% and 1% performance.

>> No.71002737

It obviously is. Look at how shitty all their English is. 100% streetshitter paid in cents per post. I'm running a fucking athlon 200ge and it runs literally everything at the same time (ftp, virtualbox, mining pool, etc.) with no lag at all. My main rig is an i7 4770k and its starting to lag doing anything remotely intensive. I'm gonna get next gen ryzen when it comes out.

>> No.71002739
File: 121 KB, 1280x720, [HorribleSubs] Hitoribocchi no Marumaru Seikatsu - 05 [720p]_00:18:26_03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>new intel security exploit
>another patch with performance decrease
>/g/ is full of threads shitting on AMD processors


>> No.71002754

shit nvidiot HOMOSEXUAL crying all time

>> No.71002767

I bought the 1700x because of 8 cores and 16 threads, if I wanted single core performance I would have gotten a 1600x which has 4.0ghz stock turbo or a fucking 1800x.
I also mentioned multiple times the E5 Xeons which I also have running have fucking 12 cores and arguably less single core performance. Learn to reading comprehension.

Scream all you want about m-muh multicore performance but it's not bringing anything new to the table, just at a lower price point, AMD is there as a budget option. it's not taking bringing any revolutionary crowns home.

>> No.71002775

Same. Went from 4790k to to 1700 and never looked back.

>> No.71002784
File: 250 KB, 360x594, 1530794916076.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This is how we know someone's trying too hard.
Also FTP, virtuabox, mining pools and all the other shit you want to also bring up can be run on Athlon IIs.

>> No.71002845

I don't even subscribed to that pathetic virgin, this video just popped up in my recommended view
Again Gamers nexus is a shit source for everything that's outside of testing some shitty games
I am mostly on computerbase and there are alot of people who have a [email protected] all core, some have them even at 4.4ghz, there are even some r5 2600 that hit 4.1ghz, considering these are the lowest trash chips besides the 4c ryzens, it isn't that unlikely that the x chips go beyond 4.1ghz and again, this is all on a improved low power process that was designed to run mobile chips at around 3 GHz

>> No.71002859

Anyone who uses bclock overclocking can be safely disregarded as it's proven to show inflated ghz numbers.

>> No.71002877

The consensus is that some chips can hit 4.3ghz maybe with stupid volts like 1.4v factoring in LLC and compensation you're hitting 1.5~1.6v which is stupid and leads to premature degradation.

>> No.71002880

Are you retarded? There are only few mb that support bclk oc on ryzen chips

>> No.71002889

>set the clocks to 3.0ghz
>cinebench runs 70% slower on amd than intel
>blender runs 20% slower on amd
>aida 64 runs 45% slower on amd
>aida fp 32 is 110% slower on amd

so what this inteltard want us to believe is that somehow despite the gazzilion of benchmarks on the matter
despite the fact that amd has lower clocks it shits on intel in everything regarding smt related
somehow he managed to show us that intel massively gained an overall 80% on average boost on zen on a older uarch

yeah the intelaviv spamming machine is activated

>> No.71002929

Anyone shooting for all ryzen's got has a supported motherboard.

>> No.71003031

Stop talking shit please, 4.3 all core @1.4v is very common on ryzen 2gen

>> No.71003052
File: 335 KB, 700x400, 1514508500778.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.71003189


>> No.71003233

What he's pointing out is that there is obviously something fundamentally flawed about Intel's architecture which makes it hitch and stutter and shit.
Yeah you're right, even an Athlon II runs shit smoothly. Intel is garbage.

>> No.71003243
File: 316 KB, 882x758, 1552828799009.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.71003244

>almost a week left for computex
>intoddlers already doing damage control

>> No.71003278

I get 180 single thread score on cinebench r15 on my 2700x, good enough for me

>> No.71003351

and the new intelrippers can reach 4.3 out of the box

>> No.71003605

I paid 200 for a server running a 200ge and a320m. What's wrong with that? I'm impressed by its performanc because of the price I thought it would be shit. But there it is running everything simultaneously smoothly.

