Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 49 KB, 660x387, 30156-49305-190315-ARM-l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
70188992 No.70188992 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

https://iphone.appleinsider.com/articles/19/03/15/highly-suspect-benchmarks-claim-to-detail-apple-designed-arm-chips-for-mac

So they really wanna go forward with this, huh
What do you expect from ARM desktop chips?

>> No.70189052

>>70188992
High frecuency A12X for Mac.

I see ARM on laptops, ARM for desktop maybe begin 64 core servers CPU but for Workstations.

>> No.70189081

>>70188992
>What do you expect from ARM desktop chips?
Locked-down, expensive hardware with Pentium 4 performance

>> No.70189093
File: 333 KB, 1920x1080, 1552437677467.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
70189093

>>70188992
INTELFAGS, AMDFAGS AND QUALCOMMFAGS BTFO!

>> No.70189426

>>70189081
Cope

>> No.70189463

>>70188992
>geekbench

sure

>> No.70189528

>>70188992
Read the article
It's highly likely these are fake

>> No.70191147

>>70188992
Lol
fake
http://www.slashleaks.com/l/apple-designed-arm-mac-processor-benchmarks

>> No.70191174

>>70188992
If they really want to be the special little snowflake, why not just have AMD Semi-custom cook something x64 for them? They can be special and not have to go through whole platform change again

>> No.70191191

Who fucking cares, it's 1000% likely to constantly overheat and thermal throttle all for the low low price of just $9001 plus tip.

>> No.70191288
File: 425 KB, 942x810, 1521465186209.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
70191288

>>70188992
>Applebench
>Appleinsider
Fuck off moron.

>> No.70191301

>>70191288
wtf

>> No.70193280
File: 52 KB, 404x760, Screen Shot 2019-03-17 at 10.08.39 am.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
70193280

>>70191288
Why is yours different?

>> No.70193380
File: 81 KB, 444x444, 1502143993622.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
70193380

>geekbench

>> No.70193516

>>70188992
>What do you expect from ARM desktop chips?
Performance-wise it still won't be as good as amd64 chips, but it'd be a lot more power efficient.

>> No.70193620

>>70193516
There is nothing intrinsic in ARM CPUs that make them any more power efficient than x86, they use less power because they are slower

>> No.70193671

>>70193280
>utilization 0
Now run prime95 for at least 5 minutes bitch boi

>> No.70193736

>>70193620
>doesn't even know how RISC works

>> No.70193810

>>70193736
And guess what? Most x86 CPUs are RISC anyways with the CISC instructions being translated to compute on the RISC core

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action