>> No.71004171
File: 43 KB, 960x711, faggot bat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Intel fags in force today. Ryzen has shifted all over Intel in every category.

>> No.71004254

Well if you 'upgraded' from a 4930K to a 1600 of course you don't notice much. Hurr durr.

>> No.71004428

>intelkikes desperate to deal as much damage as possible even before june
Lol, okay rajesh shekelberg.

>> No.71004438

Intelkikes are desperate. Hence the pre-emptive shillings. They aren't even waiting till zen2 is announced.

>> No.71004489

here it is we found the one guy that defies every single benchmark every made those past two years only to get more attention to his channel

>> No.71004637

>upgrade every year
>flash GPU bios
>get fast (read magical) RAM
>expensive cooler
>extensive tweaking of their system
>play mental gymnastics that they dont need features in games/boycott games that implement them
>cherrypick benchmarks all day to find the few rare occasions when AMD is only slightly behind to argue cost/performance

>Just to prove to strangers on the internet their hardwares aren't inferior to intel and nvidia

How do AMDrones live with themselves?

>> No.71004946

I went from a 2500k that could barely oc and 8 gb of RAM to a 2600 oc to 4.1 and 16gb of 3333cl15 ram for only 200€ after selling the 2500k with it's mobo and ram. Feels good, I saw improvements on everything, even gayming. Shit like das3 or sekiro would hold mostly 60 fps but with abysmal frametimes, and those games are not multithreaded wonders of optimization. Shit like OW went from 100fps with drops on teamfights to the low 70s to 200fps+.

>> No.71005398
File: 195 KB, 2092x1128, wew.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

nice try, faggot.

>> No.71005563
File: 57 KB, 1314x1192, Ashes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

One, nothing wrong with me

>> No.71005572
File: 57 KB, 1314x1192, RSS.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Two, nothing wrong with me

>> No.71005573

That's a gpu bottleneck you drooling retard

>> No.71005576
File: 79 KB, 1000x747, imagen.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]



>> No.71005592
File: 10 KB, 235x232, d85d42d6764d293cb86346c572ce80ba.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>even used at the intel(tm) approved 720p resolution

>> No.71005603
File: 52 KB, 1314x1192, BF1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Three, nothing wrong with me

>> No.71005604

>get your 8700k to 5ghz with an industrial chiller just to lost to ayymd

>> No.71005615
File: 53 KB, 1314x1192, SWB.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Four, nothing wrong with me

>> No.71005622

>t-t-that's a gpu bottleneck
When why does intel have worse 1% than ryzen, hmm?

>> No.71005627

>2T on ryzen

>> No.71005641
File: 55 KB, 1314x1192, Deus.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

One, something's got to give

>> No.71005651
File: 61 KB, 1314x1192, FH.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Two, something's got to give

>> No.71005669
File: 53 KB, 1314x1192, MEA.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Three, something's got to give

>> No.71005673

>caring about video game machines
get a life, kids.

>> No.71005682
File: 50 KB, 1314x1192, Dirt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.71005692

I know, why can't they care about politics, television, movies, netlifx, facebook and other normie shit?
Like spend $100k building a rat rod you'll never drive already like a real human.

>> No.71005704


>> No.71005713


>8700K: $380
>2700X: $285

>> No.71005719
File: 53 KB, 1314x1192, PC2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Let the bodies hit the floor

>> No.71005731
File: 51 KB, 1314x1192, Prey.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Let the bodies hit the floor!

>> No.71005735

>a 1080ti can't be fully utilized, ever
Why you pathetic retards try so hard?
All these Benchmarks are made in maximum quality which contradicts the purpose of low Resolution Benchmarks which are there to take as much load of a gpu as possible
All these shitty Benchmarks are within an margin of error and the ones that aren't, you can see the 6core intel pull ahead of the 8c 2700x
Do the Benchmarks in low quality and you will see how much faster even the 6core intel is compared to top end ryzen cpus in a multithreaded title like Battlefield
You AMDrones are pathetic and the reason everybody thinks amd is for poor degenerates

>> No.71005747
File: 53 KB, 1314x1192, SE4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Let the bodies hit the floor!!

>> No.71005749

>he thinks only GPU load is increased for ultra quality
You are the deluded one friend.

>> No.71005764
File: 53 KB, 1314x1192, SoW.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Let the bodies hit the floor!!!

>> No.71005777
File: 54 KB, 1314x1192, Warhammer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Let the bodies hit the floor!!!!

>> No.71005783

Why does Intel have such an advantage at lower resolutions, but they even out at higher ones? Does it become more of a GPU bottleneck as resolution increases?

>> No.71005793
File: 52 KB, 1314x1192, WD2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Let the bodies hit the...


>> No.71005809
File: 53 KB, 1314x1192, Witcher.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.71005819

The cpu isn't the one that draws the picture on your display u mongoloid
Honestly i think these spastics are inturd fans in disguise to take credibility from amd, because no one can be this retarded

>> No.71005830

Imagine being this much of a delusional intelkike.
Do you even know what "bottleneck" means you absolute faggot? If this was a gpu bottleneck, and if the kiketel chip could actually could btfo the ryzen, it wouldn't have worse 1% lows than ryzen. And it would still be ahead of the ryzen. But everyone knows what kind of stutterfest and washed out visuals an intel+nvidia combo provides. A while ago, some inturd was unironically saying that a 6ms/12ms lag doesn't matter.
Do you play AAA gaemes with everything at 360p with aliasing turned to the max? I swear, all these faggots parroting "muh gpu bottleneck" don't even know what the gpu and cpu actually does.

>> No.71005847
File: 84 KB, 653x726, 1533566085480.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Wow and here I thought ryzen owners were the productivity nuts.

>> No.71005872

everyone knows that only gaemen benchmarks from launch week with gimped rams matter anon. Anything above 480p is highly anti-semitic btw.

>> No.71005878

productivity doesn't matter either!

>> No.71005899

Get a load of this lying AMDrone
I don't see the ryzen having better 1% lows even with your damage controll Benchmarks
Learn what a GPU bottleneck is you piece of shit, if there wasn't a gpu bottleneck, the results wouldn't be within margin of error and the results wouldn't differ in low Resolution Benchmarks, which take stress from the gpu away

>> No.71005931
File: 41 KB, 600x416, 1298574546091.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Say rabi, what kosher resolution should we test to make sure we have a (((((((((fair)))))))))) gaming comparison? I was thinking 340p but it might be really tough on an i7-8700K OC'd to 5 GHz paired with a GTX 1080ti, what about 240p?

>> No.71005947

linux compilation time
only relevant benchmarks

>> No.71005952

It's okay, we get it, you don't know how limiting factors work. And I guess you're blind as well. Or perhaps only fps spikes matter to you, not stable, smooth performance.

>> No.71005955

Is this before or after Meltdown+Spectre+Zombieload patches and disabling HT on the Intel chip?

>> No.71006008
File: 126 KB, 1920x1362, AMDPOOinCPOO.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Lower the Setting from maximum to minimum to show how much FPS the CPU can deliver u dellusional Subhumans spreading Buzzwords

>> No.71006046
File: 43 KB, 650x337, 97971.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Is ray tracing kosher?

>> No.71006071

you don't understand... you need to post other benchmarks, where ryzen is much worse

>> No.71006090
File: 41 KB, 650x337, 97994.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

So video encoding is out of the question?

>> No.71006103
File: 17 KB, 602x477, kernelcompile.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.71006122
File: 115 KB, 1920x1362, POOCPU.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Why do AMD Subhumans always lie?
Is this their way of Life?
Are they so poor because they lie every time?

>> No.71006134
File: 42 KB, 650x337, 97979.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Yeah this is definitely not kosher

>> No.71006148
File: 53 KB, 641x483, Ryzen-gaming-memory-opt_1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This, just keep posting fake benchmarks where half the cores are turned off and RAM is misconfigured on the ryzen system. I'm sure if we post enough fake benchmarks, AMD will fall to its knees.

>> No.71006191
File: 36 KB, 750x410, Ryzen-R7-1700-vs-i7-7700k-Average-Gaming-FPS-Benchmark-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>low settings
Do you have ANY idea how anti-semitic this is? Post low 240p benchmarks before I report you to zion.

>> No.71006220
File: 83 KB, 653x726, 1491349230554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>FX at the bottom

>> No.71006225

Do you really find yourself funny?

>> No.71006226
File: 78 KB, 1920x1362, magic RAM didn't help.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

There are no Cores disabled you lying faggot
>MuH magic B-Die RAM
didn't help either

>> No.71006245

>2700x with oc 2080ti performs worse than 2600 with vega56
lmao, are you even trying moshe?

>> No.71006268

>muh magick ram
>cries out the kike as we bitches about 29ns latency while simultaneously saying that 6ms/12ms lag differences don't matter. Bonus points for also pulling out a 3200ram with shit timings.

>> No.71006271

>>under 3000 views
That's a good hint he's not a paid shill

>> No.71006273

>No gpu showed
>no settings showed
>doesen't correspond with major sites Benchmarks
The absolute state of poointhecpoo chwrry picks

>> No.71006296

because the rumors are only getting out of hand now?

>> No.71006315

Nothing about latency was said by me
>you got BTFO by the same site you quoted you imbecil
These are real world Benchmarks with hundreds of community members BTFO american shill sites

>> No.71006320

anon I really really like this meme, mind if I save it?

>> No.71006342


>> No.71006351
File: 1.19 MB, 1366x768, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

You guys are a fucking disgrace, jesus CHRIST. Zion is ashamed in you all, have you all forgotten that we are god's chosen people? How could you let zion down so much? All you had to do was spam more fake benchmarks than real ones. Principal technologies has like 6 gorrilion of those that you could have used.


>> No.71006376
File: 197 KB, 800x800, Hf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>house fires

>> No.71006392

>youtube Benchmarks

>> No.71006413

>Chipset fan
Imagine the whine...

>> No.71006424
File: 1.25 MB, 1366x768, Untitled2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I'm serious, because you guys didn't post enough fake benchmarks in this thread now the goyim are asking questions they shouldn't be asking.

>> No.71006448

720P low with a really good card is usually used to test actual CPU performance, but at higher resolutions even a high end GPU becomes a bottleneck.

>> No.71006465
File: 33 KB, 750x523, 1543284106651.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Even a fucking 1080ti? Fuck off rabbi, were on to you.

>> No.71006471

>fake Benchmarks
>Benchmarks of major sites being posted
>with community test to extra BTFO AMDrones
>posts some youtube benchmark and proceeds with his stolen stale meme
Back to pleddit you go, pooinloo

>> No.71006484
File: 226 KB, 800x800, Hf2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.71006502
File: 106 KB, 640x250, Intel-Perf-Claim-9900K-1-640x250.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


Here is a UNQUESTIONABLY TRUE LEGITIMATE benchmark for you go--- I mean.... guys.

>> No.71006534

Notice how the Settings in his Screens are cranked to the max, to get highest load on the GPU, but even there, the 6C Inturd CPU manages to get more FPS than the 8c pooinloo as soon as the load on the gpu is reduced

>> No.71006541
File: 35 KB, 201x210, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.71006546

Sour grapes because they bought a now gimped cpu

>> No.71006558

But but... the AMD shills told me FX aged like fine wine.

>> No.71006602
File: 149 KB, 640x484, ACO-640x484.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.71006613

It really did, you have 8 threads and it's clocked high at stock, but the IPC is just hilariously bad.

>> No.71006636
File: 42 KB, 653x726, 151493057218132.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>I It's not fair guise, our Benchmarks were supossed to show that AyyMD can compete
Please SIR do your Part and Bui AMD anyway

>> No.71006672


>> No.71006704
File: 85 KB, 1200x675, 1543546863286.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This thread reminds me so much about the news network sinclair thing.


>> No.71006713
File: 31 KB, 640x480, 19-116-172-01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

But but... 1080p doesn't matter! Look at the 1440p benchmarks! *still loses*
Yeah the 8 core FX chips can still be somewhat okay with multithreaded stuff. It's sort of like a Core 2 but with 8 cores. FX is nearly the worst CPU lineup of all time, only the Pentium 4 is worse. Although IMO it's up for debate which is actually worse.

>> No.71007041

Notice how all the AyymDdrones got dead silent after their fake Benchmarks got exposed

>> No.71007073

you just have to say you will give a good mark and a poor review to the competitor and you will get the review part

>> No.71007086

nobody wants to post in your retarded fake and gay shill thread

>> No.71007103
File: 384 KB, 2560x1440, Screenshot (2173).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Zen performs on par with 2011 Sandy Bridge? REEEE shill. Stop with the facts, you're triggering me.

>> No.71007106

i'm not op you nigger and the only ones that posts fake and gay shit is you from your amdunboxed channel

>> No.71007128

lol no

>> No.71007300

So what you're saying is that ryzen can't properly run anything? Reminds me of ashes of singularity benchmarks.

>b-b-b-but look at this one cherry picked benchmark and disregard all the others please!

>> No.71007996

>Zen performs on par with 2011 Sandy Bridge
That's kinda insane if the IPC is damn near sandy bridge levels, let's not forgot the 2700X is throwing blows with a $500 9900K in int he gaymen you typical buy intel for, unless you've got a super high end nvidia card, there's no reason to buy a 9900K

>> No.71008434

Keep deluding yourself little AMDrone

>> No.71008456

BREAKING: AMDrones were raging on that video and he just uploaded a response video a few minutes ago.

IPC Test 08 Followup: Addressing Comments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sA5od7Vq7oI

>> No.71008565

>yes goyim nothing fishy here

Never trust anyone with that soi YouTube avatar.

>> No.71008617

>soi avatar
Man, you really showed him. Cold hard fact spitter right here. Big brain.

>> No.71008650

Everyone knows your game by now intel

>> No.71008726
File: 2.73 MB, 2560x1440, Screenshot (2183).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Oi vei goyim fall for the Ryzen meme.

>> No.71008734

>No massive security flaws degrading performance.

Intel shills btfo

>> No.71008836

No, he's saying that both you and the youtuber in question are full of shit.

>> No.71008871

Ayymd BTFO once again

>> No.71008904
File: 23 KB, 640x480, 19-116-491-02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

We shouldn't be celebrating AyyMD getting BTFO. It's really pathetic that their newest chips can only compete with over half a decade old Intel chips.

>> No.71009014

Why do Ayymdrones deny reality?

>> No.71009108
File: 66 KB, 568x612, 1495966581343.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Be quiet Intcel. Ryzen is only 2% worse at 4K at half the price.

>> No.71009614

>own 4770k
>buy 2700X, because 9700k wasn't available in my country yet at that time due to supply issues
>forced to buy 2700X
>its the same shit as my 4770k, except with 4 more cores
>my brother who JUST WAITed a few months down the pipe bought a 9700k
>its ridiculously more faster than my 2700X, we both own 2080s and a 1440p monitor

Literally AMJUST, I'll wait for the next big Intel processor and sell this 2700X

>> No.71009881
File: 54 KB, 500x373, 1467250560144.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

post speccy with the thread in the background

>> No.71009968

Same, went from 3570k to 1700.
BF1 went from unplayable stutterfest that couldn't hold 60 fps to playing at 120+ FPS with zero stuttering.
Never looking back.

>> No.71010068
File: 327 KB, 1366x728, amdpoo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Here you go incel

>> No.71010123

What amdrone can afford that

>> No.71010141

I think pentium 4 is worse, i had a gateway with one, ran like shit battery wouldnt even last an hour.
But bulldozer is worse than phenom.
I get just as good fps on my phenom ii x4 955 black vs my friends fx8350 vishera.

>> No.71010143

I thought you said you had a 2080 you incel.

>> No.71010153
File: 165 KB, 1000x432, 1548763078703.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>15 minute delay
>those fucking tabs
>2070 instead of 2080
>>>>>1366x768 resolution
you trying to play me here gooby?

cmd line, type your post number, then run coreinfo, then post number again

>> No.71010156

That's a screenshot of a /bst/ post, he literally took a screenshot of his browser and shopped the image on top of it.

>> No.71010174
File: 82 KB, 480x480, tumblr_ol55h3sVFV1s9rrcgo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>windows 10
Poo confirmed.

>> No.71010187
File: 3.34 MB, 2560x1440, Ryzen 1440p Bottleneck.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>buys 2700X
>is surprised that it's bottlenecking your GPU, even at 1440p
You let the drones convince you that Ryzen is "only 3% worse at gaming". Sorry you fell for the Ryzen meme.

>> No.71010199

how pathetic can one man be

do you get paid at least

lol he outed himself as a fraud already

>> No.71010221

no wonder it says windows 10 while it looks like windows 8.1

>> No.71010230

They may be lying about having a 2080 but they're not lying about a 2700X bottlenecking a 2080 though.

>> No.71010232
File: 128 KB, 1200x911, have-sex.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.71010265

and the screen is at a laptop resolution, and the tabs, and the hwinfo screen is from another thread he just plopped it over his screenshot. I can't even call it Photoshop, he probably did it in MSpaint

>> No.71010351

Imagine being this delusional

>> No.71010376
File: 164 KB, 550x544, gentoo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.71010405

Wow, you sure debunked that benchmark with cold hard facts. I got owned.

>> No.71010487

>5.1ghz 9700K(costs over 100buckaroos more) vs 4.2ghz 2700x
>ddr4 3600 on the 9700k vs ddr4 3200 on the ryzen (lol)
>liquid cooler on the 9700k but not the ryzen
>better ssd on the 9700k
Come on now. I know you lot are fucking shameless but this is just sad.

>> No.71010592

>>5.1ghz 9700K(costs over 100buckaroos more) vs 4.2ghz 2700x
Muh price!!! Some people want the absolute best performance and AMD is not offering that on their consumer platform.
>ddr4 3600 on the 9700k vs ddr4 3200 on the ryzen (lol)
You conveniently left out that the Ryzen system has superior timings. And even if the 9700K had overall superior RAM, that wouldn't explain 30 extra frames per second on average at 1440p high settings.
>liquid cooler on the 9700k but not the ryzen
This has nothing to do with the performance. Nice you added it in there to make it look like you had many points.
>better ssd on the 9700k
Again, adding irrelevant points to make it look like you had many rebuttals.

>> No.71010668
File: 83 KB, 700x436, best cpu of the world.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>still shamelessly shilling with his gimped benchmark for his tranny game
lol, okay retard.

>> No.71010705

>tranny game
>lol, okay retard.
Damn, I got owned again. AMD fanboys just spew facts nonstop.

>> No.71010743

Fu k off the gay old gaymer
Ipc single thread hasn't mattered a Fuck since 201x and bulldozer

>> No.71010748
File: 429 KB, 1066x600, 1534324837461.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>D A M A G E C O N T R O L
enjoy your pozzed exploit ridden cpu intard

>> No.71010840

>Single thread doesn't matter!
(unless AMD is better at it)
Hey there AyyMDrone. How does it feel to finally experience Sandy Bridge performance over half a decade later?

>> No.71010880
File: 38 KB, 495x619, images-38.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

It's literally pointless even windows 10 balances up to 16 threads well although falls dos pretty hard at 32
Cores are the new ghz

>> No.71010881
File: 83 KB, 681x522, 1528964800915.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Hey Intard how does it feel to lose all that performance you thought you were getting due to security patches? Money well spent huh? Ahahahahaha

>> No.71010887
File: 206 KB, 679x397, 1544041262350.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Your image is out of date, have a more accurate one.

>> No.71010922

Need to make one out of the doesn't matter pasta but it's unironically too long

>> No.71010927
File: 1.75 MB, 2560x1440, Screenshot (2184).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Oh boy AMD fanboys are embarrassing.

>> No.71010995

I went from an A6-3650 to an i5-4570 and haven't noticed much difference. General use is no different, multitasking is still pretty shit even though I have double the RAM

>> No.71011042

>general use is no different going from A6-3650 to i5-4570
Well, duh. Going from an FX-8150 to an i9-9900K will show no difference with regular tasks such as web browsing and watching videos.

>> No.71011184

i.e. audio/video/photo editing/rendering, gaming, streaming, or any other individual app like a word processor or steam performed pretty much as poor as ever. I did not expect YT videos to play faster with a new rig. The SSD was a much better upgrade than the CPU, but everything still grinds to a fucking halt if any of my drives are writing.

>> No.71011214

I mean that I just recently got my SSD, and that had a much bigger impact on general use than other upgrades. Before I went from a 5400 to 7200RPM HDD and used that for a good while

>> No.71011236


t. i7-7700 ownee waiting to switch to zen 2

>> No.71011315
File: 65 KB, 750x562, fixing_it.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I really don't understant something, given the performance in:

Even at 1080p what's the point in investing hundreds of dollars more on an intel system when:
A.) You're now required to disable hyperthreading or sacrifice a huge chunk of security
B.) Need to find a high end Z motherboard with enough phases and VRMs to support intel's designated (((((95W TDP)))))
C. Need a very high end tripple fan AIO or even more expensive exotic custom liquid cooling with 360mm tripple fans to maintain that 5GHz overclock

Why go through all that trouble when on average you only get single digit gains especially with hyperthreading disabled

t. i7-7700 owner with HT off

>> No.71011395

Yeah upgrading from a mechanical drive to an SSD will be one of the most noticeable upgrades one can do to their computer. An upgrade that's not a placebo.

>> No.71011434
File: 15 KB, 600x463, ayympoors btfo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

this is on stock settings, too

>> No.71011538
File: 12 KB, 1378x492, thread ripper more like bed shitter.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

How did AMD let this happen?!?

>> No.71011631

>Tfw chipset waterblocks will be back
Hyped af

>> No.71012981

you're the reason why this board has a terrible reputation and why no one can take amd, and amd claims, seriously.

>> No.71013016

nice projections there rajesh

>> No.71013046

I bet you find yourself very funny.

>> No.71013175

>99.9% of all the reviewers never saw such a drop
>one smol annoying boi with a clickbait video made ryzen to perform worse than a bulldozer


>> No.71014435

went from 3570k to 1600.
Even Wii U emulation improved, which is supposed to be shit on AMD.

>> No.71014493

>Even Wii U emulation improved, which is supposed to be shit on AMD.
It's literally, unironically, shill lies.

>> No.71014506

damn the incels are furious today
understandable desu

>> No.71014542
File: 25 KB, 569x428, consider_the_following.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


So, I dunno if Intel fanbois know this, but Zen 3 is next month...

AMD gon' rape Intel this year.

>> No.71014619

>It's another gayming benchmark comparison thread that doesn't show stuff like video rendering, audio encoding, etc

>> No.71014735

fucking this right here
went from a 3770k to a 2600x, averages basically didn't change because gpu limited autism but my 1% lows were almost the same as average and .1% was still tolerable. If I had a high refresh rate monitor maybe an intel cpu of similar price would have been better, but I'm a 60hzlet on a gtx970 and I'm a slut for buttery no-stuttery performance

>> No.71014815

It's zen2 you retarded amd drone
Learn your script first

>> No.71014843

Yeah I thought my 2500k wasn't bottlenecking my 7970 (basically a 1050Ti), but boy was I wrong. 4 threads is trash.
I got 4-5x higher 0.1% minimums.

i5 shills are scum.

>> No.71014845
File: 132 KB, 1519x605, Screenshot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


I'll wait for the next big Intel processor, this 2700X is fucking trash compared to my brother's 9700k

I didn't fall for the Ryzen meme, there weren't any 9700ks or 8700ks in my country months ago and I'm not buying the 9900k since its too expensive

>> No.71014865

Here's what people don't understand.

The belief that gimping settings for the sake of "uncovering" the bottleneck, is already ancient myth.

What these youtuber reviewers aren't telling you, is the fact that games are still being written in a way that it maximizes one core at a time. which defeats the purpose of having more cores. Just look at the multi-core concepts that were shown by the API-makers.

They always have one core/thread take most of the burden of the process.

Here's hoping that after Zen2/3, the API Makers, as well as kernel updates for OS's will now fully scale with load-balancing in mind.

>> No.71014873

>I'll buy an overpriced 6-core that will have to compete against a lower-priced 8 core.

Imagine being this retarded.

>> No.71015005

Lol. I paid cheaply for a server because I thought I want going to do anything much with it but the $50 cpu is doing everything including virtualization smoothly. Go fuck yourself raja.

>> No.71015108

You're doing something wrong if a 9700k is "massively faster" than a 2700X when you're bottlenecked at 1440p with a 2080.
Set it to high performance profile and enable PBO. I bet your RAM is running at 2133, too.

>> No.71015114

Sorry Intel bros, your noname youtuber admitted he has a botched setup and put the OP video in private.


See you soon in another new vulnerability.

>> No.71015164
File: 108 KB, 898x882, 1556295578434.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>Throwing blows

You're out of your dumb little faggot mind.

>> No.71015610

here we go again with the cherry picked benchmarks

>> No.71015634

>a whole orchard in front of you, but you've picked only a single cherry

>> No.71015691

Not only that but the cherry is fake. He knows it, which is why he posts it.

>> No.71015752

That's the intent with Zen 2. Gonna see how the 3600x is and if it's what the rumours claim 4ghz/8core/16 thread then it's going to be a better option. Will need a new GPU tho so will be interesting if the Navi GPUs are good or shit. Been a while since an AMD only rig was viable.

>> No.71016041
File: 92 KB, 539x518, cachemem.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I see no problems here.

>> No.71016080

Pentium 4 was easily worse than FX. FX-8150/FX-8350 was still a "good" chip and can still play games today to some extent. They aren't remotely competitive but they are still good enough that they lasted to the Ryzen chips for AMD purists, disregarding the insane chips they made since I have heard much on them.

Not saying they were remotely the best option for most purposes (8 cores/8threads meant they had some merit) and they definitely weren't as good as the Sandy Bridge and onwards chips but claiming they were remotely as bad as Pentium 4 is insane when Pentium 4s couldn't even touch Athlons.

>> No.71016093
File: 122 KB, 300x360, PIANAA.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

mfw been wanting to upgrade from my 2600k to the new amd stuff so I can have another rig last me for 10 years

>> No.71017126

based and redpilled

>> No.71018330

This -- I honestly can't fathom why people give a shit about anything more than high-quality, consistent 60hz performance.

>> No.71018333
File: 32 KB, 644x533, silicon lottery results.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

You're retarded for believing forum trollposters who are doing suicide bench runs for bragging rights. Look at the chart posted by SiliconLottery, a company that tests and sells verified overclock-capable bins of CPU models.

91% of 2700X that can do 4.1Ghz at 1.375v
67% can do 4.15 at 1.40v
32% reach 4.2Ghz at 1.425v
Following the trend,
>7% of 2700X can do 4.25 at 1.45v
>.85% of 2700X can do 4.3Ghz at 1.475

For most people to hit these speeds they have to use a stupid amount of voltage. Liking pumping 1.55v+ into the chip for 4.3Ghz to be stable. That's enough volts to kill the chip in months.

>> No.71018399
File: 148 KB, 829x797, cachemem.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

same desu

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.